A speech delivered in the castle-chamber at Dublin, the XXII. of November, anno 1622 At the censuring of certaine officers, who refused to take the Oath of Supremacie. By Iames Bishop of Meath. Ussher, James, 1581-1656. 1631 Approx. 18 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 8 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2005-12 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A14241 STC 24555 ESTC S118952 99854159 99854159 19567 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A14241) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 19567) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1368:7) A speech delivered in the castle-chamber at Dublin, the XXII. of November, anno 1622 At the censuring of certaine officers, who refused to take the Oath of Supremacie. By Iames Bishop of Meath. Ussher, James, 1581-1656. [2], 12, [2] p. Printed by R[obert] Y[oung] for the Partners of the Irish Stocke, London : 1631. Printer's name from STC. Running title reads: A speech in the castle-chamber concerning the Oath of Supremacie. The last leaf contains a commendation from King James to the author. Usually found as part 5 of STC 24544 or 24544.5. Reproduction of the original in the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign Campus). Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Church and state -- Great Britain -- Early works to 1800. 2005-02 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2005-03 Apex CoVantage Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2005-04 Emma (Leeson) Huber Sampled and proofread 2005-04 Emma (Leeson) Huber Text and markup reviewed and edited 2005-10 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion A SPEECH DELIVERED IN THE CASTLE-CHAMBER AT DVBLIN , the XXII . of November , Anno 1622. AT THE CENSVRING of certaine Officers , who refused to take the Oath of SUPREMACIE . BY IAMES Bishop of Meath . LONDON , Printed by R. Y. for the Partners of the Irish Stocke . 1631. A Speech delivered in the CASTLE-CHAMBER concerning the Oath of SUPREMACIE . WHat the danger of the Law is , for refusing this Oath , hath beene sufficiently opened by my Lords the Iudges ; and the qualitie and quantitie of that offence hath been aggravated to the full by those that have spoken after them . The part which is most proper for me to deale in , is the information of the Conscience , touching the truth and equitie of the matters contained in the Oath : which I also have made choice the rather to insist upon , because both the forme of the Oath it selfe requireth herein a full resolution of the conscience ( as appeareth by those words in the very beginning thereof ; I doe utterly testifie and declare in my conscience , &c. ) and the persons that stand here to be censured for refusing the same , have alledged nothing in their owne defence but only the simple plea of Ignorance . That this point therefore may bee cleared , and all needlesse scruples removed out of mens minds : two maine branches there bee of this Oath , which require speciall consideration . The one positive : acknowledging the Supremacy of the governement of these Realmes , in all causes whatsoever , to rest in the Kings Highnesse onely . The other negative : renouncing all iurisdictions and authorities of any forreine Prince or Prelate within his Maiesties dominions . For the better understanding of the former , we are in the first place to call unto our remembrance that exhortation of St. Peter . a Submit your selves unto every ordinance of man for the Lords sake : whether it bee unto the King , as having the preheminence ; or unto Governours , as unto them that are sent by him , for the punishment of evill doers , and for the praise of them that doe well . By this we are taught to respect the King , not as the only governour of his dominions simply ( for wee see there bee other Governours placed under him ) but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as him that excelleth , and hath the preeminence over the rest , that is to say , ( according to the tenure of the Oath ) as him that is the onely supreme Governour of his Realmes . Vpon which ground we may safely build this conclusion ; that whatsoever power is incident unto the King by vertue of his place , must be acknowledged to be in him supreme : there being nothing so contrary to the nature of Soveraigntie , as to have another superiour power to over-rule it . Qui Rex est , Regem ( Maxime ) non habeat . In the second place wee are to consider , that God for the better settling of piety and honesty among men , and the repressing of prophanenesse and other vices , hath established two distinct powers upon earth : the one of the Keyes , committed to the Church ; the other of the Sword , committed to the Civill Magistrate . That of the Keyes is ordained to worke upon the inner man ; having immediate relation to the b remitting or retaining of sins . That of the Sword is appointed to work upon the outward man ; yeelding protection to the obedient , and inflicting externall punishment upon the rebellious and disobedient . By the former , the spirituall officers of the Church of Christ are inabled to c governe well , to d speak and exhort and rebuke with all authoritie , to e loose such as are penitent , to commit others unto the Lords prison , untill their amendment , or to binde them over unto the iudgment of the great day , if they shal persist in their wilfulnesse and obstinacie . By the other , Princes have an imperious power assigned by God unto them , for the defence of such as doe well , and executing f revenge and wrath upon such as doe evill ; whether g by death , or banishment , or confiscation of goods , or imprisonment , according to the qualitie of the offence . When St. Peter , that had the Keyes committed unto him , made bold to draw the Sword ; he was commanded to h put it up , as a weapon that he had no authoritie to meddle withall . And on the other side , when Vzziah the King would venture upon the execution of the Priests office , it was said unto him ; i It pertaineth not unto thee , Uzziah , to burn incense unto the Lord , but to the Priests the sons of Aaron , that are consecrated to burne incense . Let this therefore be our second conclusion : that the power of the Sword and of the Keyes are two distinct ordinances of God ; and that the Prince hath no more authoritie to enter upon the execution of any part of the Priests function , than the Priest hath to intrude upon any part of the office of the Prince . In the third place we are to observe , that the power of the civill sword , ( the supreme managing wherof belongeth to the King alone ) is not to bee restrained unto temporall causes only ; but is by Gods ordinance to be extended likewise unto all Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall things and causes . that as the spirituall Rulers of the Church doe exercise their kinde of governement , in bringing men unto obedience , not of the duties of the first Table alone ( which concerneth piety and the religious service which man is bound to performe unto his Creator ) but also of the second ( which respecteth morall honesty , and the offices that man doth owe unto man : ) so the civill Magistrate is to use his authority also in redressing the abuses committed against the first Table , aswell as against the second , that is to say , aswell in punishing of an heretick , or an idolater , or a blasphemer , as of a thiefe , or a murtherer , or a traytor ; and in providing by all good meanes , that such as live under his government k may leade a quiet and peaceable life in all piety and honesty . And howsoever by this meanes we make both Prince and Priest to bee in their severall places Custodes utriusque tabulae , Keepers of both Gods tables : yet do we not hereby any way confound both of their offices together . for though the matter wherein their government is exercised may be the same ; yet is the forme and manner of governing therein alwaies different . the one reaching to the outward man onely , the other to the inward : the one binding or loosing the soule , the other laying hold on the body and the things belonging thereunto : the one having speciall reference to the iudgement of the world to come , the other respecting the present retaining or loosing of some of the comforts of this life . That there is such a * civill government as this in causes spirituall or Ecclesiasticall , no man of iudgement can deny . For must not Heresie ( for example ) bee acknowledged to be a cause meerly spirituall or Ecclesiasticall ? and yet by what power is an Hereticke put to death ? The officers of the Church have no authority to take away the life of any man : it must be done therefore per brachium seculare ; and consequently it must bee yeelded without contradiction , that the temporall Magistrate doth exercise therein a part of his civill government , in punishing a crime that is of it owne nature spirituall or Ecclesiasticall . But here it will be said . The words of the Oath being generall ; that the King is the only supreme governour of this Realme and of all other his highnesse dominions and countries : how may it appeare that the power of the civill sword only is meant by that government , and that the power of the Keyes is not comprehended therein ? I answere : first , that where a civill Magistrate is affirmed to bee the governour of his owne dominions and countryes ; by common intendement this must needs be understood of a civill governement , and may in no reason be extended to that which is meerely of another kinde . Secondly I say , that where an ambiguitie is conceived to bee in any part of an Oath ; it ought to bee taken according to the understanding of him for whose satisfaction the Oath was ministred . Now in this case it hath been sufficiently declared by publick authority , that no other thing is meant by the governement here mentioned ; but that of the civill sword onely . For in the booke of Articles agreed upon by the Archbishops & Bishops & the whole Clergie in the Convocation holden at London anno 1562. thus we read . Where we attribute to the Queenes Majesty the chiefe government , ( by which titles wee understand the minds of some slanderous folkes to be offended : ) we give not to our Princes the ministring either of Gods Word or of the Sacraments ( the which thing the Injunctions also lately set forth by Elizabeth our Queene doth most plainly testifie : ) but that onely prerogative which we see to have beene given alwaies to all godly Princes in holy Scriptures by God himselfe , that is , that they should rule all estates and degrees committed to their Charge by God , whether they be Ecclesiasticall or Temporall , and restraine with the Civill sword the stubborne and evill doers . If it be here objected that the authority of the Convocation is not a sufficient ground for the expositiō of that which was enacted in Parliament : I answer , that these Articles stand confirmed not onely by the Royall assent of the Prince , ( for the establishing of whose Supremacy the Oath was framed ) but also by a speciall Act of Parliament ; which is to be found among the statutes in the thirteenth yeare of Queene Elizabeth , chap. 12. Seeing therfore the makers of the Law have full authority to expound the Law ; and they have sufficiently manifested , that by the supreme government given to the Prince they understand that kind of government only which is exercised with the Civill sword : I conclude , that nothing can be more plaine than this ; that without all scruple of conscience , the Kings Majesty may be acknowledged in this sense to bee the only supreme governour of all his Highnesse dominions and countries , as well in all spirituall or Ecclesiasticall things or causes as temporall . And so have I cleered the first maine branch of the Oath . I come now unto the second ; which is propounded negatively : that no forrein Prince , Person , Prelate , State or Potentate , hath or ought to have any jurisdiction , power , superiority , preheminence or authority , Ecclesiasticall or spirituall within this Realme . The forreiner that challengeth this Ecclesiasticall or spirituall jurisdiction over us , is the Bishop of Rome : and the title whereby he claimeth this power over us , is the same whereby he claimeth it over the whole world ; because he is S. Peters successor , forsooth . And indeed , if S. Peter himselfe had beene now alive , I should freely confesse , that hee ought to have spirituall authoritie and superioritie within this kingdome . But so would I say also , if S. Andrew , S. Bartholmew , S. Thomas , or any of the other Apostles had beene alive . For I know that their commission was verie large ; to l goe into all the world , and to preach the Gospel unto every creature . so that in what part of the world soever they lived , they could not bee said to be out of their charge ; their Apostleship being a kind of an Universall Bishoprick . If therefore the Bishop of Rome can prove himselfe to bee one of this ranke : the Oath must be amended ; and wee must acknowledge that hee hath Ecclesiasticall authoritie within this Realme . True it is , that our Lawyers in their Year-bookes by the name of the Apostle do usually designe the Pope . But if they had examined his title to that Apostleship , as they would try an ordinary mans title to a piece of land : they might easily have found a number of flawes and maine defects therein . For first it would be enquired , whether the Apostleship was not ordained by our Saviour Christ as a speciall Commission ; which being personall onely , was to determine with the death of the first Apostles . For howsoever at their first entry into the execution of this commission , we finde that m Matthias was admitted to the Apostleship in the roome of Iudas : yet afterwards when Iames the brother of Iohn was slaine by Herod , wee doe not reade that any other was substituted in his place . Nay we know that the Apostles generally left no successors in this kinde : neither did any of the Bishops ( he of Rome only excepted ) that sate in those famous Churches , wherein the Apostles exercised their ministery , challenge an Apostleship or an Universall Bishoprick , by vertue of that succession . It would secondly therefore bee inquired , what sound evidence they can produce , to shew that one of the company was to hold the Apostleshipp as it were in fee , for him and his successors for ever ; and that the other eleven should hold the same for terme of life only . Thirdly , if this state of perperuity was to be cast upon one : how came it to fall upon S. Peter , rather than upon S. Iohn ; who outlived all the rest of his fellowes , and so as a surviving feoffee had the fairest right to retaine the same in himself & his successors for ever ? Fourthly , if that state were wholly settled upon S. Peter : seeing the Romanists themselves acknowledge that he was Bishop of Antioch before he was Bishop of Rome ; we require them to shew , why so great an inheritance as this , should descend unto the yonger brother ( as it were by Burrough-english ) rather than to the elder , ( according to the ordinary manner of descents . ) Especially seeing Rome hath little else to alledge for this preferment , but only that S. Peter was crucified in it : which was a very slender reason to move the Apostle so to respect it . Seeing therfore the grounds of this great claime of the Bishop of Rome appeare to be so vaine and frivolous : I may safely conclude , that he ought to have no Ecclesiasticall or spirituall authority within this Realme ; which is the principall point contained in the second part of the Oath . FINIS . IAMES REX . RIght Reverend Father in God , and Right trusty and welbeloved Counsellor , wee greet you well . You have not deceived our expectation , nor the gracious opinion we ever conceived both of your abilities in learning , and of your faithfullnesse to us and our service . Whereof as we have received sundry testimonies both from our precedent Deputies , as likewise from our Right trusty & welbeloved Cousin & Counsellor the Viscount Falkland our present Deputy of that Realm ; so have we now of late in one particular had a further evidence of your duty and affection well expressed by your late carriage in our Castle-Chamber there , at the censure of those disobedient Magistrates , who refused to take the oath of Supremacy . Wherein your zeale to the maintenance of our just and lawfull power , defended with so much learning and reason , deserves our Princely and gracious thankes ; which we doe by this our letter unto you , and so bid you farewell . Given under our Signet at our Court at White-hall the eleventh of Ianuary , 1622. In the 20. yeare of our Raigne of great Brittaigne , France and Ireland . To the right Reverend Father in God , and our right trusty and welbeloved Counsellor , the Bishop of Meath . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A14241-e70 a 1 Per. 2. 13 , 14. b Iohn 20. 23. c ● . Tim. 5. 17. d Tit. 2. 15. e Matth. 16. 19. & 18. 18. f Rom. 13. 4. g Ezra 7. 26. h Matt. 26. 52. i 2. Chr. 26. 18. k 1 Tim. 2. 2. * As on the other side , that a spirituall or ecc●esiasticall government is exercised in causes civill or temporall . For is not Excommunication a maine part of Ecclesiasticall government , and Forest lawes a speciall branch of causes Temporall ? yet we see in Sententiâ latâ super chartas , anno 12. R. H. ; that the Bishops of England pronounce a solemne sentence of Excommunication against the infringers of the liberties contained in chartâ de Forestâ . l Mark. 16. 15. m Acts 1. 25 , 26.