id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_jakojabqqvbd7p65gvkkyrmsnm	James C. Kaufman	Creativity polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener	2010	9	.pdf	application/pdf	10762	748	56	(Big-C, Pro-c, little-c, and mini-c) leads to the conclusion that creative polymathy may actually be fairly how might educators nurture the multi-creative talent in gifted students? Position two argues that creativity is a domain-specific construct (i.e., the skills that help one be creative in one domain would be of little use in mini-c creativity include a student having a personally meaningful insight on creativity across multiple domains (at the little-c level) suggests that different domains, then the skills a person has that lead to creativity in one If creativity is domain general, it would be expected that different is domain specific, it would be expected that different creative behaviors Why domain specificity does not rule out creative polymathy experiences, or opportunities that support–or undermine–the development creativity-relevant skills in a domain). about creative domains is the Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model Generality of creativity across performance domains. The case for domain specificity in creativity.	./cache/work_jakojabqqvbd7p65gvkkyrmsnm.pdf	./txt/work_jakojabqqvbd7p65gvkkyrmsnm.txt