The timorous reviler sleighted being a brief reprehension of a scornful pamphlet, styled, The second part of the Quakers Quibbles, subscribed by the name of Thomas Thompson, but (by some) suspected to be the author of the two pamphlets, the one entituled, The spirit of the Quakers tryed; the other, Controversie ended; with divers others against the people called Quakers. Whitehead, George, 1636?-1723. 1674 Approx. 24 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 7 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2005-12 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A65890 Wing W1965 ESTC R220976 99832359 99832359 36832 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A65890) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 36832) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 2103:17) The timorous reviler sleighted being a brief reprehension of a scornful pamphlet, styled, The second part of the Quakers Quibbles, subscribed by the name of Thomas Thompson, but (by some) suspected to be the author of the two pamphlets, the one entituled, The spirit of the Quakers tryed; the other, Controversie ended; with divers others against the people called Quakers. Whitehead, George, 1636?-1723. Hedworth, Henry, attributed name. 8 p. s.n., [London : 1674] Caption title. Signed at end: G. W.; attributed to George Whitehead. Dated at end: London, the 27th of the 12th moneth, 1674. A reply to a pamphlet attributed to Thomas Thompson, but sometimes thought to be by Henry Hedworth, the author of the other two pamphlets named in the title. Copy has some print fade. Reproduction of the original in the British Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Thompson, Thomas. -- Second part of the Quakers quibbles -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800. Society of Friends -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800. 2005-02 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2005-03 Aptara Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2005-04 Judith Siefring Sampled and proofread 2005-04 Judith Siefring Text and markup reviewed and edited 2005-10 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion THE Timorous Reviler SLEIGHTED : Being a Brief Reprehension of a Scornful Pamphlet , styled , The second Part of the Quakers Quibbles , subscribed by the Name of Thomas Thompson ; but ( by some ) suspected to be the Author of the Two Pamphlets , the one entituled , The Spirit of the Quakers Tryed ; the other , Controversie Ended ; with divers others against the People called QUAKERS . Shun Prophane and Vain Bablings , 2 Tim. 2. 16. THe Author's Account of himself , viz. I not pretending to Infallibility , my Opinion being still , so long as we are men in this Condition , humanum est errare , Q. Quib. 1st part , pag. 38. God keep me humble and little in my own Eyes still , to confess my Fallibility , whilst it pleases him we should be in this State and Condition , 2 part . p. 6. My Opinion is , Humanum est errare ; and that would have born me out , I honestly and ingenuously telling the World , that I pretended to no such Infallibility , as the Quakers do , p. 25. If unwillingly there should happen any Mistake , to be committed by me , as possibly there may be , considering the Weakness that all men are subject unto ( unless Quakers ) I should not be ashamed honestly to acknowledge it in Print , and beg their Excuse for it , pag. 81. Observ. That his Scurrilous and Abusive Pamphlets against the Quakers , are Effects , not only of his Fallibility , but of his Envy also to us , is evident ; but whether he will be as good as his word ( or perform his Pretension ) before , as to acknowledge any of his Mistakes in Print , the Sequel will try him ; which to do , would not be so Disgraceful to him , as to lie under the Guilt of manifest Perversions , Lyes and Slanders , which he is chargeable with in much more then this Tract takes notice of . To begin with him : Touching the Two Passages he seems to take great Advantage upon in his Epistle and much of his Pamphlet ; I begin with , and state the first as followeth . 1st , Whereas to convince him of W. Penn's or our Christianity , he proposed the Gift of Tongues immediately inspired , and such Mighty Signs as were in the Church in the Apostles dayes for Evidence . Upon this I queried thus , viz. And what if God will not bestow such Gifts and Signs now , must we therefore be no Christians ? Qua. Plainness , p. 14. He concludes , That this Interrogation absolutely destroyes my own Cause , and answers my self in all I writ , Argumentum ad hominem : and why so ? He puts the Case to Immediate Revelation from God , to Divine Inspiration , to being sent and commissionated by God , and called by the Spirit to Prophesie and Preach the Gospel , as the Apostles were , and to the Light Within , which the Quakers so much talk of , and to the Doctrine of Infallibility , and to the Gift of Discerning of Spirits . From all which he infers , What if God will not bestow such Gifts now , must we therefore be no Christians ? Epist. p. 2. The ingenuous and impartial Reader may easily suppose how he hath mannaged the rest of his Controversie by this Beginning : How plain and evident is his Perversion and Fallacy in this his Retorsion , and how Unchristian : as for instance , from my implying by way of Interrogation , that we might be Christians , though we had not the Gift of Tongues , Mighty Signs , or Outward Miracles ( that were peculiar to some Christians and Ministers in the Apostles dayes ) he infers the same putting the Case that the Dispute be about Immediate Revelation , and so to Divine Inspiration , the Light Within , &c. supposing , that if God will not bestow these upon us now ( any more then the other ) are we therefore no Christians ? ( saith he ) as if we may as well be Christians without Immediate Revelation , Divine Inspiration , &c. as without the Gift of Tongues ; and he would make my Question be speak the same of the one as well as the other , to give away my Cause : Oh Injustice ! Apparent Partiality and False Construction put upon my words , never spoaken nor intended by me [ as my Principle ] for the Gift of Tongues and Working of Miracles were only peculiar to some in the primitive Church , 1 Cor. 12. Whereas a Manifestation of the Spirit was given to every man to profit withal ; and he that hath not the Spirit of Christ is none of his : So that though men may be true Christians and Ministers without the Gift of Tongues , yet not without Divine Inspiration , Divine Light , and Immediate Revelation from God , in some Degree , more or less . Also , as to the Spirit and Gift of Prophecy , and of Discerning of Spirits , and Working Miracles in a Spiritual Way , I cannot give away our Cause as to these , nor did I ever intend to exclude those Gifts out of the Church among us ; for we have sufficient Evidence both of true Prophets and Discerning of Spirits , as a Gift given to divers [ And doth not the Apostle prefer Prophecy above Tongues , which were for a Sign , not to them that believed , but to them that believed not ? see 1 Cor. 14. 5. & 22 , 23 , 24. vers . So hast not thou plainly implyed thy self to be an Unbeliever and a Dark Man , who wants such a Sign to be shewn thee , to evidence that we are Divinely Inspired ? And yet , if we could speak with the Tongues of Men and Angels , that were not a sufficient Evidence ( of it self ) to convince Unbelievers , that we are ●o inspired ] And I must say , that though every Member in the true Church hath not all those peculiar Gifts that some have , yet none can be either True 〈◊〉 or Living Member of the True Church ( or of Christ ) without Divine Inspiration ( for a Rule ) or a partaking of the Spirit , Life and Power of Christ within ( viz. in an Immediate Way ) which is sufficient to evidence and shew forth it self in what Operation , Gift or Demonstration , as the Spirit pleaseth or willeth ; and not as man willeth , in his own Will and Time. 2. Whereas to clear our selves from that Charge of Preferring our Books before the Scriptures ( because of the Titles given to some ) after I had discovered the Unjustness of the Charge , and Falseness of the Comparison , I said , Such Titles therefore have been not strictly , but figuratively placed upon some Books * Hence he infers , That Thomas Hicks may as well tell me — for all his words , wherein W. P. and I charged him with Forging and Forgeries , Slanders and Lyes , that such Titles , such Words or Sayings are not strictly but figuratively placed , and put down in his Dialogues . Upon which this Opposer vapours and triumphs , as if he had gotten some great Prize , filling part of his Book with his Taunts and Jeers hereupon , as if he were some singular Rhetoric●an ; but his Perversion and silly piece of Quarrel appears very plain : For , Are there not some Figurative Phrases lawfully used ? Yes . He denyes not all Figures , he sayes ; Why does he quarrel then ? And how grosly and fallaciously does he compare some Titles of our Books with those Passages in Tho. Hicks's Dialogues , which we not only charged upon him ( but also proved in our Books ) to be Forgeries , Slanders and Lyes , though affirmed by him for very Truth ? And from our Charge this Author and all his Abettors can never clear him , by all his Shifts and Retorsions . For , supposing ( as for ought this man knows otherwise ) T. H. be really guilty , as charged of Forgery , Slanders and Perversions , Is it as lawful to excuse this by a Figure ( which must needs be the Devil 's drawn Figure ) as when we treat of the Light Within being risen out of Darkness , such a Title is placed upon the Book , as , Light risen out of Darkness : which properly belongs to the Matter or Subject treated on , and is explained in the Treatise accordingly ? Is this all one with forging Lyes and Ridiculous Stuff in other men's Names ? Oh sensless Man ! Is this thy Rhetorick ? Dost thou make no Difference between a Metonymical Phrase , used in a serious Sense , and a palpable Slander or designed Forgery to render men Odious , as T. Hicks hath done , beneath the common use of Phrases Ironical ? Surely this will not blow away our Charges , nor make T. H. much beholding to me , or his Way easie * ( as this man reckons I have done ) nor have we Cause to think , that I have so furnished my Adversary with such Weapons as may mortally wound our Cause , as he saith ; nor is there any need for the Quaker to wind or twine , kick , winch , slatter and flutter , as he scornfully words it ; however , he thinks he has found a Net , and is able to hold the Leviathan , he saith . Oh silly Scorner ! blush and be ashamed : Is this thy Net , that if we use Words or Phrases in a figurative Sense in some Case , then a Lyar and Forger may as well excuse himself by a Figure ? Wilt thou grace thy Cause by such Rhetorick , thinkest thou ? Being so accustomed to equivocate and quibble thy self , thou art ever and anon accusing us therewith . Thou sayest , The Quakers have excluded themselves from using of Figures : Why so ? Because all Figures were ended by Christ , the Substance . Here thou art a very silly Quibbler : Did we ever say , That Christ ended Figurative Speeches , when he so much used them ? And also , his Ministers often spoak figuratively , not only Metaphors and Allegories , but Metonymyes also : Or have we not rather confessed Christ , the Substance , as ending the Figures and Shaddows under the Law ? See now how thy silly Quibble is evident , and what a Scornful Fellow , as thou termest thy self , thou hast shown thy self to be . Thy Pamphlet is made up much with Scoffs , Quibbles , gross Perversions and Abuses , the greatest part of which I am necessitated at present to pass by , as looking upon thee to be an unworthy , cowardly and base-spirited Man , who shuffles about to hide thy self , but makes no Conscience of exposing others by Name to Infamy and Reproach ; as for instance [ after thou hast charged me with Circumlocutions and Evasive Words ] thou both evadest and shufflest about the Question made concerning the Name Thomas Thompson ( subscribed to both thy Pamphlets against us ) as , Whether this be the real Author's Name ? thou putst us off thus , He hath a Nose in his Face , as well as any Quaker hath ; what if the Author , instead of Thomas Thompson had subscribed M. A. could not W. P. have joyned N. and then have read it thus , A Ma● ? and sayes , It is happy for him that I am so ignorant , and that my Light leaves me into so much Darkness of the Author — Suppose the Author be a Private Person ; what if he dwells 50 or 60 Miles from London ? &c. pag. 10 , 11. And what Evasions and Shufflings is here ? Hast thou not bewrayed thy own Equivocation , and that the Author's Name is not Thomas Thompson ? A shuffling Apology of the like Nature we have in the Pamphlet , entituled , The Spirit of the Quakers Tryed , p. 44 , 45. wherein the Author ( it is supposed this same ) gives his Reasons why he is afraid to discover his Name . But what doth my Person signifie to the Merit of the Cause ( sayest thou ) that is that which they ought to mind , if they were ingenuously honest , and not my Person ? &c. p. 12. It is very likely thy Name and Person would neither add to the Merit of ( nor grace ) thy Cause : Thou art very Cautious and Timorous thy Name or Person should be discovered , and here hast gotten a Pretence that stands in Judgment against thee , while thou makest no Conscience of scurrilously abusing other men's Names in Print , with a Multitude of scornful Reflections upon G. Whitehead , W. Penn , and others , and not only so , but upon the Quakers in general , with which thy Pamphlet is much stuffed , short of all Seriousness and Sobriety : Where is thy Conscience and Religion ? Is it all devoured with Lightness , and turned into Scorn ? Dost thou think to terrifie us with using such a Liberty of Speech as thou tellest of , pag. 7 ? And hast not thou made use of such mean and unmanly Artifices as thou tellest of , pag. 12 , as namely , to be Angry and Waspish , and therein to reflect upon Persons ? What is then become of thy Cause ? And when did we ever tell thee , That we would have thee guided by our Sufferings meerly ? p. 8. Herein thou pervertest : But hast thou not formerly perceived something of Religion and Christianity , as the Ground of our giving up to suffer ? However , we are satisfied , that we suffer as Christians , and that the Presence of God hath been with us in many Sufferings and Tribulations , and that his Presence and Power is with us to this day , whatever Mockers and Apostates say to the contrary . I deny all Prejudiced Angry Anabaptists Spirits , p. 15. Dost thou so ? Deny Prejudice and Anger in thy self then : Why hast thou appeared so much then ( like an Envious Socinian ) for the Angry Anabaptists , as one greatly possest with the Leaven of their Spirits ? As for Craftily taking thee for a Baptist , or jumbling thee with them . I did not , nor do take thee for a Baptist ; though I did look upon thee as having jumbled thy self as a Consederate with them , or an Assister of them against us ; I have Ground to think who thou art , and possibly in time thou mayest be more manifest , for thy creeping underly Work of Strife , and dark Attempts against the Lord's People . And whereas to clear the Baptists Innocency touching thy other Pamphlet , thou addest these words , viz. I do hereby declare once more , and affirm , as in the Presence of God , that no Baptist nor Anabaptist , so called , did see that my Epistle to W. P. till after I had writ it , p. 15. Very like so ; how should they ? But to take thy Intention ; If they did not see any part of it , nor advise thee in the writing of it , this clears them not from seeing or approving it for Publication , nor thee from being a Partial Abettor of them in their Socinianiz'd Cause , which it seems is very lame therefore , and like to be more lame and defective , if they leave it in thy hands to mannage : It is well , if while they are contending for the Humanity of Christ , they do not at length oppose or further deny his Divinity . As for clearing thy self of Contradictions , thou art so far from it , that I think I can easily make it appear to any indifferent Person , met thou hast added divers more Contradictions , Confusions and Gross Perversions ; as also can as easily remove thy Charge of Contradictions or Inconsistencies , which thou hast framed against Me , W. P. G. F. G. K. J. C. &c. but at present I count it not worth my Labour or Time particularly to enervate them , except thou wouldst appear and shew thy self , like a Man , not afraid to discover thy self or Name : but it appears in thy hiding and obscuring thy self under another Name , as divers think , thou hast the more Liberty to traduce and abuse thy Neighbours , or such as have wished thee well , and are not willing to render thee Evil for Evil. But if thou wilt enter into any serious Debate about Principles , come forth and shew thy self , and do not use such Equivocal Subterfuges : I proffered thee fair enough in my Letter to thee , when I desired but so much Civility from thee , as to have an Hour's Discourse with thee in the Presence of Two or Three of thy Friends and mine , that I might have shewn thee , wherein I apprehend the Truth , my Self and my Friends wronged , in divers Passages of thy Book ; proffering , either to come to thy House , or to meet thee , if I might know where : But instead of either , thou shuffledst me off with a long Letter , subscribed T. T. neither letting me know where thou dwellest , nor where I might meet with thee ; pretending some Circumstances of thy Occasions would not conveniently admit ; with some other trivial Allegations . A strange Put-off ! What , not spare an Hour's Time to discourse or examine thy own Injuries and yet can take many Hours to write Pamphlets thereof against us ? Oh Timorous Man ! What sorry Shuffling art thou fain to make use of ? And as concerning our Confession of the Christ of God , both as to his Divinity and Manhood , we have not been nor are ashamed thereof ; and instead of proving us guilty either of Equivocations or Confusions , therein it may be easily made appear , how far thou hast brought forth both , together with many impertinent and groundless Cavils against us thereupon : And as for the Divinity or Deity of the Son of God , and his Sonship , and being Christ before he took Flesh , thou art so far from confessing this with us , that thou makest a meer Scoff at our serious Account thereof , p. 30 , 31. Telling me of a pretty Medley of Hypocrisie , Quibbling and Confusion , and deviating from Scripture-Language in speaking of the Divine Nature , or Word cloathed with the Most Holy Manhood being the Christ. But is this a Truth in it self , yea or Nay ? What! is the Socinian or Biddlean Proselyte offended at our confessing the Divinity of Christ so much as we do , when he dares not appear ingenuously and publickly to state his own Principle ? But whatever he thinks of our deviating from Scripture-Language , or of opposing our selves therein ‖ we would not impose or force a Belief of our Principles in such Language as is Unscriptural and doubtful , or make meer Words Matter of Contention , where they are sound , or according to Scripture ; neither would we be imposed upon by Words both Doubtful and Unscriptural ; and if we be necessitated , in our own Vindication , to use any words that are not expresly laid down in Scripture , it is in Condescension , and not for Contention [ Note , that this Man boggles at and evades my Eight plain Questions in pag. 22 , 23. of Q. Plainness , about the Son of God ; and instead of giving any ingenuous Answer , he meerly Triffles , Quarrels , Contemns , Retorts , Questions , &c. through much of his second Section . Passing by at present many Injuries and Falshoods , and scornful Cavils against my self . I must take notice of one Abuse against Samuel Fisher , pag. 54. and reiterated p. 59 , 89. where thou thus chargest him , That he positively asserts the Scriptures to be a Nose of Wax ; yea , and saith , it is capable of being no other ; and for this quotes Samuel Fisher's Additional Appendix , p. 21. Thou art here very positive in thy Charge , which indeed is a Charge of a high Nature ; But hast thou dealt honestly or truly in this ? Was it S. F's positive Assertion concerning the Scriptures themselves ? Or did he speak it with Reflection upon them who make or render the Scriptures no better then a Nose of Wax by their own various Interpretations ? Though he be Dead , yet he speaketh for himself so much as may detect thy Injustice and Abuse against him ; where treating of the then Priests Confusion , or going round , &c. about the Transcriptions and Translations of their Text , which they take to be their Rule ( he thereupon addeth ) Which were they never so certain and entire , by answering to the first Original Copies , yet are not capable to be ( to all men ) any other then a Lesbian-Rule , or Nose of Wax ; forasmuch as even where men have them ( as half the World has not ) they are lyable to be Wrested and Actually Twisted Twenty Wayes by Interpreters , whose Expositions , Senses and Meanings ( which are as Many and Various as the Thoughts , and Conceits , and Inventions of the Men are , who comment upon them ) must be the Rule , &c. see his Additional Appendix to his Rusticus ad Academicos , pag. 21. Now judge ( serious Reader ) whether it be Samuel Fisher's own positive Assertion , That the Scriptures are a Nose of Wax ( in themselves ) or whether that they are not rather made so ( or no better ) by such as Wrest and Twist them ? What a manifest Perverter is this Man ! Surely the Lord will rebuke him , and all perverse Opposers and Perverters . Whereas thou sayest , That the Baptists have this to say for themselves , They do not pretend to Immediate Divine Revelations and such Inspirations , nor to a Gift of Infallibility , nor yet to any such Immediate Commission from Heaven , as the Quakers do , viz. to go forth as Prophets and Apostles , p 56. I say , the Baptists are then greatly declined from what many of them pretended at first , as may be seen in divers of their ancient Books ; wherein they profest Inspiration , and confest to the Sufficiency of the Spirit 's Teaching , and being moved and led thereby , both in Praying and Preaching ; see Sam. How 's Sufficiency of the Spirit 's Teaching , commended by W. Kiffin ; D. King 's Way to Sion ; T. Colster's Works , with many others : Hast thou mannaged the Baptists Cause well , in saying , They do not pretend to Immediate Revelations , Inspirations , &c. contrary to their former Testimonies ? And whether we or they will shew more or greater Evidence , Time , Tryals and Sufferings will further manifest , as it hath already : God hath made our Testimony both evident and effectual in many Consciences , through our Travails and Suffering as Christians ; wherein he hath appeared with us and for us , and stood by his Prophets and Faithful Witnesses among us . As for thy Comparison between the Quakers and Muggleton in both thy Pamphlets ; there is enough in it to manifest how Unjust , Irrational & Dishonest thou art therein ; it will neither hold as a just Comparison either in general , or in the particulars * For all the rest of thy Revilings , Hard Speeches , Cavilling and Quarrelling against us , we commit our Cause to God , and appeal to him to plead it , and to evidence for us in the Hearts of our Adversaries , as we doubt not but he will yet further , for his own Name and Truth 's sake ; in the mean time , he hath given us to Rejoyce over the Revilings of our Adversaries , to pray for them that persecute us . And though we are as Fools for Christ , we have learned to shew forth so much of Christianity , as when Persecuted , patiently to Suffer it ; when Revised , to Bless ; when Defamed , to Intreat ; Rejoycing when men Revile , Persecute and speak all manner of Evil of us falsly for his Name 's sake : whose Sufferings we esteem Greater Riches then all the Glory of Egypt . London , the 27th of the 12th Moneth , 1674. I subscribe my self thy Abused Friend and Lover of Truth and Men. G. W. THE END . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A65890-e10 * And withal , shewed as high Titles given to Baptists Books as ours , Qu. Plainness , p. 71 , 72 , 73. * Which renders his Friend T. H. his Cause very lame , and sorely wounds it ▪ then ‖ When we Oppose our Adversary's Raising Conten●ion , by their imposing Unscriptural and Unsound Words . * It is not thy Mocking [ and telling G. W. That when thou talkest of Reason he presently thinks of Plums ] that will clear thee . How easie is it for a Scoffer to fill Books witk such Frothy Stuff ?