An account of Mr. Ferguson, his common-place-book in two letters. Glanvill, Joseph, 1636-1680. 1675 Approx. 65 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 19 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2004-08 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A70177 Wing G798 ESTC R23394 12068308 ocm 12068308 53428 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A70177) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 53428) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 70:2 or 1669:29) An account of Mr. Ferguson, his common-place-book in two letters. Glanvill, Joseph, 1636-1680. Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707. [2], 35 p. Printed by Andrew Clark for Walter Kettilby ..., London : 1675. Illustrated t.p. Attributed to Joseph Glanvill. Cf. BM. Item at reel 1669:29 identified as Wing F729 (number cancelled). Reproduction of original in Cambridge University Library and Bodleian Library. Mr. Glanvill his letter to Mr. Sherlock -- Mr. Sherlock his answer to Mr. Glanvill his letter. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Ferguson, Robert, d. 1714. -- Interest of reason in religion. 2003-11 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2004-01 Apex CoVantage Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2004-04 Amanda Watson Sampled and proofread 2004-04 Amanda Watson Text and markup reviewed and edited 2004-07 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion AN ACCOUNT OF Mr. FERGUSON HIS Common-Place-Book , IN TWO LETTERS . LONDON : Printed by Andrew Clark , for Walter Kettilby at the Bishops-Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard . 1675. Mr. GLANVILL HIS LETTER TO Mr. SHERLOCK . SIR , I Lately met with Mr. Ferguson's Book , and was a little surprized to find my self by name concern'd in it , as one of those that had been the occasion of his writing about the Interest of Reason in Religion . I had in my Discourse of Reason accus'd the Dissenters of decrying the sober use of our Faculties under the misapplied names of vain Philosophy , carnal Reason , and the wisdom of this World ; and some others whom he mentions , had spoke to the like purpose : He therefore thought it necessary that they should vindicate themselves from those aspersions , and endeavour to give a stop to those groundless , and unjust clamours , page 9. Now whether those Accusations are just or not , I appeal to any one that can remember but twenty years past , and hath been in the least acquainted with the Preaching , Writings , and Discourses of those men in their times : How far they are reformed since , I do not know ; but I have never heard of their Recantations , nor have they taken any care to convince the world that their private Desks are more sober then their publick Pulpits were . On this occasion , Sir , I cannot but take notice , how hard it is to deal with the people of this sort , when we speak or write against their Opinions , Practices , and Declarations , and those that have been most publick and notorious : If there happen to be two , or three , or some very few unknown persons , of a little different temper , they will be ready to flie upon us as false accusers , and such as traduce the whole Party for the Extravagancies of a few . Thus you know it hath hapned to some excellent late Books , that have given the most just , and lively descriptions of the humour of Non-conformists , which have been vilified and rayl'd at as slanderous Invectives and Abuses ; because some few that go with them , are somewhat less foolish , and extravagant then the rest : According to which Rule , it will be untrue to say , that Lions and Bears are wild and dangerous creatures , because some of them have been tam'd and made gentle : and a man may not affirm the Crow is black , because some are greyish : and now and then a Bird of that species by extraordinary accident may be white . If among the Dissenters there are so many sober Assertors of the necessity , and usefulness of Reason in the affairs of Religion , 't is very much that they have not all this while stood up , and reprov'd the dangerous Follies , and Extravagancies of their Brethren that have opened the door to Atheism , and Enthusiasm by their ignorant Railings against it . And since they have thought fit to be silent in this matter , how should we know that there are men of such sober principles among them . The Declamations and violent Out-cries against Reason we have heard till our ears have tingled : but the justifications of the judgments of Reason in Religion have been such private whispers , that hitherto we have heard little , or nothing of them from these men : and I might ask Mr. F. how it comes about , that persons so zealous against error , who were still pelting each other both from Press and Pulpit upon every petty difference in opinion , should let pass so many rude Defamations of our Faculties , as they needs must frequently hear , without the least reproof , or opposition of them , if so many have been so very Orthodox in this point , as he would have us to believe ? But I say no more of that . The Author hath a double justification of his Party against our Charge . We have the first , page 7. They are a people , so far as I know , innocent of all undue reflections upon Reason . The other is , I Robert Ferguson do acknowledge the use of Reason in Religion in 274 pages ; ergo , Our late pretended Rational Divines do traduce the Non-conformists in suggesting that they are defamers of Reason , page 62. This is the sum and strength of the whole Discourse , to which a short answer will suffice . For my part , though I have been drawn into some Philosophical Controversies , yet I never begun any ; and though I have received some publick Provocations to ingage in the Disputes of Religion , yet hitherto my disinclination to them hath kept me unconcern'd : But notwithstanding this indisposition , Mr. Ferguson's title , and the mention he made of me , as one of the occasions of his Book , inclined me to look into his Discourse with design of further Vindication of our Faculties , if that Essay had given me any reason for it : But I soon perceived that this supposed Adversary was a Friend , and one that liked my Book so well , as to borrow the main things of his from it ; though as he is pleased to say of Des Cartes , He was not so ingenious to confess at whose Breasts he had suckt , nor out of whose Garden he had gathered his best Flowers : And 't was a little unkindly done of him to mention my Name where he supposed I had erred ; and to take no notice of it , when he thought I had done so well as to deserve to be transcribed . Indeed he hath enlarged in the proof of some Principles of Religion by Reason , in which he hath been more beholden to other men : But in the Notions that strictly appertain to the main state of the matter , he hath been pleased to credit and enforce my Observations by the addition of his Suffrage and Authority . When I saw how Affairs went , I left the close perusal of his Book , and only cursorily skim'd over his Pages , casting my eye here and there , as it hapned ; and in that running reading I observ'd these following things and Expressions , in which the Gentleman very kindly , and to my great honour hath concur'd with me . M. Ferguson . Knowledge then ( viz. in the state of Innocence ) inhabited our minds in no less plenty than Light doth in the universal Luminary . p. 18. Jos. Glanvill . Knowledge dwelt in our undepraved natures as Light in the Sun , in as great Plenty as Purity . Vanity of Dogmatizing . p. 13. M. F. It was wonderfully advantaged by a delicate and apt disposure of bodily Organs . ibid. J. G. Depending on the delicacy and apt disposure of the Organs . Van. Dogm . p. 5. M. F. There was no Jarring in our humors till the Fall caused them . p. 19. J. G. There was no jarring or disharmony in the faculties till sin untuned them . Van. Dogm . p. 4. M. F. Hindred by the Distemperature of indisposed Organs . ibid. J. G. Hindred in its actings by the Distemperature of indisposed Organs . Van. Dogm . ibid. M. F. takes the whole substance of his Discourse about the Understanding in the state of Innocence , and after , under the Fall. p. 18 , 19. out of ▪ I. G. in his Vanity of Dogmatizing . p. 4 , 5 , &c. M. F. The vast Volumes of the School-men are stuft with Peripatetical Depravations . p. 246. J. G. The Volumes of the Schoolmen are deplorable evidence of Peripatetical Depravations . Van. Dogm . p. 166. M. F. Their Scholastick Controversies are resolved into the Subtilties of his ( Aristotle's ) Philosophy . ibid. J. G. These Scholastick Controversies are ultimately resolved into the Subtilties of his ( Aristotle's ) Philosophy . V. D p. 167 M. F. Speaking of the Union of the Soul and Body saith , — How this can be is a Knot too hard for Human Reason to untie . p. 490. J. G. Saith of the same , — It is a Knot too hard for our degraded Intellects to untie . Van. Dog. Ed. 2. p. 15. M. F. How a pure Spirit should be cemented to an earthly clod , — is a Riddle that no Hypothesis of Philosophy can resolve us about . p. 490. J. G. How the purer Spirit is united to this Clod , — is a Riddle that must be left to the coming of Elias . Van. Dog. Ed. 2. ibid. M. F. To affirm it , viz. the uniter of Soul and Body to be of a middle nature partaking of the affections and adjuncts of both , is that which our reasonable Faculties will never allow us to subscribe to . ibid. J. G. To suppose an uniter of middle constitution that should partake of some of the qualities of both is unwarranted by any of our faculties . Van. Dogm . p. 21. M. F. How that which penetrates a Body without giving a jog to , or receiving any from it , should either impress a motion upon , or receive an impression from it , is unconceivable . p. 496. J. G. How that which penetrates all Bodies without the least jog or obstruction , should impress a motion on any is by his own confession alike unconceivable . Van. Dogm . Ed. 2. p. 17. M. F. treats of the incomprehensibility of the union of the parts of matter . p. 483 , 484 , &c. the substance of all which is taken out of I. G. in his Scepsis Scientifica , p. 37 , 38 , 39. and his Answer to White , p. 41 , 42 , &c. M. F. endeavours to shew the unconceivableness of the union of the Soul and Body , p. 489 , 490 , 491 , &c. and again p. 495 , 496. all out of I. G. in his Scepsis Scientifica . p. 15 , 16. M. F. The reproach which Iulian slanderously fastned upon the Primitive Christians , that they had no ground for their Faith , but that their wisdom was only to believe , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . p. 62. J. G. The charge of Julian the Apostate against the Primitive Christians , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That their wisdom was to believe ; as if they had no ground for their Faith. Of Reason , p. 218. M. F. He is worse than an Enthusiast , who affirms , that the way to be a Christian is first to be a Brute . p. 20. J. G. Saith , that in the Enthusiastick Divinity , — The way to be a Christian is first to be a Brute . Of Reason , p. 223. M. F. Men being misled by their senses , affections , interests and imaginations do many times mingle errors and false conceits with the genuine Dictates of their minds , and then appeal to them as the principles of truth and reason , when they are indeed nothing else but the vain images of our Fansies , and the conclusions of ignorance and mistake . p. 241. J. G. Liable to be mis-led by our senses , and affections , and interests , and imaginations , so that we many times mingle errors and false conceits with the genuine dictates of our minds , and appeal to them as the principles of truth and reason , when they are but the vain images of our Fansies , or the false conclusions of ignorance and mistake . Of Reason , p. 196 , 197. M. F. Whatsoever is proved by reason we are firmly to believe it , though there be many things in the theory of it , that are wholly unconceivable . p. 198. J. G. What is — clearly proved by reason ought to be believed , though there are many things in the theory and manner of it unconceivable . Philosoph . Pia , p. 82. Thus , Sir , I have given you some Instances among many , of the faithfulness of M. Ferguson's Memory , or of his Phrase-Book : There is no doubt but they have furnished him as well out of other Writers , but I have neither the humor nor the leisure to make further search after stoln Goods : Only I cannot but take notice to you that this is the Man that divers of his Party glory in , as their elegant and rational Writer , and urge him as a great proof of the partiality and injustice of those who will not allow Non-Conformists to write either good Sense or good Language ; If either of these be in his Book , you may ghess by this Specimen how little Honour is reflected upon them from it : And if others would claim their Feathers , as I have called for some of mine , I believe , he would have scarce enough left to cover theirs or his own nakedness . I remember such Discoveries were once made upon another Champion of the Cause , M. Hickman ; who had also furnished his Pack with Lace and Ribband borrowed from his Neighbours Shops . 'T is pity but these men had Judgments to choose , for then they would put better Books into the hands of their Admirers . But when they take this Liberty , I would advise them not to fall foul upon the Owners , while they have their Goods in their hands ; nor to pick their Pockets then when they are confidently pleading their own Truth and Honesty against them : If this Gentleman had let me alone , I had likely never known this quality of his ; but unluckily he hath detected himself , as he did that warned his Chapman , to whom he had sold a stoln Horse , not to let him drink of such a Water , which was in a Ground out of which he had taken him . Upon the whole matter , Sir , I desire you to deal gently with this Adversary , lest unawares you should smite some of your Friends , and among the rest , Your affectionate Friend and Servant , Ios. Glanvill . Mr. SHERLOCK HIS ANSWER TO Mr. GLANVILL HIS LETTER . SIR , I Have received your Letter , and thank you very heartily for it . I was much puzzled before to give an account of the inequality of M. Ferguson's Style and Reasoning : for his Words are sometimes proper and elegant , his Arguments strong and weighty , at other times his Phrase is barbarous and pedantick , and his Reasonings childish : and I always observed that he writ best upon some trite and beaten Argument , where he had no Adversary ; but take him out of the road of Common Places and Phrase-Books , and he could neither write consistently with himself , nor any thing to the purpose . This gave me a great suspicion of the man , that he was a mere Collector , and that his Book was made just as the Epicuraeans fansie the World was , by the accidental Concourse of Atoms , and may serve for a Confutation of that wild Hypothesis ; it being a plain Demonstration , how impossible it is to make a good Book out of the best Common-Places and Collections , unless a wise man have the composing of it . Upon the receipt of your Letter , which made so pleasant a discovery of the man , I had the Curiosity to enquire a little further , and in requital of your kindness , I have here sent you some of his gleanings from other Authors , though so changed and transformed , and found in such ill Company , that I fear those worthy persons will be ashamed to own them . And because M. Ferg . with the usual confidence of a bold Scot , pretends a very particular Friendship with that excellent Person , Sir Charles Wolseley , I shall first take notice how bold he has made with him ; which I suppose he did upon the Authority of that old Saying , All things are common among Friends ; and therefore he might challenge as good a right to Sir Charles his Writings , as himself . M. Ferg . among other things shews the Use and Serviceableness of Reason in proving the Divinity of the Scripture , p. 56 , &c. Sir Charles had done this before him , and had managed that Argument like a Scholar and a Gentleman , in his Book entituled , The Reasonableness of Scripture-Belief ; from whence our Author has borrowed most of his best Arguments , and many times his Words and Phrases . M. Ferguson premises , that the Testimony of the Holy Ghost in the Souls and Consciences of men is the most convincing evidence , that such men can have of its ( the Scriptures ) Divinity , but yet rejects it from being a proof of the Scriptures Divinity to others . Interest of Reason , p. 57 Sir Charles likewise tells us , the Testimony of the Holy Ghost in the minds and consciences of men to the truth of the Scriptures ( though it be the most convincing evidence that can be given to them , &c. ) 't is not to be urged in proof of the Scriptures against its professed Adversaries . Scripture belief , p. 79 Sir Charles assigns two reasons for this ; Mr. Ferguson has divided the second Reason into two , and set the first Reason in the third place . M. F. 1. The Holy Ghost convinceth no man as to the belief of the Scripture , without enlightning his mind in the grounds and reasons upon which its proceeding from God is evidenced and established . There is no conviction begot by the Holy Ghost in the hearts of men , otherwise than by rational evidence , satisfying our understanding , through discovering the motives and inducements that ascertain the truth of what he would convince us of , Ibid. p. 57 Sir Ch. Wols . Second Argument the latter part ▪ The Illuminations of the Holy Ghost in the minds of men are no other way to be conceived of , than that he is pleased to propose the right grounds and reasons upon which things are to be believed , and to convince and satisfie the understanding , that they are so , and to bring men to acquiesce in conclusions by ascertaining them of the truth of the premises . M. F. 2. No mans particular assurance obtained thus in way of Illumination by the Holy Ghost , is otherwise urged as an argument of conviction to another , than by proposing the reasons , which our Faith is erected on . The way of such mens evidence is communicable to none , unless they could kindle the same rays in the breasts of others , which have irradiated their own , and therefore they must deal with others by producing the grounds of their conviction , not pleading the manner of it , Ibid. Sir Ch. Wols . The beginning of the second Argument . Whatever evidence the Holy Ghost gives to any man to assure him of the truth of any proposition , that evidence , as such , can never go beyond his own breast , nor can I ever prove any thing by it , as it is a Divine and infallible Evidence , because such evidence is no way communicable to another but in an ordinary way : Nothing is visible to another in such cases , but the reasons I can produce , the Divine Illumination I have within my self to convince me , that such Reasons are cogent and prevailing can never be so demonstrated , as to convince another that has no such Illumination , Ibid. p. 81 I am now Sir perfectly satisfied of what great use that trick is of varying phrases , which we learned at School ; for this has made Mr. Ferguson a famous Author , who by the little arts of transplacing words , of turning Nouns into Verbs , or Verbs into Participles , or converting a single word , such as Illumination , into the phrase of kindling Rayes , can make other mens Writings his own . But to proceed , M. F. 3. The Holy Ghost , as a distinct person in the Deity is not a Principle demonstrable by reason , &c. to prove the Divine Authority of the Scripture by the Testimony of the Holy Ghost , when we cannot otherwise prove a Holy Ghost , but by the Testimony of the Scripture , is to argue circularly and absurdly , Ibid. Sir Ch. Wols . 1 Argument , Because the Blessed Spirit it self is not a common demonstrable principle amongst mankind , &c. to go about to prove the Scriptures by any evidence arising from the Holy Ghost must needs be visibly absurd , because there is no other way to prove that there is any such being as the Holy Ghost , but by the Scriptures themselves , Ibid. Master Ferguson having premised this , proceeds to prove the Divine Authority of the Scriptures ; and First , To justifie the necessity of some supernatural Revelation in order to the conducting us in Religion , Ibid. p. 62 Sir Ch. Wols . First , I will endeavour to render it a thing reasonable to be believed that there should be some supernatural law revealed from God , and given to mankind , &c. Ibid. p. 86 M. F. His first argument is taken from the imperfection of natural light , p. 64 This is largely managed by Sir Charles , p. 87 , &c. His second Argument , That the Religion of men at present towards God is the Religion of sinners , &c. but natural light cannot instruct the world how God will be atoned , Ibid. Sir Ch. Mankind in every age have applied to God in a sense of sin , and of guilt contracted by it , and upon that account have adjudged it necessary to make some further offering to God for their sins , &c. Now the reason of the world does not issue it self into any positive certainly about such things , &c. Ibid. p. 133 , and p. 145 , &c. Argument 3. All mankind hath universally consented in this , that besides the light of reason , there ought to be some supernatural Revelation from God , &c. Sir Ch. Discourses this at large , p. 123. &c. to which M. Ferguson indeed refers his Reader : as also to Camero de verbo Dei : for which he is beholden to Sir Charles's citation of him in the same place . Master Ferguson's next undertaking is to make it appear , that it is expedient , that this Revelation should be some where or other consigned to writing , ibid. p. 68. This is but just mentioned by Sir Charles Wolseley , and therefore he is forced to have recourse to some other ; and he has made a very good choice , no less person than the Reverend Dean of Canterbury , Dr. Tillotson , in his Rule of Faith : where you may find the sum of all Master Ferguson's arguments upon this head , which are of any force ; only sometimes to avoid those particular instances , which the Dean gives , he chuseth others with so little judgment , that it would puzzle a very wise man to defend them : And it is pretty to observe how sometimes he varies phrases , and sometimes retains the very same expressions ; as to give an instance of each . M. F. p. 69. I readily acknowledge , that the Articles and Precepts of Religion , may in some cases and circumstances be safely preserved and securely conveyed down from age to age by oral Tradition ; namely when the things themselves to be preserved and reported are few , the number of the persons to be instructed in them small ; the age of those to whom the successive communication is given , lengthened out to several hundreds of years , &c. Dr. Tillotson , Rule of Faith , p. 33. We grant that oral Tradition in some circumstances may be a sufficient way of conveying a Doctrine , &c. in the first ages of the world , when the credenda or Articles of Religion , and the agenda or precepts of it were but few , and such as had the evidence of natural light ; when the world was contracted into a few Families in comparison , and the age of man was ordinarily extended to six or seven hundred years , &c. M. F. p. 71. I shall only add , that the tradition of the one true God , though most easie to have been preserved , being not only short and plain , but having foundation and evidence in the light of Nature , was nevertheless soon corrupted and defaced by the worlds lapsing into Polytheism . Dr. T. Ibid. p. 187. The tradition of the one true God , which was the easiest to be preserved of any Doctrine in the world , being short and plain ; planted in every mans nature , and perfectly suited to the reason of mankind ; and yet this tradition not having past through many hands , &c. was so defaced and corrupted , that the world did lapse into Polytheism and Idolatry . Where it is pleasant to observe , how Master Ferguson by altering the expression a little , unawares falls into non-sense ; that the tradition of the one true God was corrupted and defaced by the worlds lapsing into Polytheism : as if men first lapsed into Polytheism , and this corrupted the tradition of one God : which is as much as to say , that men worshipped a great many Gods , while they believed there was but one ; and by this means in time forgot that there was but one God. And indeed our Author is oftentimes very unhappy at varying phrases , and makes either wretched English , or wretched sense of them . Master Ferguson's next undertaking is , thirdly to prove , that no written Records besides the Bible can lay claim to the priviledge of being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Divine Inspiration : and here he considers the Ethnick Legislators , Poets , and Philosophers ; and especially the Alcoran , page 76 , &c. all which is done at large by Sir Charles Worsely , page 164 , &c. of which Master Ferguson has only given us a short and imperfect abstract . The same may be truly affirmed of those positive media ( as he calls them ) by which the Divine authority of the Scripture may be rationally demonstrated , which indeed he has cast into a different method ; but as far as I observe , has nothing but what is particularly discours'd by Sir Charles from page 179. to the end of the Book . In one thing indeed Master Ferguson takes the confidence to differ from Sir Charles , whether Miracles be always a certain demonstration of the truth of any Doctrine ? or whether God may ▪ not sometimes permit Impostors to work Miracles for the tryal of our Faith ? This latter Sir Charles affirms , Mr. Ferguson denies ; which is not civilly done to dispute such a nice point with his friend , which he confesses is not very material , when he had borrowed from him all his substantial and material notions . But the best of it is , Sir Charles has no need to stand to his Courtesie in this matter , and it is well for him he has not . And upon this occasion I cannot but take notice , how Master Ferguson deals with Des Cartes ; he charges him with affirming , Deum posse fallere , si velit , that God can deceive , if he please . Now Sir you know very well upon what occasion Des Cartes said this ; it was when in order to free his mind from the prejudices of sense and education , and popular opinions , he set himself to doubt , as far as possibly he could , as long as there was the least imaginable pretence for doubting ; and therefore doubts whether there be a God , or any thing else : and whether this God be not a deceiver , &c. And Master Ferguson might as well challenge Des Cartes with denying that he himself had any body , or that there were any external objects , such as the Sun , Moon , and Stars ; as with affirming , that God might deceive , if he pleased ; for he says the one as much as the other , while he was in this doubting humour , and only upon a design to come to some first Principle , which he could not doubt of ; and to lay the foundations of a more certain knowledge : and therefore he immediately adds ▪ Et certe cum nullam occasionem habeam existimandi aliquem Deum esse deceptorent , neo quidem adhuc satis sciam , utrum sit aliquis Deus , valde tenuis , & , ut ita loquar , metaphysica dubitandi ratio est , quae tantum ex ea opinione dependet ; ut autem etiam illa tolletur , quamprimum occurret occasio , examinare debeo , an sit Deus , & si sit , an possit esse deceptor , hac enim re ignorata , non videor de ulla alia plane certus esse unquam posse , Medit. Tertia . i. e. Since I have no occasion at all to think , that God is a deceiver ; nor as yet am certain , whether there be a God , or not , this opinion ( of Gods power to deceive ) is but a very slender and metaphysical reason of doubting : However that we may remove this too , as soon as things are ripe for that inquiry , we must examine whether there be a God ? and if there be one , whether he can be a deceiver ? for while we are ignorant of this , I cannot see how we can be throughly certain of an thing . And accordingly , when in his method he had proved the being of God , he proves too , that he cannot deceive us , and founds the truth and certainty of our faculties upon it . And in the second objections he is charged with asserting Deum non posse mentiri aut decipere , that God cannot lye or deceive ; which they say is contrary to the opinion of many Schoolmen . And in his Answer to these Objections , to which Master Ferguson refers us , he owns the charge , and defends himself from their exceptions . By this we may see , how well skilled Mr. Ferguson is in Des Cartes his Philosophy , or what a brow he has , to charge that upon Des Cartes as his professed opinion ; the contrary of which he makes the ground of all certainty . Such another wise discourse he has , page 123. of Infallibility ; the result of which is , that our Faith is infallible , though we are not infallibly assured : but this is beyond my first design , only I could not but take this occasion to show you , what a man of reason this is , when he argues at his own natural rate , and dares forsake his Masters : and it were very easie to make it appear , that he has not one good argument , but what he has borrowed from some late Modern Authors , who are far enough from being Fanaticks ; which is an excellent way of proving , that Fanaticks are great friends to Reason . But to give you some few instances more of Mr. Ferguson's transcribing from Modern Authors . M. F. p. 48. If all things be the result of matter , how comes a principle of reason to be conveyed into us , by that which had it not inherent in it self . Sir C. W. The unreasonableness of Atheism , page 92. The casual conjunction of these atoms could not make the world , because it is made with a principle of Reason ; and they could not have induced such a principle by chance , unless some way or other they had it inherent in themselves before . M. F. This Hypothesis supposeth , that to have been the effect of chance which carries in it the characters of a wise contrivance . Ibid. Dr. Til. Serm. 1. p. 40. Nothing can be more unreasonable than obstinately to impute an effect to chance , which carries in the very face of it all the arguments and characters of a wise design and contrivance . M. F. If the fabrick of the world be nothing but the result of the casual meeting , and concatenation of Atoms , how comes it to pass , that by their daily motion and justling one another , they do not dance themselves into more worlds . Ibid. Sir Ch. Ibid. p. 91. If the dancing motion of these Atoms in this fancied space did by chance first dance the world into this form , &c. what is the reason these Atoms never danced themselves into any thing else . You may see Sir , what a youthful fancy Mr. Ferguson has to be so pleased with this metaphor of dancing , which much better becomes a Gentleman than a Divine ; but yet I perceive Mr. Ferguson has so little skill in the thing , that he spoils all these Metaphors , if he attempts to vary the least word ; for I remember I have heard some say , that justling is no very gentile way of dancing . M. F. p. 50. To the fortuitous jumbles of blind matter . Dr. More 's Antidote , p. 42. From a blind fortuitous jumbling of the parts of matter . And in the next words some body or other has put a trick on him : for thus he proceeds . The consideration of the Fabrick of things made Plato say , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , which I may english in the words of the Holy Ghost , that all things are made in number , weight , and measure , which are not the words of the Holy Ghost , unless he will acknowledge the book of Wisdom to be Canonical Scripture : for there it is , 2 Wisdom 20. M. F. p. 51. What convictions are we furnished with of the Being of God , from the innate harmony that is in the several parts of the Creation , and the convenient disposure of all the Creatures to a subserviency to one another in mutual offices ; chance cannot have linkt one thing to another , nor can contraries combine into a mutual coalition without the influence of a supreme Being , who overrules them . Sir Charles ibid. p. 42. The natural rectitude and innate harmony of the world , and the due subordination of things one to another , and to the whole of the world . Direct contraries are over-ruled to a perfect harmony and coalition in the propagation of the world , p. 87. Here Mr. Ferg . has a little altered the phrase , but much for the worse ; for to combine into a coalition , I doubt is not good sense . M. F. p. 52. Men have rather chosen to worship any thing for a God , than wholly to be without one . Dr. Till . Serm. p. 55. Men will rather have any God than none ; and rather than want a Deity will worship any thing . M. F. p. 53. For not onely Cicero tells us , that there is nothing so absurd , which some of the Philosophers have not maintained : But Aristotle informs us , that there have been some who have held , That a thing might at the same time be , and not be . Sir Charles ibid. p. 74. Aristotle tells us , that there were some that affirmed , A thing might be , and might not be at the same time ; and Cicero has long since told us , that nothing could be so absurd , that had not some Philosopher for its Patron . Now though these are very familiar sayings , yet I have reason to think that Mr. Ferg . transcribed them out of Sir Charles , because he has not given us the Latine and Greek of these sayings , as Sir Charles has not ; which Mr. Ferg . never fails to do , when he can come easily by it , of which we have an instance or two in the same page . Ferg . ibid. Reason becomes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , infected with those evil opinions that proceed from lust ; when men are once sunk into the greatest sensualities , their reason becomes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , compliant with their sensual appetites . Mr. Smith's select Discourses , p. 15. That reason that is within us , as Plotinus hath well expressed it , becomes more and more 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , it will be infected with those evil opinions that arise from our corporeal life . Their highest reason is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , complying with their senses . M. F. ibid. Besides men living as if there were no God , can make no apology to the world , but by espousing such notions , as may justifie them in their courses . Dr. Till . Serm. p. 104. For when men live as if there were no God , it becomes expedient for them , that there should be none . — Besides , that men think it some kind of apology for their vices , that they do not act contrary to any principle they profess . M. F. p. 63. There hath been no Nation so savage , nor people so barbarous , who have not acknowledged some kind of external Performances necessary for the expressing of the inward Sentiments of Devotion and Honour , which they bear to the Deity . Amyrald of Religion , p. 2. There is no Nation so savage — no people who do not essay by some kind of Performances to express the Sentiments of Devotion and Honour they bear towards him . M. F. p. 132. Words that are intelligible , when they are spoken , are as intelligible when they are written . — Now as God can speak as plainly as any of his Creatures can ; and as words are at least as easie to be understood when they are written , as when they are spoken ; so we have no reason to think , that God affects obscurity , or envies , that men should understand him . Dr. Till . Rule of Faith , p. 66. First , Whatever can be spoken in plain and intelligible words , and such as have a certain sense may be written in the same words . Secondly , That the same words are as intelligible , when they are written , as when they are spoken . Thirdly , That God if he please can indite a Book in as plain words as any of his Creatures . Fourthly , That we have no reason to think that God affects obscurity , and envies , that men should understand him , &c. M. F. p. 140. Nor is it any argument , that these Texts of Scripture are not easie to be understood , because some out of prejudice or perverseness have wrested them to a corrupt sense ; seeing God did not endite the Bible for the froward or captious , but for such who will read it with a free and unprejudiced mind , and are willing to come to the knowledge of the truth . Dr. Till . ibid. p. 87. And what if some out of prejudice do mistake , or out of perverseness do wrest the plainest Texts of Scripture , &c. Is this any argument that those Texts are not sufficiently plain ? Can any thing be spoken or written in words so clear , which a perverse or prejudiced mind shall not be able to vex and force to another meaning ? God did not write the Scriptures for the froward and the captious , but for those who will read them with a free and unprejudiced mind , and are willing to come to the knowledge of the truth . M. F. p. 148. We have the attestation of Reason , which tells us , that nothing is well known , but by that , which hath a just analogy to it , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , every thing is best understood by that which bears a resemblance of it ; things of sense and life are onely known by vital and sentient faculties . As the eye cannot behold the Sun 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , unless it have some resemblance of the Sun in it self ; no more can any man understand the things of God in a due manner , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , unless he be made to partake of the Divine Image . Mr. Smith's select Discourses , p. 2. All things of sense and life are best known by sentient and vital faculties , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , every thing is best known by that which bears a just resemblance and analogy with it . And as the eye cannot behold the Sun 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , unless it be Sun-like , and hath the form and resemblance of the Sun drawn in it ; so neither can the Soul of man behold God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , unless it be God-like , hath God formed in it , and be made partaker of the Divine Nature . Where by the change of one little word he has spoiled all ; for it is true as Mr. Smith says , that things of life and sense are best known by sentient and vital faculties ; but it is false to say as Mr. Ferguson does , that they are onely known this way : for there is a Philosophical Knowledge of Sounds and Colours , as well as a Sensitive Knowledge of them : And Mr. Ferguson acknowledges , that a bad man may have a true knowledge of the meaning of Scripture , though he have not a vital sense of Religion . So easily may an ignorant Scribler spoil the best Sayings of Wise men . Thus , Sir , it is pleasant to observe how Mr. Ferguson has borrowed all his Arguments , that are worth any thing , against Des-Cartes his Philosophy , from Dr. More , with a little variation , that I have reason to think , that he never read ten lines in Des-Cartes . M. F. The Anonymous Author of Philosophia Scripturae interpres after all his operose and impertinent wrangling — Only instead of Reason , we have Philosophy advanced to a Dictatorship over the Word of God , and Des-Cartes made Master of the Chair . 158. Dr. More 's divine Dialogues 1 part , in the Preface . The learned Author of Philosophia Scripturae Interpres after an operose , subtile and copious endeavour of evincing , that Philosophy is the best interpreter of Scripture , as if all that pains had been intended in the behalf of Des-Cartes , to set him in the infallible Chair . — M. F. p. 249. Nor will I press his ( Des-Cartes ) discharging all spirits from place , though that seems consequentially to discharge them from being . See Dr. More 's first Dialogue , p. 136. &c. M. F. Nor will I dwell upon his disbanding all Final Causes out of the precincts of Natural Philosophy . Dr. More ibid. Preface . A third property of his Philosophy is a seeming modesty in declining all search into the final causes of the Phaenomena of the World. — M. F. ibid. p. 250. His attempting to prove , that all the Phaenomena of the Universe might arise out of matter by meer mechanical motion , and that matter alone , supposing such a degree of motion communicated to it — could have produced the Sun , Moon , Stars , Planets , Animals , and the Bodies of Men in such Organization , Order , Beauty and Harmony , as now they are . Dr. More ibid. It is a confessed principle with him , that matter alone with such a degree of motion , as is supposed now in the Universe , will produce all the Phaenomena of the World , Sun , Moon , and Stars , Air , Water , Earth , Planets , Animals , and the Bodies of men , in such order and orginazation , as they are found . M. F. ibid Neither will I dwell upon his notion of the Conflict between the Flesh and the Spirit , which the Scripture so emphatically mentions ; namely , that it is nothing but the repugnancy of those motions , which the Body by its Spirits , and the Soul by her Will endeavour to excite at the same time in the glandula pinealis , or little Kernel , where he supposeth the Soul to be harboured and seated : as if the whole conflict which the Holy Ghost so solemnly describes under the notion of a war betwixt the law of our members , &c. were nothing else , but that the Kernel in the midst of the Brain being driven on one side by the Soul , and on the other by the animal Spirits — when the corporeal Spirits by their rude joggings of the glandulous button , endeavour to excite in the Soul a desire of any thing , and the Soul repels it by the Will she hath to avoid the same thing , this constitutes the war , &c. Dr. More ibid. The Combat betwixt the superiour and inferiour part of the Soul , the Flesh and the Spirit , as they are termed in Scripture and Divinity , is at last resolved into the ridiculous noddings and joggings of a small glandulous button in the midst of the Brain , encountred by the animal Spirits rudely flurting against it . This little sprunt Champion called the Conarion , within which the Soul is entirely cooped up , acts the part of the Spirit , and the animal Spirits of the Flesh ; and thus by the Soul thus ingarrisoned in this Pine-kernel , and bearing her self against the arietations and jurrings of the Spirits in the Ventricles of the Brain , must that solemn Combat be performed which the Holy Ghost calls the war , &c. Sometimes , Sir , our Author pretends to ancient Learning , and to give an account of the original of Heresies from the Pagan Philosophy ; and for this he is beholden to Mr. Gale , in his Preface to the Court of the Gentiles , part 2. which I shall give you a short view of . M. F. p. 242. And not to insist on the ill influence that the Phoenician and Chaldaick Philosophy had on the Iudaick Theology , though it be of easie proof , that their Planetary Deities and Teraphims sprung from thence ; not to do any more but mention , that the chief errours of the Pharisees , Sadducees , and Esseans took their rise from the Graecian Philosophy , their Dogms being a mixture of Pythagorean , Platonick , Stoick , and Epicurean Notions . Mr. Gale Pref. We shall begin with the malignant contagion , which the Judaick Church received from vain Philosophy : So long as the Judaick Theology continuod under its own native habit — it retained its primitive Purity — But whence sprung this ( declension ) but from the Phaenician and Chaldaick Philosophy , touching Planetary Deities , and Daemons , called by the Phaenicians Baalim . We no way doubt but to demonstrate , that the main errours of the Pharisees , Sadducees , and other Judaick Hereticks received their first formation , &c. from Graecian Philosophy , especially the Pythagorean . M. F. ibid. Both Irenaeus and Tertullian affirm the errours of the Gnosticks to have sprung from the Platonick Idea's , though I think it not improbable , that both their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 & 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 took their birth from Pythagoreanism . Gale. From whence borrowed they ( the Gnosticks ) their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 — but from the Mythologick and Symbolick Philosophy of the Pythagoreans . M. F. 243. Hierom assureth us , that Pelagius suckt all his Doctrines from the Philosophy of Pythagoras and Zeno , and Iansenius fully proves it . Gale. Had not the Pelagian Heresie the same pestiferous root : this is incomparably well demonstrated by Jansenius , &c. M. F. ibid. Nor did Samosatenus and Arrius derive their blasphemous opinions concerning the Deity of Christ , save from the Platonick Philosophy . Gale. Where had Paulus Samosatenus his blasphemous infusions but from Plotinus ? And did not Arrius in like manner derive his blasphemous perswasions touching Christ , from the same poisoned fountain ? M. F. It was not therefore without cause , that Tertullian stiled the Philosophers the Patriarks of Hereticks . Gale. This Tertullian was greatly sensible of , and therefore stiles the Philosophers the Patriarks of Hereticks . M. F. 245. The Platonick School at Alexandria was the Seminary of the chiefest and most pestilent errours vented in the Church during the four first Centuries . Gale. Vain Philosophy was the chief Seminary of Errours broached in the four first Centuries after Christ. — Samosatenus learnt his blasphemies from Plotinus , successor to Ammonius in his School of Alexandria , — Origen Scholar to Ammonius in his School of Alexandria . M. F. p. 243. Holstenius hath shown us , how the Manichean Principles were framed from the Pythagorean . Dr. Parker Plat. Theology , p. 89. Holstenius hath made a parallel between the Pythagorean and Manichean Principles . M. F. 245. Ioannes Baptista Crispus hath wrote a Discourse of Plato's Opinions , and hath at the end of every Chapter shown , what Heresies sprung from each . Dr. Parker ibid. Johannes Baptista Crispus in his discussing of Plato's opinions , has at the end of every Chapter shewn , what Heresies sprung from each opinion . M. F. p. 244. The Popish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or Saint-worship , is nothing but an imitation of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or Daemon-worship of the Pagan Philosophers . Gale ibid. The whole Papal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or Saint-worship , is but an imitation of the Pagan 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or Daemon-worship . M. F. p. 245. The purity and simplicity of the Gospel was no less corrupted by blending the Dogms of Aristotle with the Articles of Faith , than it had been by mingling the Philosophy of Pythagoras and Plato with the Doctrines of Christ. Dr. Parker ibid. They have in the same manner corrupted the simplicity and purity of Christian Religion by blending the Placits of Aristotle with the Articles of Faith , as Manes and Valentinus did by mingling with the Christian Faith the Philosophy of Plato and Pythagoras . M. F. 247. Corrupted into an artificial kind of wrangling , and degererated into contentions and unprofitable altercations . Gale ibid. Corrupted into an artificial kind of contentious disputation — and wrangling dispute . I doubt , Sir , you already censure me for a very idle person , who can spend my time in such an unprofitable pursuit of this Author ; and therefore though I can scarce open an English Author of any account , without making some new discoveries of Mr. Ferguson's pilfering humour , I shall now for a conclusion principally confine my self to his discourse of Metaphors , Chap 2. which he has almost intirely stole from Vossius and Glassius , not excepting his Greek and Latine Citations , with which he makes such a flourish and boast of Learning . M. F. p. 283. Origen especially seems to have made it his business to find out Mystical and Cabbalistical Senses in the plainest parts of Scripture , which made one of the Ancients themselves say of him , Ingenii lusus pro Dei mysteriis venditat ; he obtrudes the sportings of his fancy for religious and sacred Mysteries : and as another expresses it , Ingenii sui acumina putat esse Ecclesiae . Sacramenta . This practice of some Primitive Writers in and about the Scripture influenced Porphyrius to deride the Gospel , as containing nothing ▪ certain in it . Glass . Philologia sacra , p. 298. Intolerabilis est Origenis — audacia , qui omnia omnino quantumlibet simplicitèr dicta in allegorias mutavit , unde Hieronimus justisfimé de eo conqueritur , Ingenium suum facit Ecclesiae Sacramentum ; & alius haud ignobilis pater , Origines sui ingenii lusus pro Dei mysteriis venditar . At que haec Scripturas interpretandi , vel torquendi potius ratio ▪ Porphyrium induxit olim , ut irrideret Christianam doctrinam , & scriberet eam nihil habere certi . M. F. 298. This may serve as an apology for Aristotle's confounding Synechdoches and Allegories with Metaphors : 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Which occasioned Cicero to observe , that Aristotle ▪ used the term Metaphor in a larger acceptation than after-Rhetoricians are wont to take it . Which account of Cicero and Aristotle , together with the Greek Quotation , you have in Vossius Instir. Orat. lib. 4. p. 84. M. F. Ibid. Terms thus applied are called by Hermogenes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Glass . lib. 5. p. 1045. Unde Hermogeni , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 M. F. p. 301. In every Metaphor three things are carefully to be attended to , the original and proper signification of the word , the signification to which it is transferred , and the similitude , analogy , and proportion , &c. Voss. ibid. lib. 4. p. 85. In omni metaphorâ tria requiruntur , significatio propria , aliena , & similitudo aut proportio . M. F. Ibid. Christ is not onely metaphorically stiled a Lion , but Tyrants are likewise so denominated , whereas cruelty and salvageness are the reason of transferring the term to the latter , so fortitude and victoriousness are the grounds of applying it to the other . Glass . ibid. p. 1113. Leo ad Christum significandum transfertur , & ad impios & tyrannos , Christus Leo dicitur ob fortitudinem & victoriam , tyranni ob atrocitatem & rapacitatem . His distinctions between a Metaphor and other Tropes and Parables are all taken out of Glassius and Vossius . M. F. p. 305. By a Parable I mean a Symbolick form of speech , where by a well appropriated similitude from some feigned story , some moral truth is insinuated to the minds of men to make it the better apprehended and understood . Gale Court of the Gentiles , part 2. p. 97. cited from Diodate . This was a fashion of teaching used among the Iews , followed by our Lord , and very profitable to make the truth understood , and to insinuate the apprehension thereof into the minds of the auditors , by a well appropriated similitude , taken from a feigned story . His discourse of Allegories , which immediately follows , is principally owing to Glassius , p. 1395. and whether he has not taken not onely his Notions , but his Greek words and sayings concerning those descriptions of God which we call Anthropopathies , from the same Author , I will leave any man to judge who will compare them . M. F. p. 315. Under Metaphors are comprehended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , in which humane parts , &c. are ascribed to God ; in such forms of speech God by a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or condescension , declares the infinite properties of his nature . — 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , He decyphers what himself is , and doth by things that fall under our apprehension ; and what is thus said of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 & 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , after the manner of men , must be understood of him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , in a way suitable to the Divine Nature . Glassius p. 1116. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est metaphora , qua quod creaturis & praesertim homini propriè competit , ad Deum transfertur , vocatur & 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condescensio — v — 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 & 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quae de Deo dicuntur , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , h. est , convenienter Deo intelligenda sunt . I confess , Sir , I am very sick of this undertaking ; for it is so far from being pleasant , that it is grievous to me , to write one line meerly to expose any man : but I thought it necessary to take down the confidence of this Author , who makes a great shew of ancient and modern Learning , by transcribing out of some late Writers , whose credit and reputation at the same time he endeavours to undermine . I am glad to find , that he reads so good Books , which I doubt not , but would make him wiser in time , if he would consider , as well as read : It is no fault indeed to use those arguments , which have been used by other men , and it is possible sometimes to hit upon the very same expressions , or some very like ; but when a man shall run through a book , and take the whole Series of Arguments , without owning his Masters ; when he shall take out whole Sentences and Paragraphs out of so many Authors , of so vastly different styles , it plainly discovers an empty Head , a barren Fancy , and a vain-glorious Mind ▪ It were easie to transcribe a great part of Glassius and Vossius , concerning the nature and use of Metaphors and Allegories , and the rules of expounding them , which Mr. Ferguson has onely translated , and from whence he has borrowed his Greek and Latine Citations , out of ancient and modern Authors , but I consider this would too much swell a Letter , and you may do it your self if you have the curiosity : And therefore I shall onely farther observe , that whereas this Author falls upon Dr. Parker at every turn , and challenges , and provokes and scorns him ; there is no Person whom he does so much Ape , as the Doctor : He borrows divers of his expressions from him , gawdy Metaphors , phantastick Allegories ▪ thwacking Contradictions , rampant and empty Schemes of Speech , and the like ; and many times transcribes whole Sentences and Paragraphs from him , of which I have given some instances above , and shall adde but two or three more here . M. F. p. 133. Heraclitus grew famous by the onely obscurity of his writings . It is said of Aristotle ▪ that being reproved by Alexander for publishing his Acroamaticks , he should make this reply , that they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ▪ made publick , yet they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , not published . Dr. Parker Plat. Theol. p. 70. Neither is Heraclitus his name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of the obscurity of his writings , less famous ; and no less common is Aristotle's Epistle to Alexander , that though he had made his books publick , yet he had not published them . Where because he would not say the very same thing that the Dr. did , he runs into a very ridiculous mistake . For though Heraclitus ▪ his name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was famous , because of the obscurity of his writings , yet it is a wild conceit , that the obscurity of his writings was the onely thing that made him famous . M. F. p. 321. When any thing is manifested by a Metaphor , the thing it self is not fully expressed , but only some similitude between it and another . Dr. Parker ibid. p. 75. When any is expressed by a Metaphor , the thing it self is not expressed , but onely some similitude observed or made by fancy . M. F. p. 323. For men to discourse in metaphorical terms of things , whose nature and properties they are wholly ignorant of , is plainly to trifle ; seeing while we know not the true Idea's of things , we can onely imagine some resemblances . Dr. Parker ibid. To discourse of the nature of things in metaphorical terms , is to sport and trifle ; but 't is still more phantastick , to talk metaphorically of those things , of whose Idea's we are utterly ignorant . Nay , Sir , it is still more pleasant to observe , that our Author cannot complement his Patron without imitating Dr. Parker : For whoever reads Mr. Ferguson's Dedication to Mr. Papilion , and Dr. Parkers to Dr. Bathurst , will ▪ find that the manner of Address , the Composition , Complement , and Fancy is Dr Parkers , though Mr. Ferguson has a little varied the words . M. F. Ep. dedic . Sir , it cost me no long deliberation to whom I should direct these discourses , the obligations I am under to you , and your Family , rendring them yours by the title of a just debt , the interest you have in me by an entail of peculiar kindnesses , gives you a right to my Studies , and the fruits of them . Dr. P. Ded. of his Plat. Theol. Reverend Sir , I shall not need to argue the decency and fitness of this address — because your absolute and unalienable right to all the fruits of my Studies , has made it due and necessary . M. F. The declining the imputation of ingratitude is my plea for prefixing your name to these Papers . Dr. Parker . I cannot alienate any thing that is theirs from being yours , without being guilty at once of the greatest injustice and ingratitude M. F. Though the concerning you in their behalf may seem an injury , yet not to have done it , would have been a crime . Dr. Parker . So that if to present you with so mean a trifle be unhandsome , yet not to have done it would have been unjust . M. F. You must be content to forgive such offences , as your self have made the result and effects of duty . Dr. Parker . Though I do but injure your name by concerning its Authority in behalf of so worthless a trifle , yet an injury , that is the result of duty and gratitude , may hope for not onely your pardon , but ( Sir , such is your candour ) your acceptance too . M. F. Were there any indecency in this address , yet the laws of gratitude supersede those of congruity . Dr. Parker . The obligations of duty cancel all the laws of indecency . This , Sir , I hope is enough to satisfie the world of Mr. Ferguson's great Learning , and how he came by it : It had been very easie to have given many more instances of this nature , but I took those which came first to hand : I need make no reflexions upon the whole ▪ since you have done it so well already ; and therefore have no more to do , but to subscribe my self Your very affectionate Friend and Brother , VV. Sherlock . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A70177-e2470 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Plut. in Alex.