A moderate, seasonable apology for indulging just Christian liberty to truly tender consciences, conforming to the publike liturgy in not bowing at, or to the name of Jesus, and not kneeling in the act of receiving the Lords Supper, according to His Majesties most gracious declaration to all his loving subjects concerning ecclesiastical affairs ... / by William Prynne, Esquire ... Prynne, William, 1600-1669. 1662 Approx. 411 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 88 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2005-10 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A56184 Wing P4011 ESTC R5505 12378666 ocm 12378666 60659 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A56184) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 60659) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 223:4) A moderate, seasonable apology for indulging just Christian liberty to truly tender consciences, conforming to the publike liturgy in not bowing at, or to the name of Jesus, and not kneeling in the act of receiving the Lords Supper, according to His Majesties most gracious declaration to all his loving subjects concerning ecclesiastical affairs ... / by William Prynne, Esquire ... Prynne, William, 1600-1669. [20], 151, [1] p. Printed for the author by T.C. and L.P., London : 1662. Errata: p. [1] at end. Reproduction of original in Harvard University Libraries. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Church of England -- Customs and practices. Church of England -- Liturgy. 2002-04 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2002-05 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2002-06 Allison Liefer Sampled and proofread 2003-05 SPi Global Rekeyed and resubmitted 2005-03 Judith Siefring Sampled and proofread 2005-03 Judith Siefring Text and markup reviewed and edited 2005-04 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion A MODERATE , SEASONABLE APOLOGY For indulging just Christian Liberty to truly TENDER CONSCIENCES , Conforming to the PUBLIKE LITURGY . In , Not Bowing at , or to the Name of IESUS , AND NOT Kneeling in the Act of receiving the Lords Supper ; according to His Majesties most Gracious Declaration to all his Loving Subjects , concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs . Comprising the principal Reasons for their Nonconformity in point of Judgement , Conscience , ( not Humour or Schism ) to these two Ceremonies ; The first whereof is at large discussed both as a pretended Duty of the Text , or Necessary Ceremony grounded on Philippians 2.9 , 10 , 11. and its true Original , progresse , abuses in the Church of Rome fully discovered . The Second briefly and occasionally touched , as inferred from that Text. ( p. 64 to 90. ) In Three serious and sober Inquiries ▪ concerning Bowing at the Name of Iesus ; Compiled above 30. years since : Published ( with some few Additions ) to prevent Uncharitable censures , and satisfy or pacify all of contrary Judgement and Practise in these Particulars . By William Prynne Esquire , a Bencher of Lincolnes Inne . 1 Thess. 5. 14.15.21.22 26 Now we exhort you Brethren , Comfort the feeble-minded , support the weak , be patient towards all men ; see that none render evill for evill unto any man , but follow that which is good both among your selves and to all men . Prove all things , hold fast that which is good ; abstain from all appearance of evill : Greet all the Brethren with an holy kisse . Gal. 5.14.15 . By Love serve one another ; For all the Law is fulfilled in One word , even in this ; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self . But if ye bite and devour one another , take heed lest ye be consumed one of another . 1 Pet. 3.8 . Finally , be ye all of one mind , having compassion one of another ; love as brethren , be pitifull , be courteous . LONDON Printed for the Author by T. C. and L.P. 1662. To the KINGS most Excellent MAJESTY , Charles the II. Most Gracious Soveraign , THis Moderate Apology , for Indulging just Christian Liberty , to truly Tender Consciences , ( not separating from the Publick Liturgy of the Church of England ) in Not Bowing at , or to the name of Jesus , and Not Kneeling in the Act of Receiving , ( except some short Additions , suiting it to the present Occasion ) was compile● , and part of it a Printed , thirty two years since , for my own Necessary Defence , and others Satisfaction . The chief cause of its present Publication , is the Justification of Two of Your Majesties Royal , Christian Indulgences to Tender Consciences , generally promised in Your Gratious Letter and Declaration from Breda , ( the contents whereof so miraculously Bowed the Hearts of all Your English Subjects , notwithstanding their former disloyal Engagements and Oppositions against Your Vndoubted Hereditary Right , to reign over them as their KING , that they all as one man , immediately dispatched the self-same Message to Your then Exiled Majesty , as the men of b Judah did to their King David , ( when thrust out of his Kingdom by Absoloms Vsurpation ) Return thou and all thy Servants , ) And since Your Majesties most glorious Return from thence , and Happy Restauration , thus really performed , and particularly granted , expressed in Your c Royal Declaration to all Your Loving Subjects of Your Realm of England , and Dominion of Wales , concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs . d Provided , That none shall be denyed the Sacrament of the Lords Supper , though they do not use the Gesture of Kneeling in the Act of Receiving . No man shall be compelled to bow at the Name of IESUS , or suffer in any kind for not doing it . Which Indulgent Declaration so ravished the Hearts of all Your Loving Subjects , that Your whole House of Commons ( their Representatives ) then assembled in Parliament , immediately after its Publication , e repaired in a Body to Whitehall , and there by their Speakers Oration in the Banqueting-House , expressed their extraordinary great Ioy , and presented their generall Thanks to Your Ma●esty , for this Your most gratious Declaration , and dispensation with their Consciences in these and other matters , not being of the substance or essence of Religion ; ●hich gave abundant satisfaction to all peaceable , sober-minded men , and such as are truly Religious ; In which return of their Thanks they were all unanimous , Nemine Contradicente , then Ordering a Bill to be drawn in pursuance of Your Majesties Directions therein . Yet notwithstanding the premises , such was the Presumption of an Over-Ceremonious Doctor , ( though Chaplain to Your Majesty ) as f soon after publikely to deny the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to my self , and other Members of the Commons House ( when ordered to receive it all together in St. Margarets Church , at the beginning of this Parliament ) because we kneeled not down to receive it from his hand , ●raving the benefit of Your Majesties Declaration , and Liberty to receive it sitting , being the gesture which f Christ himself and his Apostles used at its first institution and celebration ; who ( as g St. Chrysostome , h Theophylact , with other Antients , and some i modern Divines affirm ) after he had eaten the Passeover standing , as they conjecture ( though the Evangelists and most k others accord they did eat it sitting ) Sate down on purpose with his Disciples to celebrate and receive the Lords Supper sitting ; to l signifie thereby , that they were then come to their Journeys end , the perfection of Religion and Sacraments . This publick contempt of Your Majesties Declaration , seconded with the sedulous Endeavours of others , totally to deprive Your loyal , peaceable consciencious Subjects , constantly resorting to Common Prayer , the Lords Supper , and all Gods publick Ordinances without separation , of all the Indulgence● therein expresly granted and really intended to them by Your Majesty , to their great Disconsolation , in Derogation of Your Royal Prerogative as Supreme m Head on Earth of the Church of England , as well in and over all Causes as Persons . Ecclesiastical , who have no Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction , but what is derived to them by , from , and under Your Majesty , nor any power● to controll Your Majesties Dispensations , or Christian compassions to tender Consciences , have engaged me , ( out of Duty to Your Majesty , sincere desires to prevent all future Scismes in matters merely Indifferent and Ceremonial , and to wipe off those unjust aspersions usually cast upon them , for not bowing at or to the Name of Jesus , or not kneeling at the Lords Supper , as Persons obstinately Scismatical , void of all Grounds of Scripture , Reason , Conscience , Antiquity , inducing them to scruple or omit these Ceremonies ; ) to publish this Apology in their behalf , consisting of Three Serious and Sober Inquiries ; Wherein all the Arguments , Reasons , Authorities for Bowing at or to the Name of Jesus , either as a pretended Duty , or necessary Ceremony , grounded on Philippians 2.9 , 10 , 11. are largely examined , refuted , retorted , and those for Sitting or Kneeling in the Act of Receiving the Lords Supper , summarily discussed , with such Christian Ingenuity , and Moderation , as ( I humbly conceive ) will give ample satisfaction to Your Majesty , and the most zealous Champions for these Ceremonies , that their Non-conformity to their use , proceeds not from any Scismatical humor , singularity , or discontent , ( as is usually suggested ) but from such solid grounds of Scripture , Reason , and such Authorities , Antiquities , as have fully convinced their Judgements , satisfied or scrupled their tender Consciences , that they cannot in faith or conscience ▪ submit to practise them , at least upon such unsatisfactory Pretences of Scripture , Reason , Antiquity , or apparent Mistakes , as have hitherto been alleadged for their use , by those who have most enforced them . And that as there were just Grounds in point of Royal Justice , Piety , Clemen●y , Christian compassion , State Policy , and Prudence for Your Sacred Majesty , at first to grant th●se Indulgences to tender Consciences , to prevent all future Scismes , preserve Your Kingdoms , Churches publick Peace , and Christian Amity , Unity , Communion among Your Protestant Subjects ; So there are the like reasons for Your Majesty to continue , if not perpetuate them , without enforcing them against their Consciences , so far as either totally to debarre them the Lords Supper , or drive them from the publick Ordinances , or inevitably to subject them to Ecclesiastical censures , to their great vexation . For which end , I shall most humbly crave leave to present these ensuing Particulars to Your Majesties Royal , and others Christian consideration . 1. That o God only wise , ( the sole p Author , Prescriber , Owner of his own Divine worship and Sacraments ) hath left all Cor●oral gestures relating thereunto , free , arbitrary , and indifferent to all Christians , N●tions , Churches , Ages , not particularly or precisely commanding in the Old or New Testament , either the gestures of Kneeling , Sitting , Standing , Bowing , or Prostration in Publick or Private Prayer , Thanksgiving , Fasts , hearing or reading his Word , receiving Sacraments , or any other par● of Divine worship , though he hath absolutely commanded th●se Duties themselves . The reason is apparent , because these Gestures are in themselves things merely indifferent , and one Gesture may be more decent , expedient to ●tir up affection , devotion , reverence , attention , upon several em●rgent occasions , in relation to the same , or different persons , duties , times , than another ; and many men by reason of age , sickness , infirmities , temper of body , custome of Countries , Nations , ( which q vary from each other ) inconveniency of Place , crowds of People , or the like , may be disabled to use one Gesture with so much devotion or conveniency as they can use another : For which Reasons in numerou● Congregations no absolute Uniformity in these Gestures can possibly be expected , nor rationally injoyned by any humane Powers , since God himself the Supreme Legislator upon these grounds , hath left them free and arbitrary to his People , as r all Divines acknowledge ; whence the Church , Saints , Apostles , Children of God in all Ages , both under the Law and Gospel , ( as Scripture Presidents demonstrate ) have by Gods approbatio● sometimes prayed and worshipped God s standing● otherwhiles (t) sitting , other times (u) bowing , and falling down prostrate on their faces ; sometimes (x) lying on their beds , couches , and othertimes (y) kneeling on their knees ; God alwayes (z) accepting their Prayers , worship in every of these Postures when their Hearts and Spirits ( which he principally (a) regards , requires , in his worship ) were upright , sincere , and their Duties performed with that Faith , Fervency , Holyness , and chearfull Obedience , which he commands . 2 ly . That the Primitive Saints , Christians , Church , and all other Churches since ●ave freely used , tollerated varieties of Gestures , Postures , Ceremonies in all parts of Divine worship , and have free liberty to alter , change or abolish Ceremonies at their pleasure ; as all Ecclesiastical Histories ( especially Centuriae Magdeburgenses ▪ 2 , to 14. cap. 6. De Ritibus & Ceremoniis ) at large demonstrate ; and the C●urch of England resolves in her 20. A●ticle of Religion , and the Preface to the Books of Common Prayer , why some Ceremonies are abolished . 3 ly . That the principle end of Gods instituting Kings , Magistrates , and Chief Authority , Trust by him reposed in them , is , To b● Gods subordinate b Ministers to protect , encourage , commend all their Subjects who do well , obeying the Lawes and will of God according to his Word ; and to punish none but evil Doers , and Transgressors of his Lawes in relation to his Worship : not to punish their Christian Subjects who obey Gods Laws , resort constantly to his publick Ordinances , Worship , Sacraments , only ●or not using such and such Gestures , Ceremonies , V●stures , which himself hath left free and indifferent to all Christians ; or to fine , imprison , excommunicate , or debar them totally from the Lords Supper , only for using the self-same Gestures , Ceremonies , as Christ himself , his Apostles , and the Primitive Christians used ; for which there is no President in Scripture , nor in the * Laws of any antient Christian Emperors to the best of my remembrance . 4 ly . That though Christian Kings and Church-Governours have Authority to c prescribe and enjoyn things absolutely necessary and expedient , warranted by the Word , in and about Gods publick worship , and to d advise and perswade the use of Things decent , expedient , though not simply necessary : Yet it is the Opinion of many judicious Divines , that they cannot impose or enforce the use of Ceremonies , Gestures merely expedient o●●●●●ent , not absolut●ly necessary , on the Consciences of their Christian Subjects , under Civil or Eccles●astical penalties : at l●astwise that it is not expedient or convenient for them to exercise such a Power , because Christ himself , the * King of Kings , his Apostles , & the most Religious Kings of Gods appointment , never exercised or claimed any such Iurisdiction , but left all Christians free , actually to use or not use them at their pleasure ; as in the cases of e Marriage , Virginity , and single life ; of f eating or abstaining from certain Meats , observing certain times and dayes to God ; of g mens praying and prophesying in the Church with their heads covered , wearing long Effeminate hair , and womens sitting in the Congregation with their heads unvailed , and h Brayding or Frizling their hair , ( which most conceive to be absolutely prohibited , not simply advised , as well as their i speaking in the Church ) yet not now prohibited by any Ecclesiastical penall Laws or Censures of our Church , though more scandalous , lesse arbitrary and indifferent than sitting at the Sacrament , kneeling , or standing in Prayer , bowing , or any other Rites or Ceremonies , now scrupled or omitted by Tender Consciences . 5 ly . That the Unity which God himself requires in his Church , and Publick worship , amongst his People and Children , is not an Vniversal Vniformity in external gestures , Ceremonies , wherein the Scripture is totally silent , but a k Unity in the Faith and substance of his worship , a meeting together with one accord , and with one consent , in one place , to pray , praise and worship God , with one heart , mind , soul , spirit , according ●o his word , ( ●ot with one kind of vesture , gesture , or posture of their bodies ) and to keep the Unity of the Spirit in the Bond of Peace , like Christian Brethren not l forsaking or separating from Gods Publick Ordinances by Law established on the one hand , nor cas●ing brethren out of the Church m ( Diotrephes like for not conforming in gestures or ceremonie● , on the other hand . ) Hence all particular Churches , Christians , and Professors of the Gospel , dispersed throughout the world , agreeing all together in the n Unity of the Faith , are by God himself called , reputed , but One Catholick Church , & One Body , United together under One Head Jesus Christ , quickned , inlivened by one and the self-same Spirit ; although they differ in their particular Rites , Ceremonies , Gestures , Liturgies , Languages ; as the various , different Members in the Body naturall , being all united together under one Head , make up but * one intire Body : And men of various Callings , Professions , Qualities , Degrees , living under the same King , Laws , Government ▪ agreeing in aliquo tertio , make up but one Kingdom , Corporation , or Body Politique , though they diff●r fr●m each other in their particular Callings , Habits , Ages , Degrees , Estates , Opinion● , ‖ Languages , Gestures , and other personal circumstances . If we look into all our great Cathedral or Parish Churches , we shall see thousands or hundreds of people joyntly resorting to Gods publike Ordinances , Worship , Sacraments celebrated in th●m , yet varying ●rom each other in their Dignities , Sexes , Ages , Callings , Conditions , Estates , Vestments , Attir●s , Fashions , Features , yea private Opinions , Voyce● , Corporal g●stures ; some of them sitting in seats , others in galleries , others on forms ; others standing in allies ; here ‖ men and women ▪ there old men , young men , children sitting or standing promis●uously together , otherwhere men and women , fitting or standing apart from each other ; some praying standing , whiles others kneel ; others praying , reading ▪ singing with an audible voice , ( though differing in tones or tunes from each other like Pipes in an Organ , or strings in a Lute ) yet all making sweet o melody and harmony in Gods ears , and but one Congregation ; as va●ie●y of Trees , herbs , flowers of different kinds , colours , shapes , virtues in one garden , bed , make up but one pleasant , fruit●ull Garden , to which the p Church is compared . Why then should any conscientious godly Ministers or Christians who approve & frequent Gods publik ▪ Ordinances , Sacraments in our Church , be sequestred from them , or any wayes molested as Non-conformists or Schismaticks , only not for bowing , kneeling or standing up when others do ? or for sitting at the Sacrament as Christ and his Apostles did , whiles others receive it kneeling ? only against t●e bare advice or direction , not peremptory Injunction of the Rubricks , or other Ecclesiastical Canon● . 6 ly . That the principal q Occasion of all antient , modern Schisms in , and Separations from our own and other Churches , yea , of most unchristian divisions , contentions in them , and of intestine Wars , commotions between Christians ; hath been the over-rigid enforcing of meer human Rites , Ceremonies , gestures , Inventions in Gods Worship , by ambitious usurping Popes , Prelates , and Clergy-men , against the rules of Christian Liberty , Charity , and our Saviours Commission to his Apostles . r To teach all Nations , to observe all things whatsoever he hath commanded them , not their own s Doctrines , Traditions , or Humane Inventions . And this ( if truly examined ) was the original of all our late intestine Schisms , Wars , Tumults , which Christian Moderation , Liberty , and Indulgence in these particulars , would easily have prevented , and will be the best antidote against the like future Maladies , as Your Majesty intimates in Your Royal Declarations and Speeches . 7 ly . That God himself having t laid a necessity and peremptory Precept upon all conscientiou● Ministers , to preach the Gospel , and Administer the Sacraments to their Flocks , and also commanded the people to u hear his Word , receive his Sacraments , and frequent his publick Ordinances , under pain of Everlasting woe and damnation ; in the performance of these Religious duties , they ought in x Conscience to obey God , who enjoynes them , rather than men , who prohibit them . Therefore no Christian Magistrates , or Church Governors can in Conscience or Prudence ( unlesse they will y ●ight even against God , in Gamal●els resolution ) prohibit or debarre them from performing th●ir duties , or resorting to Gods Ordinances or Sacraments , only for Non-conformity to such Gestures or Ce●emonies which God hath left free and indifferens to them , and are no essential parts of , or nec●ssary appurtenances to his Worship . 8 ly . That it is the Doctrine of Optatus Melivitanus , St. Augustine , and other Fathers of old against the Donatists , and of the z Church of England , and her Bishops , Divines at this day against Anabaptist , and Separatists , ( who separate from our Churches , because there are many Goates , Tares , and wicked men , as well as Sheep , Wheat , Saints admitted into , and unto the Sacraments , Ordinances administred in them ; ) That it is the a Will of God and Christ , that Sheep and Goats , Tares , Chaff and Wheat , Good and Bad , should live , grow , and continue together in the visible Church , till Christ himself shall separate them at the day of Judgement ; and that no visible Church on Earth ever did or shall consist only or mostly of real Saints and Christians truly regenerate . If then Goats , Tares , and unregenerate men , externally prof●ssing the Gospel of Christ , are there freely permitted to live , grow within the Church , by our Bishops , Magistrates , yea freely admitted to all Gods Ordinances , notwithstanding their unregeneracy and impenitence , without molestation or seclusion , though b no constituting Members of the true Church of Christ , consisting only of the Elect : Then much more ought those Conscientious Godly Ministers , and Christians , truly fearing God , and studying c to keep a good Conscience in all things void of offence both towards God and men , living in all good Conscience , and d walking as becomes the Gospel of Iesus Christ , who are real constituting Members of Christs Church , not to be deprived of their Ministry , Gods Publick Ordinances , Sacraments , or cast out of the Church 〈◊〉 no Members of it , for Non-conformity to such Gestures or Ceremonies , 〈◊〉 God himself hath not prescribed , and are not essential or necessary in his publick worship ; but to live quietl● without distur●anc● ; left the S●tyrists censure against suc● proceedings , e Dat veniam Corvis , vexat censura Columbas . and our Sa●iours sentence be justly charged upon unmercifull Church-Governours , f Wo unto you Scribes and P●arisees , Hypocrites , for ye tythe mint , and anis and cummin , but have omitted the weightier matters of the Law , Iudgement , Mercy , and Faith. Ye blinde Guides which straine at a Gnat , and swallow a Camell . These 8. Considerations , together with that Divine O●acle of the wisest of Kings , Prov. 20.28 . Mercy and Truth preserve the King , and his Throne is upholden by Mercy ( engraven no doubt in Your Majesties Royal Heart with indelible Characters ) super added to the Three Serious & Sober Inqui●ies here humbly prostrated at Your Majesties feet , and submitted to Your most Gracious perusal , and Judicious Royal censure , will ( in my weak apprehension ) abundantly satisfie all the Reverend Bishops & Clergy of our Church , with all Your sober-minded Subjects , studious of Your Majesties Honour , or our Churches tranquility , that there are as just Ground for Your Majesty to continue and perpetuate Your premised Indulgences to tender Consciences , as at first to grant them ; That so all Your Loyal and Loving Subjects , though of different Perswasions , may have still cause to proclaim to all the world with publick Ioy and Triumph , ( after so many late tragical Revolutions of publick Governours and Governments in order to their just desired Civil and Christian Liberties ) this assertion of the Poet , g Fallitur Egregio quisquis Sub Principe credit Servitium ; Nunquam Libertas gratior extat Quam sub Rege pio . Now the God and h Father of all Mercy , whose i tender Mercies are over all his works , and hath commanded all his Children ( especially Christian Kings who sit on his Royal Throne ) to be k mercifull as he their Heavenly Father is mercifull ; abundantly showre down all Temporal and Spiritual Mercies , Blessings ▪ Graces on Your Majesties Royal Person , Consort , Family Posterity , Government , Kingdoms ; and after a long most Glorious and Gracious Reign on Earth , translate You in peace , triumph , to his l Heavenly Kingdom , and there Crown You with an Eternal m Crown and weight of Glory ; Which is , and shall be the daily Prayer of Your Majesties most Loya● Subject and humble Servant William Prynne . Lincolnes-Inne , May 1. 1662. To the Unprejudiced Readers . SElf-Vindication , against ignorant a Calumniators ; Self-preservatien , against potent b Prosecutors ; seasonable Satisfaction , to p●ivate Friends , and open Enemies ; publick Instruction , to all sorts of Persons ; Christian Compassion , to tender Consciences , and Evangelical Moderation in the free use of corporal gestures , which God the Father , and Christ his only Sonne have left c indif●erent to all Christians in their own divine worship , ( presc●ibed by , reserved to themselves alone ) were the orginal grounds of compiling these Three s●rious and sober Inquiries in the years 1630 , 1631. and his Majesties most gracious Indulgences to tender Consciences , promised in his Royal Declarations from Breda , before ; and punctually performed in his Declaration to All his loving Subjects of his Kingdom of ENGLAND and Dominion of WALES , concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs , after His miraculou● and most Gloriou● Restauration to his Royal Throne ( especially in relation to Bowing at the Name of IESVS , * and KNEELING in the Act of Receiving the Lords Supper , which some have publickly violated , by denying the Lords Supper to those who kneeled not , though Members of the Commons House ) engaged me in point of Conscience , Duty , Honour , Iustice ( in regard of my interest and transactions in that happy un-opposed Deliverance of our King and Kingdoms from worse than Aegyptian bondag● ) the only cause of their present Publication . The over-rigid enforcing and sad vexations prosecution of d sundry consciencious godly Ministers and People in our Episcopal Visitations , Consistories , High Commissions , and Suspentions of them from their Ministry , and Lords Supper heretofore , for not conforming to these and other Ceremonies , Innovations , out of real scruples of Conscience , grounded ( as they humbly apprehended ) upon Scripture , reason , the examples of Christ himself , his Apostles , and the Primitive Churche● , as they were the true original occasions of our late unhappy Schismes , Troubl●s , Confusions , Tragedies , Wars and Desolations , out of which we are so lately rescued , ( like ` brands out of the fire ) by the omnipotent miraculous hand of f God alone ; So the over-violent re-infor●ing of them on mens Consciences by severe Laws and new Injunctions against his Majesties most indulgent Declarations , in the judgement of many moderate , sober Well-wishers to our Churches , Kingdoms Peace , Vnity , Prosperity , may prove very dangerous , especially in this juncture of tim● , when the universal decay of all sorts of Trade , the dearth of Corn , multiplicity , variety of publick Taxes , have much afflicted the whole Body of the Nation ; and the discontents of several Sects , Interests , have administred j●st fears of new Distempers at home , and Emnityes , if not Enemies from abroad . Upon which consideration , I apprehended the best service I could now perform to his Majesty , our Church , and State , was , to present this Moderate , Seasonabl● Apology to the view of all our Civil and Ecclesiastical Governours , conteining the true Reasons , Grounds of Non-conformity to these two Ceremonies , by such sober Ministers and Members of our Churc● , who not out of Scisme , humour , discontent , but a sincere desire , with the Apostle St. Paul , to g have and exercise a Conscience alwayes void of offence towards God and towards men h to hold the my●●●ry of Faith in , and i to serve God with a pure conscienc● : either cannot or dare not in point of judgement or conscience submit unto them . Which if duly pondered by the Greatest Zealots●or ●or them , will I trust ( through Gods blessing ) so far prevail upon their Spirits as to see just reason , if not totally to Disuse th●m in their own practise , yet at least not to enforce them so far upon their native Christian Brethren as to drive them from , instead of continuing them in our Churches b●some . I shall therefore most humbly and heartily beseech all Civil Christian Magistrates , ( whose Power is principally confined by God , l to be terrors to evil Workers , and Mi●isters of God , to punish evil doers , which disobey his Laws ; not to restrain or punish their Subjects ●or following Christs or his Apostles examples in the use of mere indifferent Gestures in Gods worship , and to enjoyn only things necessary as well as decent , m not merely indifferent in themselves , left fr●e and arbitrary by God and Jesus Christ himself to all his People ) together with all the Reverend Bishops and Clergie of our Church , seriously to ponder , and pursue this sacred , solid , true Christian advice of the antient , famous Bishop and Martyr St. Cyprian , in his most excellent Epistle to Caecilius , in relation to the manner of celebrating the Lords Supper , and imitating Christs own example therein , without any Humane inventions or new Ceremonies super-added thereunto , ( which the Bishops and Church of Rome , with other Churches , Prelates have over-much forgotten , transgressed , to the prejudice of Christianity ) worthy to be perpetually ingraven in their very Souls . In Sacrificio quod Christus obtulit , non nisi Christus sequendus est : Et quod Christus solus debeat audiri , Pater etiam de coelo testatur , dicens , o Hic est Filius meus dilectissimus in quo benè sensi , ipsum audite : Quare , si solus Christus audiendus es● , non debemus attendere quid alius ante nos faciendum putaverit , sed quid , qui ante omnes est Christus prior fecerit . Neque enim Hominis ( nor yet Ecclesiae ) consuetudinem sequi oportet , sed Dei veritatem , &c. as he there excellently proves at large ; concluding , Quod f● p non minima de mandatis dominicis licet solvere , quanto magis tam magna , tam ad ipsum Dominicae passionis & nostrae redemptionis Sacramentum pertinentia , f●s non est infringere , ●ut in aliud quam quod divini●us institutum sit , Humana traditione mutare . Nam ●i Iesus Christus Dominus obt●li● , & hoc fieri in sui comm●morationem p●aecepit : U●ique ille Sacerdos vice Christi vere f●ngitur , qui Id quod Christus ●●cit imitatur ; & Sacrificium unum & plenum tunc offert in Ecclesia Deo Pat●i , ●i ●ic incipiat offerre , secundum quod ipsum Christum videat obtulisse . Caeterum omnis Re●igionis et veritatis Disciplina sub●ertifur nisi id quod spirituali●er praeceptum fideliter reservetur . Religioni igitur nost●ae congruit & timori , & ipsi loco atque officio Sacerdotii nostri , in Dominico calice miscendo & offerendo custodire traditionis Dominicae veritatem , et quod prius apud quosdam videtur er●atum , Domino monente , corrigere , ut cum in claritate ●ua & majestate coele●ti venire caeperit , inveniat nos tenere quod monnit , observare quod docuit , facere quod fecit . The non-observance whereof hath transformed the Lords Supper it self , instituted by Christ as ● q badge and prime instrument of Christian Peace , Vnity , Communion , Amity amongst all Professors of Christianity , as St. r Augustine , Gulielmu● Stuckius & other● prove at large , t from whence it was called PEACE it s●lf in the Primitive Church , and u sent by Members of one distinct Church to an●ther as a token of Peace , and Christian communion ) is now become the greatest Subject of Seism , Contention , Discord , and Persecution too : so as we may well take up that lamentation of v Stuckius , as well in relation to our own , as most Churches of Ch●istendom , Quam ver● dolendum e●● perditis hisce nostris temporibus atque moribu● sacrosa●ctum & salutare illud convivium , mutuae illiu● nostr● cum Christo pariter & nobiscum invicem Communionis Sacramentum tot & tantarum rixarum , contentionum , inimicitiarumque acerbussimarum inter Christianos , seminarium extitisse : by reason of human Inventions , Traditions , Ceremonies , Innovations superadded thereunto , by the pretended power and custome of the Church ; which in matters of Divine Worship and this Sacrament , ought with St. Paul to deliver and prescribe nothing to the People x but what they received from the Lord ; and to say with him , y Be ye followers of me as I also am of Christ ; and walk in love , as Christ also hath loved us , The best and only means to silence all Controversies , prevent all Scismes , and establish Unity and Unanimity in our Church ; which God gran● we may all henceforth cordially z pursue . Amen . Tertulliani Apolog●ticus adversu● G●●tes . c. 24. Videte ne & hoc ad Irreligiositatis Elogium concurr●t , ●●imere Libertatem Religionis , & interdicere optionem Divinitatis , ut non lice●t mihi colere quem velim . N●m● se ab invito coli vellet , ne homo quidem . The first serious and sober Inquiry concerning Bowing at the name of IESUS . SECTION 1. Whether bowing at every Pronunciation of the name Jesus , be a Duty commanded , or Ceremony warranted by Philip. 2. v. 9 , 10 , 11 ? THe bowing of the Knee , head , and capping at every recital of the name of Iesus , is grounded by all its patriots on the text aforesaid , (a) Wherefore , God also hath highly exalted him , and given him a name which is above every name ; that at the name of Iesus every knee should bow of things in heaven , and things in earth , and things under the earth : And that every tongue should confess ; that Iesus Christ is Lord , to ( or in ) the * glory of God the Father . But this Text , if rightly read and understood gives no colour at all to this p●etended Duty or Ceremony . To make this apparent , I shall fi●st clear the Text from a gross mistranslation of it , purposely made to countenance this Ceremony . First therefore , take notice , that the word ( At ) is ●oisted into the Text instead of ( In , ) the true translation and reading thereof being , ●hat In , not At , the name of I●sus every Knee should bow , &c. the Greek Original Text in all Copies and Greek Fathers is , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , and all Latine , or Greek Fathers translated into Latine , with all Latine Translations whatsoever ( except Beza and Castalio ) all Latine Commentators , Expositors , whether Papists or Protestants ( those only who follow Beza and Castalio their Translations excepted , being but three or four ) render it , In nomine Iesu , where ever they recite this Text , not Ad , or Apud Nomen . True it is , that Beza and Castalio , and they onely render it Ad nomen , that To ( not At ) the name of Iesus every Knee should bow ; But then they also interpret this Name to be nothing else , but Christs Soveraign Power and Dominion , not his Name Iesus . All others read it , In Nomine Iesu : Neither is there any one Author , Expositor , or Translator extant , besides these and their few followers , that ●ead it Ad Nome● , as all Schollers must acknowledge . The antient Manuscript English translations , of which I have seen divers Copies , sorts ; the several old printed English translations of Mr. William Tindall , Mr. Miles Coverdale . Thomas Matthew ; The Bishops Bible set forth at first by Matthew Parker , Archbishop of Canterbury : since revised and published by the Bishops , Anno 1595. The Epistles and Gospels in Latine and English printed at Paris 1558 Erasmus his antient English Paraphrase commanded to be had in all Churches by b Queen Elizabeths Injunctions , and the Canons of 1571. Dr. Fulk , and Mr. Cartwright , in their answers to the Rhemish Testament , All of these render this Text In , not At the Name Iesus , &c. So do all our antient English Writers , who recite it , as Bishop Latimer , Bishop Hooper , Bishop Ridley , Bishop Alle● , Bishop Tonstall , Tho : Beacon , Tho : Palfryman , Iohn Veron , Mr. Fox , Mr. Nowell , Lancelot Ridley , with a world of others ; who read it , In the Name , &c. and the Common-prayer-books , both of King Edw. 6. Queen Elizabeth , King Iames , and King Charles , ratified by several Acts of Parliament , in the Epistle on the Sunday next before Easter , untill the year 1629. all read it , In the Name of Iesus ; which Mr. Iohn Cozens ( a great Patriot of this Ceremonious bowing ) well considering , and knowing it gave a fatal blow to this bowing at the Name of Iesus , I know not by what Authority , caused the Common-prayer-books to be corrected , ( in truth , corrupted , perverted ) in this particular , changeing In , into At the name ; by means whereof , most , if not all our Common-prayer-books , printed ●ince the year 1629. render it , At the Name , whereas all before that year read it most truly , In the Name , according to the Originall . I must confess that the English Geneva Bible , Anno 1570. ( which * King Iames affirmed to be the worst Translation of all others , and was never read publickly in our Churches , ) renders it , At the Name ; which grew from the mis-englishing of Mr. Beza his Ad Nomen , which , in truth signifies To , ( not At ) the Name , if duly Englished . Neither can our Bowers at the Name Iesus take much advantage hence , if Mr. Beza be rightly translated , because they all confess , d that they do not bow to the Name but Person of Jesus , only at the recital of this Name . True it is , the last English translation ( made by e King Iames special appointment ) reads it At the Name , contrary to the Book of Common-Prayer , and all former English translations approved by our Church . How this came to pass , I shall relate from credible * information . When this new Translation of the Bible was fully finished by the Translatours , and presented to King Iames , he appointed Bishop Andrews to have the last perusal of it , who thereupon dealt with it , as Mr. Cozens since did with the Common-prayer-book , and turned the Translatours In , into At , without their privity or approbation ; as making best for the Ceremony of Bowing at the name of Iesus , which he had a little before ( and since too ) p●eached for in a f Court Sermon ; by which means our last Translation now renders this Text , At the name , whereas the Translatours ( according to the former English Editions ) had truely rendred it In the name . Now , that this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , ought to be translated , In , not Ad nomen , at , or to the name , is infallible . First , because it is so Englished in all g other texts of Scripture whatsoever , this phrase AT the name , being used in no place else but this throughout the Bible , nor yet in any English Author extant that I have seen or found , but In the name , onely ; Now why it should here alone be translated At ( not In ) the name , and in no other place , no reason can be given , unlesse it be purposely to support this Ceremony of bowing at the Name Iesus , which else would fall to ground , which makes this Translation here the more suspitious . Secondly , At the name , is neither good English , nor good Sense ; For , though we use In or At promiscuou●ly , when they relate either to a time or place , a● In a time , or At a time ; In such an hour or day ; A● such a day or hour ; In such a place , street , town , house ; At such a place , street , town or house ; yet we never use them so when In relates to God's , Christ's , King's , or any man's Name or Authority , there being no such English expression , as At the name , extant in any Author , W●●t , Warrant , or used in any Scripture-text , but this onely . T●at this Expression is neither good English nor Sense , these instances will manifest ; where the same Greek phrase and words , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , are used , Acts 3.6 Peter spake thus to the Creeple , In the name of Iesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk : should this Text be rendered , At the name of Iesus rise up and walk , it would marr both the English and Sense too . Acts 9 27 , 29. I● is recorded of St. Paul , that he spake boldly I● the name of the Lord Iesus ; should we read it , He spake boldly ▪ ●t the name of the Lord Iesus , it would be plain non-sense . Acts 16.12 . Paul spake thus to the Spirit in the Damsel possessed with the Spirit of Divination , I command thee In the name of Iesus Christ to come out of h●r ; turn this Text into At the Nam● of Iesus I command thee to come out o● her , & you deprave it quite . So 1 Cor 5.4 , 5. In the name of our Lord Iesus Christ , when ye are gathered together , and my Spirit , with the power of our Lord I●sus Christ to deliver such an one unto Sathan ; ●ender this , At the name of our Lord Iesus Christ , &c. and you vitiate both the English and meaning , Ephes. 5.20 . Giving thanks alwayes for all things unto God and the Father In the name of the Lord Iesus Christ ; translate this Giving thanks , &c. At the name of the Lord Iesus Christ , and you ma● the Sense and Text , 2 Thes. 3.6 . We command you Brethren ( saith the Apostle ) In the name of our Lord Iesus Christ , that ye withdraw your selves from every broth●r that walketh disorderly ; turn this In into At the Name , and all the sense is spoyled . So Math. 21.9 . The multitude that went before our Saviour into Ierusalem , cryed , Bl●ssed is he that com●th in the name of the Lord ; transform this into , Blessed is he that cometh At the name of the Lord , and you deform it quite , Iohn 14.13 , 14. Whatsoever ye shall ask In my name , I will do it ; read this , Whatsoever ye shall ask At my name , you spoyle all the Text. Acts 10.48 . And he commanded them to be baptized In the name of the Lord ; render this He commanded them to be baptized At the name of the Lord , and it is pure Non-sense . In all these Texts the Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , the sam● verbatim with that of Phil. 2. Mat. 28.19 . Christ saith to his Disciples , Go ye therefore and teach all Nations , baptizing them in the ●ame of the Father , of the Son , and of the Holy Ghost ; translate this Baptizing them At the name of the Father , of the Son , and of the Holy Ghost , you spoyle both the English , sense , and Baptism too . There is nothing more common in Scripture than these phrases , used in hundreds of places , In the name of the Lord , In my name , and the like ; * Translate any of all these into At the name , and you pervert them quite . Turn but , I believe in God , to I believe at God ; Our Father which art in heaven , to Our Father which art at heaven ; Or the ordinary phrase of our Warrants , and of his Majesties Officers , These are to require , or , I charge and require you in the Kings , or , in his Majesties Name , into I charge and require you at the Kings , or , at his Majesties name ; Or our most common speech , Go to such a man in my name , to Go to him at my name , and you quite corrupt both the ●nglish and sence in each o● them : So that the Translators of this text of Philip. 2.10.11 . That In the name of Iesus ( that is , In the vertu● of the supreme Soveraign Power , Lordship , Godhead , Authority of Jesus Christ at the general day of Judgement , when all things , that is , All men , all Angels , Spirits , good and bad , in heaven , earth , hell , shall stand before hi● Person and tribunal , as their supreme Lord and Judge , as Isay 45.23 . Rom. 14.9 , 10 , 11. Rev. 5.12 , 13 , 14 expound it ) by changing it into Iesus● ( that is , at the hearing or mentioning o● the name Iesus in time of Divine service , as the Patriots of this Ceremony glos●e it , ) have marred both the English , and quite perverted the meaning of this sacred Text , only to maintain this Ceremony . It is evident then by all these concurrent parallel authorities , that the true translation of this Text is this , That In , ( not At ) the name of Iesus every knee should bow ( or be bowed , in the passive tense ; ) which will almost quite subvert the bowing at the name ●esus . ●or● the words being thus truly rendered , can never be prope●ly expounded or strained to this sense . That in the name Iesus , ( to wit , at or in every naming of the word Jesus , or when ever the name Jesus is mentioned in the Church in time of Divine service of Sermons ) every knee , or Head then present should bow ; there being no One pa●allel text in Scripture , wherein the name of God or Iesus , is or can properly be interpreted at the mentioning , or at or in the naming of God or Iesus ; But they must necessarily be expounded in this sence , In the name of God , or Iesus , that is , In the supreme Power , Majesty , Soveraignty , Authority of God , or the Lord Iesus : In the name , being oftentimes used for , In the Soveraign Power and Authority of God , of Iesus , or Christ onely ; not for the bare names God , Iesus , or Christ , as Mat. 28 19. Acts 3.6 . & 16 , 18. 1 Cor. 5.4 , 5. 2 Thess. 3.16 . Mat. 7.22 . Mar. 9.38 . ●uc . 10.17 . Mar. 16.17 , 18. See also 1 Sam. 17 45. Psal. 8.1 . Psal. 10.1 , 5. Psal. 33.21 . Psal. 44.5 . Psal. 48 10. Psal. 54.1 . Psal. 89.24 . Psal. 118.10 , 11 , 12. Psal. 124.8 . Prov. 18.10 . Esay 50.10 . & 64. ● . all to the same purpose . Thus all Justices , Judges , Officers in their Warrants use the word Name , when they w●ite , These are to will and require you in the King● Name , ( that is , In or by virtue of his royal authority , not of any Christen name or Surname of his ) to do thus and thu● . The true translation of this text being thus cleared , ( which I hope to see accordingly amended in all our New printed Bibles and Common-Prayer Books , by rechanging At , into In the Name , by publike authority and command from the King or Parliament in case the Bishops neglect it ) and the meaning thereof in part discovered , I shall next examin the true genuine sence o● the words . For the full understanding whereof so far forth only as respects this Ceremony of bowing at the name Jesus ) these 4 ▪ things are to be inquired , 1. What is meant by the name above every name , which God gave to Christ after his exaltation into heaven , in which every knee must bow ? and what that name is ? 2ly . What is here m●ant by bo●ing of every knee ? 3ly . What , by things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth ? 4ly . When , and where this bowing of every knee shall be ? For the first : Most Expositors generally accord , that this Name above every name which God gave to Christ , is nothing else but his supreme Power and jurisdiction , or his inherent real Soveraign Lordship , as he is both God and Man , over all things and creatures whatsoever ; or , which is all one , his real title Lord , ( given him above 50 times in the New Testament in direct terms ) or Lord of all things , coupled with his actual fr●ition of his suprem● Lordship . That this , and nought else is in truth the name intended in this text , is most perspicuous , not only by the forequoted Scriptures , where name is used for Soveraignty , Power , Authority , but also by direct texts ; as Ephes. 1.19 , 20 , 21 , 22. According to the working of his mighty power which he wrought in Christ , when he raised him from the dead , and set him at his own right hand in heavenly places , farr above all princip●lity , power , and might , and dominion , and every Name that is named , not only in this world , but also in that which is to come , and hath put all things under his ●eet , and gave him to be head over All things to his Church . Here , the Apostle useth Name , for principality , power , dominion , or Lordship ; and makes the name above all name , given to Christ at his Exaltation , nothing else but his supreme Lordship over all things ; which Christ himself acknowledgeth , Mat. 28.18 where he tells his Disciples after his Resurrection , All power is given unto me in heaven and earth . St. Peter in his Sermon Acts 2.32 , to 36. after he had spoken of the Passion of Christ , concludes thus of his Resurrection and Dominion ; This Iesus hath God raised up , &c. for , David is not ascended into the heavens , but saith himself , The Lord said unto my Lord , Sit thou on my right hand , untill I make thine enemies thy footstool ; Therefore , let all the house of Israel know , that God hath made the same Iesus whom ye have crucified , both LORD and Christ. The making of Christ ( then ) after his Resurrection as God and Man , Lord over all , was the name above every name , which God , then , gave to Christ , who is Lord of all , as the same Apostle Peter affirmes in his Sermon to Cornelius , Act. 10.36 . Yea Lord over all ; Rom. 10.9.12 . and King of Kings and Lord of Lords , 1 Tim. 6.15 . Rev. 17.14 . chap. 19.16 . That observable text Rom. 14 6 , to 13. will make this most clear , He that regardeth the day regardeth it unto the Lord , and he that regardeth not the day , to the Lord he doth not regard it . He that eateth , eateth to the Lord ; for , he giveth God thanks ; and he that eateth not , to the Lord he eateth not and giveth God thanks ; for none of us liveth to himself , or dieth to himself ; for whether we live , we live unto the Lord , or wh●ther we die , we die unto the Lord Whether therefore , we live or die , we are the Lords . For , to this end Christ both died and rose and revived ( mark this well ) that he might be Lord both of Quick and Dead . But , why dost thou judge thy Brother ? or why dost thou set at nought thy Bro●her ? we must all stand before the judgement s●at of Christ ; for , it is written , as I live , saith the * Lord , every knee shall bow to me and every tongue shall confesse to God. So then every one of us shall give an account of himself to God. Here the Apostle expressely resolves , that the Name given to Christ by God his Father , after his Resurrection , was nothing else , but Lord , yea Lord both of quick and dead ; And that this bowing of every knee prophesied by Isay c. 45 , 23. and alluded unto in Phil. 2.10 , 11. is nothing else but the Appearance , Submission and Subjection of all men & Angels to him , as their supreme Lord , when they shall stand before his Tribunal , in the day of Iudgement ; not any bowing of the Knee , or stirring of the Cap unto him , when his Name Iesus is mentioned in the Church , where the greatest part of men never yet appeared , nor resorted unto in any age . If all these direct parallel Scriptures be not sufficient or satisfactory enough to prove & evidence this hi● Name Lord , or his Soveraign Dominion over all Creatures , as God equal with his Father , to be the Name above every Name , in which all Knees must bow , the text it self unanswerably resolves it . For , that Name above every Name , in which all Knees must bow , is that Name only which every tongue must confesse ; the text it self assuring us so much , and coupling the bowing of the knee , and confession of the tongue both together . But the Name which every tongue shall confesse , is this , That Iesus Christ is LORD , Phil. 2.11 . Therefore Lord must be that Name above every Name , in which every knee must bow . This is the Name by which all persons , Good and Bad , Pagans and Christians , Iews and Gentiles , all Angels and Devils shall call Christ at the last day of Judgement , the only time when this Scripture shall be actually fulfilled . Which day , as it is * often called , The day of the Lord , and Christ comming to Judgement , the comming of the Lord ; and He ( with referrence to this day ) the Lord : So himself expresly saith , that Good and Bad shall then joyntly confesse him to be , & call him Lord , witnesse Mat. 7.21 , 22. & 15.11 . Not every one that saith unto me , Lord , Lord , shall enter into the kingdom of heaven , &c. Many will say to me in that day , ( to wit , the day of Judgement ) Lord , have we not prophesied in thy Name ? &c. But most full and expresse is that of Mat. 25.35 , to 45. When the Son of man shall come in his glory , and all his Holy Angels with him , then shall he sit upon the Throne of his glory , and before him shall be gathered all Nations , and he shall seperate them one from another , as a Shepherd divideth his Sheep from the Goats . And he shall set the Sheep on his right hand , and the Goats on his lest ; Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand , Come ye blessed of my Father , &c. Then shall the righteous answer him , saying , LORD ▪ when saw we thee an hungred , and fed thee , &c. ( Here we have all the Sheep , that is , all righteous men at the day of Judgement , joyntl● calling Christ LORD , whiles they stand before his Tribunal receiving a sentence of absolution , and a Heavenly Kingdom . ) Then shall he say to them also on the left hand , Depart from me ye cursed into everlasting fire , &c. Then shall they also say unto him , LORD , when saw wee thee an hungred , &c. Here wee have all the Goats , that i● , all wicked men whosoever , at the day of Judgement , joyntly calling Christ LORD , to the glory of God the Father ; Therefore this name LORD , being unquestionably the name above every name , which every tongue shall then joyntly confess , must be the name above every name , in which every knee must bow , as these scriptures p●ove pas● all contradiction . To clear this up yet more fully by other Texts , consider that memorable place of Iude 14 , 15. And Enoch also the seventh from Adam , prophecyeth of these saying ▪ Behold the Lord cometh with ten thousand of his Saints , to execute Iudgement upon all , ( in the general day of Judgement ) and to convince all that are ungodly among them of their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed , and of all their hard speeches , which ungodly sinners have spoken against him . Then compare it with Psal. 96. & 98. which thus prophecy of Christs Kingdome , and comming to judge the world under this very Title of LORD , repeated no lesse th●n 16. times . O sing unto the LORD a new Song , sing unto the LORD all the earth : Sing unto the LORD , &c. For the LORD is great , and greatly to be feared , he is to be feared above all Gods. F●r all the Gods of the Nations are idols , but the LORD mad● the heavens ; Honour and Majesty are before him , strength and beauty are in his Sanctuary . Give unto the LORD ( O ye kinreds of the people ) give unto the LORD glory and strength ; Give unto the LORD the glory due unto his name , &c. O worship the LORD in the beauty of holinesse , fear before him all the earth . Say among the Heathen , that the LORD reigneth , he shall judge the people righteously , &c. Make a joyfull noise before the LORD the King ; Let the heavens rejoyce , &c. before the LORD , for ●e cometh to Iudge the Earth : he shall judge the world * with righteousnesse , and the people with his truth . So Psal. 7 , 8. The LORD shall judge the people , judge me O LORD according to my righteousnes● . Psal 110.1.6 . The LORD said unto my LORD , sit thou at my right hand untill I make thine enemies thy footstool , &c. The LORD at thy right hand shall strike through Kings in the day of his wrath ; he shall judge among the Heathen . Psal. 135.13 , 14. Thy name O LORD endureth for ever , thy memorial O LORD to all Generations , for the LORD will judge his people Isay 3.13.14 The LORD will stand up to Iudge the people ; the LORD will enter into judgement with the antients of his people . Peruse Ioel 3.13 . to 18. Mich. 4.2 . to 8. where Ch●ist in relation to judging all Nations and People , is frequently stiled LORD by way of prophecy , before his incarnation or resurrection , and compare th●se Scriptures with others in the New Testament after his resurrection ; as 2 Tim. 4.1 . I charge thee before God , and the LORD Iesus Christ who shall judge the quick and the dead , at his appearing and his kingdome : 2 Thess. 1.7 , 8 , 9 , 10. When the LORD Iesus shall be r●vealed from heaven with his mighty Angels in flaming fire , taking vengeance on them that know not God , and ●bey not the Gospel of our LORD Iesus Christ ; who shall be punished with everlasting destruc●ion from the presence o● the LORD , and from the glory of his power , when he shall come to be glorified in his Saints . &c. Rev. 4.8.11 . Holy , holy , holy LORD God almighty , which was , and is , and is to come . ( to wit , to Judgement ) Thou art worthy O LORD to receive glory , honour and power , for thou hast created all things , and for thy pleasure they were and are created . Rev. 19.1 , 2. Salvation , and honour and power be unto the LORD our God , for true and righteous are his judgme●ts . 1 T●ess . 4.15 , &c. We who are alive & remain unto the coming of the LORD shall not prevent them which are asl●ep ; For the LORD himself shall descend from heaven with a shout , with the voyce of the Archangel , and with the trump of God , and the dead in Christ shall rise first ; Then we which are alive and remain shall bee caught up together with them in the clouds , to meet the LORD in the air , and so shall we ever be with the LORD 2 Thess. 2.1 . Now we beseech you brethren by the coming of the LORD Iesus● C●rist , and by our ga●hering together unto him . Jam. 5.7 , 8 , 9. Be patient therefore , Brethren , unto the coming of the LORD , &c. For the coming of the LORD draweth nigh Behold the Iudge standeth before the door . Heb. 10.30 . Vengeance belongeth unto me , I will recompence it , saith the LORD ; the LORD shall judge his people . Act. 17.31 . He hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world in righteousnesse , by that man ( the LORD fore-mentioned ) whom he hath ordained , whereof he hath given assurance , in that he hath r●ised him from the dead . All these united to the preceding texts , and 1 Cor. 8 6. But to us there is but ONE LORD , Iesus Christ , by whom are all things , and we by him , will abundantly evidence that name of Christ above every name , in which every knee shall bow , and which every tongue shall confesse , in the day of Judgement at Christs second coming , to be this Name LORD , or his Divine Soveraign Power and Dominion , not his name Iesus . True it is , that some * Interpreters ( especially those Fathers who writ against the Arrians ) assert , that the name above every name in this text , is the name of GOD , interpreting , he gave him a name above every name , in this manner ; He made and manifested him by his Resurrec●ion to be God , as well as man. But thi● , though a real truth in it self , yet in the strict literal sence , as I take it , cannot be the name , because Christ was God from all Eternity ; and both God and man , from his womb , not resurrection , and his Human nature cannot be properly call●d God , nor honou●ed with that name , but as conjoyned with his Divine in one person . Now the name which this text speaks of , was a name principally given to him in respect of his Humane nature , which alone was humbled and highly exalted , not his Divine , it being uncapable of Humiliation or Exaltation ; and that not from Eternity , but from the time of his Resurrection , as the words ( wherefore God hath highly ●xalted him , & given him a name above every name &c ) import . God therefore cannot properly be this name , but rather Lord , which suits with both hi● nature● , he being supreme Lord and Judge of all , both as he is God and man , and made so especially from the time of his Resurrection and Ascention into Heaven , and his * Session at his Fathers ●wn right hand , untill his Enemies be made his Foot-stool , as the fore-cited and subsequent Scriptures evidence . Other Fathers and Expositors interpret this name to be his ‖ name of the natural begotten Son of God ; a name above all names given to Men or Angels , Heb. 1.4 , 5. Now Christ being mightily declared to be the Son of God , by hi● Resurrection from the dead , Rom. 1.4 . and this name being more excellent then any of Men or Angels ; Some probably from thence inferre , the Son of God , to be this name , he being so in regard of both natures . But this , though a truth , cannot so properly ( as some conceive ) be the name here intended , it being given to Christ from all Eternity , Iohn 1.12 compared with Heb 1.4 , 5 , 10. And likewise declaratively given to him at his Baptism , when there came a voice from Heaven , saying , This is my beloved Son , in whom I am well pleased , Mat. 3 ▪ 17. not after his Resurrection , as the name this text doth speak of , was : This name then is rather Lord , o● that Soveraign Lordship , Dominion , Kingdom , which the Son of God , in r●spect of his Human● nature , obtained by his Resurrection , and the advancing of it to sit down on the right hand of the Majestie on high , as supreme Lord and heir of all things , Heb. 1.2 , 3 , 8 , 13. Col. 1.15 , 16 , 17 , 18. Som 5 or 6 Antients only there are of many hundreds , who directly ( not secondarily , or by way of allusion only , as others do ) make the name Iesus , the name above every name in this text ; their reason is , because the words are , that In the name of Iesus every knee shall bow . But this is a sencelesse reason , for the words are not , that In the individual name Jesus every knee should bow , which in truth had been a particular designation of it to have been the name ; but , that In the name OF Iesus ( as all translate it ) every knee should bow , which words OF Iesus , are a designation only of his Person , not of this his name . Now Jesus hath many names in Scripture , as Emanuell , Son of God , Christ , Messias , Lord , Lamb of God , King of Kings , Lord of Lords , Mediator , Head of the Church , Saviour , God , and the like , every one of which is the name of Iesus , representing the person of Jesus to us , though they are not the word nor name , Iesu● ; so that these words resolve not Jesus to be the name above every name , in which every knee should bow , but rather sends us to inquire what name of Jesus it is , in which all knees must bow ? Now , that the name Jesus cannot be the name intended in this text , is undeniable , for these th●ee reasons . First , Because a this name was given to our Saviour by the Angel , before he was conceived in the womb , and was imposed on him at his Circumcision , by those who Circumcised him ; whereas the name above every name in this text of the Philippians , was given to Christ after his Passion , Resurrection , and Ascension , Phil. 2.9.10 . Secondly , Because Every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , must bow in this name intended in this text ; but this they cannot do in the name Iesus ; for Iesus is & signifieth nothing else but b a Saviour , and Christ being c no Sa●iour at all to Angels , Devils , or Damned persons , it is not possible that they should bow unto him as to their Iesus , or Saviour . Now , though he be no Jesus , nor Saviour to any such as these , yet he is their Soveraign Lord and Iudge , he being the Lord , the Iudge of all Angels , Devils , and Damned Reprobates , as well as of the Elect , to whom alone he is a Saviour , ● Jesus , and they d all shall both call him their Lord , and submit unto him and his final judgement , as their Lord at the last day . Seeing therfore every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , cannot bow to Christ as their Jesus , because he is not a Jesus , or Saviour to them all , but only as to their Lord , to whom they must , shall , and will all individually and joyntly submit , he being equally a Lord to all ; and since every tongue shall confess , not that Christ is their Iesus , but that Iesus Christ is their Lord to the glory of God the Father ; the name Iesus cannot , the name Lord only must be the name above every name , here meant , in which every knee shall bow . Thirdly , Because the name , in which every knee must bow , must be and is a name above every name , as the text witnesseth : But this name Jesus is not a name above every name , it being the a name of his humiliation , im●osed on his humane Person only , at his Circumcision , not at his Exaltation after his Passion ; a name which gives him Dominion over his redeemed people only , not over Angels , Devils or damned persons , to whom he is not a Saviour ; a name rather of love , grace , mercy , then of Soveraign Dominion and Power ; Therefore it cannot be the name above every name to which all knees must and shall bow , mentioned in this text , but his name Lord alone , coupled with his Soveraign , Divine power and Dominion over All Angels , Devils , Men and Creatures whatsoever . From all which I argue thus . If the name above every name , in which every knee must bow , be not the name Jesus , but Lord , and the supreme Lordship , power and Dominion of Christ over all : then there is no ground nor colour in this text for any bowing , cringing , or cappi●g at the naming of Jesus , when ever recited in the Church or elsewhere . But , the name above every name , in which every knee must bow , mentioned in this text , is not the name Jesus , but Lord , and the supreme Lordship , Power and Dominion of Christ over all ; as I have undenyably manife●●ed , it being that name which every tongue shall confesse , and call Christ by in the great Judgement day . Therfore , there is no ground nor colour in this text , for any bowing , cringing or capping at the naming of Jesus , when ever recited in the Church or elsewhere . Having thus found out the Name in the text , I come now to examine , What is meant by the bowing of every knee in this Scripture ? Thi● phrase of bowing the knee , hath 4. significations in sacred Writ . First , it is used for a adoration , when it is referred either to God , Images or Idols . Secondly , for b Veneration or civil reverence , when it is attributed to men , as to Kings , Magistrates , Masters , Parents and others , whom we usually reverence with bowing the knee . Thirdly , For * Prayer it self , usually made to God , with c bended knees , as Ephes. 3.14 , 15. Fourthly , for Subjection only ; which is commonly expressed among men by the outward gesture of bowing the knee . Thus it is used , Esay 45.23 . Rom : 14 11. and in this text of the Philippians , as all Expositors old and new acco●d , who thus interpret these words : That , In the name of Iesus every knee should bow , that is , That all creatures , in heaven , earth and hell should submit and subject themselves to Christ Iesus as to their Soveraign Lord , King , Iudge : good men and Angels willingly ; Devils and wicked men , even * against their wills : And that this is the true meaning of the words , will appear , 1. By these texts Psal. 8.6 , 7 , 8. Psal. 103.19 . Psal. 110.1 , 2. 1 Cor. 15.24 , 25. Eph. 1.20 , 21 , 22. ( a most full text ) Rom. 14.8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12. Acts 2.33 , 34 35 , 36. Heb. 1.8 , 9 , 13. Revel . 5.8.12 , 13 , 14. Secondly , ●ecause this bowing of the knee is attributed to Angels in heaven and Deuils in hell , which have no knees to bow as men haue ; therefore it cannot be construed of any literal bowing of the knee , which Angels and Spirits cannot yield , but of a bowing of subjection , which good and bad Angels can & do render to Christ as their Lord as well as men . 3ly , Because if this should be taken literally , most of the Patriots of this Ceremony of bowing , would be in very ill case . For , the text requiring the bowing of every knee , their putting oft their hats , caps , inclining their heads or bodies , or bowing only of one of their knees , could be no fulfilling of this literal bowing of every knee in the text , in their meaning , unlesse they can prove their heads , hats , caps , or upper parts of their bodies , to be their knees , or one leg , knee to be Both , or every of their knees : Their practice therefore of capping at the name Jesus , of inclining their heads and upper parts without bowing their knees , to testifie ( as they say ) their subjection to Christ , is a plain confession , that this bowing in the text is nothing else , but the subjection of all creatures to him , as their LORD . Hence therefore I argue thus . If the bowing of every knee in the name of Jesus be nothing else but the joynt subjection of all Angels , Men and Devils to Christ , as to their Supreme Lord , not any actual bowing of the knee when his name Jesus onely is mentioned in the Church ; then this text neither commands nor warrants any bowing of the knee , head , or body , ( much lesse any stirring of the hat , or vailing of the bonnet ) at the naming of Jesus in the Church . But the bowing of every knee in the name of Jesus mentioned in this text , is nothing else , but * the joynt Subjection of all Angels , Men and Devils to Christ , as to their Supreme Lord , ( as all acknowledge not any actual bending of the knee , when his name Jesus is mentioned in the Church . Therefore , this text neither commands nor warrants any bowing of the knee , head or body , much lesse any stirring of the hat , or vailing the bonnet , at the name of Jesus in the Church . Proc●ed we next to enquire , What is meant by things in heaven , things in earth , and things under the earth ? All Expo●itors accord , that by things in heaven ; is meant all the blessed Angels and Saints raigning with Chri●t in heaven ▪ By things on ear●h , all creature● upon earth , especially m●n and women , whether good or bad . By t●ings under the earth , Devil● and damned soul● in hell ; and if we believe some Popish Authors , the souls likewis● in Purgatory : which Purgatory , I doubt , will prove either no * place at all , or hell it self , because it is under the earth , as hell ( they say ) is , and in the very confines of hell , by their own confession ; and in many of their antientest * Hours , Missals , Histories ▪ expresly stiled He●● , ab inferno libera nos Domine , &c. Well then , this being the meaning , and these the bowers in the name of Jesu● , I would gladly learn from any Patrons of thi● Ceremonie , with what shadow of reason they can affirm ▪ that by bowing of every knee in the name of Iesus in thi● text , is meant , the bowing of the knee , head , or body at every mentioning of the name Jesus in time of Divine service ? Is there , I pray , any Divine service , Chapter , Gospel , Liturgy , Collect , Homily , Sermon read , chanted , preached , or any religious mention of th● name of Jesus in hell , among Devil● and damned Spirits ? yet their knee● are enjoyned and ough● to bow , in the name of Jesus , at well as Saints and Angels in heaven or men in earth . Certain ( I dare say ) it is , there is no Divine Service , Prayer , Reading of Gospels , Collects , Homilies , Preaching , or sacred mention of the name of Iesus , in hell , but only by way of cursing or execration ; Yea , as certain it is , that Christs salvation , redemption extend not at all to Angells , much lesse to Devils : as Hebr. 2.14 ▪ 16 , 17. 2 Pe● . 2.4 . Iud. 6. Mat. 25 ▪ 41. resolve ; nor ye● to the damned in hell ; yet his Soveraign Lordship and Power do . The Devils and damned Souls do not ▪ cannot bow to Christ as to their Jesus or Saviour , yes they both do and must of necessity bow and submit to his Royal Scepter , Soveraignty , Power , as their * LORD . The bowing therefore of the Knee at the naming of Iesus , especially in time of Divine service , being not to be found or imagined amongst Devils or Reprobates in Hell , cannot possibly be intended the bowing in the name of Jesus mentioned in this Text , which extends to those in Hell it self , but only this bowing of Subjection , which they * yield unto him as their LORD . Again , every knee of things in earth , is to bow in the name of Iesus ; If we take this generally for all Creatures upon earth , animate , or inanimate , many of them want Knees to bow , yea Eares to hear ; most of them understanding to apprehend the name of Iesus , or distinguish this name of his from others , or to be instructed in this duty of bowing the Knee , when ever they hear the Lord Jesus named . If we understand this generally of all men on earth , Alas● , the greatest part of men in the world , since the Creation till this present , neither knew the Person , Gospel , nor ever heard of the name of Iesus ; they never had , nor shall have here on earth any Divine service , reading or preaching of the Gospel , Collects , Homilies , wherein the name Iesus was or shall be mentione● ; how then can they observe or perform this duty of bowing at the recital of the name of Iesus , in time of Divine Service , Sacraments , or elsewhere ? yet notwithstanding every of their Knees shall and must bow in the name of Iesus ; they * being all now actually put in subjection under his feet as their LORD , his Kingdom ruleth over them all , his Scepter now swayeth them though they know it not , and will not voluntarily submit thereto , and he shall judge them all at last . This bowing therefore must be a bowing of Subjection , which every knee of things in earth doth , may , shall and must yield to Christs Divine Soveraign Power , Dominion , Lordship , not any bowing or capping at the recital of his name Iesus , in which , at which , to which they neither do , nor yet actually can , shall or will bow their Knee● ; I am certain , not in time of Divine Service , or Sermons , which they want . Finally , this bowing of the Knee in the name of Iesus , is attributed to things in Heaven , which have no real co●poral knees to bow , nor the name of Iesus to bow at , but Iesus himself their Soveraign Lord and King immediatly to contemplate and adore , to whom they with all ch●arfulness subject themselves , both as to their Redeemer and Soveraign Lord too ; Witnesse Rev. 5.11 , 12 , 13 , 14. forecited . Yet who can prove or dare affirm , that these actually bow their Knees at every naming of his name Iesus ? This bowing therefore being applyed to every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , both severally and joyntly , and yet neither of them actually performing this Ceremonious bowing of the Knee at the name of Iesus , either joyntly or separately in the Church , in time of Divine Service , Sermons or Sacraments , though all of them joyntly or severally do , will , shall , must subject themselves to Christ , as their Supreme Lord , either with or against their wills ; This bowing in the Text must necessarily be acknowledged , to be only a bowing of Subjection , which all Creatures both for the present do , and chi●fly at the day of judgement shall yield to Christ as their Lord , & Iudge both of quick and dead ; No● a bare bowing at every recital of his name Iesus , which none in heaven , none in hell , yea very few on earth ( and most of those either out of ignorance , mistake , superstition , or blind devotion ) yield unto him . From hence therefore I thus dispute , That bowing of the knee in the name of Jesus which every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , doth not , cannot , shall not either joyntly , severally , or actually use ; cannot be the bowing mentioned or intended in this text . But the bowing of the knee at the sound of the name of Jesus , ( especially in time of Divine service , to which the Patriots thereof principally restrain it ) is such a bowing , which every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , doth not , cannot , shall not actually use , either joyntly or severally . The●e●ore it cannot be the bowing intended ( nor yet a duty , ceremony prescribed or warranted ) by thi● text , b●t the bowing of subjection only . I now proceed to the last thing to be inquired of , to wit , When & wh●re this bowing shall be ? Certainly it shall be , not now or here in the Church , but hereafter before the Tribunal of Christ , when he shall come to judge both quick and dead . To make this apparent , we must consider that this text ( as all generally expound it , and * Mr. Page himself acknowledgeth in direct terms ) is not a precept , enjoyning any actual bowi●g of the knee to us for the present , but only a prophesie or prediction of a universal bowing of every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , especially at the great day of Iudgment , when they shall * all appear before Christs judgment seat . This is clear by Isaiah 45.23 . of which this text is but a rehearsall . I have sworn by my self , the word i● gone out of my mouth in righteousnesse , and shall not return ; T●at unto me ( not at , or to my name Jesus ) every knee shall bow , every tongue shall swear . This text of Isaiah is a direct prophesie of a bowing of every knee , and a confession of every tongue that should be hereafter made to the very person of Christ , to which this of Philippians relates , as our own Bibles , with all Expositors ( who referre these texts one to another , as parallels ) accord . But , ( then ) when or where shall this prophesie de futuro , be fulfilled ? St. Paul , and the spirit of God , by him resolve this doubt expresly , That it shall be in the general day of Iudgement , when we shall all stand before Christs Tri●unal . Rom. 14 9 , 10 , 11 , 12. For to this end Christ both died● and rose and revived , that he might be LORD both of the dead and living . But why dost thou judg● thy Brother ? or why dost thou set at nought thy Brother ? we shall all stand before the Iudgement seat of Christ. ( But some might demand , by what Scripture prove you this ? why , by this very prophesie of Isaiah saith he ; For it is written , * As I live saith the LORD , ( not Jesus ) every knee shall bow to me , and every tongue shall confesse to God ; So ( then ) every one of us must give an account of himself to God. The Apostle therfore referring this text , this bowing to the very day of Judgement , for the time ; to Christs own Person , before his Tribunal , for the place ; and reciting this prophesie as an infallible Argument and Prediction to prove , that we shall all hereafter appear before the Iudgement seat of Christ ; it is an undeniable evidence , that this bowing of every knee , and confession of every tongue , of things in Heaven Earth , and under the ●arth , in the Philippians , referring to this prophesie of Isaiah , by Pauls own resolution , is principally , if not only meant of a bowing of Subjection to ●hrist himsel● as their Lord & Iudge , b●fore his Tribunal at the general judgment , not of any bowing or capping at the recital of his name Iesus , now or here in the Church . To make this yet more per●picuou● , consider I pray you , that bo●h in Isaiah 45.23 . Rom. 14.11 . and Phil. 2.10 , 11. The bowing of every kn●e , and conf●ssion of every tongue , ●re coupled together as joynt con●emporary concurrent Acts ; So that every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , shall bow in the name of Iesus , at that time when , and in that place where , every ●ongue shall confesse , ●hat Iesus Ch●ist is LORD . But when and whe●e shall every tongue confesse that I●su● Christ is LORD ? Christ himself ●xpresly resolves it , * Mat. 7.22 , 23. that it shall be in the grea● day of Iudgement , before his Tribunal ●nd Person : and most fully , Mat. 25.31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , &c. that it shall b● , when the Son of man shall come in his glory , and all his holy Angels with him , when he shall sit on the throne of his glory , ●nd all Nations shall be gathered before him ; when he shall sev●re the righte●u● from ●he wicked , the sheep from the goats , se●ting one of them on his right hand , the other on his left ; when he● shall pronounce , Come ye blessed , &c. to the one , Go ye cursed to the other .. For the● all the sheep on his right hand shall joyntly call him LORD , vers . 37. LORD , when saw we thee an hungred ; and all the goats on his left hand shall joyntly do the like , vers . 44. LORD , when saw we thee an hungred ; yea all his holy Angels who shall then a●tend him , v. 31. Mat. 16 27. 2 Thess. 1.7 . and actually call him their Lord too , by their attendance on him ) shall then no doubt acknowledge and confesse him to be the Lord , a● they did at his * Na●vi●y : Vnto you this day is born in the City of David , a Saviour , which is Christ the LORD , as is intimated to us Psal. 103.19.20 , 21. and directly affirmed Act. 1● . 17 . Heb 1.6 , 7 , 8. Yea , no doubt the Devils ( whose LORD he is , Mat. 4.7.10 c. 8.29 , 31. c. 10.1 . Mark 1.34 . Luke 8.2 . c. 10.17.20 . c. 4.36 . being reserved in chains of darknesse to the judgement of the great day , Iude 6. 2 Pet. 2.4 . ) shall then in deed● , if not in word● , confess● that Iesus Christ is LORD , as well as the greatest and most d●mned Reprobates . This there●ore being the time when , the place where every t●ngue shall confesse that Iesus Christ is LORD , must certainly be the time , the place , when and where every knee shall bow in the name of Jesus . Thi● will ●urther appear by the 2 Cor. 5.8 , 9 , 10 , 11. We are willing rather to be absent in the body , and to be present wi●h the LORD : wherefore we labour , that whether presen● or absen● , we may be accep●ed of him : For we must all appear before the Iudgement seat of Christ , that every one may receive the things done in his body , according to that he hath done , whether it be good or evil : Knowing therefore the t●rrour of the LORD , we perswade men . For the Son of man shall come in the * Glory of the Father , ( which every tongue shall then con●esse , Phil. 2.11 . ) and then shall be rewarded every man according to his works . Mat. 24.30 Then shall all the Tribes of the Earth mourn , and they shall see the Son of man coming in the Clouds of Heaven , with Majesty and great Glory : And he shall send his Angels with the great sound of a Trumpet , &c. Watch therefore , for ye know not what hour your Lord both come , &c. Blessed is that Servant whom his Lord when he cometh shall find so doing , &c. The Lord of that Servant shall come in a ●ay when he looketh not for him , and in an hour that he is not ●ware of , and shall cut him in sunder , &c. there shall be weep●ng and gnashing of teeth . And Rev. 4.10 , 11. chap. 5.11 , 12 , 13 , 14. & chap. 7.9 , 10 , 11 , 12. The 24. Elders ●all down before him that sate on the Throne , and worship him ●hat liveth for ever and ever , and cast their Crowns before ●he Throne , ( here is the bowing of their knees ) saying , Thou art worthy O LORD ( not O Jesus ) to receive glory , honour , and power , for thou hast created all things , and for thy pleasure they are and were created ; ( here is the confession of their tongues in direct terms , that Jesus Christ is LORD . ) And I beheld , and I heard the voice of many Angels round about the Throne , and the Beasts , and the Elders , and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand , and thousand of thousands , saying with a loud voice , worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power , and riches , and wisdome , and strength , and honour , and glory , and blessing ; ( here we have all the Angels joyntly bowing their knees round about Christs Throne of Judgement , and confessing with their tongues ▪ that he was worthy to receive power , and honour , and stre●gth , the same in effect with that in Phil. 2.11 . that Iesus Christ is LORD ; now mark what follows . ) And every Creature which is in Heaven , ( here are things in Heaven ) and on the Ear●● , ( here are things on Earth ) and under the Earth , ( and here are things under the Earth , agreeing verbatim with this of Phil. 2. ) and all that are in them heard I saying ; Blessing , honour , glory , and power be unto him that s●tteth upon the throne , and unto the Lamb , for ever and ever ; ( here is the confession of every tongue , that Iesus Christ is LORD ) and the 4. Beasts said Amen . And the 24. Elders fell down and worshipped him that liveth for ever and ever : ( here is the bowing of the knee , both of them before the Tribunal of Christ , at the last day ) Af●er this I beheld , and l●e a great multitude , which no man could number , of all Nations , Kindreds , and people , and tongues , stood before the Throne , and before the Lamb , cloathed with white Robes , and Palmes in th●ir hands , and cryed with a loud voice , saying , Salvation ●o our God , which sitteth upon the Throne , and unto the Lamb : ( here we have all tongue● confessing that Jesus Christ is Lord , to & in the glory of God the Father ) And All ●he Angels stood round about the Throne , and about the Elders , and about the 4. Beasts , and fell before the Throne on their faces , and worshipped God , saying , Amen ; blessing , ●nd glory , and wisdom , and thanksgiving , and honour , and power , and might , be unto our God for ever and ever , Amen . Adde her●unto Rev. 20.12 , 13. And I saw the dead , small and great , stand before God , and the Books we●e opened , and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the Books , according to their works . And the Sea gave up the dead which were in it , and death and Hell , ( or the Grave ) d●livered up the dead which were in them , and they were judged every man according to their work● ; And death and Hell were cast into the lake of fire . Here are both the bowing of every knee , and confession of every tongue of things in Heaven , things in Earth , and things under the Earth , of all Men and Angels joyntly together , before Christ● Throne , as to their God , Lord , and Soveraign Judge : This bowing therefore of every knee , this confession of every tongu●●t the last d●y before Christs Tribunal , must needs be the bowing of every knee in the name of Iesus , the confes●ion of every tongue that Iesus Christ is Lord , in the glory of GOD the father , prophesied of , & intended in the Philippians , & Isa. 45.23 . And in truth , when or where should this bowing of every knee , and con●ession of every tongue be else , b●t in that great day of Judgement ? when all things in Heaven , Earth , and und●r the Earth , all Men and Angels , good and bad , shall be joyntly summoned b●fore the Soveraign Tribunal of Christ ▪ their Lord and Judge , to be judged and sentenced by him . For it being both a joynt and universal bowing of every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , and an unanimou● general conf●ssion of all tongue● , it cannot possibly be actually verified or performed , but when all of them shall be gathered together into one place , and shall personally st●nd before Christ● Tribunal , where they shall all both hear , see , know and acknowledge him to be their Lord , and thereupon actually bow unto him , as to their Soveraign Judge and Lord ; which the greatest part of men in all ages , being Infidel● , Pagan● , who never knew nor heard of Christ on Earth , cannot pos●ibly perform till that day shall come . Wherfore this text , or prophesie , cannot be actually verified of them before the day of Judgement , and Christs coming to it . The time then of this bowing of every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , in the name of Jesus , and the confession of all tongues , being only the day of Judgement , not the time of this present life , or of Divine Service , or Sermons ; and the place , before Christs Tribun●l , Throne , not the Church ; and this bowing ( then ) not to his name Jesus , but his Person , ( every knee shall bow to * Mee ) as he is supreme Lord , God , Judge both of quick and dead , I shall thence deduce this unanswerable Argument , to prove this Ceremony no duty of the text . If the bowing of every knee in the name of Jesus , mentioned and intended in this text , be only a joynt bowing or prostratiō of all things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , in the great day of Judgement , not in time of Divine Service or Sermon , or in this present life , and that before Christs Tribunal only , not in the Church ; Then this text can be no precept , warrant , or colour at all for any bowing at every naming of Jesus in the Church , neither can it be deduced from or justified by it . But the bowing of every knee in the name of Jesus ▪ mentioned and intended in this text , is only a bowing or prostration at the great and gener●l day of Judgement , not in time of Divine Service or Sermon , or in this present life , and that before Christs Tribunal only , not in the Church , as all the premised Scripture-evidences , and Orthodox Expositors acknowledge . Therefore this text can be no precept , warrant , or colour at all for any bowing at the naming of Jesus in the Church , neither can it be deduced from or justified by this text . Having thus run over these 4 particulars , we may from them collect the true sense and meaning of this text of the Philippians , which being but a prophesie , not a precept , can infer no present duty : The true genuine sense of it in few words is this . That God hath highly exalted his Son Christ Iesus , since his Passion & Humiliation ; that is , he hath set him at his own right hand in Heaven , even in his Humane nature ; and given him a name above every name ; that is , hath made him King of Kings , and Lord of Lords , and exalted him above all powers , creatures whatsoever , made him the Soveraign Lord and Judge both of quick and dead , given him power over all flesh , yea all power both in Heaven and Earth , and put all things in subjection under his feet ; that in the name of Iesus every knee should bow &c. that is , to this very end and purpose , that all creatures both in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , all Angels and Men , whether good or bad , whether in Earth , Heaven , or Hell , should by reason , vertue , means , and in consideration of this his supreme power and advancement , submit and subject themselves to him ( especially at the day of Judgement when they shall all appear before his Tribunal ) as to their Soveraign Lord , and supreme Judge , and conf●sse him with their tongues to be their Lord , to ( or in , as many of the Fathers read it ) the glory of God the Father . This then being the t●ue genuine bowin● of subjection in the text , as is evident by the premises , and that ●ignant text of 1 Pet. 3.31 , 32. By the resurrection of Iesus Christ from the dead , who is gone into Heaven , and is at the right hand of God , Angels , Authorities , and Powers being made subject unto him ; compared with Col. 1.15 . to 21. Heb. 13.4 , 5. c. 2.5 , 7 ▪ 8 , 9. Ps. 110.1 . 1 Cor. 15.20 , to 29. and this which I have insisted on , the undoubted meaning of this text , the sole argument that can be thence deduced to justifie the bowing at every naming of Jesus , is but this : All creatures in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , ●●all joyntly in the general day of Judgement , submit themselves to Jesus Christ , as to their Soveraign Lord and Judge , and bow their knees unto his person before his Tribunal . Therefore all Christian men and women must ( now ) bow their knees , heads , or vaile their hats , whenever they hear his name Jesus mentioned , during Service or Sermons in the Church on Earth . A grosse ridiculous non sequitur , needing no other answer but derision ; Seeing * Mr. Calvin , M●rloret , Bishop Alley , Olevian and Piscator , affirm , That the Sorbon Sophisters are more than ridiculous , who co●lect from this place , that as often as we hear the name Iesus mentioned , we are to bow the knee , as if it were a magick word , which had all its efficacy included in the sound . Hence * Bishop Babington , Dr. Fulk , Mr. Cartwright , and Dr. Willet , resolve , that this bowing at the name of Iesus , is not commanded in , nor warranted by this text , the name therein ●xpressed being not the name Iesus , the bowing not literal , the time of it the day of Iudgement , and the place wh●re it shall be , before Christs Tribunal , as most Expositors joyntly accord : Hence our Learned * Dr. Whitaker , in his Preface to his Answer to Saunders his Demonstration concerning Antichrist , mustring up divers absurd consequences of the Papists and Jesuits , from sundry texts of Sc●ipture ; as , Christ entred into Peters Ship ; therefore the whole Church is Peters , to wit , the Popes Ship. Barnabas laid down the price of the Field he sold , at the Apostles feet ; therefore the Popes feet ar● to be kissed : with many such like consequences ; concludes with this , as the grossest of all the rest , A name above every name is given to Christ , that in the name of Iesus every knee should bow ; Therefore as oft as we bear the name of Iesus mentioned , we must uncover our heads , and bow our knees . After which he thus proceeds . When , I say , men shall hear these and infinite such like Expositions and Argumentations of these new Masters , if there be any sense left in them , not only of the Holy Ghost , but likewise of Common judgement , they cannot think that a Religion grounded upon ●●se foundations can be firm and certain , and to be preferred before all others . If then this Grave and Learned Doctor , being Regius Professor of Divinity in the Vniversity of Cambridge , hath thus br●nded the bowing at the name Jesus , as it is deduced from this text , for an absurd , ridiculous , Iesuitical non sequit●r , and that Religion which is built upon such strange consequences , false and unsound ; I wonder much that any of our Lea●ned Prelates , Ministers , and better sort of people , should be so over-seen , and blinded through cu●tom , usage , and inconsideration , as thence to deduce and defend the like Popish consequence , a●d to presse this Ceremony of bowing , with such earnestnesse , and zeal as now a dayes they do , as if all Devotion and Religion consisted in its use ; when as they should ●ather detest the Mountebank cozening tricks , and devices of Sorbonists and other Popish persons , thus decryed by our own and other Learned Protestant Writers ; then favour those amongst us , who to maintain the credit of this Ceremony of bowing at the name of Jesus , dare of●er violence to the very text it self , and our Common-Prayer-book , by changing IN , into AT the Name , &c. which corrupts both the English , words , and sense of the text , as I have clearly evidenced , of purpose to delude poor simple people , to draw them on to errour , or Popish superstition , and interpreting the name above every name , to be the name Jesus , in which every knee shall bow , whereas in truth it is the name LORD , the supreme Power and Dominion of Christ , as our own Common-Prayer-book , in the Thanksgiving after the Communion administred , thus expounds it , Glory be to God on high , &c. O Lord God , Son of the Father , thou that sittest at the right hand of the Father , have mercy upon us , For thou only art the Lord , thou only O Christ , with the Holy Ghost , art most high in the glory of God the Father . Having thus surveyed and cleared the words , and tru● meaning of this perverted text , I shall only desire you to observe these 4 things in it . First , that it is rather a prophesie of a bowing that shall be given to Christ as Lord at the last day , ( as all Orthodox Expositors accord ) than a precept prescribing any such bowing to Christ for the present , as is undeniable , by comparing it with Isaiah 45.23 Rom. 14 ▪ 9 , to 14. Rev. 5.10 , to 14. Iude 14.15 . chap. 3.14 , 15 , 2 Thes. 1.6 , to 11. Secondly , that the bowing of the knee here mentioned , is not spoken of as a distinct act of some particular persons only in the Church , and that oft reiterated at every sound of the Name Jesus , but of one joynt habitual or actuall universall bowing of every knee of things in Heaven , Earth , and under the Earth , Isaiah 45.23 . Rom. 14.9 , to 13. Rev. 5.9 , to 14. Thirdly , that this bowing of the knee in the Text , is coupled with the Conf●ssion of the Tongue , so that when ever the knee thus bowes in the Church , every tongue also ought to confesse , at the same time , that Iesus Christ is Lord , in the glory of God the Father : So that if any will hence necessarily inferre , an actual bowing of eve●y knee in the Church , at every naming of Jesus , they must likewise every time they bow their knees at or to this name , confesse & cry out aloud with their tongues and voyce , That Iesus Christ is Lord , to , or in , the glory of God the Father : Which , what a confusion , disturbance , distraction , in mens attentions , devotions , it would breed in the Church , ( as their frequent bowings do now at the name Jesus , above 20. times in one day , one Chapter , yea * twice or thrice in one verses reading sometimes , and that just as the name Jesus is uttered , before the following words recited , or the sense or person understood , whence some have bowed to Ioshua , Iustus , and Bar-Iesus too , when Act. 7.45 . Heb. 4.9 . Col. 4.11 . Acts 13.6 . have been read , instead of Jesus Christ the Lord ) all men of common sence may conjecture . Fourthly , that every knee should bow in this text , is not in the active , but passive tence , whence Miles Coverdale and others translate it , Vt omne genu flectatur , that in the name of Jesus every knee be bowed , whether they will or not ; Devils , damned souls , and wicked men , being unwilling to submit to Christ , as their Soveraign Lord , and subjected to him even against their wi●ls , Psal. 110.5 , 6 1 Cor. 15.24 , 25. Luke 14.27 . Heb. 2.8 . Eph. 1.22 . Therefore this bowing can be no religious duty or worship . Every of which con●iderations will sufficiently evidence this bowing at the name of Jesus , to be no duty of the text . If all thi● be not sufficient to satisfie our Bowers at every recital of the Name Jesu● , both concerning the true ●eading and meaning of this text , but that the wo●ds must still be re●d At the Name &c. This name at which they bow , must be the Nam● Jesus only , and this bowing at or to it , a duty enjoyned by this Text , t●ough no Father , nor Orthodox Protestant Writer I have seen ever esteemed it so before Bishop Andrews . I shall then demand of them , but these questions . First , why they bow not at the sight of the Name Jesus when they behold it in a Bible , Book , Window , Hanging● , Wall , Medal , Pulpit-Cloth , Cross or the like , as well as at the sound or hearing of it ? since this Text confines it not to the hearing or sound alo●e , and at the Name , may be as aptly interpreted at the sight , as at the sound of the Name ; which is every way as venerable , comfortable , majestical , sweet , and as worthie cap & knee when we behold the Characters of it written , printed , painted , carved , engraven , or embroydered , ●s when we hear the sound of it uttered or pronounced , as the Rhemists , Alphonsus Salmeron , and Cornelius a Lapide two Jesuites , together with Molanus and Carolus Stengelius a Benedict in Freer conclude , from Phil. 2.10 . in their passages hereafter cited . Let them therefore henceforth learn to bow at the sight , as well as at the sound of the name Jesus , or else give over their bowing when they hear it , because they forbear to bow to it when they see it . Secondly , if bowing at the hearing of the name of Jesus be a duty of this text , why then do they not bow to it in all place● & at all times alike ? in the streets , fields , house , closet , ( as the Papists do to their Crucifixes , Crosses , Images , Hostia ) as well as in the Church ? when they hear men curse or ‖ ●wear by this sacred name ( when the●e is most cause to honour it by bowing to , or at it , because it is then most dishonoured , profaned ) as well as when they hear the Minister read or utter it in Divine service , Homilies or Sermons ? Why bow they not every time they hear it , as well as sometimes onely , it being alike sacred , venerable at all times , in all places , and representing Jesus his person to our minds a like ? This text restraining it ( in their sence ) no more to the Church than to any other place , no more to one mans uttring of it , then anothers , no more to the sound then sight of it . Thirdly , if it be a Duty enjoyned them by this text , at every recital , hearing , or sight of it , why doe they not account it a dangerous , mortal sin to omit , or carelesly , and superficiously to perform it , which few have ever deemed it ( if any ) till of late ? Fourthly , if it be a duty of the text , that every knee should bow at the naming of Jesus , why do most of them only use to put off their caps at , or to it , when recited , and not to bow their knees ? why do they more frequently only nod or bow their heads unto it th●n their knees ? or only one knee , ( which men for the most part do ) not both , ( which few but women practise , who mak● cou●tesies at it ) since the text requires every knee ( therefore both their knees ) should ●ow , not one on●y . Fifthly , why do they duck , and bow their bodies or head● at the naming of it ( as many Cathedralists , Priests , and others do ) even when they are actually kneeling on their knee● , and praying to God , and Ch●ist Jesus himself ? yea , why give they mo●e reverence , honour to the name Je●us a●one , than to the very Person , Majestie of God , or Jesus Christ him●elf ? For when as they are wo●shipping God and Jesus Christ on their knees , in their most ●erious prayers , and humblest , lowliest postures of body , even then at every naming of the word Jesus , to bend or bow their heads and bodies particularly in a more special , lowlier manner than before only because this name Jesus is mentioned in the Prayer , what is it but to pre●erie , honour , adore his bare name Jesus before his Person , Deity , and God the Father himself , and to advance the very name , sound , syllables of Jesus , above his Person , to whom they would not have thus so frequently , lowly , and seriously bowed afresh , had not this name Jesus been mentioned , though their minds , thoughts were or should be immediately fixed on God and him , and their knees , bodies bowed down to them in Prayer before ? If this be not superstition , will-worship or worse , let their own Consciences and Reasons who are guilty of this practise judge . Sixthly , if bowing at the name Jesus be a duty of this text , I would willingly know , why the Apostles , * Fathers , and P●imitive Ch●istian , for above one thousand years after Christ , were utterly ignorant of this duty , of which there is no foot-steps , no mention in Antiquity ? why ‖ Pope Iohn the 20th . or rather the 22th . above one thousand years after Christ , should be the fi●st that ever set this Ceremony on foot , and that with an indulgence of 20. years pardon for every enclining of the head ( not of the knee ) at the name of Jesus ? why no antient , no modern Commentators on this text but Papists & Jesuits , before Bp. Andrews , could find out this duty in , and acquaint us with it , as a thing therein required ? VVhy no a Protestant Churches in forein parts , can yet find out , or practise this duty ? VVhy b few but Papist● , but Jesuits , have formerly pleaded for it , till this our present age ? VVhy few but Popes or Popish Councils and Authors have hithe● to pressed it ? Why there is a special Prayer for the bowers at it , inserted into the Masse of the name Iesus ? for which name the Papists have not only a solemn double Feast day on the 7th . of August , stiled Festum dulcissimi nominis Iesu , but also a special Masse , called Horae nominis Iesu , The Howers or Masse of the name Jesus . Seventhly , if it be a duty of the text , why then have c Protestant Churches and Writers oppugned it from time to time , as a Popish Superstition and Innovation , as the Rhemists and Stengelius acknowledge ? why then do d Calvin and Marloret , both in their Commentaries on the text , and e Paraeus , Piscator , with others , declaim thus against the Sorbonists ? The Sorbon Sophisters are more than ridiculous , who collect out of this pres●nt place , that the knee must be bowed as oft as the name Iesus is pronounced , as if it were a magick word or spell , which hath all its efficacy included in its sound : why doth our Learned g Dr. Whitaker tax William Raynolds the Rhemist , with his Popish Companions of Rhemes , for abusing this text of the Philippians , in straining this Ceremony from it , which he expresly censures , as Superstitious , which ( saith he ) may breed a more dangerous error than any it can remove , to wit , that Iesus is better than Christ , which is wicked to imagine ? Yea , why do h Thomas Beacon , Dr. Fulk , k Dr. Willet , l Bishop B●bi●●●on , Dr. Airay , and Mr. Cartwright , on and ●rom this ●ext , condemn and write against the Papists for using this ge●●●lection , as no wayes warra●ted or commanded by it ? Why do they censure the bowing at this Name only ▪ as Popish , Superstitious , Idolatrous in th● Papists , and making an apparent di●parity between the Three sacred Persons of the Trinity , which are Co-equal , by giving more honour to the second Person , and his very name Iesus , than to the first and third , and their most sacred names ? or than to the other names of Iesus , as Emanuell , Saviour , Christ , Messias , Son of God , and the like ? whose Judgements , that you may the better descern in this particular , I shall verbatim transcribe , reciting both the Papists words and their answers to them , as I find them printed in their works . I shall begin with Mr. Thomas Cartwright , who brings in the Rhemists writing thus against the Protestants . They , by the like wickednesse , charge the faithfull people for capping or kneeing when they hear the name of Jesus , as though they worshipped not our Lord God therein , but the syllables , or letters , or other material Elements whereof the word written or spoken consisteth ; and all this by Sophistications to draw the people from due honour and devotion towards Christ Jesus ; which is Sathans drift by putting scruples into poor simple mens minds about his Sacraments , his Saints , his Crosse , his name , his image and such like , to abolish all true religion out of the world , and to make them plain Atheists . But the Church knoweth Satans cogitations , and therefore by the Scriptures and reason , warranteth and teacheth all her Children to do reverence whensoever Iesus is named , because Catholicks do not honour these things nor count them holy for their matter , colour , sound and syllables , but for respect and relation they have to our Saviour , bringing us to the remembrance and apprehension of Christ by sight , hearing , or use of the same signes , else why make we not reverence , at the name of * Iesus the Son of Syrach , as well as of Iesus Christ. And it is a pittyfull case to see these profane subtilties of Heretiques to take place in religion , which were ridiculous in all other trade of life . When we hear our Prince or Soveraign named , we may without these scruples do obeisance , but toward Christ it must be superstitious ; Thus the Rhemists . To whom Mr. Cartwright thus replies , at the special instance of * Sir Francis Walsingham , and other Lords of Queen Elizabeths Privy Counsel , and request of all the heads and Professors in the Univers●ty of Cambridge , with sundry other eminent English Divines . This dirt which they dash us with is as well made of them , as thrown by them . For it is false , that we will have no reverence given to the name of Iesus ; We say , that there ought to be no other honour or reverence given to it , than unto the name of Christ , of Lord , of God. And further we say , that this suppleness of your knees , in bowing at the name of Iesus , is nothing but a mask to hide the straitness and numbness of all the joynts of your heart and soul in your submission to the Commandement of Iesus . For it is well known , that your knees which are Cammel-like in the courtesie which you give to this name , are joyntlesse and Elephant-like in your obedience unto his precepts to whom this name appertaineth . Again , we testifie that this is a will-worship , not only troublesom unto the assembly by irksom scraping of the pavement and unseasonable interruption of that which is read or preached , but pernicious also , in regard of the suspition that it may move of the inequality of the Persons in Trinity , whilst a title of the Son being honoured with cap and knee , the other Persons have neither bonnet vailed , nor foot moved to testifie any honour unto them . The vaunt of Scripture for proof of this worship , must needs avaunt . For , this being the only stay and prop which they can pretend out of Scripture , makes nothing for it . First , for that the name of Iesus in this place , signifieth not any title or note whereby Christ is called , but his authority , and whatsoever is glorious and exc●llent within h●m ; as in divers places it doth likewise appear . Secondly , for that he understandeth not by the word knee , the member of the body , whereby they honour but ( by a borrowed sp●ech ) the subjection and bending of all creatures unto the infinite power of Christ : so that the souls d●parted and Angels ( which have no knees ) are subject unto this courtesying , as well as men living upon earth . If therefore the heavenly Spirits can yield this subjection unto Christ without courtesying at the name of Iesus , it followeth that this Exposition of bowing the knee is farr from the meaning of the Apostle in that text . Thirdly , for that the kneeling and courte●ying here spoken of , is performed as well by the wicked and disobedient , as by the holy and obedient Spirits , it is plain , that all kind of reverence , being a voluntary and frank worship of Christ after the pr●script of his word , is without all warrant of this place . This Scripture making nothing ●or them , their reason , although it were likely , cannot bear it out ; And whereas they would free thems●lves from superstition of●esus ●esus the Son of Sy●ach , as to Jesus the Son of GOD , whilst the knee j●mping with the very fir●● utterance of the word Iesus , prev●nteth ●ft●ntimes the pronunciation of the other words , of the Son o● Syrach . The very danger ther●fore of communicating of this worship with others which they would have prop●r to our Saviour Christ might easily have admonished them of the ins●ffi●iency of this Service . And seeing the name of Iesus in the Son of N●n● and in the high Pri●st of that nam● , of whom only we are assured that they were ri●htly thus called , is the same with the name ascribed unto Chri●t , o●●esus ●esus in their own right , but in the right of Christ , wh●s● figures and lively representations they were . And if oth●rs might hold it , yet you which give the same hon●ur to the Image , which you give unto the Thing it self , cannot be conceived so to doe . What will you answ●r to this● that as you are in danger of superstion in the former point , so in this you are charged with profannesse , who neither cap nor courte●ie at the name of Jesus it● Thus far Mr. Cartwright . Dr. Andrew Willet , an eminent sound English Divine , in an * Appendix concerning the name of Jesus , ●elates the opinions both of the Papists and Protestants concer●ning this Ceremony in these words . The Papists . The name of Jesus ought to be worshipped by capping and kneeing therunto , by wearing it in their caps and setting it up in solemn places , alleadging that of St. Paul , That at the name of Iesus all things shall bow , Phil. 2.10 . * Yea , they say that Protestants by abolishing the name and image of Christ , do make way for Anti-christ . The Protestants . First , The bowing at the name of Jesus , as it is used in Popery , to bend the knee at the sound thereof , is not commanded in this place ; which sheweth ●spe●ially the subjection of all Creatures , ( of Turks , Jews , Infidels , yea of the Devils themselves ) to the power and Iudgement of Christ. Secondly , Protestants have only taken away the superstitious abuse of the name Jesus . Thirdly , The kneeling at the name of Iesus , is Supe●stitiously abused in Popery For the people stoop only at the sound , not understanding what is r●ad , and so make * an Idol of the Letters and Syllables , adoring and worshipping the very Name , when they hear or see it : And again , In sitting and not vailing at the nam● of Christ , Emanuell , God the Father , the Son , and the Holy Ghost , and bowing only at the name of * Iesus . Fourthly , Due reverence may be used to our Saviour , without any such Ceremony of capping or kneeing ; neither do we bind any of necessity to use this reverence to the nam● of Iesus , as the Papists do , who think that Christ cannot be othe●wise honoured ; neither do we judge and condemn those that do use it , being free from Superstition , and grounded in knowledge , and carefull not to give offence ; for superstitious and offensive ignorance is not in any case to be defended . Fifthly , This outward reverence to the name of Iesus , was * first taken up amongst Christians , because of all other names it was most derided and scorned of the Pagans and Iews , and therefore they did the more honour it : But now there is greater danger of Popish Superstition in abusing Holy things , then of profane Paganism in utterly contemning them : and ther●fore there is not such necessary and iust occasion of using this ex●e●nal gesture now , as was in former times ; It was not used of necessity then , much lesse now . * Synodus M●guntina , c. 59 ( An. 1549. not An. 813. as is commonly mistaken , this Ceremony not being so antient by 200. years ) it was thus decreed . Pari Religione ad nomen Salvatoris nostri Domini Iesu Christi , similiter ad Evangelium , Magnificat , Benedictus , Nunc demittis , Gloria in excelsis , Gloria Patri , caeterasque id genus Divinorum Officiorum partes , si● genuum fl●ctione , apertione capitis , ac totius corporis gestu se componant , ut ad ea quae ibi aguntur , animam intendere videantur : Let men with like Devotion at the name of our Lord and Savi●ur Iesus Christ , as likewise at the Gospel , the Magnific●t , Benedictus , Nunc dimittis , Gloria in ●x●elsi● , Gloria Patri , and other parts of the Di●ine s●rvice , s● com●ose thems●lves by bowing the knee , uncovering the head , and the like gesture of the whole body , as they may seem to have their mind occupied in those things that are done . I note out of this Decree , three things : First , That they should bow at the name of Christ , as well as when Iesus is named . Secondly , That the like Reverence should be used when as other Psalms are sung , and when mention is made of the Father , and the Holy Ghost , as in Gloria Patri . Thirdly , That this gesture should not be done in Reverence to names , words , or syllables so pronounced , but only to declare our attention . Thus then we see , that this Superstitious custom in bowing to the name of Iesus only , is contrary even to their own Popish Canons and Decrees . The like things also was decreed , * Synodus Augustensis , c. 23. Thus far Dr. Willet , who recites almost verbatim Dr. F●lks word● , and opinion of this Ceremony , in his Answer to the Rhemists Notes on Phil. 2.10 . who there expresly defines ; It is certain , that the bowing of the knee at the sound of the name of Iesus , as it is used in Popery , is not commanded nor prohibited in this place , ( of Phil. 2.9.10 ) But it pertaineth to the subjection of all Creatures to the Iudgement of Christ , in the general day of Iudgement , when not only Turks and Iews , who could yeild no honour to Iesus , but even the Devils themselves shall be constrained to acknowledge t●at he is their judge . Learned Dr. William Whitaker , Regius Professor of Divinity in Cambridge , in his Answer to William Reynolds the Rhemist , Cambridge 1590. p. 398 , 399. writes thus of this Text and Ceremony : of●esus ●esus , Mr. Reynolds is very earnest , and concludeth in the end , that I am an Atheist , and make no account of Christ , for denying , seeing we yeild this honour of cap and courtesies to the Letters , Name , Seal , and Seat of the Prince . If this be a true Argument , ( Mr. Reynolds ) as you in your vehemency would have it seem , how commeth it to passe , that Gods name among you is not honoured with like reverence of cap and knee , whensoever it is heard ? Will you put off your caps when the Prince is named , and will you make courtesi●s at the * Popes name , at his triple Crown , or Crosse , and will you never once stir your caps , or bow your knees when God is named ? Is this your Religion ? is this your Fashion ? Then let me conclude against you , as you have done against me , That you are by your own Arguments very Atheists , such as make no account of God himself ; for oth●rwise , this conclusion of your ( That I am such a one for not honouring the name of Iesus in such sort ) is falsly , though most maliciously devised . The Jews and Infidels have abhorred the name of Jesus , I grant , But no more the name of Jesus , than the name of Christ , seeing Jesus is Christ , and Christ hath as much deserved to be hated of them , as Jesus : Christs name may a thousand times be heard amongst you , and no man moveth cap or knee . Jesus is no sooner sounded , but every man by and b● putteth off his cap , and scrapeth on the ground with his foot : and yet not alwayes , or in all places , but in the Church , and specially at reading of the Gospel . This may breed a more dangerous opinion tha● any it can r●move , that Jesus is better then is Christ , and more worthy of Reverence , which is wicked to imagine . Reverend and pious Dr. Gervase Babington , Bishop of Worcester , in his Exposition of the Catholick Faith , in his Works , London , 1622. pag. 195 , 196 , 197. determines thus of this Text and Ceremony : The Papists ( w●ites he ) strangely des●ant of this holy name Jesus , but whether such stuff be worth the touch , I referre it to you . Surely to rake up this Channell , were to stir up a great deal of ●oul matter ; For ( in truth ) the follies of their Writers herein a●e most monstrous . But said I follies ? I might say more , and say but right . Yet a little to manifest their blindnesse , you must understand ( say they ) that there ●re 3. manner of Psalters . The fi●st is called Davids Psalter , containing thrice fifty Psalmes . The second is called the Psalter of our Lady , containing thrice fifty Aves . And the third is called the Psalter of Iesu , containing fifteen principal Petitions , which t●n times repeated makes also thrice fifty ; in the which Psalter the glorious name of Iesu is called upon * 450. times . These ten Petitions may be said upon our ten Fingers , or ten Beads , or read in a Book . For example , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu mercy ; Iesu , Iesu , Iesu mercy , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu mercy ; and so ten times over , which maketh one Petition . This they say shall be very meritorious , because it is written , * Whatsoever you shall aske in my name , that you shall have , and there is no other name whereby we can be saved . This is most wonderfull blindness and boldnesse , thus to abuse unto Superstition this holy Name , and thus to pervert these holy Scriptures . The Scriptures you see are farre from any such sense , the one promising that whatsoever we ask in his Name , that is , for his sake , for his merits and passion , not for the word Iesus , the literal word ; and the other teaching , that there is no other Name , that is , no other means or way whereby we can be saved , not ascribing our Salvation to the word or syllable Iesus : But hear more . * Another of their learned Rabbies going about to tell the greatnesse of this Name ( not of him that hath the name , but of the litteral word ) saith , that all things are comprehended within these four numbers , one , ten , a hundred , a thousand , and then , these numbers are in the word Iesus ; wherefore he concludeth , that it is a wonderfull name , which you see in him was a wonderfull trifling in a serious matter . A third findeth that name of God delivered to Moses , SVM , I am , in this word Iesus ; And how ? Forsooth , saith he , Iesus hath three terminations , when it is declined , Iesus , Iesu , & Iesum : now take the last letter of every termination , and you have S. V. M. which put together spell SVM . Then he cryeth out , O nomen ineffabile ! O nomen verè tetragrammaton ! O gaudium Angelorum , laetitiam lustorum , &c. O name that cannot be expressed ! O name truly tetragrammaton ! O joy of Angels , and comfort of the Just. Furthermore , ( saith he ) this name , if you mark it , hath three Vowels and two Consonants , which is a mystery : for the three Vowels I. E. V. signifie the Trinity ; and the two Consonants , ( or rather one Consonant twice put , to wit S. ) signifie the two parts of Christs humanity , his Boy and his Soul. Therefore We must Worship this Name above all Names . Which what profound Divinity it is , you see . Others of them rob Christ of his Divine power , vertue , and might , and ascribe it to this litteral word of his name , saying , This is the name that gave the blind sight , the deaf hearing , the lame going , the dumb speech , the dead lise ; and finally , that cast out Devills out of the bodies of men , &c. Then is told a tale of a Souldier that was taken out of St. Patricks Purgatory , by this name . And how ? Because St. Paul said , ‖ He was not only ready to be bound in Ierusalem , but to dye for the name of the Lord Iesus , ( a place , if you mark it , well applyed . ) Therfore when his Head was cut off at Rome it gave three leaps , and at every leap said , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu. Why St. Paul meant , as I take it , that he was ready to dye for the name of the Lord Jesus , that is , for his Gospel , truth , profession o● him , &c. not for the litteral word Iesus . It is true , but thus blind were and are still these men , refusing all reformation , and running headlong to their ow● destruction , whilst they place the vertue in the name , that they should have ●aught to be in the Person of Christ , God and Man , not once mentioning in all this , his mercy , merit , death , bloodshed , love , or such like . I cannot omit that profound Doctor , whom Erasmus mentioneth , that noted how many letters were in the word Iesus , namely five , and then how S. standeth in the middest betwixt two Syllables , to signifie , that even so Iesus is the middle or Mediator betwixt God and Man , with such other good stories more there ; a● though we had no better means to prove Christ our Mediator , but by such curiou● , idle , foolish descant as this . But thus left they the Fountains of God , and digged Cisternes to drink on after their own fanci●s . Le● us leave them therefore and their dreams , and still hold that which hath been said before , that this name was given him , not to be abused to Superstition and Folly , but to tell us , that as his name was , so indeed was he , a true , full , and perfect Saviour of his people from their si●● ; not a half Saviour , as Gabriel Biel writeth , Principally by Christ , but not Only by Christ. After which he addes , I think the place to the Philippians ( ch . 2.9 , 10 ) not well understood , hath and doth deceive them : Indeed they are easily deceived that will not search for truth , and they are justly given over to strong delusions that delight in errour , and have not a love of the ●ruth ; otherwise the place to the Philippians would not be mistaken . But look we a little at the same , and mark from whence the Apostle took it , and compare Spiritual thing● with Spiritual t●ing● ; The place is borrowed from the Prophet * Isaiah , and therefore by conferrence evident , that the word ( Name ) signifyeth power , glory , honour , and authority a●ove all powers , glories , honours , and authoritie● ; And ( bowing the knee ) signifyeth subjection , submission , and obedience of all Crea●ures to his beck , rule , and government , for what material knees have things in Heaven , Hell , & c ? This knew the antient Father St. Origen , and therefore writing upon the 14. to the Romans , ( where these words be again ) saith , Non est carnaliter hoc accipiendum , quasi Coelesti● , ut Sol , Luna , Angeli , genua aut linguas habeant , sed genu flectere significat , cuncta subjecta esse , & cul●ui Dei obedire , These words are not to be taken carnally , as though things in H●aven , as the Sun , Moon , Angels , &c. had knees , or tongues : But to bow the knee signifyeth , that all thing● should be subject and obedient to the service of God. This knew St. Hierom also , and therefore saith , Non ad genua corporis● sed ad subjectionem mentis , & inclinationem spectat , sicut David dicit , Adhaesit pavimento anima mea . It doth not belong to the knees of the body , but to the subjection and bowing o● the mind , as David sai●h , My soul cleaveth to the earth or dust , noting his inward humiliation , not a r●●l ●nd outward matter ; For shall we think ( saith he ) that either Heavenly things , or all Earthly things ●ave knees , &c. No , I say again , but by thi● phrase of sp●ech is m●ant subjection , whereof bowing of the kne● is a sign ; as when he saith , * I have left me 7000. men which have not bowed the knee to Baal , that is , which have no● been subject to that Idol . Fornicator libidini genu flectit , &c. The Fornicator is sa●d to bow his knee to lust , The Covetuous man to his riches or desire , The Proud man to his pride , &c. because they are subject to these things . Et ●o●ies Diabolo flectimus qusties peccamus , And so oft we bow to th● Devil as we commit sin , saith thi● good Father . The like in effect have Theophilact , Bed● , Ambros● , the glosse , and some of their own Papists . Imperio ejus subjiciantur Angeli , Homines , Daemones , To his rule and government shall be subj●ct Angels in Heaven , Men in Earth , and Devils under the Earth . This is to bow the knee to him , and this is for him to have a name above all names . Let it suffice both for Answer to the place of the Philippians , and for declaration of this Popish ignorance and errour : Great is the judgement certainly when men have eyes and s●e not , ears and ye●●ear not , hearts and yet understand not , and God avert it from his people more and more . After which he thus proceeds , This title of Christ , is given to our Saviour , to ●istinguish him from others that were c●lled Iesus as well as he , who were many● ( the name in these places and time● being usual , ) as I●sus the Son of Nun , Iesu● the Son of Iehozadeck , Iesus the Son of Syrach , Iesus Iustu● , Col. 4.11 . and many more , but none of all these was Iesus Christ ; therefore this addition of Christ , you see , makes a difference betwixt this our J●sus , and all these ; And by the way , ( I should touch it again ) Doth not even the common use of the name shew , that the place of the Philippians is not literally to be understood ? For how could that name be a name ab●ve all names , which so many had as well as he , if you respect the literal name ? Therefore need● by Name , must be meant some other thing , ( as you heard before ) even power , authority , rule , and government , which is in Christ above all o●hers . S●condly , This title sheweth his Office , for it signifyeth Annointed : And this again sheweth the grosse ignorance , or wilfull malice of Papists , in so extolling the ●are word Jesus ; greater● Henry ( a proper name , common to many of his Subjects ) or King ? ( a name of Office , peculiar to him ) Mary , or Queen ? John , or Earl and Lord ? As then Henry and King be , so is Jesus and Christ , therefore judge whether is greater , if we were to stand upon names and litteral rules . This have some of their own well seen and confessed , but I had rather alledge the Scripture● . First then consider , at the first tydings brought of his happy Birth unto the Shepherds , mark how the Angels content n●t themselves to say , * Vnto you is born a Iesus , or a Saviour , but they adde more comfort , which is Christ the Lord. * Thereby preferring this Jesus before all that ever were so called , by a title of his Office : The like we read in Matthew , ‖ Of whom is born Iesus , which is called Christ : In * Iohn we read of a dissention , &c. Not whether he were Iesus or no , but whether he were Christ , knowing the greater moment to be in that : A●ain , * A L●w was made to excommunicate whosoever confessed him to be Christ , not against calling him by the name Iesus ; In the same place you see the poor man which had received sight , to fall down and worship when he heard the title of the Son of God , and not doing it before in that sort , though he knew his name to be Iesus : In the * 10th . of Iohn , they would have stoned him , for s●ying he was the Son of God , and called it Blasphemy , but they did not so for the name of Iesus : I● ‖ Luke they demanded of him , Art thou the very Christ ? not , Act thou Iesus ? for so they called him without offenc● , and when they heard his Answer , they rent their Clothes , thereby declaring how far greater it was to be Christ , then to have the literal name of Iesus . All which places , with many more , ought truly to teach and perswade our souls , to look for his Office , that hath his name which is so comfortable , and not to be * Children , playing with Letters and Syllables , and adoring Titles with honour that is due to the Person , as those fond men do , salving all the matter with a foolish distinction of concomitancy , by which all Idolatry may be as well excused . Thus thi● Learned pious Bishop of our Church , expresly against Bishop Andrews and others fancies since . If this Bishop seem singular in this case , I shall adde another Prelate to second him , even that Famous Learned Divine William Alley , Bishop of Exeter , Divinity Lecturer at Pauls , in the first year of Queen Elizabeth , who in his Poor Mans Library , Tom. 2. Miscelanea Praelectionis , 3 , & 4. London , Cum gra●ia & p●ivilegio Regiae Majestatis , 1571. fol. 42 , 43 , 88 , 103 , 104 writes thu● , God the Father gave un●o Cur●●●ot only the glory of his body , but also the glory o● his name , A● it is written by Paul , Philippians 2.9 , 10. He gave him a name which is above all name●●●hat In ( so be * twice renders it , not A● ) the name of Jesus every knee should bow , both of thin●s in Heaven , of things in Earth , and of things under ●h● Earth● These words ( writes he , answering the Papis●s obj●cting it for proof of their imaginary Purgatory ) are not to be understood of the worshipping of God , ●or this worship standeth not in this , that the kn●e should be bowed , ●ut doth sp●cially require the spiritual effects and motions of the mind : Paul there speaketh of the great Authority and power which is committed and given to Chri●t , by which power every creature of Heaven , Earth , and Hell , is made subject unto him , even the Devil himself , with all the wicked and damned spirit● , will they nill they , are delivered under his feet ; and the words which go before shew this sufficiently , for it is said , God gave him a name that is above all name● , that all knees should bow In that Name ; W●ich words if ye will apply unto the Divine Worship , as though they which worship God be in Purgatory ; Then must you grant also , that the Devil and all the damned spirits do worship Christ ; Nomen , name in this place is taken for dignity and honour , and so it is used almost in all tongues , especially in the Scriptures it is a familiar speech ; Paul therefore by this word Name , signifieth high and great power to be given unto Christ , and Christ to be set in chiefest degree of honour , that there may no dignity be found like , either in Heaven or in Earth . It is to be wondred of some which do coactly restrain this sentence of Paul to the two Syllables of this name Jesus : Paul speaketh of the whole Majesty of Christ ; For they which do consider , and have no further respect but only to the two Syllables of the name , do like as one would discusse and find out by this word Alexander , the great prowesse of the name which Alexander gat him ; But I pray you , * how much more foolish are the Sorbonists , which gather by this place of Paul , that the knee is to be bowed as often as this name Iesus is pronounced ? As though this word were a word which hath in the very sound all the power included : But Paul speaketh here of the honour which is to be given to the Son of God , and to his Majesty , and not to the Syllables either sounded or written : And in this behalf , how much ( I pray you ) did the pel●ing Pardoners deceive the people , in selling this name in Golden or Painted Papers , as though they might obtain either remission of sins , or else the favour of God thereby ? Thus much Bishop Alley . To him I shall annex that late Learned Reverend Divine , * Dr. Henry Airay , Provost of Queens Colledge in Oxford , who upon this Text of the Philippians , writes thus , And hath given him a name , &c. Where we are not to unde●stand , that God gave unto Christ after his Resurrection any new name which he had not before ; for as before , so after , and as after , so before , he was and is called , the wisdome of God , the power of God , the true light of the world , faithfull and true , holy and just , the Apostle and High Priest of our profession , a Priest for ever after the order of Melchizadech , the Saviour of the world , the Prince of Peace , the Mediator of the New Testament , the head of the Church , the Lord of Glory , Iesus Christ , the Son of the Father , the Son of God , and God ; neither had he any name after his Resurrection which he had not before ; But by a name is to be understood in this place , glory , and honour , and Majesty , and Dominion over all things created , ( as the same word is elsewhere used , Ephes. 1.21 . ) So that when it is said , God hath given him a name above every name , the meaning is , That God having raised up Christ Jesus from the dead , hath so highly exalted him in the Heavenly places , that he hath given him all power both in Heaven and Earth , all Dominion ov●r all Creatures whatsoever , and the same glory which he had with him from the beginning , so that now he raigneth and ruleth with him● King over all , and bl●ssed for ever , which he there proves and parallels with Heb. 2.9 . Ephes. 1.20 , 21 Iohn 17.5 . Mat. 28.18 . And then concludes thus . To knit up all in a word , Christ ( God and Man ) after his Resurrection , was Crowned with glory and honour , even such as plainly shewed him to be God , there to rule and raign as Soveraign Lord and King , till he come in the Clouds to judge both quick and dead ; After which , he proceeds in these words , * Where by the name of Jesus w● are not to understand the bare name of Jesus , as though it had the vertue in it to drive away Devils , or as though at the very sound of it all were to bow their knees , For at the name of Saviour ( which is the same with Jesus ) none boweth , and the name of Christ , Emanuell , of the Son of God , of God , are names no lesse precious and glorious then is the name of Jesus ; True it is , that bowing at the name of Iesu● is a Custome which hath been much used , but to bow and kneel at the very sound of the name , when we only hear the name of Iesus sounding in our ears , but know not what the name meaneth , * savoureth of Superstition . By bowing the knee , the Apostle here meaneth , that subjection which all Creatures ought continually to perform , and which all Creatures shall perform to Christ in that day ; some , wilingly and chearfully , as Holy-m●n and Angels : some , unwilling , and to their confusion , as the Devils , and wicked men their Instruments ; For so the Lord by his Prophet useth the same phrase of speech , where he saith , a Every knee shall bow to me : That is , shall be subject to me , and worship me . Here then is a duty prescribed , necessary to be performed of every Christian , which i● , to glorifie him who is exalted into the height of glory , both in our bodie● and in our spir●t● , to worship him with holy worship , to subject our selve● to him in all obedience un●o hi● Heavenly will , For b worthy is the Lamb that was killed to receive all power , and wisdome , and strengt● , and honour , and praise , and glory ; The Angels in Heaven they glorifie the name of Jesus , in ●hat they are alwayes ready to execute his wlll , and do wha●soever he commandeth them ; This also is that holy worship wherewith we ought to worship him , and to glorifie hi● name , even to be hearer● and doer● of hi● word , to obey hi● will , to walk in his Laws , and to keep his Commandements , not the bare and outward capping and kneeing at the name of Iesus , but principally , obedience unto his will that is named , is the h●nour which here he accepteth of us ; For , a● Not ev●ry one that sayeth Lord , Lord , s●all enter into his Kingdom , so Not every one that boweth at the name of Iesus shall enter into his Kingdom , but ●e that doth his will , and walketh in his w●yes : Saul when he was sent to slay the Amalekites , thought t● honour God greatly by sparing the best of the Sheep and of the Oxen , to sacrifice unto him ; But it wa● said unto him , c Hath the Lord as great pleasure in Burnt-●fferings and Sacrifices , as when his voyce is obeyed ? Behold , 〈◊〉 obey i● better then Sacrifice , and to hearke● is b●●ter then the fa● of Rams : So you haply think , * You honour our blessed Saviour greatly , when yo● bow your selves at every sound 〈◊〉 hi● name ; But behold , to ob●y his will is better then cap●ing and kneeing , and all ou●ward Cerem●nies whatsoever : Yet mistake me not I beseech you , as though I thought that the names of Iesus , of Christ , of the Lord , of God , of the Father , of the Son , or of the Holy Ghost , were names of ordinary account or reckoning , or to be passed over withou● reverence , as other name● , nay when●oever we hear , or speak , or think of them , we are to rever●nce the Majesty of God , signified thereby ; and fearfull it may be to them that think or speak of them prophanely or lightly , or upon each light or trifling occasion , or otherwise then with great reverence and fear , that the Lord may not hold them guil●●esse : But this I say , t●at neither the sound of these Syllables of * Iesus , nor the name of Iesus , should aff●ct us more then any other names of Ch●ist , as though there lay some vertue in the bare word ; But whensoever we hear , or think , or speak of him , we are to r●verence his Majesty , and in the reveren● fear of his name , to subject ●ur selves unto his will. This is a part of that duty whereby we must glorifie Christ Jesus . After this , in the 31. Lecture he proceeds to prove , That by bowing of the knee in this Text , is meant the subjection of all creatures unto Christ , and that this Text shall be actually & ●rincipally fulfilled before his Tribunal only , in the generall day of Iudgement ; So that by his expresse resolution it appears : First , That the name Jesus is not the name above every name mentioned and intended in this Text. Secondly , That kneeing or capping at this name is not here enjoyned . Thirdly , That no more capping or bowing is to be given to the name Jesus , then to any other names of Christ , or God. Fourthly , That the bowing and capping at this name only , is Superstitiou● , and attribute● some vertue to the Letters and Syllables of the name it s●l● . Fifthly , That the bowing of every knee here mentioned , is and shall be principally per●ormed and fulfilled in the day of Judgement . To these our Learned Orthodox Bishops , and Divines , I could adde Mr. William Charke , in his Answer to a Scandalous Libell or Censure , Mr. Perkins , in his Discourse of Witchcraft , c. 3. Mr. Thomas Wilson , in his Exposition on Rom. 14 ▪ 11. p 601. who conclude this bowing at the name of Jesus to be no duty or Ceremony warranted by Phil 2 ▪ 9 , 10 , 11. and censure the P●pists for adoring and abusing the name of Jesus to Supe●stition and Idolatry : But I shall conclude with the words of Iohannes Brentius an eminent Protestant Divine , Explicatio in Epist. Pauli ad Philip. c. 2. v. 9 , 10. Quod autem Paulus ait , Vt in nomine Iesu omne se genu flectat , &c. non sic intelligendum est , quod necessarium sit ut prolato hoc nomine semper externa g●nua flec●ere debent , haec est enim Puerilis Ceremonia et propter Pueros usurpanda aliquoties ; which I wish those Reverend Fathers of the Church , who most presse and practise it , a● becomming their Dignity and Gravity , would seriously consider , lest they verifie the Proverb , Bis Pueri Senes . Now because Bp. Andrews is the fi●st and principal Divine of Eminency in our English Church , who hath expounded this Text of the Philippians against the stream of the Fathers , and Protestant Writers of our own and other Refo●med Churches , and preached up bowing , cringing at every recital of the name Jesus in the Church , as an indispensible r●ligious duty , prescribed to all Christians in this Text , when as * Mr. Hooker and others repute it only , an arbitrary harml●sse Ceremony , which no man is constrained to use , and wherein Christian liberty ought to take place , therefore no duty of the Text : And because his Sermon on it is the principal Authority which those who now most presse , practise this Duty , or Ceremony of bowing , rely upon , without due Examination of his Words and Reasons ; to undeceive all his seduced Proselytes , I shall in the next place soberly examine , discover the manifold oversights , errors , mistakes , in his so much admired Sermon on this Text and subject , being necessitated thereunto for my own just defence , by some of his Fellow-Bishops , who seem much displeased for my over-modest brief censure of them in my Lame Giles his Haltings ; whom I hope to convince , or convert to my opinion , by the irresistable evidence of Truth , and by such sacred and humane Authorities , Reasons , as they shall not be able to gain-say . If any shall deem me his or their Enemy * because I tell and discover to them the truth ; I shall patiently undergo their undemerited indignations , and silently lament , that Veritas Odium Parit , should now be experimentally verified in any Fathers of the Church , or Ministers of the Gospel , who are specially commanded , * To speak every man the Truth to his Neighbour , to execute the judgement of Truth and Peace in their Gates ; to love the Truth and Peace , and not to imagine evil in their hearts against their Neighbours , especially for discovering or defending Truth , and refelling Falshood , in matters which concern mens Consciences and immortal souls , whose sati●faction and benefit alone I only intend , by these serious and sober Inqui●ies . SECTION II. Whether these Passages in Bishop Andrews his Sermon at Whitehall , on Easter day 1614 ▪ on Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. concerning Bowing at the name of Jesus only , as a Duty of this Text , and his Reasons to evince it , be Orthodox or Heterodox ? His words and passages in that Sermon are these . A Name he gave him ; What name ? not ( inter ) among the famous men on Earth , but ( super omne nomen ) above them all ; There is super upon super , another super to his name , no less● then his Person : That , above * all Persons , and This , above all names whatsoever : This name is named in the Vers● , and it is the Name of Iesus : But how is this name said to be above all names ? What , above the name of God ? We may say with the Apostle , when he saith , God did give it him , it is manifest , he is accepted that did give it him : But we need not so say ; For , this is one of Gods own Names ; I am ( saith he ) and besides me there is no Saviour ; How is it then given him ? Accepit et ●omo quod quod habebat ut Deus : What as God he had , as man he received , with his nature his name , and the chief of all his names , the Name of a Saviour , for above all it is , above all to him , above all to us , &c. To save , the highest Law , and the Name of a Saviour the highest Name , &c. For the knee , two things . First , He would have it bow . Secondly , He would have it bow TO his Name ; To bow the knee , and TO his name to bow it , this is another Prerog●ative : He is exalted to whose person knees do bow , But he to whose * Name only , much more : but the case is here otherwise , For his Person is taken out of our sight , all we can do will not ‖ reach unto it ; But his Name he hath left behind to us ▪ that we may shew by our reverence and respect TO IT , how much we esteem him , how true the Psalm shall be , * Holy and Reverend is his Name . But if we have much a doe to get it bow at all , Much more shall we have to get it done TO HIS NAME . 1. There be that do it not : What speak I of not doing it ? There be that not only forbear to do it themselves , but put themselves to an evil Occupation , to find fault where none is , and cast scruples into mens minds , by no means to do it . Not to do it AT his name ? Nay , at the Holy misteries themselves not to do it , &c. But to keep us to the name ; This is sure , the words themselves are so plain , as they are able to convince any mans Conscience . And there is no Writer ( not of the * Antient ) on this place , that I can find ( save he that turns all into Alegories ) but literally understands it , and likes well enough we should actually perform it . Yet will ye see what subtilties are taken up to shift this duty ? All knees are called for , and all have not knees : Here are three ranks reckoned , and two of them have none . What is that to us ? we have , to us it is properly spoken , and we to look to it ; And if this were ought , that the Spirits in Heaven and Hell have no bodies , and so no knees : Why , they have no tongues neither properly , and then by the same Rule take away confessing to , and so do neither . But the Apostle , that in another place gives the Angels tongues , ( * with the tongue of Men and Angels ) might as well in this place give them knees , they have one as much as the other ; And in both places , ‖ Humanum dicit , he speaks to us after the manner of men , that we by our own language might conceive what they do ; For sure it is , the spirits of both kinds , as they do yield reverence , so they have their wayes and means to expresse it , by somewhat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the knee . They do it their way , we do it ours , and this is ours : Let us look to our own then , and not bu●ie our brains about theirs ; but for us and our sakes , they are divers times expressed in the * Revelation even doing thus , falling down before him . Secondly , Why TO HIS NAME more then to the name of Christ ? There want not reasons why : 1● Christ is not , cannot be the name of God , God cannot be annointed ; But Iesus is the name of God , and the chief name of God , ( as we have heard . ) 2. The name of Christ is communicated by him to others , namely to Princes ; so is not Iesus , that is proper , * Ego sum , & preter me non est alius ; and ever that which is proper , is above that which is holden in common . 3. Christ is annointed , To what end ? to be our Saviour ; that is the end then , and ever the end is above the means ; ever the name of health , above the name of any Medicine . 4. But when we find expresly in the Verse , this name is exalted above all names , and this act limited TO it in direct words , and so this name above them in this very particular , why seek we any further ? Thirdly , What ? to the two syllables ? or to the sound of them ? What needs this ? Who speaks of sound or syllables ? The Text saith , Do it TO the name ; the name is not the sound , but the sence : The caution is ea●ie then , Do it TO the sence , have mind on him that is named , and do his name the honour and spare not . Fourthly , But it cannot be denyed , but there hath been Superstition used in it . Suppose there hath , and almost in what not ? In hearing of Sermons now is there not Superstition in a great many ? What shall we do then ? Lay them down ? Abandon hearing , as we do kneeling ? I trowe not ; But remove the Superstition , and retain them still ; Do but so here and all is at an end . Indeed , if it were a taken-up worship , or some humane injunction , it might perchance be drawn within the case of the ‖ Brazen Serpent . But being thus directly set down by God himself , in us , there may be superstition ; in it , there can be none ; and if it be in us , we are to amend our selves , but not to stir the Act which is of Gods own prescribing . It was never heard in Divinity , that Superstition could ever abolish a duty of the T●xt . That we set our selves to drive away Superstition , it is well , but it is well too that we so drive it away , as we drive not all reverent regard and decency away with it also ; And are we not well toward it ? We have driven it from our head , for we keep on of all hands ; and from our knees , for kneel we may not ; * we use not I am sure . Sure , heed would be taken , that by taking heed we prove not Superstitious , we slip not into the other extream before we be aware , which of the two extreams Religion worse endureth , as more opposite unto it : For believe this , As it may be superstitio●sly used , so it may be irreligiously neglected also . Look to the Text then , and let no man perswade you , but that God requireth a reverent carriage even of the body it self , and namely , this service of the knee , and that TO HIS SONS NAME , ye shall not displease him by it , ●ear not ; Fear this rather for the knee , if it will not bow , that it shall be stricken with somewhat that it shall not be able to bow : And for the Name , that they that will do no HONOUR TO IT , when time of need comes , shall receive no comfort by it . And so I leave this point . Thus far this Bishops words , whose great ●ame and estimation for learning , drew on many other Bishops , Deans , Prebends , Divines , Scholars , and Laymen to practise and promote this Bowing to or at the Name of Iesus , ( formerly disused for the most part ) as a duty of the Text , or a necessary Worship , or decent Cer●mony grounded thereon , without any due examination of his words , Quotations or Reasons , which if soberly discussed , rather overthrow than ratifie his Conclusions . I shall therefore briefly survey them in the general , and then descend to discusse some particulars . First , Be pleased to take notice of the mis-translation of his Text , At the name , for In the name of Iesus every knee should bow , against the Original and all other English Translations extant , but that of Geneva ; which corrupts both the English , sense , and meaning of the text ; & renders it as incongruous English and Nonsence ; as to translate these Scriptures , a Where two or three are gathered together IN my name ; Receive one such Child IN my Name ; Whatsoever ye shall ask IN my name ; many shall come IN my name ; Believe IN my name , &c. Into , where two or three are gathered together At my ●ame ; Receive one such At my name ; Whatsoever ye shall ask At my name ; Many shall ask At my name ; Believe , hope , trust At my name ; O● , b sound IN the Faith , into ●ound AT the Faith , which is neither good English , Sense , nor Scripture . 2ly . Observe how he no lesse then ten times , or more changeth At his name , into Ad nomen , To the name of Iesus . He would have u● bow To the Name ; To his name to bow , &c. are Ten times repeated . Which , as it idolizeth the name Iesus it self , by giving divine honor and worship To I● , as a duty of this Text ; so it justifies and makes much for the Iesuites and Romanists bowing to and adoring his name Iesus wherever they behold it written , c carved , painted , as well as hear it pronounced . Yea in some measure it subverts his pretended new Duty of his Text by this Nonsequitur : Every knee should bow To the name of Jesu● ; Ergo , all Christians must bow their Knees To this Name Iesus , when ever it is pronounced in the Church , and they hear the sound thereof in reading of a Chapter , Epistle , Gospel , Collect , Prayer , Sermon , Homily , or administration of the Sacrament . 3ly . Consider his main Scripture cited to prove this bowing At and To this name Iesus , to thi● Name only , not his Name God , Lord , Christ , or any other Name , is Psalm 111.9 . Holy and Reverend is his Name . But is this name Iesus , the Holy and Reverend name , intended in that Text ? Nothing lesse . For first , this Psalm was compiled many hundred years before our Saviours incarnation , or his Name Iesus given unto him by the Angel , or imposed on him by his direction at his circumcision , Mat. 1.21 , 25. Lu. 1.31 . c. 2.21 . What name was it then , which is so holy and reverend ? the very Psalm it self resolves in direct terms , it was no other but Lord , four times repeated in it , v. 1 , 2 , 10. Praise the Lord , I will praise the Lord with my whole heart ; &c. The works of the Lord are great , &c. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisedom ; there being no other Name else used in the whole Psalm , nor in the Psalm next before and after it , viz. 110. & 112. That this title LORD is this holy and reverend Name , is further evident by the 1 Chron 16.7 , to 12. & Ps. 105 1 , 2 , 3 , &c. In that day David delivered this Psalm to thank the LO●D . O give thanks unto the Lord , call upon his Name , Glory ye in his holy Name , Let the heart of them r●joyce that seek the Lord , Seek the Lord & his strength Seek his face evermore , &c. Ps. 103.1 , 2. Bl●sse the Lord O my Soul , and all that is within me blesse his Holy name . Blesse the Lord O my Soul , &c. ( Here is his Holy name above every Name ; his Exaltation and Dominion over all Creatu●es thus follows ) v. 19.20 , 21 : The Lord hath prepared his Throne in Heaven , and his Kingdom ruleth over all . Bless the Lord ye his Angells that excell in strength , that do his commandement , hearkning to the voyce of his word . ( Here are things in Heaven bowing their Knees to him ) Bless the Lord all ye his Hosts , ye Ministers of his that do his pleasure . Blesse the Lord all his Works in all places of his Dominion ( in heaven , earth , and under the earth ) agreeing with Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. and resolving LORD to be his holy Name above all Names , since every tongue should confess that Iesus Christ is Lord , in or to the glory of God the Father . Adde to this Psalm 142.21 . My mouth shall speak the prayse of the Lord , and let all Flesh blesse his holy Name for ever and ever , Lu. 1.46.49 My Soul doth magnifie the Lord , &c. For he ●hat is Mighty hath magnified me , and holy is his Name . Therefore this Name Lord , not Iesus , is the name that is holy and reverend mentioned in Psalm 111. and the Name above every Name in which every knee should bow , intended in the Phi●ippians , notwithstanding this Bishops and other Doctors fancies to the contrary ; and the bowing of every kneee , a ‖ bowing of subjection of all Creatures to his Soveraignty , especially in the day of Judgement , as I have * already evidenced at large . Which I shall further demonstrate by these ensuing Scriptures , Rev. 1.5 , 6 , 8 , 18. Jesus Christ , the first begoten of the dead , the Prince of the Kings of the earth , &c. to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever , Amen . I am Alpha and Omega , the beginning and ending saith the Lord , which is , and which was , and which is to come , the Almightie . I am he that liveth and was dead , and behold I am alive for evermore Amen ; and have the keyes of Hell and Death , Rev. 3.21 . To him that overcommeth will I grant to sit with me in my Throne , even as I also overcame , and am set down in my Fathers Throne ; Rev. 6.10 And they cryed with a loud voyce , how long O Lord holy and true , dost thou not judge and avenge our Blood , &c. And the Kings of the earth , and the Great men , and the rich men , and the chief Capt●ins , and the mighty men , and every bond-man and free-man hid themselves in the denns , &c. and said to the Mountains fall on us , and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the Throne , and from the wrath of the Lamb. R●v . 11.15 , 16 , 17. And there were great voyces i● heaven , saying , The Kingdoms of the World are become the Kingdoms of the Lord , and of his Christ , and he shall reign for ever and ever . And the 24. Elders which sate before God o● their seats fell down on their faces , and worshiped God , saying , We give the thanks Lord God Almightie , which art , and wast , and art to come , because thou hast taken unto thee thy great Power , a●d hast reigned . And the Nations were angry , and thy wrath is come , and the time of the dead that they should be judged , and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy Servants and Prophets , and to the Saints , and them that fear thy name , small and great , and shouldest destroy them that destroy the earth , Rev. 15.3 , 4. And they sung the song of Moses , and of the Lamb , saying , Great and marvellous are thy works , Lord God Almighy , ju●t and true are thy wayes thou King of Saints , &c. Who shall not fear thee O ●ord and glorifie thy name , for thou onely art holy , for all Nations shall come and worship before thee , for thy Judgments are made manifest , Rev. 16.7 , 8 , 9. And I heard the Angel say , Thou art righteous , O Lord , which art , and wast , and art to come , &c. And I heard another under the Altar say , Even so , Lord God Almighty , true and righteous are thy judgements , Rev. 18.8 , &c. Shee shall be burnt with fire , for strong is the Lord God that judgeth her . Rev. 19.1 , 2 , 4 , &c. After those things , I heard a great voyce of more people in heaven , saying Allelujah , salvation , ●nd glory , and honour , and power ●nto the Lord our God ; for true and righteous are thy judgements , for he hath judged the great Whore And the 24. Elders , and the 4. Beast● fell down and worshipped God that sat● on the Throne , saying , Allelujah , &c. And I heard as it were the voyce of a great multitude , and as the Voice of many waters and mighty thundrings , saying , Allelujah ; For the Lord God Omnipotent reigneth : Let us be glad , and rejoyce , and give honour to him , &c. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword , that with it he should smite the Nations , and he shall rule them with a rod of Iron , ●nd he treadeth the winepresse of the wrath of God ; and he hath on his vesture , and on his thigh a name written , King of Kings , and Lord of Lords , &c. And I saw the dead , small and great , stand before GOD , and the Books we●e opened , &c. and they were judged every man according to their works . And then it will be mo●t clear , That the Names of God , Lord , Lord of Lords &c. not the name Jesus , ( not once mentioned in all these Texts ) is the name above every name ; and the bowing , subjection of all Angels , Men , Spirits , great and small , good and bad before the Throne or Judgement seat of Jesus Christ , and his judging of them , the bowing of every knee ; and their confessions of him to be LORD , and GOD , in the glory of God the Father : the very same intended in Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. Isay 45.23 . and Rom. 14 4ly Take notice of these his Hyperbolical expressions , which may prove very dangerous if not warily unde●stood , and quali●ied with some grains of charity and candor . Here is super up●n super : Another super to his Name , no l●sse then his Pe●son . That above all persons ( not excepti●g the Persons of God the Father , and God the holy Ghost ) And this a●ove all names whatsoever : not excepting the Names of God , God the Father 〈◊〉 HOLY SPIRIT , ( no more then the other great and glo●ious names of Christ , Son of God , Lord , &c. ) whose Persons and Names too are Co-aequal with the Person and Name of I●sus ; Therefore to be equally adored , bowed to and honoured by all O●thodox Christians : whereas these his expressions , seconded with constant bowing● only at and to the Name , Person of Jesus , not of God the F●ther , or God the Holy Ghost , imply , yea make an inaequality in the very Trinity it self , and advance the Pe●son , Name of Jesus the Sonne , above the Person , N●me of God the Father ; and Person , Name of God the holy Spirit ; whose Deity the * Eunomians , Macedonians , Samosetanus , Photinus , and their followers d●nyed of old ( and Biddolph with others amongst us of late ) as well as the Arrians denyed the Deity of Jesus Christ. 5ly . His words , That God requires this service of the knee , and that to his Sonnes name ( Jesus ) Ye shall not displease him by it , fe●r not , &c. They that will do no honour ( he me●●s by this bowing at or to it , every time it is recited ) when time of need comes shall have no comfort by it : Have mind on him that is named , and do his Name the Hono●r , and spare not , are such dangerous , bold assertion● , as never fell from any Protestant Divines mouth or pen before his ; and that in a Royal Court-Auditory ; and cannot be justified by any of his Admi●ers ; nor excused ( as learned Bishop Morton confessed to me when he had well considered them , and Archbishop Abbot too ) from the censure of Name-worship , Will-worship ; nor distinguished from the Papists worshipping of his Name , Cross , Body in the Eucharist , if compared with his former passages . 6ly . Observe this other collateral passage of his , Not to do it at his Name ? Nay , at the holy Mysteries thems●lves not to do It. Which may have a harsh construction agreeable to the Doctrin and practise of the Chu●ch of Rome : Even to bow at , kneel to , adore the very Body of Christ in the consecrated Host , and Elements themselves ( as the Papists do ) which he hath left behind him in his Chu●ch ( as the Bishop writes he hath 〈◊〉 his Name ) when he ascended into heaven , to shew forth his death till he come ; This seems to be his meaning by his precedent words , His name he hath left behind to us , that we may shew by our reverence and respect to It , how much we esteem him . But to take them in the favourablest sense , they import , That kneeling at or to the consecrated Elements of Christs body and bloud , in the act of receiving them in the Lords Supper , is a duty prescribed by , or necessarily inferred from this Text of Phil● 2.9 , 10. as well as bowing at and to the name of Jesus , which some Great * Rabbies have thence concluded , with more confidence then judgement . For as there is not one syllable in the whole Text , Chapter or Epistle relating to , or intended of the Lords Supper ; and so not of kneeling , bowing at or to the sacred Mysteries in it ; So doubtlesse things in heaven , and thing● under the earth , did never yet receive or eat the holy Sacrament ; much lesse adore or kneel thereat or thereto : Neither can this Text in any probability enjoyn the Posture of kneeling at the Lords Supper , upon these considerations following : 1. It is most apparent , that Jesus Christ himself instituted his last Supper and admini●tred the consecrated bread and wine to all his Disciples as they sate at the * Table , immediately after the Pascal Supper ended in a Sitting , not Knéeling Posture ; as all the Evangelist●●hus joyntly attest , Mat. 26.20 . &c. Mar. 14.18 ; &c. Luke 14 ▪ 22. &c. Iohn 13.12 . &c. When the ●ven was c●m● H● sate down with the Twelve , as Matthew records it He sate down and the Twelve Ap●stles with him . So Luke● And as They Sate and did eat , afterward Iesus took ●read , &c ( So Mark , ) And said , Take , ●at , this i● my body , &c. Compar●d with Luke 22.27 . Whether is gr●ater , He that si●teth at Meat , or he that serveth ? Is not ●e that Sitteth at M●at ? but I am among you as he that serveth ( spoken by Christ to the Apostles at and while they sate receiving the * Lords Supper , or applyed by this Evangelist to that Season ) And with Luke 24.30 . ( wh●ch some Protestants and most Papists apply to this Sacrament , after Christs Resurrecti●n ) And it came to passe as he sate at meat with them ; He took Bread , and blessed it , and brake and gave to t●em . Therefore Christ instituted , and the Apost●es received the Sacrament sitting , without all dispute . 2ly . It was the constant usage and custome of the Jewish Nation , yea the practise of Christ & his Apostles to Sit at all their Civil and Sacred Fe●sts , Suppers , Sacrifices , R●pasts , as is most evident by all these ensuing Texts , most express in point , Gen. 27.19 . c 37.25 . c 43.33 . Exod. 16 3. ●ev . 32.6 Judg. 19.6 . 1 Sam. 9.22 . c. 16.11 . c. 19●5 , 24 , 25 34. c. 20 24 Ruth 2.14 . 1 Kings 10.4 , 5. c. 13.19 , 20. c. 15.35 2 Chron. 9.4 . Ps. 26 . 4● 5. Prov. 23. 1 Cant. 1.12 . Ezech 44.3 Mich. 4.4 . Neh. 8● 7. Esther 3.15 . c. 7.7 . &c. Mat. 14.19 , 20. c. 15 35. c. 26.6 , 7. Lu. 14.7 , 8 , 9 , 10. c. 17.7 , 8. c. 7.36 , 37 c. 9.14 . Marke 2.15 , 16. c. 13.3 , 4. c. 6.39 . &c. John 6.10 , 11 , &c. c. 12.1 , 2. Act● 10.41 . Mar. 8.6 . c. 6. 21 , 22 , 26. 1 Cor. 8.10 . c. 10.9 . Lu. 22.14 , 27 , 30. Therefore no doubt they all ●sed this Ge●tur● of Si●ting , not kneeling at the eating and drinking the sacred Mysteries of the Lords Supper , as well as of the Passeover , a Type only of the Lords Supper ; whic● the Jewes alw●ies received Sitting , after t●eir deliverance ●rom the Ae●yptian bondage ( though mo●t conjecture they did eat it St●nding in Aegypt when fir●● in●tituted , though the Text doth not express it ) as is proved at large by learned Francis Tremelius on Mat. c. 26.20 . Gulielm . Stucki●● Antiqu. Conv. l. 2. c. 34. and others , against the error of Chrysostom , ●heophilact , and * others who thought the Jewes , and our Saviour Chri●t with his Disciples did eat it standing , not sitting . 4ly . The Jews and people of God , yea Heathens too , in their Solemn publick and private Fasts , Prayers , Sacrifices , Devotions usually SATE ( not Kneeled ) down before the Lord and his Prophets , witnesse Judg. 20.26 . 1 Sam. 1.9 2 Sam. 7.18 . 1 Chron. 17.16 . Ezra . 9.4 . Neh. 1.4 . Ps. 137.1 . Gen. 31.10 1. Kings 19.4 . Isay 52.2 . c. 3.26 . c. 47.1 , 5 , 8. Job 2.8 , 12. Num. 2.10 . Ezech. 14.12 . c. 20.12 . c. 26.16 c. 33.31 . Mich. 7.8 . Zech. 4.8 . Lu. 1.79 . Lu. 10.13 . c. 8.35 . Mat. 27.61 . Deut. 33 . 3● 1 Cor 14 30. Jam. 2.3 . Yea we read that Christ usually SATE when he instructed the people ; Mat. 13.1 , 2● &c. 26.55 . he said , I sate daily with you teaching in the Temple : yea he SITS now at his Fathers own right hand in heauen , making intercession for u● . Col 3.1 . Ps. 110.1 . Rom. 8.34 . Hebr. 1.3 c. 10.12 . Therefore it is more than probable ( from this consideration ) that Christ and his Apostle SATE nor kneeled at the Lords Supper , this gesture of Sitting being a gesture of humility ( as St. * Augustine defines ) as well as Kneeling , and more frequently used in daies , duties of fasting and humiliation , than any other posture , a● the premised Scriptures evidence , or than falling down upon the knees to pray on such daies as these , of which we find one onely President in Scripture , Ezra 9.5 . and that after long sitting down astonied , v. 3 , 4. which sufficiently refutes the error of those , who repute Kneeling the fittest , humblest gesture both in Prayer , and receiving the Sacraments , though they use it not in the Act of Baptizing . 4ly . That Chrysostom , Theophilact , Calvin , Camerarius , Beza , and others on Mat. 26.20 . Mar. 14.18 , &c ▪ Lu : 22.14 . are of opinion , that Christ and his Apostles did eat the Pascal Supper standing ; which being ended , Deinde recumbentes , & recumbentibus tradidit suum Sacramentum : Primum enim perfecit significatum , deinde verum perfecit : & recubuisse proprium Pascha traditurus . Peracto selenni Pascharitu , ut caenaret r●cubuisse interpretor : learned Gulielmus Stuckius , Antiqu. Convivinalium , l. 2. c. 24. De more Sedendi ad Mensam , de sedibus atque sellis , proves at large , that it was the general custom of the Iews , as likewise of the Grecians , Romans , and most other Nations in their Civil and Sacred Feasts , to sup and eat SITTING ; and that Christ and his Disciples did institute and eat the Lords Supper Sitting , which Buxdorfius , and Antonius Walaeus Commentarie on Mat. 26.20 . prove at large , to whom I refer the Readers for fuller satisfaction . 5ly . This truth of our Saviours and his Apostles Sitting at the Lords Supper , That Christ administred and his Disciples received the Lords Supper Sitting , is so apparent , that the Papists themselves ( who , as most affirm ) introduced Kneeling at the Lords Supper to adore the Consecrated Elements , and that the Priests might with more ease put the Bread into the Receivers mouths , which themselves must not touch nor handle ) in most of their Mass-books , a M●ssals , B●eviaries , Howers , and other Books of Devotion , picture our Saviour in their Masses and Festivall , De Caena Domini , sitting with his 12. Disciples round about a Table administring the Lords Supper to them SITTING , not Kneeling . And they have also compiled sundry Hymns , and Anthems , expressing this their posture of Sitting at the Lords Supper , viz Rex Sedet in Caena turba cinctus Duodena Se tenet in manibus , se cibat ipse cibus , &c And b In supremae nocte caenae recumbens cum Fratribus Cibus turbae duodenae se dat suis manibus . And some of their c Schoolmen debate at large , Whether his Body there present under the Elements after Consecration ( as they hold ) be not now SITTING , not lying on the Altar ; because he first instituted it SITTING ? as they unanimously grant ; and is now SITTING at Gods right hand in heaven . 6ly . All foreign d Protestant Divines and Commentators I have seen on the Evangelists , joyntly grant and assert , that Chist instituted , and his Apostles received the Lords Supper sitting ; and our own Martyrs , Writers , both used and writ for the use , continuance , and revival of this gesture of Sitting , as * Mr. William Tyndal , e Thomas Beacon , in their Workes , printed cum Privilegio long before Mr. Cartwright and others raised this Cont●ove●sie ; and Mr. Hooker , Bp. Morton Dr. Iohn burges , with others who have writ in defence of kneeling at the Sacrament , acknowledge it for a truth . Whence f Dr. Boyes a Dean of Canterbury in his Pestil on St. Stephens day , thus argues for the change of this posture used by Christ & his Apostles . Concerni●g Kneeling at the Lords Supper , If the Church have power and authority ●o change the time , commanding us to receive the Communion in the morning , whereas Chirsts was in the g night ; to change the place , whereas Christ ordained it in a h Private house , we communicate in a Temple . To change the Number and quality of the Persons delivering the Sacrament unto more than twelve , and to Women as well as Men ; I see no reason but it hath authority to change the Gesture . The Time was altered , because for this Sacrifice the Morning is the most fit time ; the Place was altered , because the Church was the most fit place . The Gesture was altered also ( being a matter not of the Sacraments essence , but of outward Order only , ) because Kneeling is the most fit gesture , for Protestants especially , who deny the gross real presence , and hold the Lords Supper an Eucharist or thanksgiving unto God , for the redemption of the World by the death of his Son ; giving of thanks is a part of Prayer , and in Prayer no gesture so fit as Kneeling . So that by this Doctors confession , Christ , his Apostles , and the Primitive Christians used the gesture of Sitting , not Kneeling at the holy Mysteries ; till the Church by her own Authority , in after ages , changed it into Kneeling . I wonder therefore much at Mr. Thomas Paybody hi● bold assertion in his Iust Apology for the gesture of Kneeling in the Act of receiving the Lords Supper , London 1629. part 2. p. 49. I do avow , that it is impossible to demonstrate , so , as the Consci●nce may infallibly build thereupon , that either Christ or his Apostles Sate in the Eucharistical Supper : and at a Great Doctors assertion , that they kneeled at it , and received only the Paschal Supper Sitting ; when all the premised Scriptures , Authors , and sundry more resolve the contrary . What Church it was that changed this Gesture , and when , how , or for what cause she did it , Dr. Boyes defines not . * But learned Thomas Beacon , Prebend of Canterbury , long before he was Dean , in his Catechism printed cum Privilegio with his Works , London 1563. ( dedicated ●o all the Archbps. & Bp● . of England , and applauded with some of their Panygerick Verses in commendation of his Piety and Learning ) gives us this account thereof , & of these Gestures of Kneeling & Sitting . Albeit I know & confess that Gestures themselves be indifferent , yet I could wish all such Gestu●es to be avoided , as have outwardly any appearance of evil , according to this saying of St. * Paul , Abstain from all evil appearance . And forasmuch as Kneeling hath been long used in the Church of Christ at the receiving of the Sacrament , thorow the doctrin of the Papists , although of it self it be indifferent , yet I could wish it were taken away by Authority of the Higher Powers . Why so ? for it hath an appearance of evil . When the Papists had made of the Sacramental Bread and Wine a God , and had taught and commanded the People to worship it as God , than gave they commandement streightwaies , that all the People should with all Reverence Kn●el unto it , Worship and Heno●r it . And by this means the Gesture of Kneeling crept in , and is yet used in the Church of the Papists , to declare , That they Worship the Sacrament as their LORD GOD and SAUIOUR . But I would wish with all my heart that either their Kneeling at the Sacrament were taken away , or else that the People were taught , that that outward Reverence was not given to the Sacrament or outward sign , but to Christ which is represented by the Sacrament . But the most certain and sure way is , utterly to cease from Kneeling , that there may outwardly appear no appearance of evil , according to the commandement of St. Paul : lest the Enemies by the continuance of Kneeling should be confirmed in their Error , and the Weaklings offended and plucked back from the truth of the Gospel ; Kneeling with the knowledge of godly honour is due unto none but God alone . Therefore when Sathan l commanded our Saviour Christ to kneel down before him and worship him ; he answered , It is written thou shalt worship the Lord thy God. As concerning Sitting at the Lords Table , which is also used in certain reformed Churches , if it were received by Publick authority and common consent ▪ and might conveniently be used in our Churches , I could allow that Gesture best . For as it is not to be doubted but that Christ and his Disciples Sate at the Table , where Christ delivered unto them the Sacrament of his Body and Blood which use was also observed in the Primitive Church a long time after ; so likewise is it most comely , that we Christians follow the Example of our Master Christ and of his Disciples : nothing can be unreverently done that is done after the example of Christ and of his Apostles : We come together to eat and drink the holy mysteries of the body and blood of Christ , we have a Table set before us , is it not meet and convenient that we sit at our Table ? The Table being prepared who standeth or kneeleth at his meat ? Yea rather who sitteth not down ? When C●rist fed the people , he bade them not knee● nor stand upon their feet , but he commanded them to * sit down : which kind of gesture is most meet when we assemble to eat and drink , which thing we do at the Lords Table : Neither doth the ●itting of the Communicants at the Lords Table want her glory ; for as the standing of the Iews at the eating of the Lords Passover , signified , that there was yet to come another Doctrine then the Law of Moses , even the preaching of the glorious Gospel of our Lord and Saviour Christ Iesus ; and other Sacraments than Circumcision and the Passover , even the Sacraments of Baptism and the Lords S●pper ; So in like manner the sitting of the Christian Communicants at the Lords Table , doth signifie , preach and declare unto us , that we are come to our journies end concerning Religion , and that there is none other Doctrine , nor none other Sacraments to be looked for then these only , which we have received of Christ the Lord. And therefore we , sitting down at the Lords Table , shew by that gesture , that we are come to the perfection of our Religion , and look for none other Doctrine to be given unto us . Thus this antient Lea●ned Prebend . Mr. Roger Cutchud some years before him , in his first and second Sermons of the Sacrament , Anno 1552. printed Cum Privilegio 1560. determine● the like in these words , Many comming to the Lords Table do mis-behave themselves , and so do the lookers on , in that they worship the Sacrament with kneeling and bowing their bodies , and knocking their breasts , and with elevating of their hands : If it were to be elevated and shewed to the standers by , as it hath been used , Christ would have elevated it above his head ; He delivered it into the hands of his Disciples , bidding them to eat it , and not to hold up their hands ; to receive it , and not to worship it : And so delivered it to them Sitting , and not Kneeling . Only God is to be so honoured with this kind of ●everence , and no Sacrament ; For God is not a Sacrament , neither is the Sacrament God : Let us use it as Christ and his Apostles did ; if thou wilt be more devout then they w●r●● be not deceiv●d , but beware that thy Devotion be not Idolatry . So he . As for Dr. ●oyes ( with Bishop Andrews , * and others ) reason for the Churches changing Christs , his Apostles , and the Primitive Churches Sitting at the Lords Supper , into Kneeling ; Because there is giving of th●nks in the Lords Supper , ( which is there●ore stiled the Eucharist , ) which is a part of Prayer ; and in Prayer no g●stur● so fit as Kneeling ; this is very weak and unsatisfactory to many judicious Christian● . 1 Because by this Reason all Christians and Kneelers at the Lords Supper , ought not to sit , but kneel at their own Tables too , when they eat and drink , because they do , or ought * to pray ▪ and give thanks to God , before and after meat , and blesse their meat , as our Saviour did the Sacramental bread and wine , in imitation of the Custom of the Iews consecrating and blessing their meat and drink at their Feasts , and Tables in their private houses , as * Guliel . Stuckiu● , with others cited by him , & ‖ Walaeus , Ainsworth , Buxdorfius ▪ prove most amply . But Christ , though be gave thanks and blessed the bread and wine at his last Supper , did not kneel , but sate with his Apostles at the Table , both when he blessed and distributed the Elements , as the premises evidence : Yea when he solemnly bless●d and distributed the Loaves and Fishes to the people , and th● bread he did eat with his twelve Disciples , he made them sit down ( not kneel ) both before and whiles he blessed them , and gave thanks , and did eat sitting , Mat. 14 19. Mark 6.39.40 , 41. chap. 8.6 Iohn 6.10 , 11. Luke 24.30 . and all Christians still do the like at their own Tables : This therefore can be no sufficient reason to change sitting into kneeling . 2ly . If Thanksgiving be a part of Prayer , and therefore to be performed kneeling , as the fittest posture , not sitting , or standing , pray why do these e Kneelers teach us , That we ought to stand up at Gloria Patri , and rise up from our knees and seats to repeat it ? and some Popish Canons enjoyn all to stand up while it is repeated ? Is it not a Thanksgiving , a Blessing , and so a part of Prayer , as well as the Eucharist ? They must therefore kneel at that for the future , or else disclaim this reason , and their standing up at it . 3ly . The Priests and others used to stand up to give praise and thanks to God , 2 Chron 20.19 . 1 Kings 8.14 , 15. Yea the Israelites more usually stood , then kneeled , when they prayed to God in publick or private , as is evident by 1 Kings 8.14 2 Chron. 20.5 . chap. 9.13 . Gen. 19 ▪ 27. Levit. 9.5 . Deut. 10 8. chap. 29 ▪ 10. 2 Chron. 29.11 . Ezech. 44.11 , 15. Ier. 15.1 . chap. 18 20. And not only the Pharisee , but humble Publican in the Gospel , stood not kneeled when he prayed with a dijected face and spirit , Lord be mercifull to me a sinner , Luke 18.11 , 13. yea Christs Disciples likewise stood when they prayed , and used the Lords Prayer , and that by Christs approbation , if not expresse precept , Mark 11.25 . When ye * stand praying , forgive , &c. which relates to Mat. 6.14 . immediately following the ●ords Prayer , which we never read the Apostles used kneeling , but standing only , and that by Christs approbation and command : How then can kneeling be the fittest gesture in Prayer , and for the Lords Prayer especially , which most Bishops and Ministers kneel down to say at the end of their own Prayers before their Sermons , which they make standing , not kneeling ? Why stand or kneel they not a like at both , and contradict the Apostles practise as well in kneeling at the Lords Prayer , as at the Lords Supper , when as they stood at the one , and s●te at the other ? Is not this to bid a Non-obstante to Christ and his Apostles ? To controul and censure their practise , gesture , instead of imitating them ? To * Lord it over Gods people and inheritance , and deprive them of that Christian Liberty which Christ himself hath purchased for them ? 4ly . There is not one precept nor president in the Bible for Kneeling at the Lords Supper , but many direct Texts and Presidents that Christ and his Apostles received it sitting , whose examples we ought to imitate , rather then any Doctors Phantasmes . No precept in the Old Testament or New , and very few presidents in either for Kneeling in Prayer , especially in publick Prayer : There are many Presidents for sitting and standing both in publick and private Prayers , ●ast● , Humiliations , in the Texts forecited , and the * Primitive Church , Christians for above 800. years after Christ , on all Lords dayes throughout the year , and from Easter till Whitsontide , constantly prayed standing , not kneeling , in honour and memory of Christs Resurrection , without bowing at his name Iesus , or kneeling at the Lords Supper , for ought appears by any Council , Father , or Ecclesiastical History ; the places of a St Ambrose , and b Aug●stine , produced by the Papists for Adoration of the Hostia , and by others for kneeling at the c Sacrament ( grounded upon a mis-translation and mistake of Psal. 99.5 . Adore and worship his Foot-stool , instead of at his Foot-stool , interpreted his holy Hill , vers . 9. not the flesh of Christ ) prove neither the Sacraments Adoration , ( not there mentioned ) nor Kneeling in the Act of receiving , much lesse the Monkish story of the Macedonian woman , recorded by d Nicephorus , e Sozomen ▪ and the f Century Writers , ( much urged of late ) who after she had received the consecrated bread into her hand , ( according to the Custom then used ) from St. Chrysostome , conveyed it away , and put other unconsecrated bread into her mouth , brought to her secretly by her Servant , from her house , for which end , P●rinde quasi orationi vacatura se inclinata summisit ( ●o Nicephorus ) Mysterium sacrosanctum occuluit : Or , cum pan●m accepisset & jam priusquam sumeret , quasi oratura in terram inclinaret , aliud quoddam domo ablatum , famula , quam ad eam rem instruxerat , subministrante , cum ori admovisset , ecce inter mandendum in lapidem induruit , as Sozomen records it . All Historians agreeing , that she received the consecrated bread not kneeling ( as g some Great Doctors mistake ) but sitting or standing ; she kneeling and bowing down as if she were about to pray , after she had received it in her hand in another posture , to convey it away secretly to her servant only , not to eat it . Finally , There is not one Canon to be found made by any General , National , Provincial , Council , or Synod from Christs institution of the Lords Supper , till above 1460. years after his Ascention : Not any one Rubrick in all the Liturgies , Writings of the Fathers , or Missals , Breviaries , Offices , Pontificals , Ceremonials of the Church of Rome it self , that I could either find , upon my best search , or any other yet produce , enjoyning Communicants to kneel in the Act of Receiving . This truth is acknowledged , and thus proved at large by our learned Dr. Iohn Burges , the best , eminentest Champion , for this Gesture of kneeling of all others . This gesture of Kneeling was never any constituted Ceremony of the Church of Rome , nor is it at this day . Bellarm. l. 2. de Missa , c. 14 , 15. sets down all the Ceremonies of the Mass , and a never mentions Kneeling in the Act of Receiving , as one of them ; no nor yet the Mass-book , which shews when the Priest or People must bow or kneel for adoration of the Crucifix , Altar or Sacrament . b Durantus , writing of the Roman Ceremonies , not only names not this gesture for one in the act of receiving , but , on the contrary affirms , That it ought to be taken Standing , and proves it also . And so doth the c Pope himself receive or partake it ; and when he celebrates the Office he receiveth Sitfing , as being a Type of Christ ; and d every Priest by order of the Mass-book , reverenter stans standing reverently at the Altar , and not kneeling there . The Bowing or Kneeling of the Priest at the Mass , are to the Crucifix set on the Altar , to the Altar , or at the time of consecration , that is , immediately after it . e The People which ●eceive not , a● well as those that do receive , are reverenter inclinari se , reverently to bow themselves to the Sacrament , not when they receive i● , but when the Priest doth elevate the Paten , or Chalice for Adora●ion , or when the Host is carried to any sick ●●rson , or in Procession . And this is that Adoration which was first brought in by f Pope Honorius the Third , and not any Kneeling or Ado●ation in the Act of Receiving . T●ue it is that the Receivers of the Host from ●he hand of the Priest do Kneel , not ●or Adora●ion , but of an antient Custom , ( since tran●ubstantiation ) not by Order or Institution . Onely in some places and occasi●ns they do it , but then not for Adoration , but either for reverence of the g Pope ( as when he administreth to the Sub-deacon , as they do also take hallowed Candle● at his hand Kneeling , h genu flexo on Candlemas day ) or else they do it to that end , that the Priest may put it more easily into the Mouth without danger of spilling , or shedding any of it . Hence in the i Miss●l of the Order of Predicants allowed by the Chapter of Salamenca 1551. and by the Pope , p●inted at Venice , Anno 1562. two of the F●ee●s ar● TO KNEEL on each side of the * Priest , holding a clean napkin betwixt him and the receiv●r , and putting it under the Communicants chin , for fear of shedding . The Communicant hims●l● is forbidden to prostrate ( id est , to bow his Body ) himself ( which in the Act of Adoration , all but the Priest which celebrates ar● th●rein command●d to do ) or to kiss● the ground , or Priests f●et . But k KNEELING upon one of the greeces he m●st hold all his Body upright , and opening his mouth neither too much nor too little , without turning his eyes or countenance undecently aside , in comely order and r●verence he is to rec●ive the Sacrament . This KNEELING of the Communicant is not for adoration of the S●cram●nt , no more than the KNEELING of those which stand side-wayes to hold the Napkin . Yea prostration , or bowing the trunk of the Body , is there forbidden them when they receive , which is in the same Chapter commanded for adoration to those that do not then communicate , but look on , ut stent super formas prostrati , and all before the Sacrificer himself , prosternant se adorantes . So that this Kneeling in the Receiving , was only for the conveniency of putting the Host into the mouth of the Receiver , and not for adoration of the Eucharist . And yet this is not any established Ceremony of the Church of ROME at this day . This may further appear not to be for Adoration , Because the Priest himself receives in both kinds standing . Nay it is against their rule that a man should adore any thing lower than himself ; The reason with them is , that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , to worship or fall down , requireth position of the whole body lower than that which is worshipped . l Mr. Thomas Morrison reports of one in Savoy who escaped difficultly for looking downward at the Host , passing by his window in procession ▪ It is therefore without question true , that Kneeling in the Act of Receiving , was never any instituted Ceremony of the Church of ROME , nor never used when it was used with them for adoration of the Sacrament , as is falsly believed and talked of by many . Thus this learned Doctor , positively ( and I conceive most truly ) concludes in a Book d●dicated by him to King Charles the first , An. 1631. And he asserts the like almost in the same words , in his T●eatise o● The lawfullness of Kneeling in the Act of Receiving , p●inted London 1631. dedicated to the Lord Keeper Cov●ntry , ch . 21. p. 66 , 67 , 68. & ch . 32. p. 110 , 111 , where he confesseth , likewise , That KNEEL●NG before and to the Host to have come in by Antichrist , when midnight was upon the face of the world , and Antichrist in his hight . Yet concludes , KNEELING in the ●ct of Receiving was not ever yet strengthened with ANY PAPAL DECREE ; but hath been since made a Footbanke unto that Antichristian Monst●r of Transubstantiation , only by misinterpretation of it , by such as sought out all means , and laid hold on any colorable thing , that might suckle the monster of their brain , when it was once born . So this Doctor . This kneeling then in the Act of receiving is acknowledged by all its learnedest Advocates , to be introduced only by Custom , Vsage , after Transubstantiation , and Adoration of the Host , ( prescribed first by Pope Honorius about the year of Christ , 1226. promoted by the Feast of Corpus Christi instituted by Pope Vrban ; and confirmed for ever by multitudes of Pardons in the Council of Vienna by Pope Clement the 5. in the year 1310 as our learned i Bp. Iewel , and others affi●m ) without any Canon imposing it on the people . The first Rubrick that ever I met with ( except that of the Missal for the Friers Predicants , forecited ) is that in the Common Prayer-book , set forth and confirmed by King Edward the Sixth , in the year 1552. used , continued in all Books of Common P●ayer ever since . Then shall the Minister first receive the Communion in both kinds himself , and next deliver it to other Ministers , if any be there present , that they may help the chief Minister ; and after TO THE PEO●LE IN THEIR HANDS , KNEELING : Which Rubrick , as the words and manner of penning declare , is rather a Direction , than Injunction to the People to receive KNEELING ; For it commands not in precise words , That the People shall all receive the Communion Kneeling , or only Kneeling , in the Affirmative , not Sitting or Standing in the Negative ; much lesse doth it threaten or inflict any penalty at all on the Minister if he give , or on the People if they receive it otherwise ; nor enable the Minister to refuse the Lords Supper to such who scruple to take it KNEELING ; for he is peremptorily enjoyned by the Statute of 1 E. 6. c. 1. Not without a Lawfull Cause ( to wit , for the scandalous crimes conteined in the Rubrick or Exhortation before the Communion , and in case of Malice , or Hatred , ) to DENY the Sacrament TO ANY WHO SHALL DEVOUTLY AND HUMBLY DESIRE IT , ANY LAW , CUSTOME OR ORDINANCE TO THE CONTRARY NOTWITHSTANDING : Onely it directs the Minister , to deliver it to the People in their hands KNEELING ; and withall makes an Apology in another Rubrick in both King Edwards Books , to clear the use of kneeling from any Superstition or intention of Adoration of Christs Body in the Elements , or any justification of Transubstantiation , to which ends the Church of Rome had abused it . All which being duly pondered , and that the first Reformers of our Religion under King Henry the Eighth , in their Treatise concerning the Lords Supper , compiled in the year of our Lord 1533. ( printed at the end of Mr. William Tyndal , our famous learned Martyr his Workes , p. 476 , 477. ) desired , That Christian Princes would command and establish a Forme of Administring the Lords Supper by them described , wherein ALL THE CONGREGATION are ordered , TO SIT ROUND ABOUT THE LORDS TABLE , as Christ , his Apostles , and the Primitive Christians did . And then compared with these ensuing Confessions of Doctor Iohn Burges in his learned Treatises purposely written in his Defence of the Lawfullnesse of KNEELING in the Act of Receiving , dedicated to our late King CHARLES and the Lord Keeper Coventry : Namely , * That the Church of England , holdeth sitting or standing to be as lawfull and holy as kneeling , putting no necessity or worship of God in any of these arbitrary Ceremonies . * That there is not to be found any Decree for the gesture of Kneeling in the Act of Receiving , no not in the Roman Church , before or after th●●eal presence , nor yet in the Greek Churches . That ‖ Beza and other Churches , which live pell-mell with the Popish , where Idolatry is openly in the streets committed , in bowing to a piece of bread , as i● it were nothing else but Christ himself , shifted into a new suit of apparell , had reason enough to forbear this gesture in their Churches , and to disswade it as a thing which had been and therefore might be dangerous . And there●ore Beza doth no where condemn the use of it , as in it self unlawfull , but only defendeth the Churches , which in respect of the perill that might ensue , or out of a desire to root out the bread-worship out of the minds of men , do decline the use of this Ceremony . And this was the judgement of all those Divines , who in the name of the French and Dutch Churches , made certain Observations upon the * Harmony of Confessions , set out at Geneva in Beza his time , Anno 1581. for in their fourth Observation on the Confession of Bohemia , sect . 14. they say thus , In this Rite of Kneeling , we leave each Church to their own liberty ; not that we condemn it simply , as evil in it self , ( used with caution given in our fourth Observation ; ) But for the rooting of bread-worship out of mens minds , it is better that Ceremony in most places were abolished , in receiving of the signs themselves . May sufficiently perswade his Majesty , our Bishops , Lords , and Parliaments , to indulge the liberty of sitting to those who scruple kneeling at the Lords Supper , since the Church of Rome her self prescribes it not by any Canon or Rubrick in the act of receiving , and there hath been , is , and may be peril and scandal in its use . Now whereas some conceit and object , That it is a great contumacy , irreverence , sawcinesse , boldnesse , for those who confesse themselves a unworthy to gather the crums under Christs Table , at his Supper , to presume b to sit and eat the consecrated Bread , and drinks the Cup at or upon the Table it self ; not KNEELING at a distance before , or prostrate under it . I desire such Objectors to ●ons●der . 1. That Christ himself out of his infinite love , invites all Communicants , not to gather up the crums under this his Table like c Dogges , or as the d captive Kings did under Adonibezecks ( the proud Tyrants ) Table , but to sit down , eat , and drink the consecrated Bread , Wine , and this his Heavenly Banquet at his Table . Therefore it is rather a high contempt , disobedience , e voluntary sinfull Humility , or slighting , undervaluing of Christs love and grace , for any invited Gue●ts like Dogges and Slaves to lye prostrate before or under his sacred Table , then with Faith and holy confidence to approach unto it , to sit , eat , and drink thereat as he enjoyns them . 2ly . That if it were no ill manners , presumption , or irreverence for the f Disciples , Lazarus , and others , to sit down with Christ himself , whiles on earth , at ordinary Tables , the Pascal Supper , and Lords Table too , or in g St. Iohn , to lean on his breast and bosome at it ; or in the Primitive Church , Christians to sit , eat , and drink the consecrated Elements at the Lords Table , for many hundred years after Christs Incarnation ; then doubtlesse it can be no contempt , misdemeanor , irreverence , unmannerlinesse for any now to do the like , but rather it must be so in those who refuse to do it , upon such fancies , grounds , which either Christ , his Apostles , the Primitive Church , Christians knew not , or deemed insufficient to induce them to change fitting into kneeling at the Lords Supper . 3ly . If the Objectors or other Subjects , or persons of inferiour quality , were invited to sit down and eat at the Kings , Princes , Lord Keepers , Lord Mayors , or any other Great Mans Table , at Dinner , or Supper , it would be reputed a strange singularity , folly , indecency , or contempt , ( not reverence , decency , or good manners ) in or for all or any of them , out of pretended modesty or unworthinesse , to kneel down only before , or lye prostrate under their Tables , but not to sit down at them , and eat together with them , when commanded , as h all antiently , and at this day use to do , without kneeling , or prostration at or under the Table . Why should it not then be so in those invited by Christ himself , to eat and drink at his sacred Table ? 4ly . Christ Jesus by his death , merits , and transcendent love , hath not only made us i Members of his body , of his bone , and of his flesh , k one in and with him , his own l Brethren , m Friends , yea n Sons and Children of God his Father ; but also o Heirs and joynt Heirs with Christ of the Kingdom of God ; yea p Kings and Priests unto God his Father ; and promised q To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my Throne , even as I also overcame and am set down wi●h my Father in his Throne : and also appointed unto his Disciples , a Kingdom , as his Father hath appointed unto him , That they may eat and drink at his Table , in his Kingdom , and sit on Thrones , and in s Heavenly places , together with him , not pick up crums under his Table , or kneel , or lye prostrate at a distance from it . All which con●idered , may satisfie the Objectors , at leastwise so far , as to disswade them from censuring their fellow Communicants who receive sitting , as irreverent , proud , prophane , und●vou● , irr●ligious , or restraining this their Christian Liberty and posture of sitting in receiving , the only thing they contend for , leaving them to kneel , or use what gesture they deem best , for their own particular practise . If any yet further object , ( as * they do ) That in the Lords Supper we receive a Pardon of all our sins from God , under the Great Seal of Heaven ; Therefore we ought to receive it kneeling , as Malefactors use to receive their Pardons under Seal from the hands of their King , kneeling on their knees . I answer , 1. The Lords Supper is not a Pardon under Seal , t to all Communicants , since the unworthy eat and drink Damnation to themselves therein , 1 Cor. 11.27 , 28 , 29 , 30. 2ly . It was instituted not as a Pardon Sealed , but in remembrance of Christs death and passion for our sins , and to shew forth his death till he come , Luke 22.19 . 1 Cor. 11.24 25 , 26. 3ly . It is received , only as spirituall meat and drink , to feed and nourish our souls unto everlasting life ; to u eat and drink as food ; not to keep or reserve in a Trunk , Pix , or Box , as men keep their Pardon● , without eating them , I am sure without drinking them , when sealed only with hard Wax and Parchment : Therefore they rather ought to receive it sitting , as a sacred Feast and Supper , at which all usually sit , not kn●el ; not as a Pardon , which . none ever received in a Patten or Chalice . 4ly . Though Malefactors receive Charters of Pardon from their Princes own hands now & then , kneeling ; yet none use to receive them from their Officers or Ministers hands in that posture in our own or other Kingdoms ; who ever received a Pardon or Charter thus from the Lord Keeper at a Seal , or from the Hanaper Officers ? Nor is the Lords Supper now received by any from Christ● or Gods immediate hands , but only from their Ministers ; Therefore we ought not to kneel by their own comparison . 5ly . The Apostles when they received it from Christs own hands at its first institution , who best knew the nature of it , did not receive it kneeling , but sitting : Neither did any afterwards receive it kneeling , but sitting from the Apostles and primitive Fathers hands ; why then should all now receive it from the Priests or Ministers hands only , kneeling , not sitting , since this reason prevailed not with them to give or receive it kneeling ? 6ly . The chief cause of receiving it kneeling in the Church of Rome after Transubstantiation introduced , as Dr. Iohn Burgess confesseth , ( & that on the * steps near the Table ) was , that the Priests might with more ease put it into the Receivers mouthes without spilling , who might not take or receive it with their own hands : which custom being exploded in our Church ( all receiving it in their hands , and putting it into their own mouths ) the reason of the introduction and use of Kneeling ceaseth . To close up this point , I shall seriously request all Protestant Kings , Nobles , Parliaments , and Layme●● considerately to observe the sad effects and dangerous consequences of allowing any Church , Council , Convocation of Clergy-men , ( who usually monopoli●e both the Title and Power of the * CHVRCH , though never so stiled in Scripture , or the Articles of our Church ) a power to alter or innovate any Ceremony or Rite , used by our Saviour or his Apostles , in the Institution and Celebration of the Lords Supper , upon pretext of Custom and lawfull Authority in the Church so to do ; ( the * only Plea for changing sitting into kneeling , in the act of its receiving ) by this one president of the ‖ Council of Constance . Upon a Petition and Complaint of some Bishops and Church-men in that Council , Anno 1414. Of the growth of Heresie and Schism in some parts of the world , by administring the Lords Supper to Lay-men in both kinds , and likewise after Supper , or else not Fasting , by some Priests , according to Christs own Primitive Institution , and the Apostles practise , who pertinacio●sly affirmed that they ought to do thus , against the laudable Custom of the Church , reasonably introduced . Hereupon this sacred Council ( as they stile themselves ) lawfully ass●m●led in the Holy Ghost , endeavouring to provide for the safety of the faithfull against this Heresie , by the mature deliberation of the Prelates therein assembled , and of many Doctors as well of the Divine as Humane Law , declared , decreed ; and defined , ( by a special Canon therein ratified ) Quod licet * Ch●is●us post Coenam instituerit , &c. That although Christ instituted after Supper , and administred this venerable Sacrament to his Disciples under both species of Bread and Wine , Tamen hoc non obstante : Yet notwithstanding this the Authority of the sacred Canons ( preferred before the Canon of the Scriptures ) the laudable and approved Custom of the Church , hath observed , and doth observe , That this Sacunrament ought not to be celebrated after Supper , nor to be received of Christians who are not Fasting , ( unlesse in case of Infirmity , or other Necessity , granted or admitted by the Law , or the Church . ) And likewise , licet in Primitiva Ecclesia , &c. Although in the Primitive Church this Sacrament was received by the faithfull under both species . Tamen , &c. Yet notwi●hstanding to avoid some Perils and Scandals , this ●●stom was introduced afterwards , that it should be received by those who consecrated , under both spec●es , and by Laymen , only under the species of Bread : Since it is most firmly believed , and in no wise to be doubted , That the intire Body and Blood of Christ is truly contained as well under the species of Bread , as under the species of Wine : Wherefore seeing , this custom was rationally introduced and very long observed by the Church and Holy Fathers , it is to be reputed for a Law , which is not lawfull for any to reject or change at pleasure without Authority of ●he Ch●rch . Wherefore to say , that it is Sacrilegious , or unlawfull to observe this Custom or Law , ought to be reputed erroneous ; & pertinaciter asserentes oppositum praemiss●rum , &c. and those who peremptorily assert the co●trary , are to be banished , and grievously punished as Hereticks , by ●he Diocesans of the places or their O●●icials , or by the Inquisitors of Heretical pravi●y in Kingdoms and Provinces , in which any thing shall peradventure be attempted or presumed against this Decree , according to the Canons and lawfull Statutes wholso●ly invented in favour of the Catholick Faith , against Hereticks . Also this Holy Synod decreeth and declareth upon this matter , that processe shall be directed to all the most Reverend Fathers in Chr●st , Lords Patria●ch● , Primates , Archbishops , Bishop● , and their Vicars in Spi●ituals , wherever constituted , in which it shall be committed and commanded to them , by Authority of this Council , under pain of Excomm●nication , that they effectually punish those offending against this Decree , who communicate the people under both species of Bread and Wine , or that exhort or teach them that it ought to be done . And if they return to repentance , they may be received to the bosome of the Church , wholsome Pennance being injoyned to them according to the measure of the ●ffence . But such of them who with obstinate minds shall not care to return to repentance , are to be restrained ( and punished ) by them , by Ecclesiastical censures , and the ayde likewise of the Secular Arme is to be invocated for this end , if need shall require . Here this Popish Council sets up the late Custom , Power Canons of the Church . 1. To alter the very institution of Christ himself , the practise of the Apostles and primitive Church , Fathers , first in two particular Circumstances or Ceremonies observed by them in the celebration of the Lords Supper , to wit , 1. In the time of receiving it after Supper . 2ly . In the manner of receiving it , after meat , but not fasting ; And ●rom these 2. Alterations in these Circumstances , proceeds in the third place , to make , justifie , decree ● Most sacrilegious alteration in the substance of it , in taking away one Part thereof , to wit , the Cup and Wine from all the Laity at one blow ; upon this absurd heretical Whymsical Reason , and notorious untruth , laid down as a most certain undubitable truth , That the Body and Blood of Christ are ( by way of concomitance ) conteined and received under each species of Bread and Wine . 2ly . It sets up , justifies , decrees a direct contrary custome of receiving the Lords Supper , 1. only in the mo●ning , 2. only fasting , 3. for Priests only in both kinds , 4. for all Laymen , under the species of Bread alone without the Cup ; with a most a●dacious , blasphemous , peremptory NON OBSTANTE to Christ himself , the Apostles and primitive Churches Practise and In●titution . 3ly . It prohibites Priests and People too , either to imitate their examples , or institution for the future ; or to say , preach , or affirm they ought to imitate them ; or so much as to speak against any of those their late Cu●tomes and Antichristian Innovations , Errors . 4ly . They excommunicate , banish , punish all those as HERETICKS , and prosecute , persecute them with Ecclesiastical censures of all kinds , and the power of the secular arm , if they once presume in any place by words or deeds to follow the Precept or Pre●ident of Christ , his Apo●●les and the Primitive Church , or oppose or submit not to their Innovations , Inversions , and subversions of them . 5ly . If the terror of those Ce●sures prevail to force conformity to their Innovations in any former Non-conformist , whether Priest or ●ayman , he must not be received into the bosome of ●he Chu●ch , without publick penitence , and Pennance proportinable to his offence . What effusion of Christian blood , Martyrdomes , Wars , Schismes , Tumults , Controversies this Canon hath procured throughout Ch●istendome ever since , the Histories of Bohemia , G●rmany . France , Spain , Italy , England , the Netherlands , Mr. Fox his Acts and Monuments , with other Martyrologies , and will abundantly inform us . Our most gracious Lord God & Author of this holy Sacrament of love & unity , so in●pire , direct our Religious indulgent Sover●ign Lord the King , his Parliament , Council , Bishops , Ministers with the Spi●it of Wisdome , Clemency , Moderation , and Christian compassion towa●ds the ●ender scrupulo●s consciences of many thousand Ministers , and truly loyal , d●tifull pious Subject● , in this particular , that the Alteration of receiving the Lords Supper from its primitive , antient , usual gesture of sitting , practised by Christ , his Apostles , the primitive Church & Ch●istians for many hundred years to Kneeling , only by late Custome since Transubstantiation , and Adoration introduced by the Church of Rome , for the premised ends ; the total abandoning of Sitting , and enjoyning the sole use o● Kneeling to all Ministers and Communicants whatsoever ; the suspending pious Ministers from their Ministry , Benefices , & inflicting ●cclesiastical Censures on them as Non-conformists , Schismaticks , for not Kneeling , or delivering the Lords Supper to their People sitting ; or writing , preaching in defence of this Ge●ture ; practised heretofore ; the dep●iving of those Laymen who refuse to receive Kneeling ( for the premised Reasons ) not only of the consecrated Cup , as this Popish Council of Constance ( with the Councils of Basil , Se●●io 30. & of Trent , Sessio 21. c. 1. si●ce that ) did , but even of the Bread too , which Romis● Priests indulge to all Laymen ; and totally secluding those from the Sacrament , who out of conscience refuse to take it Kneeling , yea Members of Parliament themselves , and passing them by with publick contempt , as of late when they were all enjoyned to receive the Lords Supper together ; and that against the expresse words of his Majesties most gracious * Declarations to all his loving Subjects of the Kingdom of England , and Dominion of Wales , concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs , then newly published ; That none shall be denyed the Sacrament of the Lords Supper , though they do not receive it Kneeling in the Act of Receiving ; ( Which hath given just ca●se o●●ear of greater seve●ity towards them and others , by over-rigid imperiou● Pr●lates , P●iest● and ●lergy-men when the Parliament is not Sitting , Ecclesiastical Cou●ts and new Liturgies confirmed ▪ resto●ed to their pristine Vigor ; ) and that barely upon p●etext , that the Custome of Kneeling was long b●●ore r●as●nably introduced , and Sitting prohibited only by the Authority of the Church , in such sort and ●or such reasons as are already mentioned in this Council of Constance ; may not produce any further Innovations in our Sacraments Administration and Doct●ine too by degrees , and engender N●w Schismes , ●ont●ntions , Disturbances , Excommunications , Pr●secutio●s , Pers●cutions of c●nscientious godly Ministers and L●yick● , to the great interruption of our Churches and Kingdomes peace , the total frustration of his Majesties most Gracious Declarations and Intentions towards all hi● loving Subjects to their general discontent . The prevention wherof , out of mere duty , loyalty , service to his Majesty , & unfeigned desire of our Churches future Unity , Prosperity , by just Dispensations & Indulgencies to all his Majesties consciencious Loyal Subjects , according to his real , and royal Intentions in this particular , hath made me more copious in this just Apology for Sitting , without passing any over-rigid Censure upon Kneeling as utterly unlawfull in the Act of Receiving , or on those who practise it in ou● Churches , out of piety , humility and true Christian devotion . Moderata durant . Let our Prelates , Churches , Parliaments * moderation therefore ( in these Particulars of Sit●ing , Kneeling and Bowing at the Name of Iesus ) be known unto all men ; and exercised towards each other ; for the Lord i● at hand . I shall close up this Discourse with the Evangelical Precept , Expostulation , and advise of God himself , and his Apostle St. Paul to the Church , Saints of Rome it self , and throughout the World in a like case , Ro 14 3 , &c. Let not him that eateth ( the Lords Supper kneeling ) despise him that eateth not ( kneeling ) nor him that eateth not , ( sitting , o● standing , but kneeling ) judge him that eateth ( sitting ) for God hath received him . Who art thou that judgest another mans Servant ? to his own Master he standeth or falleth , ( sitteth or kneeleth . ) He that ●a●eth ( sitting or standing ) eateth to the Lord , for he giveth God thanks ; and he that eateth not ( sitting or standing , but kneeling ) to the Lord he eateth not ( so ) and giveth God thanks : Why dost thou judge thy Brother , or why dost thou set at nought thy Brother ? ( who receiveth sitting , standing or kneeling ) We shall al● stand before the Iudgement seat of Christ Let us not therefore judge ( or censure ) one another ( in these * indiff●rent Gestures ) any more , but judge this rather , that no man put a stumbling block , or an occasion to fall in his Brothers way . Let us therefore follow a●ter things that make for P●ace and things whereby we may edifie ( not crucifie , grieve , destroy , excommunicate , or discontent ) each other . Destroy not him with thy meat ( or thy gesture at it ) for whom Christ died . All things indeed are pur● , but it is ill for that man who eateth with offence ; or to impose any Gesture ) whereby thy Brother stumbleth , or is off●nd●d , or made weak . Happy i● he that condemneth not himself in that which he alloweth ; for whatsoever i● not of Faith is Sin to him that doth it . But to leave this Collateral Discourse of Kneeling at the Sacrament , which some would enforce from this Text ; and return to Bishop Andrews passages concern●ng Bowing AT and TO the Name of Iesus , as a duty of the Text. I shall desire the Readers to take notice of these Mistakes and Errors ( as I humbly conceive them ) not onely couched , but clea●●y ●xpr●ssed in them . His first Error is this , That the name Iesus is the name above every name intended in this Text , which Fathers and modern Exp●sitors gainsay . His Second , That the name Iesus is above all names whatsoever , yea , above the name of God His Third , That this name Iesus is one of Gods own names , and the chiefest name of God. His Fourth , That this Text enjoynes men to bow TO ( not in or at ) this very name Iesus , and to this name only . His Fifth , That our Saviour hath left this his name behind him , now his Person is ascended into Heaven , to this very end , that we might do reverence and bow unto it . His Sixth , That the words of the Text are so plain , as they are able to convince any mans conscience , that they ought to bow to the name of Iesus when rehearsed in the Church . His Seventh , That there is no Writer of the Antients on this place ( except Origen ) but litterally understands it , and likes well we should actually perform this duty of bowing to the name of Iesus when pronounced . His Eighth , That Ambrose , Hierome , Cyril , and Theodoret ( in their Quotations in his Margent ) are of this opinion , and thus understand this Text. His Ninth , That there want not Reasons why we should rather bow to the name of Iesus , than to the name of Christ. His Tenth , That Christ is not , yea cannot be the name of God. His Eleventh , That God cannot be annoynted . His Twelfth , That Iesus is the chief name of God , and so by consequence , that Iesus could not be annoynted , for therein consists the force of this Reason . His Thirteenth , That the name Christ was communicated by God to others , but the name Iesus , not , it being a proper name to our Saviour only . His Fourteenth , That that which is proper , is above that which is holden in common . His Fifteenth , That Christ is not so good as Iesus , because the end is better than the meanes , and he was annoynted that he might be a Saviour . His Sixteenth , That we must bow to the name of Iesus with reference to the sence , That is , with ●eference to the Person of Iesus , as he is a Saviour . His Seaventeenth , That this bowing is no taken-up worship , or humane invention or injunction , but a ●uty of the Text , directly set down by God himself , yea an Act which is of Gods own prescribing . His Eighteenth , That the Brazen Serpent was not a thing enjoyned nor instituted by God himself , as this is . His Nineteenth , That the Superstition occasioned by this bowing cannot abolish it . His Twentyeth , That this bowing , as it may be superstitiously used , so it may be irreligiously neglected too . For the two first of these his Mistakes they are directly confuted by sundry Fathers , who make the ●ame here given to Christ , above every name , to be no other , but the name God , and that in truth and reality , not mere appellation , as Verse 6. Who being in the form of GOD , thought it not robbery TO BE EQUAL WITH GOD , compared with Verse 11. That every Tongue should confesse that Iesus CHRIST is LORD to ( or in ) the glory of GOD THE FATHER , intimate . Witnesse likewise their ensuing Authorities . Tertullian De Trinitate , lib. Tom. 2. p. 261 , 262. Accepit enim nomen quod est super omne nomen , quod ut que non aliud intelligim us esse , quàm nomen D●i . Nam qu●m Dei sit solius esse super omnia , consequens est , ut nomen illud sit super omnia , quod est ejus qui super omnia est Dei , &c. vid. Ibid. Athanasius De Incarnatione Christi contra Apollinarium , p. 271. C. Et cum dicit , Ideo super-exaltavit eum Deus , et dona vit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen , de Templo loquitur quod est corpus suum . Non enim qui altissimus est , sed ca●o ejus exaltatur , carnique suae altissimi nomen donavit , quod est super omne nomen . Neque verbum Dei donatitia ratione hoc nomen accepit ut Deus vocaretur , sed caro ejus cum ipso simul , Deus appellata est . Non enim dixit verbum Deus sactus est , sed Deu● erat verbum : Semper enim inquit , Deus verbum , ut ille ipse Deus ●actus est caro , ut ipsius caro ●fficeretur Deus verbum , quemadmodum Thomas Palpator ipsius carnis proclamavit ; O qui e● & Dominus meus , & Deus meus ; ut rumque simul Deum appellans , &c. St. Hilarie , Enarratio in Psal. 2. p. 198. H. Et donavit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen , &c In ●o●ma itaque Dei m●nens formam Se●vi accepit , Scilicet , ex Deo homo natus ; ut post mortem Crucis in ●omen quod est super omne nomen exaltetur . In Deum namque quia nullum ultra Deum nomen est , prov●hitur eique hoc potenti , id est , ut esset quod suerat ante , donatur . St. Ambrose , Comment . in Phil. 2 9 , 10. Et donanavit ei nomen quod est super omne nomen , &c. Videtur ergo donum Patris , hoc est esse Filium , & nomen ejus super omne nomen sit , hoc est , ess● Deum . Nomen enim Dei ; sed per naturam , non per appellation●m●uper ●uper omne nomen est . Hinc est , ut in nomine I●su omne genu flictatur coelestium , terrestrium , & in●●rn●r●m ; Sicut ad Romanos significat inter caete●a dicens . Ex quibus Christus secundum carnem , & super omnia benedictus Deus in saecula , &c. Consideremus dicta , sic advertamus vim locutionis . Certe nomen quod super omne nomen est DEI NOMEN EST. Sed si per naturam non constat hoc nomen ▪ non est super omne nomen . Appellativum enim nomen in solo vocabulo est , non in nobilitate naturae . Et adoptivo Deo non flectit creatura genu , sed vero , non concraeaturae . Et quomodo fieri potest homo sit in gloria Dei Patris ? non potest esse , nam ei hoc competit qui natus est ex Deo. In gloria enim Dei Patris ●sse , nihil differre a Deo est , ut una gloria sit Patris & Filii per communem substantiam & virtutem , &c. With whom Iohannes Salisburiensis in Phil. 2.9 , 10. Ms. in Bibl. Bodliana , accord . Dionysius Alexandrinus , Epistola contra Paulum Samosatens . Bibl. Patr. Tom● 3. p. 74 , 75. Ti●us Bostrensis in Cap. 1. Evang. Lucae , Bibl. Patrum , Tom. 4. p. 339. e. Idacius advers . Varimadam loc . ibid. p 622. a. Caesarii Dialog . 1. p. 650. a. Basilius Magnus De Spiritu sancto ad Amphyl . Cap. 8. Tom. 1. p. 180. Agobordus ad Ludovicum Imperatorem , Bibl. Patr. Tom. 9. Pars ● . p 556 G.H. Pas●hatius Ratbertus in Math. Evang. l. 10. Bib. Patr. T. 9. Pars. 2. p. 1156. B.C. l. 11. p. 1177. B. exposit . in Ps. p. 1249. G. Et Paulinus Aquiliensis . Patr. contra Felicem Vigel● Epist. l. 2. ( thus expound this Name and Text ) Et donavit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen , ut in nomine I●su , &c. Nomen nempe super omne nomen solius VERI DEI EST , verique Filii Dei. Nuncupativum vero , vel adoptativum nomen , non supra , ●ed infia . Cui inquam , nisi vero Deo omne flectitur genu ? Cui Nuncupativorum D●orum , vel adoptativo rum Filiorum flectitur omne genu Coelestium , Te●restrium , aut In●e●norum ? aut quem ex illis omnis lingua confitetur in gloria esse Dei Patris ? &c. Donavit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen ; virtutis scilicet & Divinatis quae in Christo corpor●liter in omni plenitudine habitabat So the●e determine . Aquinas , in his Summ● , 3. pars Quaest. 49. Artic , 6. Conclusio . Propter quod , &c. Et dedit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen , thus expounds it , Ut scilicet ab omnibus nominetur Deus , & omnes ei reverenti●m exhibeant sicut Deo : Et hoc est quod subditur , ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur Coelestium , Terrestrium , & In ●●norum . Alexander Alensis , Theologiae Summa pars 1. Quaest. 21● Membr . 1. Artic. 4. thus interprets , Dedit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen , &c. ut quod Deus dare , sit manifestare , pa●et ; nomen quod est super omne nomen , id est Honorificentiam quod vocatur Deus . Chytraeus Postill . in Dominica Palmarum , and Zanchius in Phil. 2.9 , 10 with other Protestants , conclude , the name here meant to be GOD essentially ; and the Bishops own words , Accepit ut homo quod habebat VT DEVS , admit it for truth . And that it is so , seems past all controversie , if we compare this Text with Isaiah 45.23 . and Rom. 14.11 , 12. from whence it is taken , As I live saith the LORD , every Knee shall bow TO ME , and every Tongue shall confesse TO GOD ; So then every one of us shall give an account of himself TO GOD : If then the name above every name be GOD , not IESVS , as all these define against Bishop Andrews , how is his bowing to the name Iesus only , not to his name God , a duty of this Text ? and his that all Antients thus interpret it , true ? Other Fathers and Authors interpret this name above all names , to be the naturall only begotten Son of God , agreeing in substance with the former . Thus Hierom , Theodoret , Sedulius , Remigius , Beda , Haymo , Theophilact , Anselme , Oecumenius , Musculus , Aretius , Zanchius on Phil. 2.9.10 . Sancti Procli . Sermo in Transfig . Christi Bibl. Patr. Tom. 5. pars 1. p. 536. C. ●●●eriis & Beatis l. 1. Bibl. Patr. Tom. 8. p. 342. C. D. ● . Augustinus Contr. Maximin . l. 2. c. 2. Basil. De spiritu Sancto , c 8. Tom. 1. p. 180. with sundry more resolve . Others take this name to be the Glory , Majesty , and Power of Christ. So Chrysostom , in Phil. 2. Hom. 7. Theodoret , in Phil. 2. Petrus Blesensis , Sermo 46. Bibl. Patr. Tom. 12. pars 2. p. 907. with whom some modern Commentators accord . Others expound it of the very name Iesus , only by way of Analogie , or Rhetorical flourish . So Origen Hom. 1. super Jesum Navae , Tom. 1. fol. 149. F. Chrysologus Sermo 144 , 145. Remigius & Haymo in Phil. 2 ▪ 9 , 10. Isychius in Levit. l. 7. c. 24. Bibl. Patr. Tom. 7 ▪ p. 108. B. Ethorius & Beatus , l. 1. Bibl. Patr. Tom. 8 ▪ p. 346. E. F. Agobardus De Picturis & Im●ginibus , lib. Tom. 9. pars 1. p. 598. C D. Lucas ●udensis , advers . Albigensium Errores , l. 2. c. 16. Bibl. Patr. Tom. 13. p. 267 , 268. Alchuvinus Contr. Felicem Vigel . Ep. l. 2. Col 810 B. C. D. But yet none of all these speak a word of any bowing to , or at this name when read , mentioned , heard , or seen , the chief thing in debate , which the Bishop endeavours to prove and enforce . Some others assert this name to be the name Christ ; as Paschatius R●tbertus , Expositio in Psal. 44. p. 1246. G. Paulinus Epistola ad Augustinum , Bibl. Patr. Tom. 5. pars 1. p. 210. which verse 11. That every tongue should confesse that Iesus CHRIST is Lord , &c. seems to imply . Others interpret this name , not to be any particular Title , but the very Person of Christ himself . So Brentius in Phil● 2 ▪ 9 , 10. Hence Hierom Comment . l. 3. in Isaiam 45. Greg. Nysson . de Anima & Resurrect . Disput. p. 194 , 212. Ambrose Enar. in Psal. 118. Octon . 20. Hilare de Trin. l. 9. p. 64. Chrysostom Hom. 32. in 1 Cor. 12. Fulgentius Object . Arrianorum Discussio , p. 204. Cyrillus Alexandrinus , de Incarnatione unigeniti , cap. 11.26 . Prosper . Expositio in Psal. 102. fol. 236. A. Paulinus Epist. ad Aprum Bibl. Patr. Tom. 5. pars 1. p. 187. B. Sancti Procli . Sermo in Transfig . Christi , Ibid. p. 535. E. Arnobius Comment in Psal. 64. Bibl. Patr. pars 3. p. 262. A. Agoba●du● ad Ludovicum Imperatorem , Bibl. Patr. Tom 9. pa●s 1. p. 556. G. Angel●mi Stromata , in lib. Regum 2 c. 12. p. 740. E. Damascen . Orthodoxae Fidei , l. 3. c 29. p. 433. C. S●meon Th●ssalonicensis Archiepiscopus De Divino Templo , Bibl. Patr. Tom. 12. pars 1. p. 880. C. Petrus Blesensis De Tr●nsfig . Domini Ibid. pars 2. p. 915. B. Nicholaus Cabasila De Vita in Christo , lib. 6. Bibl. Patr. Tom. 14● p. 127. A Papa Innocentius 5. In Circumcisione Domini , Se●mo . 1. Tom. 1. p. 95. De contemptu Mundi , l. 2. c. 15. p. 449. read it thus , Ipsi , Ei , Illi , or , Coram illo flectetur omne geun , &c. Not , In n●mine , or Ad nomen Iesu. Others interpret this name to be LORD ( the usual name of God ) of which at large before , Section 1. For the Third , That Iesus is the name of God , and the chiefest name of God. I answer , That though God the Father , and the Trinity in unity be stiled Saviour in the Scripture , as Isay 43.11 . I am , and besides me there is no * Saviour ( the place which the Bishop quoteth ) 2 Sam. 22.2 , 3. Psal 106.21 . Isay 45.15 , 21. c. 49.26 . c. 60.16 . Jer. 14.7 , 8 Hosea 13.4 . Luke 47. 1 Tim. 1.1 . c. 2.3 . c. 4.10 . Tit. 1.3 . c. 3.4 , 5 , 6. Jude 25. To the only wise God OUR SAVIOUR , be Glory and M●j●sty , Domini●n and Power , now and ever Amen . Yet we ●ead not in all the Scriptu●e that God the Father was ever called Iesus , nor yet that the Trinity in unity , or Deity it self is stiled by this Name . Now Iesus and Saviour though they accord in signification , yet they differ in this . 1. In Time and Antiquity , Saviour being used in the Old Testament , long before Christs incarnation and Nativity ; Iesus was imposed on him after his Incarnation , Mathew 1.21 , 24. Luke● . 31 . c. 2 21. 2ly . One of them is a Title of Office or Honour , accruing from some gracious del●ve●ance , the other a proper personal Name imposed on our Saviour at his Circumcision ( as our Names in Baptisme a●e ) to distinguish him from other men● 3ly . They differ in Ph●ases and Words , Iesus & Soter ; Iesus & S●rvator ; I●sus and Saviour . The words are different , and diff●●ently used in all Lang●ages ; and that they vary from each other , the very usual phrases in Scripture ( Iesus Christ , our Saviour ; a Saviour , which is Christ the Lord ; our Saviour Iesus , &c. coupled o●t together ) testifie ; For if they were Synonimaes it would be a kind of Tautology . And if they are both one and the same , then all men should and would cap and bow to both of them alike , especially since Bishop Andrews tells us , that Saviour is the name above every name , &c. in this Text , and one of * GODS own NAMES . And if Saviour be the Name , then all must cap and bow to it as well as to the name Iesus ; and that , when it is spoken or intended of God in the Trinity , or of God the Father as well of Iesus his only Son , which none now practise , neither doth the Bishop here urge them to it . Again , as Iesus is not the name of God the Father , or of the Deity ; so it denotes most properly and immediately nought else but the * humanity of our Saviour ; it being a name imposed on him as Man at his Circumcision ; rather to difference him from other men , than from the other Persons of the Trinity ; whence * Beda , Anselme , ‖ Alcuinus , Aquinas , and others conclude ; Iesus est proprium nomen assumptae carnis , and Hoc nomen Jesus significat solam naturam humanam ; not the Deity or Divine Nature of Christ , as this Bishop mistakes . For the Fourth , That this Text enjoynes men to bow not barely in or at , but TO the very name of Iesus , and to this name only . It is certainly a grosse Mistake ; for first the words are , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , In nomine , not Ad nomen ; In the name , not At or To to the name , as the ‖ antient English Translation● of Trevisa , Tyndal , Co●erdale , Matthews , the Epistles and Gosples printed in English at Paris , 1558. the Common-Prayer-books of Edward the 6th . Queen Elizabeth , King Iames , and King Charles , ( till altered of late by Doctor Cosens ) in the Epistle on Palm Sunday , Bishop Alley , the Bishops Bible , Dr. Fulk , Mr. Cartwright , Bishop Iewell , and all our antient English Writers who cite it , read it . Now ●o bow in the name , and to bow to the name of Iesus , are two different things of various natures ; Therefore this Injunction to bow in the name is no warrant for any to bow to the name of Jesus , which this Text requires not . 2ly . This bowing to the name of Jesus , as a divine worship , adoration and duty of the Text , is as great Idolatry as to adore and bow to his Cross , Picture , Body , or consecrated Bread in the Sacrament , &c. which we * all cond●mn in Papists ; yea , it makes our bowing at to be really TO the name of Jesus , and the very same with that of the Papist● , which our ‖ Protestants condemn as Superstitious and Idolatrous in them . 3ly . The fore-alleged Fathers and Authorities prove , That the name Iesus is not the name above every name intended in this text ; therefore there is no ground to bow to it , and it alone . 4ly . Cyrillus Alexandrinus in Hesaiam lib. 5. cap. 55. Tom. 1. p. 262. ● . In ●ohannis Evangelium , l. 11. c. 17. p. 666 A. De Incarnatione Unigeniti , cap. 11. Tom. 1.2 . p. 114. E. & Dialogus de T●initate , l. 3. p. 270. A. reads it thu● . ●t dedit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen , ut in nomine I●su Christi omne genu s● flectat , joyning the name Christ with Jesus . Synodus Franco●urdiae ad Menam habita , sub Adriano Papa 1. thus , Cessate cum adoptivum nominare , qui verus Deus , & verus Dei Filius , in cujus nomine omne genu fl●ctatur coelestium , terrestrium , & infernorum . Dionysius Alexandrinus , Epistola contra Paulum Samosa●ensem , thus . Propter quod D●us exaltavit illum , & donavit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen ; ut in nomine ejus omne genu fl●ctatur , &c. Ar●obius , Comment . in Psal. 88. ●hu● , Ego Primogenitum ponam eum , ut in nomine ejus omne genu fl●ctatur , &c. Angelomus in hi● Str●mata in libr. Regum 3. cap 8 thus . Christo enim propter glor●fae m●ritum Pas●●onis datum est nomen , ut in nomine e●us omne genu flectatur , coeles●ium , terrestrium , & inf●rn●rum . P●schatius Rat●ertus , in Mat. Evang. l. 10. thus . Et donavit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen , ut in nomin● D●mini omne genu flectatur ●oel●stium , t●rrestrium , & in●●rn●rum . Attributing this bowing of eve●y knee , not at all to the Name , but Person , Deity of Christ expressed , represented by any name , as Isay 45.23 . Rom. 14.9 , 10 , 11 , 12. expresly do , Every Knee shall bow TO ME , &c. For the Fifth , That Christ hath taken his Person out of our sight , but hath left his name Jesus behind to us , that we may shew by our reverence and respect unto it , how much we est●em him , &c. As it abstracts and severs Christs Person from his Name , and contradicts Mat. 28.20 . And ●o I AM WITH YOU ALWAIES EVEN UNTO THE END OF THE WORLD ; so it makes much for , and directly justifies the Papist● Adoration of their Hostia , Images , Crosses , and the Name Iesus * carved , written , painted , or printed in a Book , Wall , Frontispiece of a Iesuites Works , or under or over a Crucifix , as well as to his Name , when barely pronounced . At the sight of which Name , n● Prelates , nor Protestants , and I think few Papists usually bow . 2ly . It is not , yea cannot be grounded on that Text of Psalm 111.9 . ( Holy and reverend is his name ) quoted by the Bishop to warrant it ; That name being only the glorious name of LORD , there attributed to God himself , as i● evident by Vers. 1 , 2.11 . &c. by sundry * paralel Texts of Scripture , and the words themselves , which are spoken in the Present , not Future Tense , H●ly and reverend IS his Name . Now this Name Iesus wa● then neither holy nor reverend , because then not known , nor given to , or imposed on our Saviour Ch●ist as God and Man ; Therefore it could not be the Name which the Psalmist writes of . 3ly . Christ hath left behind him all his other Names , as Emanuel , God , Son of God , Lamb of God , Lord , King of Kings , Lord of Lords , King of Saints , Head of the Church , chi●f Shepheard of the sheep , God , &c. as well as this , he hath not carried them , or any of them quite away to Heaven with him , and left Iesus alone behind him on Earth ; Therefore we should either reverence , bow to them or him , in and by them all alike , if this Reason proves good ; or else give no special adoration , bowing , or reverence unto this Name Iesus alone , since we do it not to any of the rest , he left behind him . For the Sixth , That the words of the Text are so plain , as they are able to convince any mans conscience , that he ought to bow to the name of Iesus , when recited or uttered in the Church . It is an experimental untruth ; We see they convince not the consciences of most men now ; They convinced not the Consciences of any of the Fathers , primitive Churches , Christians , antient Expositors , or modern Protestant Commentators on this Text heretofore , nor any forein Protestant Churches at this day ; Neither are they ( I dare confidently a ver it ) sufficient to convince any intelligent Christians conscience , upon due examination , now , That this bowing at , or to the name of Iesus only , which the Bishop only contends for , is a duty of this Text ; there being nothing either in the sence , or words , that can manifest it to be a Duty upon evident and infallible grounds , though all acknowledge that the same subjection , adoration , prayer , and divine worship are due to Christ as are to God the Father , and to the holy Ghost , but no other . For the Seaventh , That there is no Writer of the Antients on this place ( except Origen ) but doth litterally understand it , and likes well , that we should actually perform this Bowing now contested for . If we take it absolutely in it self , it is a most apparent untruth , since not one of the antient Fathers or Expositors extant in P●int or Manuscripts hath so expounded it , or made any mention of this duty : But if we take his words as he hath qualified them , ( And there is no Writer , no not of the Antients , on this place , that I can find , &c. ) We must either conclude , That the Bishop , though very learned , never sought after any Antient● Writers on this place ; or at least , That he never found out any , or mistook their words or meaning , since there is not one of them extant that ever gave this his exposition of them . For the Eighth , That Ambrose , Hierom , Cyrill , and Theodoret , ( the only Antients he mentions , in the places barely quoted in his Margent , not reciting their words at large ) concur in judgement with him , in this kind of bowing at , or to his name , and thus understand this Text : It will appear far otherwise , if we survey their words . * St. Ambrose his words are these . Quid de Officio pedum loquar , qui totum corpus sine ulla sustinent o●eris injuria ? Flexibile genu quo prae caeteris Domini mitigatur offensa , ira mulcetur , gracia provocatur . Hoc enim Patris summi erga Filium donum est , ut in nomine Iesu omne genu curvetur , Coelestium , Terrestrium , & Infernorum , & omnium lingu● confit●atur , quoniam Dominu● Iesus , in gloria est Dei Patris . Duo enim sunt quae prae caeteris Deum mulcent , humilitas & fides ▪ Pes itaque exprimit humilitatis affectum , & sedulae servitutis obsequium : Which place desciphering only the principal uses and offices of the feet , vizt . to appease the Lords wrath , and procure Gods favour by bending the knee to him , ( not Iesus ) in the affection of humility , by Humble Prayer in the name of Christ , and diligent service and obedience , makes nothing at all for genu-flections , or bowings to , or at every recital of the name Iesus , ( not here mentioned by Ambrose ) much lesse when we are on our knees praying to him , when some superstitiously bow down their heads to and at this name . Neither doth St. Ambrose in his Commentary on Phil. 2.9 , 10. or in any other place of his works , where he dilates upon it , make any such literal Exposition of this Text , or name as is pretended , so as his Quotation is impertinent . * St. Hieromes alleaged authority , is far more impertinent to his purpose . His words are these . Mihi incur vabitur omne genu , & jurabit & confitebitur omnis lingua Deo. On which words of Isaiah he thus descants . Sed & hoc jurat , quod idolis derelictis omne genu ei flectatur Coelestium , Terrestrium , & In●ernorum , & omnis per illum juret lingua mortalium : in quo perspicuè significatur , populus Christianus : Moris est enim Ecclesiastici CHRISTO g●nu flectere Quod Iudaei mentis superbiam demonstrantes , omnino non ●aciunt . Sed & omnis lingua cunctarum gentium Barbararum , non in Synagogis , sed in Christi Ecclesiis consitetur De●m , &c. In all which passages , 1. The name Jesus is not so much as once mentioned , much less is there any intimation of bowing to it , when recited . 2ly . All the Argument the Bishop can hence collect , is but this . It is an Ecclesiastical custom for Christians to pray kneeling , or bow their knees to CHRIST , ( not JESUS ) in their publick and private Prayers ; Ergo it was then an Ecclesiastical custom to bow the knee to and at the ●ecital of the name of Jesus only , but not to or at the name of Christ ; whereas the contrary would better follow : Ergo it was then an Ecclesiastical use for Christians to bow their knees at , to the name of Christ , not to or at the name of Jesus , which refutes all his reasons and Arguments to the contrary . 3ly . Hi● Text is only Omne genu El fl●ctatur , & moris est Ecclesiastici , flectere● not , ad nomen Iesu , or in nomine Iesu , or Christi : This Father he●e speaks only of the Person , not of the name of Christ , or Jesus : Therefore he gives no colour at all for any bowing to or at the name of Jesus , as the Bishop suggests , punctually against his words . For St. Cyrills authority , it is only this . Quid est igitur quod annunciatum est ? Salus & conversio omnium ●bique gentium : Mihi enim inquit , flect●t se omne genu , & jurabit omnis lingua p●r Deum . Flectet se genu Deo , & nomen ejus ab omnibus in juramento adhibebitur , quid aliud signi●i at , quam omnium conversionem & agnitionem & co●junctionis cum ipso patefactionem ? Qui enim per conversionem ad Deum redeu●t , prorsus nec genu immundis spiritibus flectunt , n●que lingua illos ut Deos circumferunt . Non enim per ullum aliquem jurabunt tanquam per Deum sed unum natura & verè esse cognoscentes ejus jugo cervic●m supponunt & genu flunctunt ; & si legitime jurare velint , ejus solius m●ntionem ●aciunt . Where observe , 1. That in all this quotation , the word or name JESUS is not so much as once mentioned , much lesse any bowing to or at his name Jesus . 2ly That the name and person only of God is mentioned , to whom all Nations leaving their unclean spirits , Idols , should in time be conve●ted , submit themselves , adore and swear by his name alone . Ergo it is a duty of the Text , for all to bow at eve●y recitall of the name Iesus , ( not here mentioned ) is a very Un-episcopal inferrence from this Fathers passage . * Theodorets words are as little to the purpose . Et donavit illi Nomen quod est sup●r omne nomen , &c. Non ergo ea accepit quae non prius habebat ; sed accepit ut homo quae habebat ut D●us . Nomen autom quidam interpraetati sunt gloriam . Ego autem Ex ●pistola ad Hebraeos invenio aliam Apostolici dicti intelligentiam : Cum enim dixisset , ‖ Sedet ad dextram Majestatis in excelsis , tanto melior Angelis effectus , quanto excellentius p●ae illis nomen haeredita vit , interpraetatur nominis differentiam , & dicit : Cui enim dixit aliquando Angelorum , Filius meus es tu , ego hodie genui te ? Et rursus ; Ego ero illi in patrem , & ille erit mihi in Filium ? Hic ergo hoc etiam dicit , quod eum seipsum humiliavit , non solum non p●r didit quod habebat ut Deus , sed hoc etiam accepit ut homo . Vt in nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur Coelesti●m , Terrestrium , & In●ernorum . Coelestes appellat pot●states , quae sub ●●●p●ctum non cadunt ; T●rr●stres autem , homines qui ad huc vivunt ; 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 autem ▪ h●c est , eos qui sunt sub terris , illos qui sunt mortui . If then this name above every name , &c be not the name Iesus , but this name , the only begotten Son of God , ( as Theodoret expressely concludes from St. Pauls Epistle to the Hebrews ) then here is no warrant for any bowing to or at the name of Je●us , or to or at this name alone● or at every ●ecital of it , in these words of his . So that these four Fathers are all point-blank against ( not for ) the Bishop● Exposition in the least degree , who therefore cau●elo●sly concealed what they writ , here truly and fully cited . For the Ninth , That there want not Reasons why we should rather bow TO the name of Iesus than of Christ. I answer , that there can be no Reasons alleged for it out of Scripture , neither hath this Bishop , nor any other yet produced any reasons of this kinde ; What reasons therefore he or others have coyned out of their own working Brayns , Fancies either without or against the Scripture , Why men should bow to or at the name of Jesus , not to or at the name Christ , are not worthy the name of Reasons ; And if the Bishops Reasons here produced be well examined , we shall find them both unreasonable and untrue , if not absurd , making wholly against his Conclusions , nothing for them , As the ensuing particulars will manifest . His first Reason , why we should not bow to or at the name of Christ , is this , Because Christ is not , yea cannot be the name of God ; For God cannot be annoynted . In which there are two most grosse mistakes . First , That Christ is not , yea cannot be the name of God. Secondly , That God cannot be annoynted . The first of these is directly contrary , 1. to Athanasius his Creed , where it is twice repeated , So God and Man is one Christ. 2ly . to the 2d . Article of the Church of England , and the 29th . of Ireland , which thus resolve . The Godbead and Manhood were joyned together in one Person , never to be divided , WHEREOF IS ONE CHRIST , VERY GOD AND VERY MAN. 3ly . To expresse Scripture , Rom. 9.5 . Of whom as concerning the Flesh Christ came , who is over all , GOD BLESSED FOR EVER . 4ly . To all antient and modern Writers , who thus conclude , and positively affirm against the Arrians , * Christus est Deus , That Christ is God , and that Christ is both God and Man ; Which Propositions were false , if Christ were not the name of God. Certainly Christ is the name of the Sonne of God , of the second Person in the sacred Trinity : All Christians are to ‖ believe in Christ ; to pray to God in the name of Christ. They are likewise * baptized into Christ , and in the name of Christ ; yea they are named Christians from the name of Christ , not Iesuites , as the Jesuites name themselves from his name Iesus . Therefore Christ certainly is the name of God , and of our Saviours Divinity , as well as of his Humanity . This verily Iraeneus testified of old , Adversu● Haereses , l. 3. c. 20. p. 333. In Christi ● . nomine , subauditur , qui unxit , & ipse qui unctus est ; & ipsa unc●io in qua unc●us est . Et unxit quidem Pater : Vnctus vero est Filius , in Spiritu qui est unctio , quemadmodum per Isaiam ; Sermo . Spiritus Dei super me , propter quod unxit me ; significans & unguentem Patrem , & unctum Filium , & unctionem qui est Spiritus . The name therefore of Christ ( in Irenaeus his Divinity ) takes in the whole three Persons of the Trinity , and so is the name of God in his repute . This was Athanasius his Assertion in his Declaration , Quod Christus sit ve●us Deus , &c. p. 371. C. D. At qua ratione possit Christus vocari Christus , si nudus homo sit ? contra idem ille si verbo coadunitus sit merito ponuntur Christus & Dei Filius , jam olim Propbetam paternam in ●o substantiam his verbi● protestantem ; & emittam Filium m●um Christum , &c. Missionem autem & declarationem idem esse cum unctione frequenter inveuiemus , &c. The same we shall find in Damascen , At nos Christum haud quaquam unius compositae natur● esse ass●rimus , &c. Christi porrò vocabulum personae ess● dicimus , ut quod unimodò vocatur , sed duplic●m naturam significet . Ipse e●enim s●ipsum unxit , corpus videlicet divinitate unguens ut Deus , unctus autem ut homo , quandoquidem ille ●●e & illud est ; unctio porrò humanitatis ●st divinitas . And Euchfoneus in his Commentarie , Ibid. ● . 266. D. Sanctorum Patrum concordi sententia . Chri●●us ●omen Hypo●●aseos est , & personae duarum natur●rum ●●gnificativum , divinae scilicet & humanae : Hinc Christus neque solam humanitatem , sed utramque ●arum i● unica persona hypostaticè unitam . Idcirco dicit liter● , nomen Christus non est unimodè dictum , id est , de un● na●ura . Neque ● . id nomen Christus de s●la dicitur natur● divina , neque solam notat humanam naturam , sed utramque simul in uno supposito unitam . Nam ipse Christus est , hoc est illud , u●pote Homo & Deus , ‖ prout nomen illud singulariter , & unice Domino nostro attribuitur , Significa●que ipsunt unctum excellentissima & divina unctione , carnent scilicet-ejus sacrosanctam Di●tatis ol●o ineffabiliter per●usam ; quae s●ne super-divina est unctio & sol● Domino nostro congruens . In qua , Divinitas est ungens ; & sacratissima Christi humanitas unctum , ipsa quoque divinitas unctio est , et ejus humanitas quod ungitur . With which the Resolution of Aquinas , and others accords . For the Second , That God cannot be annoynted : It is most ●alse ; For God the Father annoynted God the Son , with God the Holy Ghost , witnesse P●al 45.6 , 7 ▪ & Hebr. 1.8 , 9. Thy Throne ( O God ) is for ever and ever , the Scepter of thy Kingdom is a right Scepter . Thou lovest righteousness and hatest wickedness , therefore God , thy God hath annoynted thee with the Oyl of Gladness above thy Fellows Thus the Fathers from these Texts inferred , resolved long ago , 1 Athanasius , 2. Hilarie , 3. Ambrose , 4. Augustine , 5 Primasius & others 6. Cyrillus Alexandrinus , 7. Venerable Beda , 8 Isychius , 9. Paschatius Ratbertus . 1. O●thodox Athanasius , Contr. A●ianos , l. 2. p. 80. A. B. C. N●n ●n dixit , ideo unxit te , ut Deus , aut Rex , aut Filius , aut verbum fieres , nam & antea hoc ipsum erat , semperque est , sed potius prop●erea , quia & Deus , & Rex es , ideo inunctus e● . Non n. alterius erat conjungere hominem cum Spiritu Sancto , quam tui ipsius qui es imago Patris , ad quam ab ini●io creati eramus , quoniam tuus est Spiritus . Caeterum , quia Deus est , quia Rex aeternus , & splendor , & character Pat●is , ideo ipse est qui expect● batur Christus , &c. Quid igitu● miri a●t qui● in●redibile , si Dominus qui Spiritus , ipse nun● dicitur , Spiritu injungi ? 2. St ▪ Hilarie De Trinitate , l. 4. p. 21. F G. thus seconds him , Ait●n in Psalmi● , Vnxit t● De●s , Deus tuus , Discernat legentis intelligentia unctum & ungentem ; distingue te & tuus ; ad quem & qui sit sermo demonstrat . Superioribus , n●dictis hic confessionis ordo subjectus est . Dixerat namque , Sedes tua Deus in saeculum saeculi , virga directionis tuae virga regni tui , dilexisti justitiam & odisti iniquitatem , ●unc quoque his adjecit , propterea ●nxit te Deus D●us t●us . Deus ergo Regni aeterni ob meritum dilectae justitiae & perosae iniquitatis a Deo suo unctus est . Nunquid intelligentiam nostram aliqua saltem nominum intervalla confundit . Nam discretio tantum Personae in te & tuus , posita est , in nullo ●amen natu●ae distincta confession● . Tuus enim rela●ivum est ad autorem , & verò ad ejus qui ex autore est significationem . Est enim Deus ex Deo , Prop●eta eodem ordine confitente ; U●xit te Deus , Deus tuus , &c. 3. St. Ambrose De Fide l. 1 c. 2. adds his suffrage to the former , Denique habes in Psalmo quadrag●simo quart● , quod & Deum Patrem , dicit Propheta , & Deum Filium declaravit , dicens ; Sedes tua Deus in seculum seculi ; & infra , unxit te Deus , Deus tuus oleo laetitiae prae consortibus tuis : Deus est qui ungit , et Deus qui secundum carnem ungitur , Deus Filius : Denique quos habet unctionis suoe Christus nisi in carne consortes ? Vide igitur qui● Deus a Deo unctus , &c. 4. St. Augustin proves it is most fully and punctually in Psal. 44. Euarratio . Propterea unxit te Deus , Deus tuus . Et vide quomodo ait , Propterea unxit te Deus , Deus tuus . DEUS UNGITUR A DEO . Etenim in Latino putat idem casus nominis repetitus . In Greco autem evidentissima distinctio est , quia unum nomen est quod compellatur , & alterum ab illo qui compellat . Unxit te Deus , O tu Deus , unxit te Deus tuus ; quomodo , si diceret , Propterea unxit te O tu Deus , Deus tuus . Sic accipite , sic intelligite , sic in Graeco evidentissimum est . Ergo quis est De●s unctus a Deo ? dic●nt nobis Judaei . Scripturae ipsae communes sunt . Unctus est Deus a Deo , unctum audis , Christum intellige , etenim Christus à Chrismate . Hoc nomen quod appellatur Christus , unctionis est , nec in aliquo alibi ungebantur Reges & Sacerdotes nisi in illo regno , ubi Christus prophetabatur & ungebatur , & unde vent●rum erat Christi nomen . Nusquam est alibi omnino in ulla gente , in ullo regno . Unctus est ergo Deus a Deo. Quo oleo , nisi spirituali ? Oleum n. visibile in signo est , O●eum invisibile in Sacramento est . Oleum Spirituale intus est , Oleum visibile exterius est ; Unctus est nobis Deus et missus est nobis , et ipse Deus ut ungeretur homo erat , ut Deus esset , ita Deus erat , ut homo esse ●on dedignaretur . Uerus homo , verus Deus , in nullo fallax , in nullo falsus , quia ubique verax , ubique veritas . Deus ergo homo , et ideo unctus Deus , quia homo Deus et factus est Christus . The like he asserts * elsewhere . 5. So Primasius , Remigius , Haymo , Anselme , Theophilact , Oecumenius on Heb. 1.9 . read it thus , O Deus ( Filius ) unxit te Deus , ( Pater ) &c. all agreeing that God the Son is annointed by God the Father , with God the Holy Ghost . 6 ▪ Cyrillus Alexandrinus Contr. Julianum l. 8. Thus Comments on this Text. Propterea unxit te Deus , Deus tuus prae omnibus consortibus tuis . Vides ? Deus ungitur Deo , &c. 7. Thus also our * Venerable Beda resolves , Expositio in Psal. 44. & Heb. 1. O Deus verbum , Deu● tuus , id est , Deus Pater unxit te , &c. Unctus Deus a Deo , often repeated . 8. Isycbius in Levit. cap. 8. concludes . Neque Christi Divinitas post unctionem ab humanitate dividitur , sed five ●ngi dicatur , five generari , five pati , five re●urgere , ●ive as●umi dicimus , hoc incarnatum verbum non dividentes , & dicentes hominem quidem unctum , Deum autem non unctum : Sed Deum cundem ●●mu● ac hominem : Hoc N. & David . fine aliqua dubitatione approbat quum dicit : Sedes tua Deus in seculum seculi , virga recta est , virga regni tui , dilexisti justitiam & odisti iniquitatem , propterea unxit te Deus , Deus tuus : Cernis D●um dici qui unetus est , quia omnia carni● suae monifestum est quod ●ibi metipsi qui incarnatus est vindicat . 9. Paschasius Rathertus Exposie . in Psal. 44. sings the same tune . Quid sequit●r ? Propterea unxit te Deus , Deus t●u● : Primum Dei nomen vocativo casu intelligendum , sequ●us nominativo ; Quia alius est Deus qu●●ngitur , alius ille a quo ungitur : T●us N. cum dicit , relativum est ad autorem per quem ungitur in Regem , &c. Unde ait , Propterea unxit te Deus , Deus tuus : Deus erg● in Regnum , ob meritum justiciae , dilectae , & perosae iniquitatis à Deo suo unctus ●st , id est , Filius a Patre : Non enim intelligentiam nostram aliquod confundit intervallum ubi discretio Personarum duobus distinguitur prae●ominibus , videlicet , te & tuus ; Non quod natura distinguatur deit●tis , cum dicitur , unxi● te Deus , ac deinde additur , Deus tuus ; Nam cum dicit , Deus et Deus , ostenditur una natura , una deitas , quia ille Deus qui ungitur ab ●o Deo est qui ungit ; Et 〈◊〉 Deus a Deo est , nihil aliud quam Deus est : Propheta eo ordine narrante , tu●s● &c. What more punctual then ●ll these conc●rrent Fathers , against th●s false , dangerous Paradox of Bp. Andrews , That God the Son was not , yea cannot be anointed ? I could adde a whole Grand ●ury more of * other learned Writers to the same effect ; but shall conclude with ●ulielmus V●sinus . Vnctio enim est , non tam d●norum acceptio , quae competit soli humanitati , sed & ordinatio ad officium M●diatoris , ●●ae competit et●am Divinitati : E●fi igitur sola humanitas potest acciper● Spiritum sanctum , tamen non sequitur exclu●●o Divinitatis ab unctione , quatenus est designatio ad officium , &c. Of which you may read much more there to the like effect . And here we will next examine the Bishops Argument , and retort it thus upon him . That name which is not the name of God , to it we must not bow . So the Bishop argues . But the name Jesus is not the name of God ; Ergo to it we must not bow . The Major is the Bishops own reason , words ; The Minor is already proved . And it may thus be evinced by his own reason last refuted . That name which is ascribed to Christ , who is , and as he is annointed , is not the name of God : For God ( as the Bishop averrs and resolves ) c●nnot be annointed . But the name Jesus is ascribed to Christ , who is , and as he is annointed , witnesse Acts 4.26 , 27. For of a truth against thy holy Child JESUS , whom thou hast annointed , both Herod and Pontius Pilate , with the Gentiles , and the people of Is●ael , were gathered together . And Acts 10.38 . God annointed Iesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost , and with power : Therefore we must not bow at or to the name of Jesus , because it is not the name of G●d , since both the●e Texts resolve that God annointed JESUS . Invert we now the Argument against this Bishop , and then see what conclusion follows . That name which is the name of God , ●o and at that name we ought to bow : So the Bishop argues . But the name of Christ , as I have proved , ( especially the names God , Iehovah , Lord , Emanuell , Spirit , Father , Holy Ghost , &c. ) are the names of God : Ergo to and at them and every of them we ought to bow . Again , Every name receives its dignity from the Person who●e name it is : So the Bishop . But every of these names of our blessed Saviour , is the name of that Person who is God as well as Man. Therefore to and at every o● these his names we ought to bow , and not at his name Jesus only , which principally denotes his humanity . For his Thirteenth Paradox , That the name Christ was comunicated by God to others , but the name Iesus not , for that is proper . It contains a double Falshood . For Fi●st , We re●d of no man or person who is stiled Christ , or The Christ , or Iesus Christ , in Scripture , but only our Saviour Christ ; Neither find we this single title Christ , in our English or Latine Translations , applyed ●o any but ou● Saviour ; Nor yet the title of M●ss●as , but to our annointed Lord and Saviour alone , who was annointed with the oyl of gladness above his fellows . Yea although that antient Kings , Prists , and Prophets , might be called Christi , because annointed ; yet none of them all were so annointed as the Lord Christ. For they were annointed with some graces only , in a measure , but Christ had the oyl of all graces , without measure ▪ They were annointed some as King and Priest only , as Melchis●dech ; some a● King and Prophet only , as David , some as Priest & Prophet , as Samuell , but Christ only and alone was annointed as King , Priest , and Prophet ; they all only with oyl ; He with the D●●●y it self : so as the name Christ in this respect was peculiar to Christ alone . Thus he was annointed above his Fellows ; so as the name● Christ is as ( yea more ) proper to him , as the name Jesus , which meeteth with the next Argument of the Bishop . The name Jesus was comunicated to Ios●ah , and divers othe●s beside and before Christ , n●t appropriated to our Saviour only . ●hi● the Bishop confesseth himself for a truth , which is evident by Hebrews 4.8 Acts 7.45 . Collossi●ns 4.11 . Wherefore I shall thus reto●t this hi● p●ime A●gument against himselfe . That name of Christ which was comunicated to others by God in Sc●ipture , at and to that we must not bow . But this name Iesus was communicated to others by God in Scripture : Ergo , at and to it we must not bow . Again , That name which is proper to our Saviour only , at and to i● we ought to bow● So the Bishop . But the names of Christ , Messias , Emanuell , Lamb of God , only begotten Son of God , &c. are proper only to our Saviour , and not comunicated unto others , Ergo at and to them we ought to bow , and not at or to his name Jesus . Moreover , That name which is prop●r , as the name of Iesus is , ( quoth the acute Bp. ) is above that which is common , and to be bowed to . But● the name Chri●t is as , ●ea more proper him as his name Iesus ▪ for he was * annointed above his Fellows : Ergo to be bowed to as well as the name Iesus . Again , If this position of the Bishop be true , mark the inevitable dangerous consequences , The names Iesus , Christ , Emanuel , Father , Son , Spirit , Word , and Holy Ghost , are all personal and proper to each person of the Trinity , Ergo they are all to be bowed to , ●nd above the names Iehovah , God , Lord , and the like ▪ or the Deity it self , which ●re common to all three persons in the Trinity ; as Athanasius Creed informs us at large . Pretty Divinity for a Bishop to assert ; yea pretty Philosophy , Policy and Morality too ; for then it will follow , Ergo Every man 's private Person , Estate , Safety , Wellfare is above , and ought to be preferred before the Republick which is holden in common . Ergo private Prayers , Ceremonies , Scriptures in an unknown tongue , and private Masses , ( which are proper to Mass Priests , who alone communicate , ) are above publick Prayers , Masses , Scriptures in the vulgar tongue , and the Communion which is equally distributed unto all the Faithfull ; yea private Conventicles are above , far better than our publick Church assemblies . Such are the consequences which will follow , from this new Episcopal pa●adox & ratiocination if admitted orthodox Again , Christ ( saith the Bishop ) is annoynted , To what end ? To be our Saviour , That is the end then , And ever the end is above the means : And what else ? Ergo , Iesus is above Christ ; the Deity annoynting inferiour to the Saviour annoynted ; and to mans Salvation ; and Christ the Head and Saviour of his Church & Members , inferiour to his Church , Members who are saved ; strange heterodox , untheological , if not heretical Consequences . To discover falseness , sophisme of this his illogical reason , we must observe , that Christs unction was that which authorised him to be a Saviour , without which he had been no Saviour . Now this is a ground in Logick and Phylosophy , Quicquid e●ficit tale est magis tale ; et Omni● causa est dignior suo effec●u ; The Kings Power and Authority which makes a Man a Judge , or Officer , is greater , supremer , than the Judge or Officer made by him ; the Deity of Christ and of the Holy Ghost anoynting , is greater than , is above the Humanity annoynted ; Therefore in this Case the Deity annoynting being the means , is better , is greater than the Humanity annoynted , or the end for which it was thus annoynted , that he might be a Saviour to his People ; God being not only the Alpha but Omega , the end of all his own and our Works , Actions , Prov. 16.14 . Rom. 11.36 . Revel . 4.11 . c. 1.8 , 11. c. 21.6 . all which Texts this Bishops Paradox contradicts . Thirdly , What ? to the 2. syllables or sound of them ? What needs this ? Who speaks of sound or syllables ? The Text sayth , Do it to the Name ; The name is not the sound but the sence ; The caution then is easie , Do it to the sence , have mind on him that is named , and , then do the Name the honor & spare not . If the Name be not the sound , or syllables , neither doth the Bishop speak of them ; What means then his former Reasons , discourses , That we must bow at , and to the name Jesus , and that Name alone , not to or at the Name Christ ? If not at or to the Name , but the Sence only : Then the Controversie is at an end by his own Confession , and so all his former discourses of the names Iesus and Christ , are to no purpose at all . Well , but we must bow to the Sence whenever the Name is mentioned , &c Excellent Divinity borrowed from the Papists sophistry , who worship the Name Jesus , the Crucifix , and Pictures of Jesus , the Body of Jesus in the consecrated Host , Bread , Wafer , Pix , only with reference to his Person ; Which to do ( say they ) is no Idolatry . Either then the Bishop and his Followers must approve the Popish Image-worship , Bread-worship , Iesu-worship , which * Protestants condemn as grosse Idolatry , or else disclaim this Answer . But admit that the Name is the sense , not the sound , What ( I pray ) is the sence of the Name JESUS to which we must thus frequently bow at every recital of it ? Is it onely the Person of Jesus ? Then why should we not bow to every of his Names as well as to this , since each of them representeth his Person to us as well as this ? But the Person of our Saviour is only the Denominatum , not the sence of the name Iesus ; The sence of this Name is , a Saviour , ( or rather * Salvation ) he b●ing therefore stiled Iesus , because he shall save his People from their sins , Mat. ● . 21 . Luke 1.31 . Well , admit it , Then Saviour being the sence , we must all henceforth bow at and to the name Saviour when recited , rather than the name Jesus . But who thus bows at or to the name Saviour , which is the sence of it ? Not one ; for none presse nor practise it as a duty , no not the Bishop himself . In a word , ‖ ●alvation , rather than Saviour is the sence of this Name , and who ever worshipped Salvation in the abstract , when Jesus is pronouned , by bowing at and to the name Jesus ? That this is no taken-up worship , &c. but an Act of Gods own pr●scribing , and a duty of the Text , directly set down by God himself , I● but a mere Imposture . Had it been so , I wonder that the ●postles , the primitive Christians , Churche● , An●ient Fathers , and those who have commented largely on thi● Text , were so blind , as not to see this duty , so directly set down by God himself in the Text , for many hundred years together ; Yea , I wonder much more that * Popes , & Papists only were so quick-sighted as to be the fi●st De●●●iers of it , even in times of greatest darknesse ! For my own part , since this duty was never discove●ed till of late , and that upon such slender evidence● , reason● produced by the Bishop , which are sooner answered than propounded , I shall crave leave to dissent , that it i● a duty of the Text , till I see clearer proofs than any yet alleadged by this Bishop or hi● Followers , so much mistaken in the Premise● . I s●all onely adde for a close , That if the bowing ●f every knee , and kneeling at or to the Name I●sus when ever mentioned in the Church , be a Worsh●p of Gods own prescribing , and a duty of the Text directly enjoyned by God himself , as this Bishop positively concludes , then by the self-same Text they must likewise kn●el and bow their knees when every tongue confesseth that I●sus Christ is Lord , in or to the glory of God the Fa●her , they being ●oth coupled together in this Text , and to be performed with one posture of bowing the knee . Hence we read , Rev. 4.10 , 11 , 12 c. 7 10 , 11● 12 c. 14.3 , to 9. c. 15 . 3.4● c. 19.4 . That when the 4. Beasts and others , gave glory , and honor , and thanks , and prayse to him that sitteth on the Throne , and cryed , Holy , holy , holy , Lord God Almighty , which was , and is , and is to come ; the 24. Elders , Angels and others did all fall down on their Faces and Knees before him that sate on the Throne , and worshipped him that liveth for ever and ever , casting their Crownes before the Throne , and saying , Thou art worthy O Lord to receive Glory , Honor , Power and Blessing , for thou ●ast created all things ; Blessing , and Glory , and Wisedom , and Thanksgiving , and Honor , and Power , and Might be unto our God for ever and ever , Amen . The same in substance with Gloria Patri , &c. And at the Communion when the Minister and People say , Almighty and everlasting God , &c. through Iesus Christ our Lord , to whom with thee ( O Father ) and the holy Ghost be all honor , and glory world without end , Amen . O Lord and heavenly Father , &c. through Iesus Christ our Lord , by whom , and with whom , in the unity of the Holy Ghost , all glory and honour be unto thee O Father Almighty , world without end , Amen . Glory be to God on high , &c. We prayse thee , we bless thee , we worship thee , we give thanks unto thee for thy great GLORY , O Lord God , heavenly King ; God the Father Almighty . O Lord the only begotten Son Iesus Christ ; O Lord God , Lamb of God , Son of the Father , &c. have mercy upon us . For thou only art holy , thou only art the Lord ; thou only O Christ , with the Holy Ghost art most high in the glory of Glory of God the Father , Amen . ( the same with Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. and Gloria Patri in effect , if not in words . ) They all use and are enjoyned by Rubricks to kneel down on their Knees , and repeat these Prayers , Thanksgivings kneeling In all which over-zealous bowers at the name of Iesus , usually bow their heads , bodies , whiles kneeling on their knees , when the name Iesus is mentioned only , not at any other of his names coupled with it , nor at , to the names of the Father and Holy ghost rehearsed with it . With what color of Scripture , ●ence , reason do or can they then practise themselves , or prescribe to other Ministers and all th● People , by N●w Rubricks , not joyntly to bow their Knees , or kneel and ●all down on them ; but quite contrary , to rise up all together from their very Knees and Seats , and stand upright upon th●ir feet , without any bowing of their Knees or Bodyes at every recital , , Of Glory be to the Father , and to the Son , and to the Holy Ghost , As it was in the beginning , is n●w , and ●v●r shall be world without end , Am●n . ( repeated at the end of every Psalm , Hymn , eight or ten times eve●y M●●ning and Evening Prayer , though no Sc●ipture , but a humane Invention of * Pope Damasus , as all acknowledge , at least 376. yea●s after Christ ) in direct opposition to the premised Texts of the Philippian● , Revelations , and practise o● the twenty four E●ders , Angels , their own and our Chu●ches usage , af●er the Communion received , and in direct contradiction to * Dr. Boyes his ●eason for kneeling in the Ac● o● R●ce●ving● because Thanksgi●ing is a part o● Prayer , ●●r which no g●sture is so fit as Kneeling ? If standing up at G●oria Patri , &c. be a gesture whereby they and others are to glorifie , worship , adore the 3. Persons of the Trinity , and that equally without distinction , standing up at and to all their Names and Persons alike ; then falling , kneeling down to , before them , in the use and recital of those other Prayses , Prayers , Doxologies , and at the Eucharist , ( quite contrary to , and inconsistent with standing up , and bowing to the name of Jesus only when all three Persons are joyntly mentioned , worshipped , glorified , praysed , adored , can be no worship of Gods own prescribing , nor duty of the Text. Either therefore they must henceforth disclaim their bowing at the Name ●esus , and kneeling at the recited Prayers , Doxologies and Lords Supper ; or else bow and fall down , upon their Knees , Faces ; not stand up at Gloria Patri for the future , to reconcile these contradictory ge●tures , usages , prescriptions resuting , subverting one the other . That the Brazen Serpent it self was a taken-up worship , ●ere humane Injunction , ( as the Bishops words imply ) is a manifest untruth ; For it was a thing of Gods own institution , Num 21.9 . 2 Kings 18.4 John 3.14 . As therfore tha● * Serpent was broken in pieces when the Israelites began to worship , and to commit Idolatry with it ; so ought this bowing at the Name of Jesus , which is idoliz●d , or superstitiously abused by many , to be abolished too , And so much the rather , because it is but a tak●n-up wo●ship , a humane Injunction , introduced , propogated at fi●st by * Popes , which hath no warrant at all f●om God , or this Text of the Philippians . That this bowing to and at the name Iesus , as it may be superstitio●sly used , so it may be irreligiousl● negl●cted too . Though I belie●e the fi●st part of it to be absolutely true , Superstition being defined by Isiodor , * Angelus de Cl●v●si● , and others● to be , A rendering of another kind of worship to God or Christ , than he prescribes in his Word , or wo●shipping God in another mann●r , according to human inventions ; I shall suspend my belief of the latter Clause , till this Bowing be proved a religious duty prescribed by God in Scripture , by stronger proofs and better evidences than any yet produced by this Bishop or his Followers . For my own part I yet think there is no Religion at all in it , and so , that it can be no Irreligion to omit it , That it is rather Supe●stition than Religion to use it ; and that many have used it , not only superstitio●sly , but idolatro●sly , by bowing to and adoring the bare Name and Letters of Iesus , which occasioned this Discourse . To evidence this , I shall in the last place present you with an Exact Chronological History of the true Original , Pedegree , and Progress of this Ceremony , unknown ( I believe ) to most , even of those great Prelates and Divines , who customarily use it ; who if they had observed that Maxime o● Aristotle , Scire est per Causam scire ; That rule they learnt in their Grammars ; Faelix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas ; or that Gospel Precept , 1 John 4.1 . Brethren , believe not every Spirit , but try the Spirits whether they are of God , b●cause many false Prophets are gone out into the World : should have first examined , who were the original Inventors , Propagators of this pretended Duty or Ceremony , and upon what motives , grounds , designs they first introduced it , before they practised it themselves , or pressed it upon others Consciences ; that so they might avoid that censure and danger denounced by our Saviour Christ himself against the Pharisees and their Disciples ( who were guided more by ‖ tradition & custome of the Elders , than Scripture or right reason ) Mat. 15.14 . Let them alone ; they be blind leaders of the blind : And if the blind lead the blind ( as I fear they do in this particular as well as others , ) both shall fall into the ditch . To avoid which danger , I shall now out of Conscience and Christian compassion , endeavour to open their eyes , and discover that new light unto them , which God hath revealed unto me , upon my best Inquiry after it , for my own private satisfaction and other● instruction ; which I hope will prove a satisfactory Apology for the Indulgence of Christian liberty to all scrupulous tender Consciences in this particular , according to his Majesti●s late Royal Declarations . SECTION III. What was the true Chronological , Original , Beginning and Progresse , of the Ceremony of Bowing at the Name of JESUS ; and by what Popes , Popish Indulgences , Artifices , Feast● , Councils , Authors , it was first Introduced , Prescribed , Propagated ? Very necessary for the Information of others , and Determination of all Controversies concerning it . IT is an unquestionable truth attested by many Fathers , Council● , and Ecclesiastical Histories , a That the Primitive Christians , and Churches of Christ , for above 850. years after our Saviours Birth , in all their Assemblies on Lords d●●es throughout the year , and between Easter and Whitsontide , did never use to bow their knees , no not in the very duty of Prayer it self , but prayed and performed all other Holy duties to God and Christ standing , in memory of Christs Resurrection from the dead : And that all the Orthodox Christians constantly asse●ted against the Arrians , and other Hereticks , b that the Three Persons of the sacred Trinity , as they were co-eternal , and co-equal , so they were to be equally worshipped , adored , honoured with one and the self-same worship and veneration ; for which end ( some write ) they invented the use of Glory be to the Father , and to the Son , and to the Holy Ghost ; and ●aptised all they admitted as Members into the Church , in their Three Name● , according to our Saviours Precept , Mat. 28 19. This being undeniable it thence inevitably follows , that during all this tract of time , they never used to bow their knees at or to the name of Jesus , when read or rehearsed in their publick Assemblies on those daies ; whence it is we find no mention at all of any such duty or Ceremony used in any Father , Council , * Historian , or other Author , for above a thousand years after Christ , who doubtlesse would have recorded it , especially in their Commentaries on Isaiah 45. 23 ▪ and Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. had there any such practise been used , or duty or Ceremony prescribed by these Texts , as some late Divines a verr , without any prose or shadow of Authority . Pope Iohn the 20. who swayed the Popedom about the year 1030 is the first I read of ( and that only in one late Protestant Writer , but no other Author , who as I suppose mistakes Pope Iohn the 20. for 22. of which * hereafter , out of Salmeron the Jesuit ) that set a●roach this Ceremony of bowing at the name of Iesus : of whom Sir Edwin Sands , in his Europae Speculum , Hagae 1629 page 16 ▪ writes thus . By grant from Pope John the 20 th ● every inclining of the Head at the name of I●sus , gets 20 years pardon ; a matter in Italy no not to this day unpractised . And to grace that Ceremony the more , I have heard sundry of their renowned Divines teach in the Pulpit : that Christ himself on the Crosse bowed his Head on the right side , to reverence his own name Jesus which was * written over it . ( A Monkish Fable ) This is the highest pedegree of this late upstart Ceremony , that I have hitherto met with . Petrus Bles●nsis Arch-deacon of Bathe , who flourished about the year 1160. a Sermo 28. De A●sumpsione B. Mariae , hath this ensuing Passage . Non frustra consuevit Eccl●sia intercessionem beatae Virginis affec●uosius caeter is implor are , ita quod audit● ejus nomine b genua terrae affigat ; imo pro nominis reverentia quasi mare confrag●sum sonant vota populorum . And in the Margent there is this Note , Mariae genua flectuntur . Which Passages seem to imply , that men did then use to bow the knee to , and do reverence at the name of the Virgin Mary : but that they did so at the naming of Iesus , I find no Authority at all in this Writer . Lucas Tudensis , who wrote about the year of our Lord , 1220. Adversus Albigensium Errores , c lib. 2. cap. 14 writes thus . Qui humilitate superbiae principem vicit , humilitate nos contr● potestates aerias semper pugnare docuit : quod ipse & fecit t●mpore carnis suae quando non recto capite , sed inclinato emisit spiritum . Inclinenius nos & illi capita nostra , non solum mentis , sed & corporis , laudes & gratias persolventes , eiqui pro nobis peccatoribus se misericorditer inclinavit . Sed sunt nonnulli qui superbiae spiritu tumefacti , ( de quibus valde dolendum est ) qui etiam cum ‖ Gloria , vel Laus Deo recitatur in Ecclesia , contemnunt , aut erubescunt , Regi Regum Iesu * Christo inclinare ; coram transeunte Cruce , vel Christi Evangelio non assurgunt : in celebratione Missae Sacerdote se ad eos vertente & Dominum annunciante inclinari contemnunt : ad benedictionem Pontificis caput nudare negligunt ▪ & quod omnino nesarium est , & haeresi proximum , cum elevatur corpus Christi à Sacerdote in sacratissimo Ministerio Missae , vel alias defertur , erubescunt vel refugiunt suppliciter adorare . Hoc max. no●nulli faciunt Curiales , qui consuev : terrenis Principibus flexis genibus & nudo capite ministrare , O stulta dementia , &c. Hunc er●o tantae promissionis accepta fiducia totis nisibus col●●demus : illi simplicitate recta humiliemur , illi mentis & corporis capita non verecundemur nudare & inclinare , quia Deus fortis pro nobis infirmis se inclina vit ; ut homo infirmus fie●et , ut humana firmitas soliditate perpetua firmaretur . A passage which may happily imply , that in those times men did use to bow their Heads ( not Knees ) to Jesus Christ the King of Kings , who bowed his Head for them : But this was not as I take it , at every recital of his name Jesus in the Epistle , Gosple , Masse , Sermons , or Prayers in the Church ( of which there is not a sylable in this Author ) but at Gloria Patri , the lifting up of the Hoas● in time of the Masse , or at the passing by of the sign of the Crosse , or Host in procession , as the sence and words import . Sanctus Franciscus , St. Francis , the Arch-Freer , who lived about the year 1230. in his Litera ad Sacerdotes , hath this ensuing Clause , * Salutem in eo qui redemit & lavit not in sanguine suo : Cujus nomen audientes adorate eum cum timore et reverentia proni in terra ; Dominus Iesus * Christus , altissimus filius nomen illi , qui est benedictus in secula , Amen . Which implyes an Injunction from this Arch-Freer , St. Francis , to those of his Order , for adoration of the Lord Jesus Christ at that time , by bowing their Heads with fear and reverence to the ground , when these his Names were mentioned all together . * Freer David de Augusta : who flourished about the year 1240. De 7. Processibus religiosi , cap. 11. writes thus , Sunt exteriores caeremoniales observantiae ; ut inclinationes , genuflectiones in horis , pulsationes , & omnes gesticulationes , quibus Claustrales utuntur in divino offi●io , vel aliis , quibus saepe minus virtuosi majorem vim faciunt , quam aliqui perfecti , & magis devoti . Which seems to imply , that Monks in those daies ( for of them he writes ) did use duckings and gen●flections , either to the Host , the Crucifix , the Altar , and it may be to the name of Jesus , though not particularly expressed ; in which Ceremonies , the less vertuous , saith he , were for the most part more devout than the most religious : ‖ Pope Vrban the 4th . about the year 1262. ( as some report ) gave an indulgence of 30. daies to all confessed and holy contrite Persons , who devoutly bowed to the Name of the Lord Iesus . These are the only passages I find in all Antiquity before the Councill of Lions , which gave any probable colour to the use or practise of this Ceremony ; which was never established in the Church , till Pope Gregory the 10th . his Papacy ( to whom most ascribe its very Original ) who in the Popish Council of Lions , in the year 1273. made this Decree . d Decet domum Domini sanctitudo : decet ut cujus in pace factus est locus , ejus cultus sit cum debita veneratione pacificus . Sit it aque ad Ecclesias humilis & devotus ingressus ; sit in iis qui●ta conversatio , Deo grata , inspicientibus placida , quae considerantes non solum instruat , sed & reficiat . Convenientes ibidem nomen illud , quod est super omne nomen , a quo aliud sub coelo 〈◊〉 datum hominibus , in quo salvos fieri credentes oport●●● , nomen videlicet Jesu Christi , qui salvum faciet populum suum a peccatis eorum , exhibitione reverentiae specialis attollant : & quod generaliter scribitur ; ut innomine Jesu omne genu flectatur , singuli singulariter in seipsis implentes ( praecipuè dum aguntur Missarum sacra mysteria ) gloriosum illud nomen quandocunque recolitur , flectant gen●a cordis sui , quod vel capitis inclinatione testentur . This is the highest Antiquity , that any e Papist or Iesuito hath hitherto found out , to justifie their bowing at or to the name of Jesus . Yet this Constitution binds men onely to bow the knees of their hearts , ( not of their bodies ) at the naming of Jesus , and of Christ too ; ( and that especially whiles the Masse is acting ) which bowing of the heart they must testifie , by the inclination of their heads , not bowing of their knees . After this , Pope f Iohn the 22. about the year 1330. to induce men to the practise of this Popish Ceremony , did ( as Salmeron the Jesuite records ) grant 200. dayes of true indulgence to all who should bend their knees , or incline their heads , or knock their breasts to or at the name of Iesu● . Therefore it was then no received duty of the Text , this Pope enducing the People to use it , only to gain his Indulgences . Anno 1350. * Robert Holc●t our Popish Schoolman in his Lectures upon the Book of Wisedom , writes thus of this Name and Ceremony a S●c●ndum nomen tuum Deus , sic & laus tu● in fines terrae . Hoc b nomen est Iesus : de quo Math. Vocabis nomen ejus Jesus , ipse enim s●lvum faciet populum suum a peccatis eorum . Solent enim multum amantes de personis amatis facere cantilenas , eorum nomina exprimendo . Igitur de hoc nomine Iesu , idem faciamus●●●xta illud Psalmi ; Laudabo nomen Domini cum cantico , & mag●●●●abo ●um laude . Est igitur notandum , quod illud nomen , est nomen honoris & excellentiae . Phil. 2. dedit ei nomen quod e●t super omne nomen , ut IN nomine Jesu omne genu flectetur co●lestium , terrestrium , & infernorum . Vnde secundum sacros Canones , quando hoc nom●n I●sus pro●ertur in Ecclesia , omnis Christianus inclinari docetur cum capite ; quamvis tàm hoc , quàm multa alia spiritualia in quibus lucrum divitiarum non consistit , a Praelatis hujus temporis negliguntur . Whence it is apparent , 1. That he deemed this Ceremon● no duty of the Text , but a thing only injoyned by the Canons forecited . 2ly . That this Ceremony , though injoyned by Canon , was yet wholly neglected and not used nor urged by the Popish Prelates of his Age ; why then should any Protestant Bishops presse it now ? 3ly . That in those times men were only required to bow their Heads , not knees , at the naming of Jesus ; a thing not prescribed , by this Text of Phil. 2. which speaks only of the knee . 4ly . That Lord , God , are the Names mentioned , Ps. 48.10 . not Iesus . Since he , about the year 1430. one Bernardinus of Sennes a Franciscan Freer , and a Popish g Canonized Saint , a great lover and admirer of the name Jesus , h did earnestly exhort the People in all his Sermons and publick exhortations ( especially in his 49. Sermon now in print , De Glorioso nomine Iesu Christi , wherein he attributes what ever the Scripture speaks of Christ himself to his very name Iesus , as h Stengelius with others since have done , to make an Idol of it ) That they would give devotion , bowing and reverence to the name of Jesus , which is above every name , in which every knee doth bow , of things in heaven , and things in earth , and things under the earth : neither is there any oth●r name under heaven given to men , in which they can be saved . This Supe●stitious , Popish Fryer in his 49. Sermon w●ites , That the name of Jesus was adored and worshiped of all Creatures , that every creature did bow its knee to his name ; when as Miracles are daily wrought in the Creatu●e in his name : That Jesus is a glorious name , and wor●hy of all worship ; whence it may worthily and truly be said , and devoutly believed , that when Paul was rapt into Paradice , and heard secret words , which are not lawfull for any to utter , he then p●rfectly learned , that the name Iesus was to be adored of all men . Therefore retu●ning from heaven , and remembring the foresaid words , and how all the glorified Citizens in heaven bowed their knees and worshipped I●sus , at the recital of this his name , and under●tanding that all infernal Spirits , and those who are yet travellers upon earth ought to do the lik● : he commanding all men in the Spirit of God , writ in this Text of Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. That IN the name of Iesus every knee should bow , of things in heaven , earth , and under the earth , &c. which the Church , willing to have every man observe , commanded men to bow the knees of their hearts in the time of Mass when the name Jesus was mentioned , citing the Canon of the Council of Lions , ( ‖ forecited ) to prove it . And the better to d●aw the People to ado●e & bow to the name of Jesus , he i did use about the end of his Sermons , to shew unto them a Picture , in which the Name JESUS was written in golden Letters , enclosed on every side with Sunne beames ; or a Glory : which Pictured name ( the 12 ▪ rayes whereof he expresseth in his Se●mon ) the People beholding did most devoutly adore , with bended knees . For which Fact of his being complained against by some who maligned his fame , to Pope Martin the 5th . this Pope when as he had heard his Answer , gave him free liberty , not only to preach , but likewise to carry about and shew unto the people this picture of the name of Jesus . From a which pattern of his , all pictures of the name of Jesus , both in Glasse-windows , Popish Authors , Masse-books , & elsewhere , were at first derived . Indeed b Antoninus records , that Pope Martin enjoyn'd him that he should no more shew this picture unto the people , left some superstition , or scandal should be raised in the Church by this his novelty : which Injunction he obeyed . But Pope Clement the 7th . ( as c Molanus records ) at the request of the Freers Minorites , ordained , that all thei● Order , and the Nuns of the Order of St. Clare , should use this picture of the name Iesus , which they were backward else to use . This Ceremony , it seems , was not yet so generally received as the Papists did desire , and therefore the Popish Council of Basil , Anno Dom. 1431. d Sess 21. Tit. Quomodo divinum officium in Ecclesia celebrandum sit : decreed , That all Canonical persons , in all Cathedral and Collegiate Churches , whiles they were saying their Canonical Hours , when the glorious name of Jesus was named , should bow their Heads , ( not knees : ) The words of which Dec●ee are these , Statuit igitur sancta Synodus , ut in cuncti● Catbedralilus ac Collegiati● Eccl●s●is , &c. Hor as Canonicas dic●uri , &c. Cum dici●ur Gloria Patri , Filio , & Spiritui Sancto , omnes consurgant Cum nominatur gloriosum illud nomen Iesus , in quo omne ge●● fl●ct●tur Coelestium , Terrestri●m , & Inferno●um , omnes capu● inclinent . About the yea● of our Lord 1490 ▪ Michael Le●hmair , Doctor of Divinity , and of the Pope● Canon Law , & Eccl●siae Pata●●●●si●● anoni●●● , in his 20. Se●mon , de C●r●oncis●one Domi●● , K. I. writes thus of the Vene●ation of the name ●e●us , and what indulgences were g●anted by ●eve●all Pope● to s●ch who bowed to it . 〈…〉 & vene●a●● deben● nomen Iesu Ad ●o● 〈…〉 , & ●nclinatione : the ●●st whereof he thus proves and prosecutes . Quarto , inclinatione , prout docet Apostolus ad Phil. 2. In nomine Jesu omne genu flect●tur Coelestium , Terrestrium , & In●ernorum : Et lic●● ub●cunque auditur nominari hoc pret●osum nomen Iesus , debeamus caput ( not g●n● ) cum maxima Reverentia inclinare , hoc tamen pr●cipue est ●●en●●m in Ecclesia , pra sertim dum celebrantur ●●ss●rum solennia . Ita statuitur in C. decet . de Immun . Eccl. l. 6. Vbi dicit Textus , Convenientes fideles in Ecclesia ; gloriosum illud nomen Jesus quando●unque ●ecol●●ur flectant genua * Cordis sui , quod capitis inclinatione testentur ; Propterea summi Pontifi●●s plur●mas concesserunt Indulgentias ●is qui se d●vote et Reverenter inclinant audiendo in Eccles●a hoc nomen Iesus . Vnde re●ert Petrus de Palude , Lector palaci● Romae , postea Cardinalis , in Expositione Psalmi 123. quod Dominus Hof●ien . Cardinalis praedicans publicè in Sermone , dixit , quod vidisset Bullam Apostol●●am in qua concessae fuissent indulgentiae unius anni of 40. di●rum , flectenti genua ad nomen Domini Iesu. Item Dominus Urbanus Papa quartus , omnibus vere confessis et contritis dedit 30. dies indulgentiarum . Ad quod Johannes 22. Sermonem ad populum faciens Avinione , adjecit dies totidem . Et ●ic sunt 60. dies totiens quotiens quis devote dixerit ( not genua flexerit unto ) Iesus Christus , in fine salutationis angelicae . He immediately subjoyns . Item Clemens 5. in Concilio Viennensi , dedit etiam unum annum Indulgentiarum de Sancto Evangelio . In principio ●rat verbum , &c. quicunque legerit vel audierit post benedictionem in Missa , in memoriam & gratiarum actionem Dominicae incarnationis , a qua fluxit fontaliter sal●● humani generis . Et quicunque in fine cum dicitur ; Et verbum caro factum est , Geniculaverit , crucemque cum osculo fecerit , habet 40. dies Indulgentiarum : & sic de hoc Evan●elio habentur Indulgentiae unius anni & 40. dierum . Ide●●● Symbolo Niceno cum in Missa legitur vel auditur ; Et homo factus est . Ex his ha●etur quantum reprehendendi sunt qui audit● Missa vix expectant Sacerdotis B●nedictionem , Non curantes hujusmodi Indulgentias , nam et Laici videntes Sacerdotes genua flectere , s●militer facere deberent , et per hoc se reddere participes illarum Indulgentiarum . Here we have the full true Pedigree and Progresse of bowing at the recital of the name of Jesus , & other sentences of Scripture , especially in the Celebration of the Masse , and the several Indulgences granted by Successive Popes , to induce the people to the practise of these genu-flections ; which yet he complains many then neglected , not caring for these large Popes Indulgencies , purchased at so cheap a rate , as the bare bowing of their heads or knees , as aforesaid . Not long after this , about the year of Christ 1500. or sooner , the Popes , with some Popish Prela●es , Priests , and Monks , when their Indulgencies would not prevail so much as they expected , to draw the people to these genu-flections , and induce them to a more constant universal adoration of , and bowing to the name of Jesus , compiled a particular Psalter , which they intituled Iesus Psalter , printed at Antwerp 1505. in Latine , since translated into English by Laurence Kellam , and printed at the end of his Manuel of Prayers , Duaci 1603. which Psalter begins thus . Phil. 2. In nomine JESU omne genu flectatur , Coelestium , Terrestrium , & Infernorum ; & omnis lingua confit●atur , quia Dominus Iesus Christus est in gloria Dei Patris , which is likewise repeated after the first and tenth Petition . It consists of 15 Petitions , The 1 : Petition is , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , mercy ; 10. times repeated one after another , without intermission : The 2. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , help me ; The 3. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , strengthen me ; The 4. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , comfort me ; The 5 Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , make me constant and stable ; The 6. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , light me ; The 7. ●etition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , grant me grace to dread thee ; The 8. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , grant me to love thee ; The 9. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , grant me grace to remember thy death ; The 10. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , send me here my Purgatory ; The 11. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , grant me grace to flee evil company ; The 12. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , grant me grace to call for help to thee ; The 13. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , make me to persever in vertue acceptable unto thee ; The 14. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , grant me grace to fix my mind on thee ; The 15. Petition , Iesu , Iesu , Iesu , give me grace to order my life to thee . Each of these 15. Petitions are thus trebled ten times over one after another , the name Jesus being 30 times repeated together in each Petition , and 54. times more in other larger Petitions , between each of these , in all ‖ 504. times , but his name Christ not once mentioned , nor any other of his names but Lord alone , and that rarely ; which name Jesus is as oft to be bowed to & adored as thus recited , by their Injunctions , Canons , to wit , 504 ▪ times in one half hour . Moreover to propagate this Ceremony and bowing to and at this name , they not long after compiled * 5. Speciall Psalms , in honorem nominis Iesu , with the Letters I. H. S. and a Crucifix in the midst of the H. prefixed to them ; together with Letaniae de Nomine Iesu , wherein the name JESU is repeated no lesse then 74. times together , with several titles added to it , as I●su potentissime , Iesu perfectissime , &c. miserere nobis , Libera nos I●su , Parce nos Iesu , exaudi nos Iesu , &c. At the end whereof follows this Prayer for those who devoutly adore and bow to the name Iesus upon Earth . ‖ God , who hast made the most glorious name of Iesus Christ ●hy only Son amiable with the chief affection of sweetnesse to thy faithfull ones , and dreadfull and terrible to evil Spirits , mercifully grant , that all those who devoutly * worship this name of Iesus on Earth , may receive the sweetnesse of its holy consolation in this present world , and in the world to come may obtain the joy of endlesse exultation and blisse in Heaven , by the same our Lord Iesus Christ thy Son. The benefit of which Masse-Prayer , our modern Advocates for bowing at and to the name of Jesus , with all their over-zealous Proselytes , may do well to claim . About the year 1510 Richardus Hampole an English Popish Priest writ a Treatise , ‖ De Veneratione Nominis Iesu , mentioned by Bishop Bale ( and if I mistake not ) extant in his Opuscula Varia , Ms. in the famous University of Oxford ) to promote the adoration of , and bowing at and to the Name of Iesus . Not long after ( as I conjecture ) there were special Liturgies , compiled and published for the self-same end by the Popes and Popish Priests direction , intituled , * Litaniae Passionis Domini nostri Iesu Christi ; beginning with this Text of Phil. 2 8 , 9 , 10 , 11. ( recited at large ) wherein the name Iesus is repeated no lesse than 164. times one after another , with Miserere nobis Iesu , Liberanos IESV , ●xaudi nos Jesu , subjoyned to each petition , as in the precedent Liturgies of the Name Jesus . They likewise then compiled printed , published , used Horae de Nomine Iesu , & Dulcissimi nominis Iesu. And , Vesperae in veneratione nominis Iesu , editae à devoto Ricardo de Hampole , printed in Horae beatitissimae Virginis Mariae ad legitimum Ecclesiae Sarisburiensis ritum , Parisiis 1519 f. 169 , 170 , &c. In which I find on the 7th . of August , in the Kalendar printed with it , and in other Popish Kalendars , a special Feast , dedicated likewise to the Name of Jesus , intituled , Festum dulcissimi Nominis Iesu , Minus duplex ; which Feast Pope Clement the 7th . ( about the year 1524. ) as Stengelius , and d Molanus inform us , appointed to be generally observed as Minus duplex , a lesse double Festival , famous among many Churches , and amongst the common people . Thus one Superstition , Idolatry to this Name , begot another . These Popish Letanies , Howers , Vespers , Psalters , Festival of the name Jesus , purposely invented to promote its adoration , to which the people were formerly very backward , brought bowing to it into general practise & request in most Churches then leavened with Popery , the Priests and People usually bowing their Heads , Knees , and putting off their Hats to it when rehearsed in Epistles , Gosples , Masses , Sermons , and Divine Offices . And hereupon the Provincial Popish Council of Sienna , or Sennes , in the year 1524. ( following the pattern of the Council of Basil ) Decreta Morum , c. 18. established the use of this Ceremony , in all Collegiate & Cathedral ( not other ) Churches , in these following words , vizt . ‖ Et ut in majoribus Ecclesiis cultus Dei vivi sanctior , juxta majorum traditiones in melius reformetur : statuimus , ut in Cathedralibus & collegiatis & conventualibus Ecclesiis , horis debitis , &c. Horas autem canonicas dicturi , &c. Cum nominatur illud nomen gloriosunt , Iesus ; in quo omne genu flectitur coelestium , terrestrium & infernorum , omnes caput ( not genu ) inclinent . And Decreta * Fidei c. 14. this Council also draws this Argument from this very Ceremony , to prove the lawfulnesse of worshiping the Image of Christ & Saints . Et nos quidem non quasi ante Divinitatem , ante imagem prosternimur ; sed illum adoramus , quem per Imaginem aut passum , vel in throno sedentem , recordamur . Et dum per ipsam picturam quasi per scripturam , ad memoriam Filium Dei reducimus , animum nostrum de resurrectione laetificat , aut de passione mulcet , non majore quidem idolatriae periculo , quam cum nomine Iesu omne genu flectitur coelestium , terrestrium & infernorum . Quem enim vocabula cursim auribus insinuat , hunc eundem fidelibus oculis imago sedulò repraesentat , &c. In the year of our Lord 1526. the Synod of Carnotum ( or Chartres ) in France , ‖ decreed thus for the use of this Ceremony . Nullus in Ecclesia maximè dum sacra aguntur ambulet , v●getur , aut discurrat . Magis autem monemus omnes & singulos ut illis Ecclesias ingredientibus sit bumilis & devotus ingressus , & intus quieta conversatio , intontis precordiis , devotis insi●●ant orationibus , & dum sacra aguntur , gloriosumque nomen Jesu recolitur , flecta●t audientes genu● , aut capitis inclinatione suam Salvatorem testentur . Not long after this , the Diocesan Popish Synod of ‖ Augusta , Anno 1548. cap. 23. in more obscure terms , prescribed this bowing , &c. to all Ecclesiastical persons , not only at the recital of the name of the Body or Bloud of CHRIST ( not Jesus ) but of the Virgin Mary too . The Can●n runs thus : Cum autem Deo Opt. Max. Creatori & Redemptori suo honorem , timorem & reverentiam homo tanquam creatura habeat ; multosque videmus ea in re damnata ignavia de●ides esse ; omnibus Ecclesiasticis personis nost●ae Dio●oesis distinctè p●aecipiendo mandamus , ut post haec summa pietate Deum ubique & honorent , & timeant , praecipuè vero in templo humiliter revereant●r & vene●entur . Et quum in nomine Domini nost●i Jesu ‖ Ch●isti omne genu co●lestium , terrestrium & inferorum flectendum sit ; volumus , ut omnes quotiesc●nque in sac●i● Concionibus , aut Missis nomini● sa●gui●is vel corpo●i , ‖ Christi , a●t Dei genetricis Mariae Virgini● fiat mentio , a●t quando canticum , Gloria in excelsis , aut gloria tibi Domine , aut Evangelii initium , aut Nativitatis * Christi ex Virgine , & inca●natio in Symbolo , aut gratiarum actio in p●aesatione , aut h●j●smodi alia in divinis officiis canuntur , vel commemorantur , detecto capite , genibusq●e flexis , ante ‖ Altare , vel ut locus tempusq●e postula verit , Deo ( ma●k it , not to the Name Iesu● ) rev●rentiam exhib●ant debitam , & populum ad ejus rei imita●ionem ve●bis factisque commoveant atque hortentur . Here are more bowings prescribed than to the Name o● I●sus only . The very next year a●ter , in the Provincial Popish Synod of | Mogun● or M●ntz , under Sebastian the Archbishop , Anno Dom. 1549. cap. 59 ( not Anno 813. as some mistake it , and ●o make this Ceremony above 400. antienter than it is ) which hath ●his title to it . M●ssa , quo gestu , & qua devotio●e audienda : this Ceremony was thus enjoyned : Sedulò commonendus est populus fidelis , Clerici etiam per P●aelato● debit● animadversione inducendi , ut in celebratione Missarum , adversus tantum myste●ium , quantum quisque que per valitudinem potest , etiam corporis gestu reverentiam quandam adhibeant : videlicet , ut dum in Collectis , pro communi orbis terrarum incolumitate ad Deum preces funduntur , ipsi quoque tanquam hujus sac●ae Communionis cives , suas p●aeces cum oratione publica conjungant , & vultu ad ‖ altare verso , aperto & demisso capite stantes , gestum orantibus convenientem prae se fe●ant . Pa●i ●eligione ad nomen Salvatoris nostri Iesu ‖ Christi , similiter ad Evangelium , Magnificat ; Benedictu● , Nunc dimittis , Gloria in Exce●si● , Gloria Pat●i , caeterasque id genus officiorum partes , sic genuum flectione , ape●tione capitis , ac totius corpo●is gestu se componant , ut ad ea quae ibi aguntur animum intendere videantur . Thomas Beacon in his Displaying of the Popish Masse , ‖ printed in the year 1563. writes thus , This use is observed at this day in the Popish Masses , The People stand up when the Gosple is read , And make Courtesie when they hear the Name of IESVS , but they understand not one word . In the Roman Missal , reformed and set forth by Pope Pius the 5th . Anno Dom. 1570. among Ritus , Celebrandi M●ssam , I find this Rubrick , ‖ De ordine sedendi , standi , genuflect●ndi in Missa ; wherein there are these directions and prescriptions , when the Mass-Priest in saying his Masse , or the Deacons and People , ought to bow the Knee . Gen●flectit qu●ndo oportet , Genuflectit quando legitur Ev●ngelium . In principio , ad illa verba : & verbum caro facta est . & evangelium cum natus esset JESUS , ad illa verba in fine : & procidens adoraverunt eum . Item Evangelium feriae quar●ae post Dominicam qu●●tam Quadragesimae , ad illa verba in fine : & procidens adoravit e●m . Et cum Diaconus cantat illa verba , ipse versus librum , celebrans & circumstantes versus Altare Gen●flectunt . Subdiaconus vere tenens librum , & Acolythi candelabra , non genuflectunt . Item genuflectit in Dominica Palmarum , & in Missis de Cruce ad illa verba in Epistola , In nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur : Et ad Passionem quando Christus expi●avit . Item quando legitur Passio , ad illa verba expiravit . From which passages it is very observable , 1. That the Roman Missal it self , though reformed by the Decree of the Council of Trent , and this Popes command ; and since revised by Pope Gregory the XIII . Anno 1573. doth not promiscuously enjoyn the Priest , Deacon or People to bow their knees at every recital of the name of Jesus in the Epistle , Gosple , or Masse , though enjoyned by the forecited Popes and Popish Councils , and then ▪ commonly practised by the ignorant Lay-people , who understood not what was read in an unknown tongue . 2ly That it prescribes the Priest and People to Bow their Knees at the ●ecital of these several intire Sentences in the Gosple , Masse and Passion : And the Word was made Flesh ; And they fell down and worshipped him ; And falling down he worshipped him ; He gave up the Ghost : Not at the bare mention of any of Christs Names ; nor yet at this Sentence , When Iesus was born ; though his Name Iesus be mentioned the●ein . 3ly . That on Palm-sunday it self , and the Masse of the Crosse ; when this very Text of Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11 ▪ That IN the name of Iesus every Knee should bow : it prescribes the Priest to bow , not AT or to this bare name Jesus ; but at the recital , end of the intire Clause and Words , as Ad illa verba in Epistola resolve , and assure us , not at every mention of his name Jesus . In Missa Votivae de S. Cruce , p. 54. at the end of this Missale Romanum : this Text of Phil. 2. v. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11. is read as the Epistle : and over against these words , Vt in nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur coelestium , terrestrium , & inferuorum , there is printed in red Letters in the Margin , HIC G●NV FLECTI●VR , to wit , after the recital of all the intire Sentence , not at the very pronunciation of the name Iesus , much lesse unto it at every recital thereof . After which follows these Versicles , Dulce lignum , dulces claves , O Crux benedicta , quae sola fuisti digna sustinere Regem coelorum & Dominum , allelujah . Dicite in Gentibus , quia Dominus regnavit a ligno : allelujah . Adoramus te Christe ( not Jesu ) & benedicamus tibi , &c. Tuam Crucem adoramus Domine ; not his name Jesus when mentioned in any of the Prayers of this Masse , but his Title Dominus , no lesse than 3. several times repeated . So as the Compilers of this Masse , these Prayers , of Missa Votiva de S. CRVCE , & Festum duplex Triumphi CRVCIS , reputed not the name Iesu , the name above every name intended in this Text , but his Name Lord , which every tongue shall confesse , quia DOMINVS Iesus Christus in gloria est Dei Patris , as they all read this Text ; upon which they also ground their adoration of the Crosse of Christ , and this Prayer for its adorers , inserted into Missae propriae Sanctorum Hispan . p. 114. Deus , qui per Crucem tuam populo in te credenti triumphum contra inimicos concedere voluisti , quaesumus , ut tua pietate adorantibus Crucem , victoriam semper trib●as & honorem . Qui vivis & regnas ; as other Papists ●ounded their * formentioned Iesus Psalter , Psalmes in honorem Nominis Iesu , Litaniae de Nomine Iesu , Horae de Nomine Iesu , Vesperae in Veneratione Nominis Iesu , Festum minus duplex De dulcis . nomine Iesu ; and a Prayer for those who adore the Name Iesus thereon ; all standing on the self-same Basis , equally admitted , embraced , or rejected upon the self-same grounds ; which I desire all considerate conscientious Protestants seriously to observe , who may as justly adore the Cros● as Name of Iesus . In the year of our Lord 1578. * Synodus Ebroicensis held in France , made this Decree for all Church-wardens under their Popish Jurisdiction to put in execution . Editui circumspiciant quid quisque aget in Ecclesia , & quomodo se g●rat a minimo usque ad maximum ; si ●aput aperiat , genua cum opus est flectat , Officio divino animum & aures adhibeat , si orationi incumbat , Agente●● contraria cum aliquae reverentia & modestia objurgent , & ad Officium cogant : the intent of which Canon perchance extends to bowing the knee at the n●ming of Jesus , and the Virgin Mary , as well as to kneeling at Collects and Prayers . The Popish Council of Rhemes since that , viz. Anno Domini 1583. as a Bochellus records , made this Decree or Canon following : In pronunciatione nominis Iesu , & cùm dicitur versus , Gloria Patri , capu● aperiant & inclinent . That in the pronouncing of the name Jesu , and when the verse , Glory be to the Father , was said or read , men should uncover and bow their heads . Which Canon extends not unto Women , b who ought not to uncover their heads in the Church , much lesse to come thither like so many Strumpets , with c cut , broidred , powdred hair , as our Viragoes do of late : whereas the words of Phil. 2.9 , 10. In the name of Iesus every knee should bow , extend to women as well as men , and rather to womens bowing , ( who in their courtesies bow both their knees full low ) than to mens ; who in their common courtesies or legs at the name of Jesus , or to men bow d only one , not both their knees : whereas this Text requires every knee to bow , and so enjoyns the bowing of both knees , not one alone ; the courtesies of women , not heads , caps , or legs of men , here prescribed to bow at Gloria Patri . The Popish Council of Bitures , alias e Concil . Bituricense , the very next year following : viz. Anno Domini 1584. promulgated this Canon to the like effect . In fine Psalmorum , & ubicunque Gloria sanctissimae Trinitati redditur , omnes consurgant , & in invocatione ●ominis Iesu , genu flectant : Which may be construed as well of kneeling only in the invocation of the name of Jesus in Prayer , as of bowing at the pronunciation of his name Jesus . Besides these severall Popish Councils , the Sorbonists about the year 1540. from Phil. 2.9 , 10. as Mr. Calvin , Marloret , and * others on that Text record , began to publish and teach this Doctrine , that as oft as the name of Iesus should be m●ntioned , ( as in some Portuasses and Masse-books it is repeated f 20 , 30. yea 504. times together ) so often men must bow their knees : for which Doctrine , write Calvin , Marloret , ●nd Bishop Alley , they are more than ridiculous . Plusquam ridiculi sunt Sorbonici Sophistae , &c. After these , the Rhemists about the year 1582. in their Notes in their Rhemish Testament , on Phil. 2.9 , 10. g sect . 2. and on Apoc. 13. sect . 7. set on this Ceremony in an higher strain , where they write thus . By the like wickedness● the Protestants charge the faithfull people for capping or kneeling , when they hear the name of Iesus , as though they worshipped not our Lord God therein , but the Syllables or Letters , or other materiall Elements , whereof the word written or spoken con●isteth : And all this by Sophistications to draw the people from due ho●our and devotion toward Christ Iesus , which is Satans drift , by putting scriples into poor simple mens minds , about his Sacraments , his Saints , his h Crosse , his Name , his Image , and such like , to abolish all true Religion out of the world , and ●o make them plain Ath●i●●s . But the Church knoweth Satans cogitations , and therefore by the Script●re and reason , warranteth and teacheth * all her Children to do re●erence wh●●soever Iesus is named , b●cause Catholicks i do not ho●our these thing● , nor count them holy for their matter , colour , sound and syllables , but for the respect and relation they have to our Saviour , bringing us to the remembrance and apprehension of Christ , by ●ight , hearing , and use of the same signs , else why make we not rever●nce at the name of Jesus the Son of Syrach , as well as at Iesus Christ ? And it is a pitti●ull case to see these prophane subtleties of Hereticks to take place in Religion , which were ridiculous in all other trade of life . When we hear our Prince or Soveraign named , we may without th●se scruples do obeysance . But towards Christ it must be Superstitious . And here it is much to be noted , that the Protestants pulling down the k Image of Christ out of all Churches , and the sign of the Crosse from mens foreheads , and taking away the honour and reverence of the name of Iesus , do make room for Antichrists Image , and mark , and name . Thus the Rhemists , whose steps and genius some modern Protestant advocates and Patrons of bowi●g at the name of Jesus , do follow to an hairs breadth , though * Dr. Fulk , in his Answer to the Rhemish Testament , Notes on Phil. 2. sect . 2. and on Apoc. 13. sect 7. Dr. Whitaker in his Answer to William Reynolds the Rhemist , Cantab. 1590. p. 398 , 399. Mr. Cartwright in his Answer to the Rhemish Testament , l Notes on Phil. 2. sect . 2. and elsewhere , Dr. Willet in his Synop●is Papismi , Century 2. Error . 51. Dr. Ayri● in hi● Lectures on Phil. 2.9 , 10. And above all other , that Reverend Father of our Church , Gervase Babington , Bishop of Worcester , a professed Opposite to this Popish Ceremony , in his Exposition of the Catholick Faith , in his Works in Folio , London 1622. part 2. page 195 , 196 , 197. expresly condemn this Doctrine , this Ceremony of theirs , as a grosse ridiculous Popish Error , which is no wayes grounded on Phil. 2. vers . 9 , 10. as all these , together with Pareus , m Commentariu● in cap. 14 ad Romanos , vers . 11. Col. 1475 , 1476 , 1477. Iohannes Brentiu● , in his n Explicatio in Epist. Pauli ad Philip. cap. 2. vers . 9.10 . ( who writes thus , Quod a●tem Paulus ait , Vt in nomine Jesu omne se genu ●lectat , &c. non sic intelligendum est , quod necessarium sit , ut prolato hoc nomine , homines semper externae genua fl●ctere debent , haec est quidem Puarilis Caeremonia , & propter pu●ros usurpanda aliquoties , &c. ) Calvin , Marlorat , Olevian , Beza , on Phillipp . 2. ver . 9 , 10 , 11. Iohannes Piscator , o Scholia in cap. 2 ad Philip. vers . 9 , 10. pag. 1166. and Obser. 6. ex vers . 10. pag. 1162. to omit all others formerly quoted , do largely prove : Pope Clement the 8. Anno Domini 1600. corrected and published his p Caeremoniale Episcoporum , which he prescribed to be used in all Churches , especially Metropolitan , Cathedral , and Collegiate , without alteration or addition thereunto , as his Bull prefixed to it attests ; afterwards dedicated to , and approved by Pope Vrban the 8. In this Caeremoniale l. 2. c. 8. De Missa solemni Episcopo celebranti , p. 206. there is this pres●ription to the Deacon who reads the Gospel in the Masse , celebrated by the Bishop . Tunc manibus junctis pro sequitur Evangelium , Et cum profert nomen Iesu , vel Mariae , inclinat se , sed profundius cum dicit Iesus , quod et omnes faciunt . But this bowing is only when the Gospel is reading , and that to the name of Mary , as well as of Iesus , but somewhat lower to the name of Iesus , then of Mary . Since these , I find some private Popish Authors , ( especially the Iesuits , who deriving their Name and Order from the name of Iesus , do most stickle for this bowing at and to the name Iesus ) who have q written in defence and Patronage of this Popish Ceremony . As namely one Alphonsus Salmeron a famous Jesuit , in his Works at large 1612. Tom. 1. Prolegomenon . 24. De Dignit . & Majest . Evang. p. 387 , 388. writes thus , That certain Popes of Rome , ( forecited by Lochmair , and among the rest , r Pope Iohn the 22 who granted an ●ndulgence for 200. dayes to all who should either bow their knees , or incline their heads , or knock their breasts at the name of Jesus ) have taught , that men are to bow their heads or knees at the naming of Iesus , to represent the great humiliation and exaninition of Christ : And That a certain Monk was ●●ffed by the s Devil ( not by Christ , which is observable ) for omitting this bowing , &c. And Operum Tom. 3. Tract . 37. Vocatum est n●men ejus Iesus . p. 335. he records , That the name of Iesus is worthy all worship , genu-fl●ction , and adoration , in whi●h name Paul would have every knee to bow , both of things in Heaven , and things in Earth , and things under the Earth . For this name , whether it be pronounced with the mouth , or heard with the ear , or t where ever it is written , painted , or ingraven , is worthy Divine Worship ; not for the bare word , writing , or picture it self , but for the signification of it ; as u the Crosse and Image of Christ are deservedly adored with the worship of Lat●ia , for the type and mystery represented in them , &c. The same Doctrine we shall find in Cornelius a Lapide , a Jesuit , in his Commentary on Phil. 2.9 , 10 in Antonius Scaynus Salodiensis , Paraphras . in Epist. ad Philip. cap. 2. vers . 9 , 10 Venetiis 1593. fol. 142. in Iohannes Molanus , Historiae S. Imaginum , Antwerp . 1617. lib. 3. cap. 1. pag. 244 , 245. and in x Carolus Stengelius , SS . Nominis Jesu , cultus & Miracula , cap. 23. where he quotes this Text of Phil. 2 9 , 10. and the Decree of Pope Gregory the 10. informing Protestants Ibid. p. 125 , 126. That Papists honour not the ●etter● , Syllables , or sound of the name Iesus , but the thing contained and signified together with the sound and Syllables : But some ( saith he ) may say , Why do we bow at the name of Iesus , rather than at the name of Christ ? I Answer , Because Christ is not a proper name , but a declaration of Christs Kingdom and power : But y Iesus is a proper name , which he hath bought with his great pain , and hath received as a reward of his labour . For alth●ugh this name was imposed on him in his very Circumcision , and promised to him in his Conception , yet both these were done , because he ought to do that in his time , which the name doth signifie ; to wit , to save his people . Paul therefore affirms , that this name was given to him , because he actually performed this with his great pain . Phil. 2. He humbled himself , therefore God hath highly exalted him , and given him a name above every name : that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow , &c. Therefore this most honourable name is given , because he merited it . z The name it self is thus honoured , because he hath merited it . As oft therefore as we Catholicks honour the name of Iesus by bowing the knee , so oft we give unto him due and deserved honour , which he hath merited with a great price , so oft we do that we ought and are bound to do ; not only out of congruity for the greatnesse of the benefit conferred upon us , but also out of debt , by reason of the * will and precept of the eternall Father ; who hath therefore given this name unto his Son , that a in this name every knee should bow ▪ that all should worship this name , and in worshipping should confesse , that Iesus is in the glory of his Father . But as oft as the Hereticks ( who utter & hear this name without any reverence , because they have not the Holy Ghost ) do not worship this name , as oft as they refuse to bow and worship , as oft as they deride others who worship and bow the knee unto it , b so oft they violate the precept and will of God the Father , so oft they do injury to God the Son , and deny him his due honour , so oft they contradict th● Apostle , so oft they scandalize , or rather deride the Church of God : Finally , so oft they do acceptable service to the Devil , c who hath in an especial manner taught them this , and by th●m doth propagate this impiety unto others . This and much more to like purpose doth this Benedictine Fre●r , Stengelius , write , and publish in print Anno 1613. which I thought good in part to transc●ibe , because it is almost verbatim the same with Bishop Andrews Sermon , ( who took his materials and reasons from him ) and with Mr. Widdows , and other late Protestants writings , and d Sermons to this purpose ; between whom and these there is now no difference at all in this point of bowing at the naming of Jesus , for ought that I can find , and so they are both accorded in this particular . This is the only true genuine Pedegree and progresse of this much pressed Duty , and admired Ceremony of bowing at the name of Iesus , that I in my poor reading can find in all Antiquity , or the Jesui●es and Papists themselves yet really produced . If better , graver , or more learned Heraulds can derive its Parentage higher , ( as ‖ some have vainly endeavoured , to deduce it from the Fathers , and the constant practice of the Primitive Church ; when as I am confident upon most diligent search and good inquiry , that there is no one Father , no antient nor modern Writer extant , to prove or warrant what they assert , as the * examination of their alledged testimonies will at first discover , ) I shall be willing to be corrected and instructed by them . But if they must needs concurre with me in this its Popish Original & Progress which I have here faithfully set down ; ( as I presume they must , since Popish Priests , Monks and Iesuites , who have been most inquisitive in discovering its original , have raised the injunction and practise of it , no higher than the Popes I have recited : ) let them now at last for very shame ( unlesse they intend to turn Champions for Romish Inventions , Superstitions , Innovations , unknown to the primitive Church and Christians ; ) contend no more for such a pretended Duty , or Ceremony , which had no other real Fathers , but the forenamed Popes , Popish Councils , Writers ; no other Mother , Nurse , Midwife , but the Antichristian Church of Rome , with whose Popish Ceremonies , Reliques , Altars , Images , Crucifixes , Genuflection● , Bowings and such like abused idolatrous , d supersticious Rites , which get ground apace upon us ) the reformed Church of England , with all her faithfull Bishops , Ministers , Members , ( especially since the prodigious , unparallel'd hellish Powder plot should stand at everlasting defiance ; for fear e God give us over to strong delus●●ns to beli●ve and embrace her other impious lies and errors by degrees , to our damnation ; and then showre down his long threatned Judgements on us , ( of which the * late revived Plague and feared Famine , should now in time admonish us ) to our eternal ruine . What therefore Tertullian writes of Stage-playes , which had the very Devil himself for their original Author , ( as he , with ‖ others largely proves , enough to cause all Christians , who in their very Baptisme have renounc●d the Devil and all his works , &c. with care and conscience to abandon them ) f Facit ad origini● maculam , ne bonum existimes quod initium à malo accepit : the same shall be my conclusion in the point in question ; Bowing at and to the name of Iesus had its original , growth , progresse from the Antichristian Popes and Church of Rome , who propagated it by their Masses , Letanies , Feasts , Canons , Councils , Indulgences , Pictures g to justifie , their idolatrous bowing to Images , Crucifixes , Hosts and Altars , as I have fully manifested in the premises . How then any zealous , judicious Protestant Bishops , High Commissioners , Ecclesiastical Officers can justly censure , suspend , molest , excommunicate any conscientious a Ministers , or Christians in their High Commission , Consistories , Visitations , for not bowing at the name of I●sus , as a Duty of the Text , or nec●ssary decent Ceremony , or declaring the Reasons of their omission or non-usage thereof , let the impartial Readers hereof determine , and their own Consciences resolve . It was Tertullians conclusion in the Case of Stage-playes , b Oderis itaque Christiane cujus auctores non poteris non odisse . And judicious c Musculus his resolution . It is not fit that these things which are rather superstitious than religious , or have so great a shew of Superstition , should be retained in the Church . God forbid that I should maintain any Traditions , or Worships which are Popish . And I call them Pop●sh Traditions , which either of their own nature , or by abuse do serve unto Popish impiety , superstition , and blindnesse ; all which ( I am perswaded ) ought to be detested , as much as possible . Let it be all our Bishops too : especially since the Church and Parliament of England themselves in their Preface to the Books of Common-Prayer in King Edward the Sixth and Queen Elizabeths reigns : Of Ceremonies why some be abolished , and others retained , thus determine of them . Of such Ceremonies as be used in the Church , and have had their beginning by the institution of man : some at the first were of godly intent and purpose devised , and yet at length turned to Uanity and Superstition . Some en●●ed into the Church by indiscreet Devotiou , and such a Zeal as was without Knowledge ; and for because they were winked at in the beginning , they grew daily to more and more Abuses , which not only for their unprofitablenesse , but also because they have much blinded the People , and obscured the Glory of God , are worthy to be cut away and clean rejected . And whereas in this our time the minds of men are so diverse , that some men think it a great matter of Conscience to depart from a piece of the least of their Ceremonies they be so addicted to their old Customs , and lest any man should be o●●ended whom good reason might sati●fie ) here be certain Causes rendred , why some of the accustomed Ceremonies be put away , ( particula●ly , Howers , Psalters , Letanyes , Feasts , Ado●ation of the name of Iesus , as well as Altars , Tapers , Copes , Images , Albes , Crucifixes ▪ Processions , Adoration of and bowing to or toward Altars , Crosses , the Hostia , &c. ) Some are put away , because the great excesse & multitude of them hath so increased in these later daies , that the burthen of them was intollerable ; whereof * St. Augusti●e in his time complained , That they were grown to such a number , that the ●state of Chr●stian people was in a worse case ( concerning that matter ) than were the Iewes : and he advised , That such a Yoke and Burthen should be taken away , as ●ime would serve quietly to do it . But what would St. Augustin have said , if he had seen the Ceremonies of late dayes used among us ? whereunto the Multitude used in his time were not to be compared . This our excessive multitude of Ce●emonies we●e so great , and many of them so dark , that they did more con●ound and darken , than declare and set forth Christs Benefits unto us . And besides this , Christs Gosple is not a Ceremonial Law ( as much of Moses Law was ) but it is a Religion to serve God , not in ‖ bondage of the Figure , or shadow , but in the freedome of Spirit , being content only with those Ceremonies , which do serve to preserve Order and Godly Discipline . Furthermore , the most weighty cause of abolishment of certain Ceremonies , was , That they were so far abused , partly by the superstitious blindness of the rude and unlear●ed , and partly by the unsatiable ●varice of such as sought more their own lucre , than the Glory of God , that the Abuses could not well be taken away the Thing remaining still . Those be taken away that were mo●● abused , and did burden mens Consciences without any cause . We think it convenient that every Country should put away such Ceremonies , which from time to time they see most abused , as in mens Ordinances it often chanceth diversly in divers Countryes . Whether all or some of these Passages may not be justly applyed to thi● Bowing at the Name of Iesus only , as likewise to kneeling at the Sacrament , upon due consideration of its original Author● , Promoters , and Pr●mises abuses , I refer to every mans conscience to resolve . Especially because it puts a difference , disparity ▪ inequality , not only between this Name Iesus , and all other Names , Titles , Attributes of our Saviour , and the Name● , Titles of God the Father , and Holy Ghost ▪ but a visible undenyable inaequality and disp●rity between their sacred Persons , though co●ternal and co●qual by our Churches * Creed , and Scriptures resolution , and to be equally worshipped , ●dored , reverenced , bowed unto by all Orthodox Believers ; whose Persons are never adored , worshipped , or bowed unto in the Church when their Name● or Titles are mentioned ▪ nor yet the Person of God the Son , when any other of his Names are uttered , but only the Person of Iesus ( or rather his name alone ) when I●sus is either read , heard or seen . Which as it apparently thwarts that express Text of Iohn 5.22 , 23. The Father hath committed all ●udgement to the Son , that all men should honour the Son , even as ( that is in the self-same manner , form ) they honor the Father , not otherwise , nor more frequently , devo●tly , reverently than they honour the Father , at and to whose person they bow not their Knees or Head ▪ when his name is recited ; as usual they do by standing up at and honouring all three persons alike in their frequent repetitions of , Glory be to the Fa-Father , and to the Sonne , and to the Holy Ghost , without bowing at or to all or any of their Names : So it seems to put an inequality and disparity between their sacred Person● and Sovereign Divine Authority , and to advance Iesus the Son , above God the Father , and Holy Ghost Especially when all their three names are joyntly read and repeated together in one Verse , Prayer , Sentence , as at the end of every Morning Prayer . The grace of our Lord JESUS Christ , th● love of God ( the Father ) and the most comfortable fellowship of the HOLY GHOST , be with us all evermore . Amen . At the end of every Evening Prayer and Communion , The Peace of God , which passeth all understanding , keep your hearts and minds in the knowledge and love of God ; and of his Sonne JESUS Christ our LORD . And the blessing of God Almighty , the Father , the Sonne , and the Holy Ghost be amongst you , and remain with you alwayes . Amen . In the Apostles Creed , ( repeated every Morning and Evening prayer . ) I believe in God the Father Almighty , maker of heaven and earth , and in JESUS CHRIST ▪ his only Sonne our LORD , which was conceived by the Holy Ghost , &c. I believe in the Holy Ghost , &c. And in the Nicen● Creed , used every Sunday and Holiday ( to omit A●●ana●ius his Creed , the Letany , Form of Baptisme , the Collect , Epistle and Gosple Trinity Sunday , they are all mentioned together ) I believe in one God the Father Almighty , maker of heaven and earth , &c. and in one LORD JESUS Christ the only begotten Sonne of God , begotten of the Father before all Worlds , God of God , Light of Light , very God of very God , being of one substance with the Father , &c. And I believe in the Holy Ghost the LORD and giver of Light , proceeding from the Father and the Son ; who with the Father and the Sonne together is worshipped and glorified . If any Pagan , Turk , Jew or sober judicious Christian should come into our Churches when these Prayers , Creeds , are read ▪ and observe both Ministers and People to bow their Bodies , Heads , Knees , with extraordinary reverence and adoration at and to the Name Iesus only , when mentioned in them , but not at or to his other Names Lord , Christ , only SON of GOD , God , very God , thus coupled with , & immediately preceding , following his Name Iesus , yea not to bow to the person of Jesus as represented to them by these other glorious Names : nor at the Name God , as it comprehends the whole Trinity in Unity , or denotes the persons of God the Father , or God the Holy Ghost ; nor yet at or to the name Person , or sence , ( to use Bishop Andrews words ▪ ) will they not all then necessarily conclude and resolve , that this Name Jesus is more adorable ▪ honourable , worshipfull , holy , divine , than all those other Names and Titles coupled with it ? Yea , that the person of Jesus himself is more adorable , honourable , glorious , divine , when represented to our minds by his Name Jesus , than by his other Names , Titles of Christ , Sonne , Sonne of God , LORD , GOD , very God ? That this Name Iesus it self addes special adoration , veneration , honor , worship to his Person , Deity ; not his Person , Deity to his Name ? or that his Person , Deity accumulate more honour , glory and worship to this Name alone , than to all or any of his other Names , Titles ? Yea would not those Infidells conceive , that Jesus was one Person , thing , and God , Christ , Lord , Sonne of God , &c. another Person or thing inferiour to , and lesse venerable , adorable than Jesus ? And that the Person of Jesus who is onely thus devoutly bowed to when his name Jesus is recited in these Prayers , Creeds , is exalted far above God the Father , and God the Holy Ghost , whose names and Persons are neither thus adored , worshipped , bowed to , nor honoured by them , when thus coupled , recited , and represented to our minds at once in one Sentence , Prayer , Creed ? And doth not this bowing directly contradict those very Creeds , wherein we professe these three Persons to be coet●rnal together and coequal , to be neither greater nor less than another , and the Holy Ghost with the Father and the Sonne together to be worshipped and glorified ? No doubt it doth in a very high degree , a● every mans Conscience upon serious deliberation will inform him ; and these ensuing Histories in some so●● demonstrate . It i● storied of e Amphilochius , Bishop of Iconium , that to c●nvince the Emperor T●eodosius of hi● Error in tollerating the Arrians ( who den●ed the Deity of Christ the Son of God , whom they adored not ▪ with divine worship , but only God the Father ) that comming one day to his Court , and beholding Theodosius , and his Sonne Arcadius , newly made joynt Emperour , and invested in equal imperial Power with his Father , standing both together ; he pu●posely bow●d hims●lf and made low and accustomed reverence to Theodosius the Father , without doing any reverence to , or taking notice of Arcadius his Son and Fellow Emperour , in equal honour and power with him . Whereupon Theodosius being very angry with this Bp. for this contempt & neglect of his Son Arcadius in not bowing & doing any obeysance to him , and sharply reprehending him for it as an injury and affront to himself ; Amphilochius wisely replyed , that he did it on set purpose : and then said , Thou seest hereby , O Emperour , how hardly thou sufferest the ignominy and neglect of thy Sonne , yea verily thou art exceeding angry with those who insult over , and refuse to reverence him ; I would therefore have thee believe me , that God the Governour of this World , doth in like manner detest those who adore not and speak blasphemies against his only Sonne ▪ and that he hates them as ungratefull towards their Saviour and Patron . Whose purpose when the Emperour had by this means understood , admiring both his Deeds and his Words , he forthwith made a Law , prohibiting the Assemblies of the Arrian Heretickes . And may we not then justly fear , by parity of reason , that God the Father , and God the Holy Ghost will , be as much offended with those , who bow and do Divine adoration and reverence only to Iesus the Son when ever this Name of his is mentioned , and yet do no reverence of bowing or adoration to the Father , or Holy Spirit when their Names are mentioned and Persons represented to their mindes together with , or before or after the Name , Person of Jesus , in the self-same Chapter , Sermon , Collect , Prayer , Creed , or Verse ? No doubt they will. f Mr. Fox records of our Archbishop Cranmer , Bishop Ridley , and Bishop Latymer , that when they were brought before the Popes , Cardinal Pool● , and Queen Maries Commissioners at Oxford , sitting joyntly together upon them to convince and condemn them of Heresie , they all severally of set purpose , put off their Caps , and bowed their Bodies and Knees with great reverence and humility to the Queens Commissioners , but would neither put off their Caps , nor bow their Bodies or Knees to the Popes and Cardinals Commissioners , nor shew the least reverence to them , because they had abjured and renounced the Popes authority ; Whereat those proud Commissioners w●re so incensed , as taking it for an high contumacy and affront to the Popes , Cardinals Persons and Authorities ( whom they then represented ) that they not only ▪ severally and openly reprehended them for the contempt , and expostulated the affront with them , but caused their Caps to be pulled off by their Officers ; These Commissioners putting off their Caps , and making reverence when ever the g Popes name was read or mentioned , without yielding any such reverence at all to the Name of God , Christ , or Queen Mary . And may we not from thence discern and conjecture how much God the Father , and God the Holy Ghost are dishonoured , slighted , contemned , yea in some sort un-godded , and how far Jesus the Sonne his Name , Person are advanced , adored above their Names , Person , when the one of them is so frequently honoured , adored , worshipped with bowed Heads , Knees , Bodies , and veiled Caps by most , and the other two reverenced by none at all , as if they were mere Cyphers ; yea not so worthy honour , worship , as the Names , Persons of Iesus , of the Pope , or of the Virgin Mary , at or to whose Names or Persons , they only use to bow their Knees , Heads , and do obeysance in an extraordinary manner and excesse of veneration whenever they hear their sound ? Let all Christians then ( especially those Bishops , Clergy-men who are most zealous for this Duty or Ceremony ) take special care , that under the specious pretexts of uncommanded reverence and devotion , they relapse not by degrees to Popish Superstition and Idolatry , in giving as much or more honour to the very Name of Iesus first , h and next by the like reason to his Cros● , Image , Picture , Representative breaden body , yea to Mary the Mother of Iesus , by Bowings , Adorations , Holy daies , Howers , Primers , Rosasaries , Offices , Prayers , Collects , Oblations , Indulgencies , than to the Person and Deity of Iesus , or to the Names , Person of God the Father , and God the Holy Ghost , as they do in the Church of Rome ; from whose grosse Superstitious , Idolatrous , * detestable Enormities , excessive , superfluous , unnecessary Ceremonies , unknown to Christ himself , his Apostles , and the Primitive Churches , Fathers , Christians , and from all approaches to them , Good Lord deliver us , Amen and Amen . FINIS . ERRATA . PRay correct these Pres●-errors and omissions . p. 15. l. 11. read send . p. 24. l. 38. fignant , r. signall . p. 41. l. 14. r. thing . l. 33. r denying it . p. 44. l. 4. body . p. 55. l. 21. et , r. ut . p 57. l 8. his , r. this . p. 58. l. 37 , 38 r. therefore brief●y . p. 59. l. 34. bow , his , r. bowing , this . l. 35. at their , r. at Emanuel . l 36. dele which . p. 62. l. 19. more , r. much . p. 66. l. 31. nor , r. not . p. 67. l. 9. r. ended , they sate down purposely to receive the Lords Supper SITTING . p. 68. l. 16. r. Martyrs upon this account . l. 23. r. Pos●il . p. 87. l. 10. dele and. p. 111. l. 36. r. proper to . p. 112. l. 29. r. the● falseness . p. 114. l. 11. r. pronounced . Margin . p. 18. l. 14. r. cun●●● . p. 37. l. 11. r. c. 41. Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A56184-e490 a At the end of Lame Giles his Haltings , 1630. b 2 Sam : 19.14 15 c Octob. 5. 1660 d Pag 16 , 17 ▪ e Novemb. 9. 16●0 . f May 20. 1●●● . f Here proved , p. 65 , 66 , 67 , 68. g Homil. 82. in Mat. c. 26. h En●●ratio in Mat. c. 26. p 26. in Marc. 14. p. 109. in Luc. 22. p. 201. Here , p. 67. i Calvin , Camererarius , Beza in Mat. 26. k See Gul. S●uckius , Antiqu . Conviv . l. 2 c. 34. l Thomas Beacon , Here p. 71. m 26 H. 8. c. 1 , 3 , 27 H , 8. c. 15.28 H. 8 c. 7 , 14 , 32 H 8. c. 22 , 24 , 26 , 31 H. 8. c. 1 , 14 , 3● H. 8. c. 29 , 34 , & 35 H. 8. c. 9 , 19 , 35 H 8 c. 1. 37 H. 8. c. 17. 1 E ▪ 6. c. 2. 1 Eliz. c. 1. ● Eliz. c. 1. Rom. 14.23 . o 1 Tim 1.17 . Iud. 25. p Exod. 25.40 . Isay 33.22 . Mat. 4.10 . c. 15.9 . Iohn ● . 20 , to 25. c. 15.10 . Psal 40 6. Isaiah 1 . 1● . Heb. 8.5 . Iam. ● . 12 . Mat. 28.20 . 1 Cor. 11.23 . q See Centur. Magd. ● , to 14. cap. 6. & purchas his Pilgrimage . r August ▪ ad Simpli● . l : 2. qu. 4. Archbp. Whitguift , Hooke● , ●p . Morton , Dr. Boye● , Dr. John Bu●ges , Paybody , with others quoted by them . s Num. 61.9 . Deut. 29.10 . Ezr. 9.15 . Mar : 11.29 . Lu. 28.11 , 13. Jo. 7.37 . Lu. 7.38 Gen. 19.27 . Lev. ● 5. ● Chron. 6.12 c. 20.13 . Psal. 106.23 . (t) Judg. ●0 . 26 . 2 Sam. 7.18 . 2 Chron 17.16 . Ezr. 9.4 c. 10 9 Neh. 1.4 . Ps 137. 1. Ioah 36. Ier. 15.17 . Ezech. 8.1.14 . c. 14.1 c. 20. 1. Mat. 26.15 . (u) Ps. 95.6 . Gen. 24.26 . Exod. 4.31 . c. 34.8 . 2 Chron. 29.28 , 29 , 30. Neh. 8.6 . Dan. 5.7 . Lu , 17.16 . Acts 20.13.14 . c. 19.4 . c. 22.8 . (x) Ps. 6.6 ps . 63.6 . Ps. 149.5 . Hos. 7.14 . Gen. 47.31 . (y) Ps. 95.6 . Deut. 9.18 , 25. Dan. 6.10 . 1 Kings 8.54 . Lu. 22.41 . Acts 7.60 . c. 9.40 . c. 20.34 . c. 21.5 . (z) Acts 10.34 , 35 Rom. 10.11 , 12 , 13. Iam. 1.5 , 6. c. 5.16 . (a) 1 Sam. 16.7 . 1 Chron. 28.9 . Iohn 4.23 , 24. b Rom. 13.1 , to 7.1 Pet 2.13.14 , 20 Ps. 101 ●im . 1.9 , 10. Ezr. 7.26 . * See my Sword of Christian Magistracy supported , p. 35 , to 79. c Acts 15.28 , 29 , 30 , 31. c. 16 4. 1 Cor. 14.34 , 35 , 40. Articles of the Church of England ▪ Artic. 20. d 1 Cor. 7 , to 10.25 , 26 , &c. c. ●1 . 4 , to 18. * 1 Tim. 6.15 . Rev. 19.16 . e 1 Cor. 7.1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , to 10. & 16. to the end . 1 Tim. 4.4 . f Act. 10. Rom. 14. 1 Cor. 8. Col. 2.16 . to the end . 1 Tim. 4.1 , to 8. g 1 Cor. 11.2 . to 17. Rev. 9.8 . h 1 Tim. 2.9 . 1 Pet. 3.3 , ● . Tertullian De Velandis Virginibus , & De habitu Mulie●um . i 1 Cor. 14.34 , 35. 1 Tim 2.11 , 12. k EZ● . 8.1.2 , &c. Ps. 122.1 , 2 , 3 , 4. Ps. 133.1 . Eph 4.3 , 13. John 17.11 , 20 ▪ 21. Rom. 15.5 , 6 , 7. 1 Cor. 1 . 1● . Act. 1.14 . c. 2.1.46 . c. 5 . 1● . Phil. 2 ● . Zeph. 3.9 Isai. 2.2 , 3. Mich 4.1 , 2 , ● . Jer. 50.4 , 5 ▪ 1 Pet. 2.8 . l Heb. 10.24 , 25. m Iohn 9.10 . n Ephes. 4.3 ▪ 4 , 5 ▪ 11 , 12. c. 1.22 , 23 ▪ c. 3.10 . c. 5.23 , to 33 Iohn 17 . 1● , 2● , 23. Hebr. 12.22 , 23. Cant. 6.9 . 1 Cor. 8.6 . c. 10.17 . c. 12.4 , to 31. * 1 Cor. 12 . ●4 , to 27. ‖ 1 Cor. 14. Acts 2 ▪ 1 , to ●3 . ‖ Psal. 148.11 , 12 , 13. Deut. 29.10 , 11 , 12. 2 Chr. 20.13 ▪ Exod. 15.1 , 2 , 20 , 21. Acts 2 . 17.1● . o Ephes. 5 . 1● . Col 3.16 ▪ 17. p Cant. 4.12 , 16. c. 5.1 c. 6.2.11 . Isaiah 58 . 1● . q Cent. Magd. 2 , to 14. cap. 6. De Ritibus & Ceremoniis & cap. 8. De Schismatibus . Fox ▪ Acts a●d Monuments , B●shop Vsher ▪ De Christianarum Ecclesiarum successione & statu . Antiq●itates Ecclesiae Brit. in vita Augustini , p. 4.5 , &c. r Mat. 28.19 , 20. s Mat. 15.3 , 6● 9. Ma● . 7.7 , 8● Col. 2.21 , 22. 1 Tim. 4.1 , 2. Heb. 13.9 . 1 Tim. 6.20 , 21. t 1 Cor. 9.16 , 17 , &c. Mat. 28.19 , 20. 2 Tim. 4.1.2 . Acts 20.28 . Iohn 21.15.16 , 17. 1 Pet. 2.5 . u Isaiah 55.3 . Ioh. 10.3 , 10 ▪ 17. Mat. 8.8 , 21. 1 Cor. 11.24 , to 2● . Prov. 28.9 . x Acts 4 . 1● . chap. 5.29 , 39 , 40 , 41. Luke 1● . 1● . Da● . 6.5 , &c. 2 Ki●g● 13.3 , ● . ● ▪ 10. 〈◊〉 Caus. 11. qu. 3. y Act● 5.39 . z Arti● 27 & Rogers thereon , Bishop Whitgist , Mor●●ton ▪ Hocker● & others . a Mat. 3.12 . c. 13.24 , to 31.47 , to 52. c. 25.32 , 33. See Dr. Feild of the Church , h. 1. c. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10. Morney , De Ecclesia . b Sic sunt in Ecclesia & domo Dei , ●t non per tin●ant ad compaginem domus nec ad societatem fr●g●●e●ae pacificae que justiciae . Augustine de Baptismo , l. 7. c. 51. De Civitat . Dei l. 20. c. 9 Dr. Feild of the Church c. 8 , 9. c Act. 24.16 . c. 23 1. d Phil. 1.27 . e Iuvenal Satyr 1 p 11 . ● f Mat. 23.23 , 24. Lu●● 1.42 . g Claudian De L●udibi●● S●●liconis , l. 3. h 2 Cor. 1.3 . Eph. 2.4 . i Ps. 100.5 . Ps. 145.7 , 8 , 9. k Lu. 6.36 . l 2 Tim. 4.18 . m 1 Pet 1.4 . 2 Cor. 4.17 . Notes for div A56184-e5160 a Giles Widdows and Mr. William Page , Anno 1630.1631 . b Bishop Laud and others . c See Augustine ad Simplic . l. 2. qu. 4. an excellent full place , for the free use of sitting , standing , as kneeling , in the act of Prayer it self , and other parts of divine wo●ship ; and Antonius Walaeus on M●t. 26. & Mar. 11. * See my L●me Giles his Haltings , 1630. d See Canterburies Doom , p. 94 , 152 , 361 , &c. Ezech. 3.2 . f Psal. 118.23 . ●4 . g Acts 24. ●6 . h 1 Tim. 3.9 . i 2 Tim. 1.3 . l Rom. 13 , 3 , 4 , 5. 1 Pet. 8.12 ▪ 14. Tit. 3.1 . 1 Tim. 1.9 , 10. Prov. 20 8.26 . Ps. 101.4 . to the end . m 1 Cor. 7.1 , 8 , 9 , 15 , 23.27 , 18 , 36 , 37 , 38. Rom. 14. throughout . 1 Tim. 4.3 , 4 Col. 2.20 ▪ 21 , 22.23 . M●t 1.6 . Gal. 5.1 , 2. o Ad Caecil . De Sacramento Dominici Calicis Epist. 63● Edit . Pamelii p. 86 , 87. p Mat. 8.19 . q 1 Cor. 10 16 , 17 c. 11 , 20 , 23. r Tract 26 i● Ioan. c 6 Epist 59. in Paulinum , O Sacramen●um Pietatis ¶ O signum unitatis ▪ O 〈◊〉 charitatis l. 1. An●i●u Conviv●l . 1. c 3. f. 7 , 8. t Eusebius Eccl. Hist. l 5. c. ●● . u Antiqu 〈◊〉 l 1. c 3. f. 〈◊〉 x 1 Cor. 11.1.23 y Ephes. 5.1 , 2. z Phil. 34 . 1● Notes for div A56184-e7440 (a) Phil. 2.9.10 , 11. * Quia Domiminus Iesus in gloria est Dei Patris : hoc est , in natura & gloria Deitatis , id est , e●usdem est gloriae & aequalitatis : Or , in aequalitate potestatis & natura divinitatis . So Prim●sius , Sedulius , Remigius , Haymo , with sundry others read and expound it . b Injunct . 61. * Conference at Hampton Court , p. 46. d Mr. Page his justification of Bowing at the name of Iesus . e See the Conference at Hampton Court. p. 45 , 46. * Dr. Bret , & others of note● Note this . f On Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. g See Acts 3 6 , & ● . 27 , 29. c. 16.18 & 1 Cor. 5 4. Eph 5.20 . 2 Thes. 3.6 In which places the Greek is the very same , as in this text , and Eng●●sh●d In the name of Iesus . * Or translate . Rest , H●pe , Trust , Rej●yce , Deligh● , Glory , Stand ●ast IN t●e Lord. Faithfull IN the Lord , speaking bold●y IN the Lord ; which dye IN the Lord &c ( used above 100. times in Scripture ) Into rest , hope trust , ●ejoyce , delight glo●y , stan● fast , faithfull , speaking boldly , which die AT the Lord : Or Tit. 2.2 . Sound in Faith i● Chari●y , in Pa●i●n●e , into so●nd at faith , at cha●ity , at p●tience , Or b●●sse , speak pray , &c. IN thy name ; Into blesse , speak pray AT thy na●e ; & you quite destroy the sense , and Eng●ish ●oo of all th●se s●cred Precepts● Texts . 4. Quaeres . 1. Quaere . * Not Iesus . * Acts 2.20 . 1 Thess. 5 2. 2 Pet 3.10 Rev. 1.18 . & chap. 5.14 . * See Isay 11.4 . * See p 1. and others hereafter cited . * Ps. 110.1 , 2. Mat 22.44 . Mark 12 36 ▪ Luke 20 42. Acts 2.34 . 1 Cor. 15.25 . Hebr. 1.13 . ‖ Ut filius Dei vocaretur , &c Theodoret , Remigius , Haymo , and others . a Mat. 1.21 , 25. Luke 1.21 , & chap 2 21. b Mat. 1.21 . c He● . 2.26 . 2 Pe● . 2.4 , 5 , 6 , 9 Iude 6 7. Mark 5 7. Mat. 8.29 . Mat 25.41 . to the end . d See p. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12. a Mat. 1.21.25 Lu. 1.31 . c. 2.21 . 2 Quaere . a 1 Kings 11.18 . Rom. 11.4 . Eph. 3.14 1● b Gen. 41.43 . Mat 27.29 . Mat. 10 . 17● 2 Kings 1.13 . * See Ambr●se , Haymo , and others in Ephes. 3.14 , 15. c 2 Chron. 6 , 13. 1 Kings 8.54 . D●n . 6.10 . Lu ●2 41. Acts 7.60 . c. 9.40 . c. 20 36. c. 21.5 Ez● . 9.5 . * Gen. 3.15 . Mar. 2.27 . Lu. 19.14.27 . 2 Thes● . 1.8 . Act● 7.39 . Rom. 2.8 . 1 Pet. 4.17 . Psal 110.1 , 2.3 . Ier. 3.13.23 . * Flectitur ei omne genu , dum omnis creatura subjicitur ei . Flectere sanè genu non est carnaliter accipiendum , &c. Nam quae genua in Spiritibus esse creduntur ? Sed genu flectere Subjecta esse ●ucta & cultui Dei obedire declarat Origen in Rom l. 9. c. ●4 . Tom. 3. f. 214. Vt in nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur , &c. id est , ut omnia genera hominum , creatur●rum , angelorum , virtutum , Daemonum & animarum quae in inferno habitant SUBjECTA SINT EI , & ejus Iudicio , metui & imperio observi●ent : Ambrose , Theodoret , Ch●ysostom , Primasius , Sedulius , Remigius , Beda , Rabanus Mau●us , Haymo . Theophylact , Oecumenius , Anselmus in Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. Rom. 14. & Cyrillus Alexandrinus lib ▪ 4 in Isay c. 45. Oratio 3. 3. Quaere . * See Peter M●ulins Water● of Siloe . Bp Vsher of Limbus ●atrū . * Horae beata Mariae , secundum usum Rhoan . * Luke 10.17 . Lord even the Devils are subject to us through thy name . * Mat 10.1 . Mar. 5.10 , 11 , 12. c. 6.7 . Lu. 4.35 , 36. c. 10.17 , 20. * Psal. 2. & 96. & 28. & 110. Heb. 1. & 2. Col. 1.15 , 16 , 17 , 18. Eph. 1.20.21 , 22. 4. Q●aere . * In h●s ●ust●●ication of ●●wing at the n●me ●f Iesus . ● 2.3.4 , &c. * 2 Co● . 5.8.10.11 . * Isaiah 45 . 23● * See Luke 13.35 . * Luke 2.10 , 11. * Mat. 19.28 . Mark 13.26 , 27. Luke 21.27 . * Isaiah 45 . 2● . The true and full sense of Phil. 2.9 , 10 , 11. * Calvin , Marlo●e● , Bp. Alley , Piscator , Olevian , on Phil. 2 9 , 10. * Bp. B●bington , Dr. Fulk , Mr. Cartwright , Dr. Willet . in the ensuing places * Dr. Whitaker * In Mat. 2● . 2● . Ioh. 11.18 , 19. Ma● . 18.47 . Ioh. 1.42 . ch . 6.24 . ch . 18.5 , 15. ch . 19 9. Luke 19.35 . Re● . 19.10 . 1 Thess 4 14. the nam● Iesus is repeated twice in one ve●● , and Iohn 19.28 . t●i●e , & as of●en ●●wed ●● & ●● . ‖ I have o●served some to pu● o●f their hat ● to it when they have pro●anely sworn by it . Nota. * See Section 3 : The Appendix of lowing at t●e name of Iesus , and Lame Giles ‖ Sir Edwin Sands Relation of the Religion of the Eastern parts : Or , Europae Speculum , 1629. pag. 10. a See the Palsgraves Religion . b See here , Sect. 3. c See the Palsgraves Religion . d On Phil. 1.9.10 . e On Rom. 14.8 . Phil 2.9 , 10. Bish●p Alley hi● Poor mans Library , part 2. fol. 103 , 104. g Answer to Will. Raynold● p. 398 , 399. h In his display of the Pop●sh Masse . N●●es en Phil. ● . ● , 10. i● Answ●● to the Rhemish Testament , Sect. 2. k Syn●psis Papis●●i the 9. generall Con●●●● sie , p 492 , 493. l ●●po●ition on the Creed , p. 10● . ●96 , 1●7 . 〈…〉 . 9 , 〈◊〉 Mr Ca●twright in his Learned Confutation of the Rhomish Testament , on Phil. 2.10 . sect . 2. * Many do so through ignorance or mistake * See the Preface before his Confutation of the Rhemists translation , Glosses and A●notations on the New Testament . Nota. Note this . * Synopsis Papismi , L●ndon 1594. the 9th General Controversy , p. 492 , 493. * Rhem Annor . Phil 2. Sect. 2. Apoc. 13.17 . * N●ta . * Falk , ibidem Yet now men a●e n●●●●●●ated to me it , and cens●●ed for not using it . * A mistake w●rranted by no History , Father , Comme●tator , or solid Author , invented by Mr Ho●ker , in h●s Ecclesiastical Policy ▪ ● . 2 se●t 30 & taken upon trust by Dr Bane● out of him , Postils p. 280. * Suri●s Tom. 4 pag 869. * Anno 1548. Surius Tom. 4. pag. 810. Dr. Whitaker . * See Fox Acts and Monuments V●l 3. p. 487 , 496. Bp. Babington . * And as often bowed unto by the Repeaters . * Iohn 14●13 . Acts 4.12 . * See Carolus Stengellus S. s●nc●i nominis Iesu Cultus , & Virtutes , cap. 2. p 30. Erasmus his Paraphrase on Phil. 2. ● , 10. ‖ Act , 21.13 . * Isaiah 45 23 ▪ * 1 Kin. 19.18 . R●m . 14.11 . I●sephus Heb. 4.7 . H●g . 1●1 . Ezra 3.2 . * Luke 2.11 . * Note this . ‖ Mat. 1.16 . * Iohn 7.43 . * Iohn 9.22 . * Iohn 10 33. ‖ Luke 22.67 . * Let the Fathers of the Church note it . Bishop Alley . * And K. Edw. the 6. his Ca●echisms too , cum privilegio . * And are not many of our Prelates , Ministers , and People now in this regard as foolish as they ? Dr. Air●y . * Lecture 30. upon the Philippians , London 1618. p. 345 ▪ to 348. * Ibidem ● . 153 , 154 , 155. * Nota. a Isaiah 45.23 ▪ b Apoc. 5.12 ▪ c 1 Sam. 15.22 . * No●a . * Nota. * Ecclesiastical Policy , l. 2 sect . 30. Dr. Fulks Notes on the Rhemish Testament ▪ Phil. 2. sect . 2. * Gal. 4.16 . * Zach 8 : 16 , 17 , 19. Notes for div A56184-e21490 * He excepts not the two Persons of the Trinity , God the Father , and God the Holy Ghost ▪ no more then their names which if intended and included in his words , they are little lesse then Heresie and Blasphemy . * Note this . ‖ Psal. 16.2 . * Ps●l . 111.9 . * Ambros. Hexam l 6. c. 9. Hierom C●m In Isai. 45. Cyrill . Alex. in Hesaiam l 4. c. 45 Orat 3. * 1 Cor. 13. ● . ‖ R●m . 6.19 . * Rev 4 . 10● c. 5.8.14 . c. 7.11 . 2ly . * Isay 43● 11. 3ly . Nota. 4ly . ‖ Mark this . 2 Kings 18.4 . * Few then d●d it , & most since do it upon this Sermons inst●gation , and Bishops reputation . a Mat. 18.20.5 . c ●4 . 5 . Mat. 9.33 , 41 , Lu. 9.48 Iohn 14 13. c. 14 18 c. 15.16 c 16 . 23.2● , 26. b Tit. 1.13 . c ▪ 2.2 . c see Section 3. ‖ Bishop●ewels ●ewels Reply to Harding . Artic. 8. p 379 , 405. * Page 3 , to 20. * See Irenaeus , Epiphanius , Augustinus cont●a Haerese● , Alphonsus de C●stro , & Ephr●im P●git de Haeresibus . See 〈…〉 See 〈…〉 ●ewell● R●p●● 〈◊〉 Harding●●rt c. 8. of Ad●ra●●●n . 1 ●●r 11. ●● . See here S●ct . 3. * Among others Dr. G. in in his Sermon before the Commons House , May 20 1661. * Luke 22.14 , 21 , 30. 1 Cor. 10.21 . Iohn 13.2 , 28. * See Iohn 13 : 13 , 14 , 15 , 16. * Calvin , Harmon Evang in Ma● . 26.20 p. 319. ●eza , Thomas Paybody , Apology for the Gesture of Kneeling , p. 50. to 60. Ainsworth Anno●ations on Exod . 12 Scaliger , De emendat . Temporum , l. 6. p. 534. Dr. Iohn Burgess his Lawfulness of Kneeling . c. 19. * Ena●ratio in Ps 126 Sessio humilitatem significat . See Thomas Beacon his Catechisme , f. 484 , 4●1 . a Alexander Alensis . Sum. Theol. Pars 4. qu. 11. Artic. 1. Qu An Christus suum met . corpus in Caena sumpse●i●● p. 374. Alex A●ensis pars 4 p. 174. b B●eviatium Romanum Antuerpiae , 1621 p 26● . c Alexander Alensis , Pars 4. Quest. ●0 sect . 7 p. 358. d See A●etius , Beza , Beacon , Brentius , Calvin , Cartwright , Chemnitius , Gual-Deodat , Maior , Os●ander , Scultetus , Tos●anus , Zuinglius , May ●rus , Marlorat . piscator , Walaeus , Danaeus * In his works p. 476.477 . e Catechism , f. 48● . f In his works , London 1622 p. ●98 . g 1 Cor. ●1 . 23 . h Mat. 2● . 18 . * Vol. 1. of his Works , ● . 484 , 485. * 1 Thes. 5. Nota. Nota. l Mat. 4. Nota. * Mat. 14 19. c. 15.35 . Ma● . 6.39 . c. 8.6 . Iohn 6.20 . Luke 9.14 , 15 * Bp. Mor●●n , Dr Iohn 〈…〉 Payb●dy * 1 T●m . 4.5 . Mat 26.26 . 1 Cor. 11 24. Rom 14.20 . Luke 22.19 . c. 24 ●0 . * Antiq. Con●ivalium l. 2. c. 36. De Consecra●ione Mensae , qua Iudaei Christiani , & aliae ●entes olim usae sunt & h●die ●tuntur , p. 27● , &c. ‖ In Mat 26 14. Mark 6 39 , 40 , 41. c. 8.6 . e Dr. Boyes his Postills , p. 7. See My short Pacifique Examination , p. 8 , to 24. Nota. * See Walaeus on this Text. * 1 Pet. 5 3. * Tertul. de ●ejunio , & Corona Militis ▪ Cyprian de Oratione . Surius Concil . Tom 1. p. 447. Tom. 2. p. 1052. Tom. 3. p. 277. Cent. Magd. 3. to 8. c. 6. a De Spirita Sanct● l. 3. c 12. Per scabellum te●ra intelligit●r , per terram autem caro Ch●isti , quam 〈◊〉 ●uoque in myste●●●s ADORAMVS , et quam Ap●st●li in D●mino Iesu ad●rarunt . b Ena●ratio in Ps●l . 98. Nemo ou●em carnem ill●m m●nducat nisi p●ius ADORAVI● , Inventum est quem adm●dum ad ●etur ta●e sca●el●●m 〈◊〉 D●mini , & n●n s●l●m n●n pe●cemu● ad●rand● , 〈◊〉 emus non ADORANDO . c ●ish●p 〈◊〉 Reply to Ha●d●ng 8 〈…〉 d 〈◊〉 l. 13. c. 7. e Hist. Eccl. l. 8. c. 5. f C●nt . Magd. l. 4. c. 6 col . 670. g Dr. Burges , his Lawfulnes of kneeling in receiving the Lords Supper , p. 83 & Dr. G. in his Sermon 1661. a Dr Burges his Answer rejoyned to the Reply of Dr. Mortons general Defence , p 478 , 479 , 480. dedicated to King Charles the first . b De Ritibus Eccles. Cathol . l. 2. p. 557. n. 29. c. 55. c Ordo Roman . Bibl. Patr. col . 1618. Tom. 8. p. 393. Sacrar . Cerem . l. 2. p. 181. Edit . Colen 15●8 . d Missale Rom. in the Rubrick set out by Pius 5. e Durantus de Ri●ibus , p 443 , ●43 l. 2. c. 11 f In De●ret . Greg. I●● . 41. g Lib C●remon . 2 p 181 h Id. p. 192. i Ca● . De s●cra Comm●n . * One Superstit●●n begets another . k See Super ●r●da in 〈◊〉 ap●● flex●● gen●b●● tot● al●o ●orp●r● erecto●e disponent ▪ &c. l Papatus sive depravatae Religionis o●i●o , p. 7● . Edenbu●g . 1594. i Repl● to H●rding , 8 A●t●cle of Ad●ra●●●on p. 381. &c. Dr. Iohn Burges his Lawfulness of Kneeling in the Act of Receiving , p. 65 , 66. * The Preface of the Answer●s , p. 25. * The lawfullnesse of kneeling in receiving the Lords Suppe● . ch . 32. p. 110 , 111 , 112. ‖ See his Epist. 12. & ●dvers . Hesh●s●um , Opuscula p. 311. et Quaest. & Re●p . 243 Edit . 157● * Harmon ▪ Confess Geneva . 1521 sect . 14. p. 120. a Mat 15.27 . The Prayer at the Communion . b Lu. 22.14 29.27.30 1 Cor. 10.21 . John 12.2 . c. 13.12.23 . c Mat. 15.26 , 27. Mar. 7 . 2● , 28. d Iudges 1.7 . e Col. 2.18 . f Mat. 26.20 . Mark 2.15 , 16. ch . 6.39 , 40. ch . 14.18 . Luke 14.1 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 , to 25 ch . 12 , 14 , 19 , 27 , 30. ch . 24.30 . Iohn 12 ▪ 2. ch . 13.12 . g Iohn 12.23 , ch . 21.20 . h Gulielmus Stuckius , Antiq. Convivalium , l. 2. c. 34 ▪ i Ephes. 5.30 . 1 Cor. 12.27 . k Iohn 17 ▪ 2● . 22 , 23. 1 Iohn 5.20 . l Hebr. ● : 11● m Iohn 15.14 , 15. n Iohn 1.22 . Rom. 8.14 , 19. 1 Iohn 3.1 , 2. ch . 5.2 . o Rom. 8.16 , 17. Gal. 3.26 , 29. Iam. 2 , 5. p Rev. 1.6 ch . ●0 . 6 . 1 Pet. 2. ● . q Rev. 3.21 Luke 22.29 , 30. s Ephes. 2.5 , 6. * Bish●p And●ews P●ybody , and others t Mark 14.24 . Mat. 26.28 . This Cup is the New Testament of my blood which is shed FOR MANY , n●t all . u 1 Cor. 11.24 , ●0 . Mat 2● . 26 , 27. Luk. 12.19 , 20. Mark 14. ●2 , 23. * See here p. 76 , 77. * Artic. 20. Acts 20 . 2● . * See here p 68 , 69 , &c. 79 , 80. ‖ Concilium Constantiense , Sessio 13. Surius Concil . Tom. 3. p 820 , 821 , 822. with Binius , & Crab. in ●heir Collection of Councils . * M●t. 26 M●r. 14. Luk 2● . 〈◊〉 q●oted ●n 〈◊〉 Ma●gin . * 5 October . 1660. p. 16. Altare Damascenum , and others . * Phil. 4.5 . * See Augusti● . ad Simplicianum , l. 2. qu. 4. Dr. Iohn Burgess of the lawfulness of kneeling in the Act of Receiving . Thomas Pa●body his ●ust Apoligy for the gesture of Kneeling in the Act of Receiving the Lord● Supper , London 1629. & others . * V. 10. Before me the●e is no GOD formed , &c V. 12. Therfore ●e are my Witn●sses that I am GOD ●recede and foll●w , Besides me there is no Saviour . Act● 1● 23. Phil. 3.20 . 2 ●im . 1.10 . Tit. 1.3.4 c 2.13 c ● 6. 2 Pet 1.1 , 11. ● 2. ●● c. ● . 18 * Alcuinus contra Felicem Vrgel . l. 2. * See Mat. 1● 21.25 . Luk. 1.31 . c. 2.21 . * Expo●it . &c. in Mat. c. 1● Tom. 5 . ● p. 1. ‖ Divinis Officiis , c. 4. n. col● 1147. ‖ Here p. 2 , 3 , 4. * See Dr● Fulk , Mr. Ca●tw●ight , Dr. Willet , Bp. Iewel Bp Morton and others . ‖ See here . p. 30 , to 48. * See Sect. 3. * Deut. 28.58 . Ps. 72.18 , 19. Ps 99.3 . Isay 57.15 Jer 10. ● c. 44.26 . Ezek 39.1 , 7● 25. Mal 1 . 11● 14 c. 2.2 , ● . * Hexam . ●on , l. 6. c. * Comment . in Isai●m , l 1● . c. 45. In Hesaiam , l. 4. c. 45. Orat. 3. * In Phil 2.9 , 10 , 11. ‖ Heb. 1. Psal. 2. 2 Reg. 2. * Aleuinus c●nt●a Feli●em Vr●el . ep . lib. 2. col . 106 , to 810. & Proclus . Cassianus , with others cited by him , & lib 3. ‖ Gal 3.27 , 29. c. 2.17.20 , 21. * Iohn 14.2 . ‖ Nota. * Tract 7. in Evangelium secundum Iohannem , Se●mo . ● . & in Ma●●m . l 2. all cited by Beda Exposit . in Hebr. 1. * Operum Tom. 8. Col. 530 , 531. Tom. 6. Col. 771 , 772 ● most full-place * On Psal 45. and Heb. 1. and on the Creed . * Psal. 45.7 . Hebr 1.8 . an● all Commentators ●n them . * Bp. Iewel Reply to Harding , Artic. 8. of Adoration . Dr. Reynolds De Idolatria Romanae Ecclesiae . The Homily of the Peril of Idolatry . Bp. Morton of the Masse . * Acts 4.12 . Neither is there Salvati●n in any other , for the●e is none other name under heaven given amo●g men , wherby we must be saved ‖ Lu. 1.69.77 . c. ● . 30 c. 3 6. c. ●● Acts 4 12. I●de 3 Isay 62. ●● . M● . ● 7. Ps. 62.1 , 2 , ● . * See Sect. ● . 〈◊〉 , p 126. * Mat W●stm . An 3●6 . S●e My Pacif●que 〈◊〉 , &c p. 8 , 〈◊〉 24. * 〈◊〉 . p. 68.69 . * 2 Kings 18.4 . * See Section 3● * See Summ● Angel. & Rosella , Tit ▪ Superstitio . ‖ Mat. 5.21 , to 38. c. 15.2 , to 7. Mar 7.3 , to 14. Gal. 1.14 . Notes for div A56184-e41150 a Tertullian de Corona M●litis , lib De Ieiunio lib. Origen H●m . 4. in Numeros , Cyprian Serm. De Oratione Cent. Magd. 7 , to 8. c. 6. De Oratione . Here p. 74. b S●e A●hanasiu● his Creed , Qu●d Christus ●it Deu● , and the Orations , T●eatises of Nazionzen , B●fil , Hila●y , Cy●ill , Greg●ry Nyss●n , and ●ther Fa●hers against the Arri●ns . * See Centur. Magd. 1. to 12. cap. 6. De Ri●i●●● & Ceremoniis . Anno 1●3● . * Pag● 1●3 . * Mat. 27.37 . Iohn 19.19 , 30. Anno 1160. a Bibl. Patr : Colon. Agrip. 1618. Tom. 12. pars 2. p. 881. D. b Which may be either intended to worship and pray to her , or else to bow at the ●e●it●l of her name . Anno 12●0 . c ●ibl . Patrum , Tom. 13. p. 266. B.C.E. ‖ It seems they then bowed , not stood up at Gloria Patri . * To Jesus Christ , not to Iesus only . Anno 1230. * Bibl. Patr. Tom. 3. p. 351. ● . * Bibl. Patr. Tom. 3. p. 351. ● . * Ibid. Tom. ●3 . 452 . H. Anno 12●0 Anno 1262. ‖ Mich. Loch mair Serm. 20. De Circumcisione Domini . L. Anno 1273. d See Sexti Decretalia lib. 3. tit . 23 c. 2. f. 187 Cent. Magd. Basiliae , 1574. Cent. 13. Col. 919.934 , 935. Greg. 10. Decretalium , l. 6. De Immunitate Ecclesiae , cap. Decet ▪ Antoninus Hist. pars 3. Tit. 20. c. 2. f. 56. Bernard . Senensis , Serm. 49. Carolus Stengelius De Ss. Nomine Iesu , c. 23. p. 123. e See Bernardinus Senensis , Sermo . 49. ●a●olus Stengelius De●ss . Nomine Iesu. c 23. & Salmeron , Operum tom . 3 tract . 3● p. 335. &c who can raise this Ceremony from no high●r pedegree . f Iohannes 22. ducentos dies verae indulgentiae omnibus qui ad nomen Iesu genua flecterent , vel caput inclinarent , vel tunderent pectus largitus est : Salmeron Operum , Tom. 3. p. 335. * Lect. 134 in lib. Sapientiae , c. 11. f● 126. Anno 1350. a Psal. 41. ●0 . b A gross mistake , this Name Iesus being not then given to Christ : not mentioned nor intended in the Psalm : but the Name Lord , or God , as v. 1 , ● , 8 , 14. resolves . Not Iesus . Nota. g See Marty●i●●●gium Romanum , & Opme●● Chronogr : p. 414. h Carolus S●engelius ▪ De●ss Nomine Iesu , cap. 29 p. 157.159 . h Carolus S●engelius ¶ De●ss Nomine Iesu , cap. 29 p. 157.159 . Nota. ‖ Here p. 1●3● i Carolus S●engelius ibid p. 159 , 160 , 161. Molanus Histo●● De Pic●uris & Imag Antw. 1617. l. 3. c. 1. Ant●ninus p●●s 3. histor . tit 24. cap 3. Salme●o● ▪ Operum tom . 3. tract . 37. p. 335. So writes Salmeron . a Molanus De Pictu●is e●lmag l. ● c. 1. & 18. b Pars 3. Hist Tit. 24. c. 5. see S●engelius , p. ●●9 , 160 c De Picturis l. 3. c. 1. & 18. See Stengelius p. 162. & Dr. Fulks Notes on the Rh●mish Testament●●n Apoc. 13. sect . 7 , 8 , 9. Anno 1431. d Su●●us Concil . ●om . 4. p 61. a. Anno 14●● Nota. * Not Corporis . Nota. Anno 1500. ‖ Is not this Battology an express violation of Mat 6.70 Bu● when ye pray use not VAIN REPETITIONS as the Heathens do ▪ for they think they shall be heard for their much speaking Anno 1506. * Printed together in Sacrae Litaniae variae , Antwerpiae , 1629. p. 15 , to 34. ‖ Printed also in Officium beatae Mariae secundum riium Sacrum , f 170 * Viz. by bowing unto it , when it is pronounced , as Stengelius understands it . Anno 1510. ‖ ●ohanne . Baleus Centur : Scriptorum ▪ Brit pars ult . p. 167. Anno 1514. * Printed Antw 1629. with other Litan●ae Variae p. 64. to 96. S● Nominis Iesu cultus , p. 162. d De Picturis ● Imaginibus , ● . 3. c. ● & 18. Anno 1●24 . ‖ Surius Concil . tom . 4. p 740 ▪ 741. Bochel . lib. 4. tit . 1. c. 2 p. 543. vid. ibid. Phil. 2. * Surius ibid. p. 731. Phil. ● . Anno 1526. ‖ Bochel . l. 4. tit . 1. c. 3. p. 544. Anno 154● . ‖ Surius Concil . t●m . 4 p. 810. ‖ Both name● are here expressed . Phil. 2. ‖ Not Iesus . * Not Iesus . ‖ Nota Anno 1519. | Sur●us tom . 4. p. 809. ‖ Nota. ‖ Iesus and Christ are here bo●h united . ‖ Vol. 3. of his works printed 1563. f. 39. ‖ M●ssale Romanum , Salmanticae , 1588. p. 26. * P. 127 , 128 , 129. Anno 1578. * Lour . Bochel . Decret . Eccles. Gal l. 4. Tit. 1. ●● 14. p. 546. Anno 1583. a Decreta Ecclesiae G●ll●●anae l 1. Tit. 2. c. 22. p 21. b 1 Cor. 11.5 , to 16. c 1 Cor. 11 . 5● to 16. ● Tim. 2.9 , 10. 1 Pet. 3 ▪ 3 , 4. Synodas Taron . 1583. & Concil Bitur . 158● . apud Bochel . Decr. Eccl. Gal. l. 6. T it 9 c. 1● , 12. See my Vnloveliness of Love-locks p. 12 , to 23.30 , 31 32 & 43 , to 5● . d See Gen. 41 43. Matth. 27.29 . Rom. 11.4 . e B●chell Decr. Eccl. Gal l. 1. Tit. 7. ● . 28. p. 8● . Anno 1584. * See here , p. 29 , 49. f See Iesus his Psalter , here p. 128 , 129. Bp. Babingtons Exposition of th● Catholick Faith p 195. Here p. 42 , 43. Anno 1582. g See Dr. Fulk and Mr. Cartwrights Answer to the Rhemish Testament , Ibid. Here p. 36 ▪ to 41. h His Crosse , his Name , &c. are here coupled together , and bowed to alike . * Note . i What difference then can any Protestant bower at the name of Iesus make between his bowing and the Papists ? which Protestants formerly condemned , and yet many of them 〈◊〉 contend for . k Which some Protestan●s , in name at least , begin now to set up again , to please the Rhemists & Papists * See He●e p. 36 , to 53. l Where he pithily dispu●es this point . as also in his first Reply to Bish●p Whitguists Answer , p 163. and in his 2. Reply , p. 215. m Heidelburgiae 1613. n F●ancofurti 1548. fol. 54 , to 58. o He●born● 1616. p Edit ▪ Parisiis p. 1633. q As I hear of some Protestants writing for this Ceremony too , as hot as any Iesuits , viz Giles Widdows , Mr. Page . r Operum Tom. 3. Tract . 37. p. 335. s It seems the Devil is be●ter pleased with this bowing ▪ than Christ. t Let our bowers at the sound only of the name o● Iesus note this well & answer it as they can . u You see h●w the Papists rank these three together , the adoration of the Cross ▪ the Image , and the name of Iesus . x Printed Augustae Vind●licorum 1613. where there is much written of this name to little purpose . y This is Bishop Andrews his Reas●n too , See his Sermons , p. 475 , 4●6 , 477. Here re●uted p. 57● 110 , 111. z This is Mr. Widdows his Reason , see his Confutation p. 6. and 30 to●2 ●2 . and 81 , 82. * So Bishop Andrews res●lves too , here p. 56 , 58. a In nomine , not , ad nomen , which signifie●h to , not at the name ; Here p. 2 , to 10. b So writes Mr. Widdows too , pag 6 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 25 , 26 , 74 , 86 , 8● , 88 , 90. and Bish●p Andrews , here p 56 , 58. c Yet Salmeron informed ●s bef●●e , that the Devil cuff●d a Monk for omitting it ; & therefore he is rather the Author , th●n the hinde●er of this bowing . d See Bp. Andrews Sermons in Folio p 475 , 476 , 477. Mr. Adams his Sermons p. 1203. Dr. Wrens Sermon Febr. 12. 1627 p 16 , 18. ‖ Bp. Andrews & Mr. Widdows , who misquote some Fathers for it : whereas Bp. Whitguift , and Zanchius write only , That it was an antient custome and practise in the Church , but quote no Authorities to prove it , because in truth there are none extant to prove it antienter than this its pedeg●ee . * See Lame Giles his Haltings , p 7.8 31 , ●2 Here ▪ p. 101 to 105. d Sic n●ta Romana superstiti● , quorum 〈◊〉 si percenseas , ridend● quam ●n●lia , mu●a etiam miserand● sunt Minucius Felix Octav p. 76. e 2 ●●es . ● . 10 , 11.12 . * This was wri●ten , printed , An 1630. ‖ Cyprian De spectac . lib. 〈◊〉 De 〈◊〉 . Dei , ● 6. f De spectaculis libr. c. 8. g See the Council of Senn● , the Rhemists , Sal. mer●n● Stengelius and Fulk qua supra . a As Mr. Sam● VVard , Mr. Snelling and others . See Canterburies D●om . p. 94 , 152 , 361. b De Spect. lib. c. 10. c Locorum Com. De Tradit . sect . 5. p. 421 , 422. * Ad I●●●arium , Ep. 119. Se● . Antiq● . Eccl. Brit p. 4. Let our Prela●es 〈…〉 it 〈…〉 their 〈…〉 under 〈◊〉 of Ex●ommunica●●●n 〈…〉 upon Ministers and others . ‖ Why sh●uld any then be imprisoned , excommunicated , deprived of his Ministry and Benefi●e for not using Ceremonies of mens inve●ting ? * Athenesius ● Nice●s Cree●s . e 〈◊〉 Eccles. Hist. lib. 5. cap 16. Centar Magd. 4 col . 994. f Acts and Mon. vol. 3 p. 486 , 496 , 649 , 660. g Fox Acts and M●n . ●ol . 3 p. 487 , 496 , and Here , p. 42. h See H●●a , Offi●ium , ●sal●erium , Rosarum , ●it●niae beat● Mariae , Crucis , N●minus Iesu , of which the●e are divers sorts . * Thus prayed against in the Letanies in the Common-Prayer Books of King Edward the Sixth , and in the Book of Ordinations , though now expunged . From all false D●ctrine and Heresie , from the Tyranny and detestable Enormities of the Bishop of Rome , Good Lord deliver us .