id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_4rocbiox2bavzk7kunx2xawim4	Stephen L. Morgan	Status Threat, Material Interests, and the 2016 Presidential Vote	2018	42	.pdf	application/pdf	13411	928	60	The April 2018 article of Diana Mutz, "Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains The current article is a critical reanalysis of the models offered by Mutz, using the data (1) the relative importance of economic interests and status threat cannot be estimated "Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote," the political scientist https://www.asc.upenn.edu/news-events/news/fear-losing-status-not-economic-hardship-drove-voters-2016-presidential-election Mutz's claim that status threat alone provides a powerful explanation for the 2016 election measures of economic hardship, material interests, and status threat are all sufficiently Question 2: Can the relative appeal of Trump to white voters with lower levels of education of status threat, the vote share falls to less than 1 percent, which leads Mutz to the conclusions 9 Mutz includes this variable in other analyses of support for Trump (see her Table S4), but she excludes this reasonable given that the additional status threat variables collected for Mutz's cross-sectional 	./cache/work_4rocbiox2bavzk7kunx2xawim4.pdf	./txt/work_4rocbiox2bavzk7kunx2xawim4.txt