id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
27485	Smith, Francis Asbury	The Critics Versus Shakspere A Brief for the Defendant			.txt	text/plain	21009	952	66	did not charge that Shakspere imitated the author of the "Contention"; There is therefore no proof that Shakspere imitated Kyd, and Professor conjecture that to the end Shakspere remained imitative and little else. Professor Wendell that Shakspere began by "imitating or revamping the the only play (of Beaumont and Fletcher), "acted before 1612, the year dates of Beaumont and Fletcher's "Philaster" and Shakspere's "Cymbeline." There is no claim that Shakspere imitated Beaumont and supposing that Shakspere imitated them in "Cymbeline," "Tempest," or "romances" of Beaumont and Fletcher and those of Shakspere, and it is "imitation" from "The Tempest." Professor Thorndike the critic has here Beaumont and Fletcher were the "imitators," not Shakspere. in Shakspere sufficiently like the original types in Beaumont and Shakspere was not content with copying Fletcher's plot, characters, and Fletcher's romances, and that in "Cymbeline" Shakspere did not that several of their plays (Beaumont and Fletcher's romances) must have	./cache/27485.txt	./txt/27485.txt