A Novel, Layered Phase in Ti&#x02010;Rich SrTiO3 Epitaxial Thin Films UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title A novel, layered phase in Ti-rich SrTiO3 epitaxial thin films. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h43d3xp Journal Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 27(5) ISSN 0935-9648 Authors Lee, Sungki Damodaran, Anoop R Gorai, Prashun et al. Publication Date 2015-02-01 DOI 10.1002/adma.201403602 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h43d3xp https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h43d3xp#author https://escholarship.org http://www.cdlib.org/ © 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 861wileyonlinelibrary.com C O M M U N IC A T IO N A Novel, Layered Phase in Ti-Rich SrTiO 3 Epitaxial Thin Films Sungki Lee , Anoop R. Damodaran , Prashun Gorai , Nuri Oh , Jarrett A. Moyer , Ji-Hwan Kwon , Naheed Ferdous , Amish Shah , Zuhuang Chen , Eric Breckenfeld , R. V. K. Mangalam , Paul V. Braun , Peter Schiffer , Moonsub Shim , Jian-Min Zuo , Elif Ertekin , and Lane W. Martin* S. Lee, Dr. A. R. Damodaran, Dr. Z. Chen, Prof. L. W. Martin Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of California Berkeley, Berkeley , California 94720 , USA E-mail: lwmartin@berkeley.edu Dr. P. Gorai, N. Ferdous, Prof. E. Ertekin Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana , Illinois 61801 , USA N. Oh, Dr. J.-H. Kwon, Dr. A. Shah, Dr. E. Breckenfeld, Dr. R. V. K. Mangalam, Prof. P. V. Braun, Prof. M. Shim, Prof. J.-M. Zuo Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana , Illinois 61801 , USA Dr. J. A. Moyer, Prof. P. Schiffer Department of Physics University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana , Illinois 61801 , USA DOI: 10.1002/adma.201403602 characterization methods, these approaches push the edge of materials control. Using these techniques it is possible to pro- duce exotic new phases that do not exist in the bulk, [ 20,21 ] syn- thesize artifi cial heterostructures, [ 22,23 ] and control materials at the unit-cell level to enable new states of matter. [ 24,25 ] Although these approaches provide unprecedented control, they are lim- ited in the geometries of phases that can be created (i.e., lay- ered heterostructures) and the cost, complexity, and lack of scalability of the continuous in situ monitoring makes large scale use challenging. In this work, we explore a new, self-assembly route to produce novel phases, whereby we combine systems with a tendency for spontaneous phase separation with non-equilibrium deposi- tion techniques and thin-fi lm epitaxy. The goal is to explore the evolution of a classical equilibrium concept (i.e., eutectic mate- rials) under non-equilibrium growth conditions that are kineti- cally limited and infl uenced by epitaxial relationships. To do this, we focus on a model oxide eutectic system: SrTiO 3 –TiO 2 . The equilibrium SrTiO 3 –TiO 2 eutectic phase diagram has been known for decades, [ 26 ] but this work is motivated by a number of recent studies. First, directional solidifi cation of this eutectic system has produced exotic, split-ring resonator-like TiO 2 fea- tures embedded in a SrTiO 3 matrix. [ 16 ] Second is the use of complex shuttered thin-fi lm deposition processes and epitaxy to study new members of the Sr n +1 Ti n O 3 n +1 Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) homologous series and their properties. [ 27,28 ] It should be noted that most work on the Ti-rich side of the phase dia- gram has been done in the context of bulk eutectic systems and what little work has been done on the Ti-rich materials as fi lms has shown only the production of amorphous TiO x inclusions in a SrTiO 3 matrix. [ 29 ] Most thin-fi lm work in this system has focused on nearly stoichiometric SrTiO 3 or Sr-excess phases. This begs the question of whether non-equilibrium growth techniques and thin-fi lm epitaxy can be used to produce novel phases and/or nanostructures akin to those observed in Sr-rich SrTiO 3 on the Ti-rich side of the phase diagram. Here, we study the growth, structure, and properties of the Ti-rich portion of the SrTiO 3 –TiO 2 phase diagram in and around the eutectic composition. We observe that the non-equilibrium nature of the growth process results in fi lms that greatly exceed the ther- modynamic solubility limit of Ti in SrTiO 3 (≈0.5 mol% of Ti in bulk SrTiO 3 [ 30 ] as compared with ≈130 mol% of Ti in SrTiO 3 in the current study) and the eventual formation of a layered, Ti- rich phase with nominal chemical formula Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 . Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)-based studies map out the structure and valence state of this phase, fi rst-principles Self-assembled oxide nanostructures produced, for example, via eutectic phase separation, spinodal decomposition-like routes, and other pathways [ 1–8 ] have drawn considerable interest for their varied properties. Such approaches leverage innate chemical and thermodynamic driving forces that favor the spontaneous separation of two phases into an equilibrium state characterized by potentially complex micro- and nano- structures (i.e., layered structures, vertically aligned rods in a matrix, etc.) and exotic composite properties. [ 4,7,9 ] Researchers have demonstrated the ability to control the geometry, shape, and size of such phase-separated structures by tuning material composition, [ 10 ] growth temperature, [ 11 ] strain state, [ 12 ] growth, and cooling rates. [ 3,13–17 ] Deterministic and ordered materials self-assembly in these systems is, however, a challenge. In particular, it is diffi cult to access submicron feature sizes in eutectic systems due to the high processing temperatures and fast cooling rates that must be used. [ 1 –4 ] Although spinodal decomposition-like routes have been used to produce nanoscale features, producing long-range ordered arrays of features via this approach is diffi cult. [ 10 ] On the other hand, non-equilibrium approaches, including modern thin-fi lm growth techniques, can be applied to sys- tems to produce atomically and chemically precise artifi cial heterostructures and nanostructures. [ 18,19 ] Leveraging advances in deposition techniques and the development of in situ Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/adma.201403602 862 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim C O M M U N IC A T IO N approaches explore the phase stability and electronic properties, and studies of the dielectric, optical, thermal, and magnetic properties reveal diminished dielectric permittivity (and low dielectric loss), an enhanced bandgap, glass-like thermal con- ductivity, and the potential for 2D anti-ferromagnetism. In the equilibrium phase diagram ( Figure 1 a), [ 26 ] the eutectic composition for the SrTiO 3 –TiO 2 system is located at 21 mol% SrO/79 mol% TiO 2 . Films of the SrTiO 3 –TiO 2 system were grown on SrTiO 3 (001), (110), and (111) substrates via pulsed- laser deposition from targets of the following compositions (where the fi rst and second numbers refer to the mole per- centage of SrO and TiO 2 , respectively): 43:57, 33:67, 30:70, 25:75, 23:77, 21:79, 17:83, 10:90, and 0:100. Details of the growth process are provided in the Supporting Information. X-ray dif- fraction studies of all fi lms (focusing on ≈100 nm thick fi lms on SrTiO 3 (111) substrates) reveal only a single set of diffraction peaks and no evidence of phase separation or multiple phases (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Atomic-force microscopy studies reveal no evidence of phase separation with the surface remaining relatively smooth across all compositions (Figure S2, Supporting Information). Only upon in-depth cross-sectional high-angle annular dark-fi eld (HAADF)-STEM imaging of the atomic structure of the fi lms did clear differences emerge (see Figure S3, Supporting Information for details) and only when we reach the eutectic composition of 21 mol% SrO/79 mol% TiO 2 does the STEM imaging reveal the presence of an unexpected layered phase with an out-of-plane periodicity of ≈0.91 nm (Figure 1 b). Such a layered phase was observed on (111)-ori- ented versions of SrTiO 3 , (LaAlO 3 ) 0.3 –(Sr 2 AlTaO 6 ) 0.7 (LSAT), LaAlO 3 , and Nb-doped SrTiO 3 substrates, but not on (001)- and (110)-oriented substrates (where complex and disordered struc- tures are observed, Figure S3, Supporting Information). High-resolution HAADF-STEM imaging ( Figure 2 a) and nano-area electron diffraction (NAED) (Figure 2 b) were com- pleted to assess the atomic structure of the phase (see Sup- porting Information for details). Both the STEM imaging and the NAED patterns reveal a periodicity of ≈0.91 nm along the out-of- plane direction (ca. 4 times longer than that of the SrTiO 3 {111} d-spacing). Along the in-plane direction, fi rst- and second-order diffraction peaks (Figure 2 b) reveal periodicities of ≈0.487 and ≈0.243 nm that correspond to Sr–Sr and Sr–O interatomic spac- ings, respectively. Comparison with the SrTiO 3 substrate (inset, Figure 2 a,b) reveals that the layered phase is composed of layers with local coordination akin to that in SrTiO 3 that are separated by a monolayer of periodically aligned Ti- and O-ions (that exhibit reduced Z-contrast and are consistent with the highly Ti-rich nature of the fi lm composition). Average structural information about the layered phase was obtained using on-axis (about the 222-diffraction peak of the substrate) and off-axis (about the 113- and 042-diffraction peaks of the substrate) X-ray reciprocal space mapping (RSM) studies (Figure 2 c–e). Here, we index the fi lm assuming that the a , b , and c lattice parameters are parallel to the [112], [110], and [111] of the substrate, respectively. The order of the diffrac- tion condition is determined by comparison to the measured periodicities from the STEM imaging and NAED patterns. On-axis RSM studies (Figure 2 c) show the presence of a fi lm peak (indexed as the 008-diffraction condition) that reveals an out-of-plane lattice spacing c ≈ 0.915 nm (commensurate with the 0.91 nm obtained from the STEM and NAED analysis). Off-axis RSM studies about the 042-diffraction condition of the substrate (Figure 2 d) show the presence of a fi lm peak indexed to be the 048-diffraction condition that enables calculation of the in-plane spacing b ≈ 0.569 nm (≈3.1% expanded as com- pared with the substrate in the same direction). Off-axis RSM studies about the 113-diffraction condition of the substrate (Figure 2 e) reveal the presence of a set of fi lm peaks indexed to be the 4 07- and 406-diffraction conditions that enables cal- culation of the in-plane lattice spacing a ≈ 0.987 nm (≈3.1% expanded as compared with the substrate lattice spacing in the same direction). φ -scans about the 042- and 048-diffraction con- ditions of the substrate and fi lm (Figure 2 f), respectively, reveal the epitaxial relationship to be [100] f //[112] s and [010] f //[ 110] s and, from STEM/NAED, the out-of-plane [001] f is found to be tilted by ≈10.2° from the [111] s (where f and s refer to fi lm and substrate, respectively). In summary, the unit cell of the layered Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com Figure 1. Self-assembled, layered eutectic SrTiO 3 –TiO 2 fi lm. a) Equilibrium eutectic phase diagram of SrO–TiO 2 system (Adapted with per- mission. [26] Copyright 1969, American Ceramic Society. Printed with permission of the American Ceramic Society (www.ceramics.org).). b) HAADF-STEM image of the resulting fi lm of eutectic composition (21 mol% SrO/79 mol% TiO 2 ) grown on a SrTiO 3 (111) substrate. Inset shows alignment of the structure. 863wileyonlinelibrary.com© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim C O M M U N IC A T IO N phase is: a = 0.987 nm, b = 0.569 nm, c = 0.929 nm, α = γ = 90°, and β = 100.2°. Note that this unit cell corresponds to two for- mula units (i.e., Sr 4 Ti 14 O 28 ) to fully encompass the complex symmetry of the system. From the STEM imaging, it is possible to extract the atomic positions (of the cations) and to produce a model of the pro- posed structure. Although it is not possible to resolve all of the O-ions, the cation arrangement suggests that all Ti–O bonding should occur within octahedra (TiO 6 ) and that all O-sites are fully occupied to both compensate charge and coordination (a detailed discussion of the atomic model and simulated diffrac- tion patterns is provided in Table S1 and Figure S4 and S5 in the Supporting Information). Based on the extracted inter atomic dis- tances, an atomic model can be constructed and the simulated diffraction pattern [ 31 ] for this initial model matches that obtained in the NAED studies well, suggesting a good initial under- standing of the structure (Figure S5c, Supporting Information). Disambiguation of the structure, however, requires addi- tional steps. Briefl y, the STEM imaging provides a projection of the atomic columns, but does not reveal the density or exact make-up of atoms in those columns. Thus, there were a number of potential candidate structures consistent with the image. We reiterate that no Ti-rich SrTiO 3 phases are reported within the vicinity of the eutectic composition in the equilibrium phase diagram. Although not reported on the equilibrium phase dia- gram, two Ti-rich phases have been reported in the literature: Sr 2 Ti 5 O 12 [ 32 ] (corresponding to 29 mol% SrO/71 mol% TiO 2 ) and Sr 2 Ti 6 O 13 [ 33 ] (corresponding to 25 mol% SrO/75 mol% TiO 2 ). Both phases are known to exist only as minor phases, are thought to be metastable, and are off in composition (8 and 4 mol% defi cient in TiO 2 , respectively) from the eutectic composition studied herein. Nonetheless, we have considered the possibility that these phases (or a phase possessing these nominal chemical formulas and a structure commensurate with that observed here) could be the novel, layered phase. A detailed description of these candidate phases is provided (Figure S6, Supporting Information). Differentiation of the potential structures for the layered phase is achieved by chemical analyses. First, from Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (Figure S7, Supporting Informa- tion) the Sr:Ti ratio for the fi lms is determined to be ≈1:3.6 that matches (within the experimental error) the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com Figure 2. Structural characterization of the novel, layered phase. a) HAADF-STEM image after smoothing process (along the [110] zone axis of the substrate) of the novel, layered phase. Inset shows a corresponding image along the same zone axis for the SrTiO 3 substrate. b) NAED pattern from the novel, layered phase. Inset shows a corresponding NAED pattern along the same zone axis for the SrTiO 3 substrate. RSM studies about the c) 222-, d) 042-, and e) 113-diffraction conditions of the substrate. f ) φ -scans about the 042- and 048-diffraction conditions of the substrate and fi lm, respectively, revealing the epitaxy of the fi lm/substrate system. 864 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim C O M M U N IC A T IO N Thus, from the atomic-level imaging, X-ray diffraction, and chemical analyses, the novel, layered phase produced during the growth of the eutectic composition materials is determined to be a new phase – Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 . The proposed unit cell for this phase is highlighted by the presence of layers with local coor- dination akin to that in SrTiO 3 that are separated by a mono- layer of periodically aligned Ti- and O-ions. We also note that in the unit cell of this structure that there are three types of octahedral bonding including two corner-, four edge-, and eight face-sharing octahedra (Figure S5b, Supporting Information). This specifi c complex and close-packed TiO 6 octahedra arrange- ment is not reported in any published TiO x phase, but corner-, edge-, and face-sharing octahedra are all possible in TiO x sys- tems. The appropriate charge balance of this structure could be achieved (theoretically, assuming nearly complete oxidation) with three possible combinations of Ti 2+ :Ti 3+ :Ti 4+ species occur- ring in ratios of 2:0:5, 1:2:4, and 0:4:3. Previous studies suggest that face-sharing octahedra in Ti-based systems require the presence of Ti 3+ [ 34 ] and since eight of the total 14 octahedra in the unit cell are face-sharing, we expect that Ti 3+ must populate the majority of the Ti-sites, suggesting that the structure should possess a 0:4:3 ratio of Ti 2+ :Ti 3+ :Ti 4+ . The average valence state of Ti in Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 was probed via STEM-based electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) studies of the Ti– L 2,3 and O– K edge spectra ( Figure 3 a). We observe a shift (to lower energies) and broadening of the Ti– L 2,3 peaks for the novel, layered phase as compared with the SrTiO 3 substrate consistent with what has been observed in oxygen-defi cient SrTiO 3−δ [ 35 ] and Ti 2 O 3 (that possess only Ti 3+ valence states) [ 36 ] thereby confi rming the presence of a mixed Ti 3+ /Ti 4+ valence state. We also note that the intensity of the α peak from the O– K edge spectra is signifi cantly diminished indicating that the Sr–O bonding contributes less to the spectra [ 37 ] which is, again, consistent with Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 (especially the TiO x inter-layers) pos- sessing less Sr–O bonding compared with SrTiO 3 . Armed with this detailed structural and chemical data, we further explored the structure and stability of the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase via density functional theory (DFT) using hybrid func- tionals (see Supporting Information for details). Considering the possibility of several valence states for the Ti-ions within the structure, it is possible that the TiO 6 octahedra may be sus- ceptible to energetically favorable internal distortions. Small perturbations of the TiO 6 octahedra may not be resolvable via experiment alone and we used the DFT approaches to assess the lowest energy structure of the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase. The simu- lations reveal that the structure is locally stable, and confi rm the presence of slight octahedral distortions, for which we fi nd an energy recovery of ≈3.4 eV per unit cell in comparison to the undistorted structure. This is a reasonably large energy recovery in comparison to the atomization energy, which we fi nd to be ≈196 eV per unit cell. Several distinct distortions are present, corresponding to the various Ti 3+ and Ti 4+ environ- ments for the octahedra. A schematic illustrating the lowest- energy structure is provided (Figure 3 b,c). From this experi- mentally and DFT-optimized structure, we can thus compare the experimentally observed atomic structure (Figure 3 d) to a simulated Z-contrast STEM image (Figure 3 e), as well as a sim- ulated selective area diffraction pattern (Figure 3 f) to the actual NAED pattern. This comparison shows excellent and nearly ideal matching (including matched modulation of the intensity across the diffraction pattern); thereby confi rming the extracted and optimized structure is representative of the real structure of the material. Based on the structural analysis that suggests a new struc- ture and phase, it is important to understand the mechanism for and nature of the evolution of this exotic phase. Clearly the structure that is formed deviates, somewhat dramatically, from the traditional eutectic system from which it was grown, and thus it warrants comparison with other exotic structures observed in materials – namely crystallographic shear struc- tures (CSS). CSS can be considered as an example of so-called non-conservative defect structures – or defect structures that change the composition of the parent material – and have been found in a range of materials. [ 38–42 ] In transition metal oxides, Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com Figure 3. Atomic models and spectroscopy of the novel, layered phase. a) EELS profi le from the novel, layered phase (orange) and SrTiO 3 substrate (blue) revealing the presence of a mixture of Ti 3+ /Ti 4+ in the former. Schematic illustrations of b) multiple unit cells (along the [110]) and c) a 3D view of a single unit cell of the proposed (experimentally and DFT-optimized) structure for Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 revealing the various types of TiO 6 octahedra bonding including corner- (blue), edge- (violet), and face-sharing (cyan). d) Smoothed Z -contrast STEM image of the novel layered phase. e) Simulated Z-contrast STEM image of the same area of the novel layered phase confi rming excellent matching of the extracted structure. f ) Simulated diffraction pattern for the model structure overlaid on the top of the NAED diffraction pattern revealing excellent matching. The blue circle marks the 000 diffrac- tion condition. 865wileyonlinelibrary.com© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim C O M M U N IC A T IO N special non-conservative defect structures occur whereby a reduction of the oxygen content results in a disruption of the underlying structural framework whence the structure is effec- tively cleaved, a fraction of the oxygen ions are removed, and the structure is placed back together, now sheared (or shifted) with respect to one another thereby creating a so-called crystal- lographic shear plane. [ 38,43 ] While early work on CSS focused on binary oxide materials, more recent work has explored CSS in ternary, anion-defi cient perovskites [ 42,44–47 ] and others have gone on to extend the idea to cation-excess systems such as the RP homologous series. [ 48–50 ] In a similar spirit, it is possible to discuss Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 within the confi nes of CSS. Assuming that the parent material is in fact SrTiO 3 and noting that the full unit cell for our system has been determined to be Sr 4 Ti 14 O 28 , we would then want to compare this to 14 unit cells of the parent SrTiO 3 (i.e., Sr 14 Ti 14 O 42 ). Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 could be produced upon the removal of 10 Sr- and 14 O-ions from the 14 unit cells of SrTiO 3 (or 0.71 Sr and 0.33 O per unit cell of SrTiO 3 ). The Sr and O are preferentially removed from (111) in the structure (producing layers of TiO x with no Sr atoms) and the remaining perovskite layers are sheared by ½[112]. Such a comparison with CSS may provide an alternative way of thinking about this system, but is important to point out a number of ways that the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 differs from traditional CSS systems. First, as noted from the analysis above, Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 is a fully oxidized system (i.e., with the exception of a small, equilibrium density of oxygen vacancies common to all oxide materials, all available oxygen sites in the structure are fully occupied) like in the case of the RP phases. In Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 the mixed Ti 3+ and Ti 4+ valence state originates from the coor- dination environment of the Ti-ions in the TiO x -layers, not from large-scale oxygen defi ciency. This is different from the vast majority of work on CSS that has focused on signifi cantly anion-defi cient systems. Second, the nature of the non-stoichi- ometry is both opposite to and vastly larger in magnitude in Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 than in previously examined systems. In the RP sys- tems, for instance, there is A -site excess and in the worst case that excess is only 2:1 A : B ratio whereas in Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 there is B -site excess with a much larger 2:7 A : B ratio. Finally, typical CSS systems lack long-range order to the CSS since there is a degenerate family of shear planes. This typically causes the material to possess complex rotations of the CSS giving rise to what some have called waves, hairpins, and Γ-shapes as in the case of the A n B n O 3 n −2 homologous series of perovskite-based CSS. [ 42 ] In the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase, however, we have observed only one variant of the potential CSS that runs parallel to the growth plane of the fi lm in a highly ordered, periodic fashion across the sample. In the end, articulation of the structure within the parlance of CSS may help shed some light on the mechanism under- lying the formation of this structure. Ultimately it appears to be an extreme type of CSS that is likely infl uenced by a number of factors. First, thin-fi lm epitaxy and substrate orientation appear to play a critical role since growth of fi lms simultaneously on SrTiO 3 (001), (110), and (111) substrates reveals that only the (111)-oriented substrates give rise to the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase. This likely arises from the fact that the TiO x layers in the structure, which possess sixfold symmetry, would be diffi cult to form on the fourfold or twofold symmetric cubic and rectangular lattices of (001)- and (110)-oriented substrates (in other words, the (111) surface is the only orientation that can accommodate the CSS). Second, the fi lm composition is found to be important since a deviation of only ≈3 mol% in TiO 2 composition can destroy the phase (Figure S3, Supporting Information). Finally, the kinetics of the growth process appear to play a role. Truly this is a non-equilibrium structure and the degree of order in the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 increases as the growth rate is reduced suggesting that the formation of the phase requires suffi cient time for the diffusion/rearrangement of the constituent ions. The system is likely metastable in the sense that the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 was found to be stable at growth temperatures <850 °C, above which the fi lm decomposes into two phases (rutile TiO 2 and SrTiO 3 ). Having established the structure, we proceed to explore the electronic structure and physical properties of Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 including optical absorption, dielectric permittivity and loss, thermal conductivity, and magnetism. Again, due to the pres- ence of mixed-valence cations [Ti 3+ (3 d 1 ) and Ti 4+ (3 d 0 )], special attention was given to probing the electronic structure and potential for spin ordering. In structures with face-, edge-, and corner-sharing octahedra, superexchange and direct exchange mechanisms compete with each other and the prevailing spin confi guration is determined by a competition between different exchange interactions that are affected by electron occupancy of orbitals, bond angles, and cation–cation separation. [ 51–53 ] From inspection of the crystal structure, two spin confi gurations are possible. In the fi rst, direct exchange interactions within both pairs of Ti-ions participating in face-sharing octahedra drive localization of the excess electrons. In this confi guration, a direct exchange interaction J is expected to be large within a pair of face-sharing octahedra, but weaker from one pair to the next. In the second, the Ti-ions (in the TiO x plane) par- ticipating in edge-sharing octahedra carry the excess electrons and superexchange mechanisms support a 2D ordered spin confi guration. Conventional DFT simulations [ 54 ] predict that the structure is not spin-polarized and, although there is a large gap between the nominal valence and conduction bands, the Fermi level is located above the conduction band edge and the system is predicted to be metallic (which it is not). Additionally, rather than distinct Ti 3+ -and Ti 4+ -ions, the extra electrons are shared equally amongst all Ti-ions (in the TiO x plane) in a metallic state. Moving to hybrid DFT calculations, which we expect to be more accurate in this case, we are able to assess the possibility of charge and spin ordering. For a standard choice of hybrid parameters, [ 55 ] we predict that an anti-ferromagnetic check- erboard-like spin confi guration, in which the excess electrons are localized on the Ti-ions within the TiO x plane ( Figure 4 a), is more stable than the non-magnetic one by ≈0.2 eV/unit cell. Examination of the distribution of up- and down-spin electron density within the TiO x plane (Figure 4 b) shows the nature of the anti-ferromagnetic order and how the oxygen ions along the octahedral shared edges mediate the anti-ferromagnetic Ti confi guration via superexchange, indicating that the second scenario considered above prevails. It should also be noted, that the spin-down electron distributions are observed to extend asymmetrically out of the plane toward the neighboring Ti atoms across the shared octahedral face, suggesting that mild elements of the fi rst scenario (a ferromagnetic coupling across Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com 866 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim C O M M U N IC A T IO N face sharing octahedra due to direct exchange) are also present, but weaker than the anti-ferromagnetic order within the plane. Finally, the electronic density of states (Figure 4 c) reveals three distinct sets of states are present in the vicinity of the Fermi energy. The lower set of states (nominally the valence band), exhibits an oxygen 2 p character while the intermediate and upper (nominally conduction band) exhibit a Ti 3 d char- acter. The intermediate states are highly localized to the edge- sharing Ti atoms in the TiO x plane and likely are states offset from the conduction bands, stabilized in part by exchange interactions leading to the anti-ferromagnetic confi guration. [ 56 ] The primary gap is calculated to be 3.7–3.8 eV. Subsequent experimental study confi rms many of these observations. Magnetic measurements of the sample cooled from 550 K in a magnetic fi eld and in zero fi eld reveal no fer- romagnetic ordering either in- or out-of-the-plane of the fi lm from 4 to 550 K, but a broad peak in the magnetic susceptibility was observed in both fi eld cooled and zero fi eld cooled measure- ments around 400 K, which could be indicative of anti-ferromag- netic ordering in the material and is consistent with the predic- tions of anti-ferromagnetic order from the hybrid DFT studies. Transmittance and refl ectance studies of Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 /LaAlO 3 (111) heterostructures also confi rm the predictions of the hybrid DFT studies. A linear fi t of αhv 2 (where α is the absorption coeffi - cient, h is Planck constant, and υ is the frequency of photon) as a function of the photon energy ( hυ ) ( Figure 5 a) reveals a direct bandgap for Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 of ≈3.87 eV. The decreased transmittance in Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 between 360 and 660 nm is due to the LaAlO 3 sub- strate with complex twin structures that refl ect the visible light diffusively and decreases the transmittance. See the Supporting Information for details of these measurements. Likewise, probes of electronic conduction reveal a highly insulating material (albeit with some anisotropy). When measured in the out-of-plane geometry, 100 nm thick fi lms revealed low leakage current densities of <0.01 µA cm –2 even under applied electric fi elds in excess of 200 kV cm –1 while measurements in the in-plane geometry revealed leakage currents at least 10 2 -times larger, but still indicative of an insulating material (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Such obser- vations are consistent with what might be expected based on the highly anisotropic structure, which could limit conduction out- of-the-plane of the fi lm and based on what has been observed mixed Ti 3+ /Ti 4+ TiO x com- pounds where the conductivity can be larger than in purely Ti 4+ systems. [ 57 ] Subsequent probes of the out-of-plane dielectric per- mittivity ( ε r ) and loss tangent of Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 / Nb-doped SrTiO 3 (111) heterostructures at room temperature as a function of frequency have also been completed (Figure 5 b). The dielectric permittivity of the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 fi lms was found to be essentially frequency-inde- pendent with a value of 48 with low loss tangents (0.002 at 10 kHz) in the frequency range 1–100 kHz. This low dielectric per- mittivity may be expected considering that the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase consists of SrTiO 3 -like layers ( ε r ≈ 300) and layers of face-sharing octahedra TiO x layers (which are structurally similar to Ti 2 O 3 that has a ε r ≈ 45) [ 58 ] that effectively produce a nanoscale, layered dielectric. Lastly, the thermal conductivity ( κ ) of the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 fi lms was measured in the fi lm-normal direction by time-domain thermorefl ectance (TDTR) [ 59 ] (see Figure S9, Supporting Information for details). We note that the thermal conduc- tivity of the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 fi lms shows a signifi cantly lower value of κ ≈ 1.3 W m-K –1 compared with parent phases SrTiO 3 and TiO 2 that range between 8.8 and 11.2 W m –1 K –1 [ 60,61 ] whereas the speed of sound of the layered fi lm remains essentially the same as the parent phases. Previously, low κ has been observed in artifi cially synthesized SrTiO 3 -superla- ttice systems ( κ ≥ 2.8 W m –1 K –1 for (SrTiO 3 ) m /(CaTiO 3 ) n and κ ≥ 1.8 W m –1 K –1 for (SrTiO 3 ) m /(BaTiO 3 ) n superlattices) [ 62 ] and in Sr n +1 Ti n O 3 n +1 RP-phases ( κ ≥ 4.5 W m –1 K –1 ), [ 63 ] but not as low as that observed in the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 fi lms. We hypothesize that the glass-like thermal conductivity arises from two main contributions: i) signifi cant phonon scattering at the bounda- ries between SrTiO 3 -like and TiO x layers in this phase and ii) a low contribution of electronic thermal conductivity from low free electron concentration. This is not surprising considering that Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 has a periodic spacing of 0.91 nm in the out-of- plane direction (excellent for scattering portions of the heat car- rying phonons) and that the electrical conductivity is extremely low as we observed from the leakage experiment. The ability to produce highly ordered layered structures with subnanom- eter length-scales could open up many opportunities for low thermal transport applications. In conclusion, we have synthesized a new phase Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 that self-assembled into a highly ordered, layered structure that consists of layers with local order akin to that of SrTiO 3 sepa- rated by close-packed, TiO x layers by combining non-equilib- rium growth techniques, thin-fi lm epitaxy, and a system with an innate chemical/structural instability. We observe that the layered Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase is realized only at the eutectic composi- tion of the SrTiO 3 –TiO 2 system, when growth takes place on Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com Figure 4. Spin confi guration, orbital charge density, and electronic density of states of the novel, layered phase. Schematic illustration of a) the proposed spin confi guration in which the edge-sharing, planar TiO 6 octahedra exhibit a 3 d 1 electron valence and a checkerboard anti-ferromagnetic spin confi guration and b) the charge density of the orbitals corresponding to this confi guration according to hybrid DFT calculations, showing the occupation of orbitals to minimize electron overlap. c) Corresponding electronic density of states for the system. 867wileyonlinelibrary.com© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim C O M M U N IC A T IO N (111)-oriented perovskite substrates, and when the kinetics of the growth process are appropriately controlled. It should be noted, however, that although the phase is found to form at the eutectic composition, the role of the innate eutectic tendency of this system in stabilizing this layered phase is not fully under- stood at this point and is clearly a matter for future studies in other systems. In-depth X-ray and electron diffraction studies and imaging have allowed for the precise identifi cation of the structure and unit cell of this phase. Subsequent chemical and spectroscopic studies were used to confi rm these studies. The Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase possesses properties that are unique from the parent SrTiO 3 and TiO 2 phases including a larger optical bandgap of 3.87 eV, reduced dielectric constant of 48, low dielec- tric loss, and a glass-like thermal conductivity of 1.3 W m –1 K –1 . This unique approach to the formation of high-ordered lay- ered materials could represent a new modality to achieve novel states of matter in other systems possessing similar chemical/ structural instabilities and can provide new insights into the design of hierarchical structures by self-assembly. Supporting Information Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from the author. Acknowledgements S.L., Z.C., P.V.B., and L.W.M. acknowledge the support of the Air Force Offi ce of the Scientifi c Research under grant FA9550–12–1–0471. A.R.D. acknowledges support from the Army Research Offi ce under grant W911NF-14–1–0104. E.B. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under grant DMR-1124696. P.G, N.F, and E.E. acknowledge support from the Strategic Research Initiatives Program of the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. N.O. and M.S. acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-1153081. The work was carried out, in part, in the Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities, University of Illinois. Received: August 7, 2014 Revised: October 20, 2014 Published online: December 18, 2014 [1] R. L. Ashbrook , J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1977 , 60 , 428 . [2] V. S. Stubican , R. C. Brandt , Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1981 , 11 , 267 . [3] Y. Waku , N. Nakagawa , T. Wakamoto , H. Ohtsubo , K. Shimizu , Y. Kohtoku , Nature 1997 , 389 , 49 . [4] J. L. Llorca , V. M. Orera , Prog. Mater. Sci. 2006 , 51 , 711 . [5] H. Zheng , J. Wang , S. E. Lofl and , Z. Ma , L. Mohaddes-Ardabili , T. Zhao , L. Salamanca-Riba , S. R. Shinde , S. B. Ogale , F. Bai , D. Viehland , Y. Jia , D. G. Schlom , M. Wuttig , A. Roytburd , R. Ramesh , Science 2004 , 303 , 661 . [6] B. S. Guiton , P. K. Davies , Nat. Mater. 2007 , 6 , 586 . [7] J. L. MacManus-Driscoll , Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010 , 20 , 2035 . [8] S. A. Harrington , J. Zhai , S. Denev , V. Gopalan , H. Wang , Z. Bi , S. A. T. Redfem , S.-H. Baek , C. W. Bark , C.-B. Eom , Q. Jia , M. E. Vickers , J. L. MacManus-Driscoll , Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011 , 6 , 491 . [9] W. Zhang , A. Chen , Z. Bi , Q. Jia , J. L. MacManus-Discoll , H. Wang , Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2013 , 18 , 6 . [10] M. Muralidhar , N. Sakai , M. Nishiyama , M. Jira , T. Machi , Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003 , 82 , 943 . [11] L. Mohaddes-Ardabili , H. Zheng , S. B. Ogale , B. Hannoyer , W. Tian , J. Wang , S. E. Lofl and , S. R. Shinde , T. Zhao , Y. Jia , L. Salamanca- Riba , D. G. Schlom , M. Wuttig , R. Ramesh , Nat. Mater. 2004 , 3 , 533 . [12] J. L. MacManus-Driscoll , P. Zerrer , H. Wang , H. Yang , J. Yoon , A. Fouchet , R. Yu , M. G. Blamire , Q. Jia , Nat. Mater. 2008 , 7 , 314 . [13] Y. Lu , C. Wang , Y. Gao , R. Shi , X. Liu , Y. Wang , Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012 , 109 , 086101 . [14] M. Parlier , R. Valle , L. Perrière , S. Lartigue-Korinek , L. Mazerolles , J. Aerosp. Lab. 2011 , AL03 . [15] A. Revcolevschi , G. Dhalenne , Adv. Mater. 1993 , 5 , 657 . [16] D. A. Pawlak , S. Turczynski , M. Gajc , K. Kolodziejak , R. Diduszko , K. Rozniatowski , J. Smalc , I. Vendik , Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010 , 20 , 1116 . Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com Figure 5. Optical, dielectric, and thermal properties of the novel, layered phase. a) The dependence of α hv 2 on photon energy ( hv ) and (inset) transmittance of the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase. b) Dielectric permittivity ( ε r ) and loss tangent (tanδ) of the Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 phase measured at 10 mV of ac voltage bias with no dc bias as a function of frequency. c) Thermal con- ductivity ( κ , top) and speed of sound ( υ , bottom) for SrTiO 3 , TiO 2 , and Sr 2 Ti 7 O 14 as measured by TDTR. 868 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim C O M M U N IC A T IO N Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 861–868 www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com [17] R. M. White , J. M. Kunkle , A. V. Polotai , E. C. Dickey , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011 , 31 , 1227 . [18] H. M. Christen , G. Eres , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2008 , 20 , 264005 . [19] D. G. Schlom , L.-Q. Chen , X. Pan , A. Schmehl , M. A. Zurbuchen , J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008 , 91 , 2429 . [20] L. W. Martin , Q. Zhan , Y. Suzuki , R. Ramesh , M. Chi , N. Browning , T. Mizoguchi , J. Kreisel , Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007 , 90 , 062903 . [21] R. J. Zeches , M. D. Rossell , J. X. Zhang , A. J. Hatt , Q. He , C.-H. Yang , A. Kumar , C. H. Wang , A. Melville , C. Adamo , G. Sheng , Y.-H. Chu , J. F. Ihlefeld , R. Erni , C. Ederer , V. Gopalan , L.-Q. Chen , D. G. Schlom , N. A. Spaldin , L. W. Martin , R. Ramesh , Science 2009 , 326 , 977 . [22] M. Dawber , N. Stucki , C. Lichtensteiger , S. Gariglio , P. Ghosez , J.-M. Triscone , Adv. Mater. 2007 , 19 , 4153 . [23] E. Bousquet , M. Dawber , N. Stucki , C. Lichtensteiger , P. Hermet , S. Gariglio , J.-M. Triscone , P. Ghosez , Nature 2008 , 452 , 732 . [24] J. Chakhalian , A. J. Millis , J. Rondinelli , Nat. Mater. 2012 , 11 , 92 . [25] H. Y. Hwang , Y. Iwasa , M. Kawasaki , B. Keimer , N. Nagaosa , Y. Tokura , Nat. Mater. 2012 , 11 , 103 . [26] M. K. Reser , Phase Diagrams for Ceramists , American Ceramic Society , Columbus, OH, USA 1969 . [27] J. H. Haeni , C. D. Theis , D. G. Schlom , W. Tian , X. Q. Pan , H. Chang , I. Takeuchi , X.-D. Xiang , Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001 , 78 , 3292 . [28] C.-H. Lee , N. D. Orloff , T. Birol , Y. Zhu , V. Goian , E. Rocas , R. Haislmaier , E. Vlahos , J. A. Mundy , L. F. Kourkoutis , Y. Nie , M. D. Biegalski , J. Zhang , M. Bernhagen , N. A. Benedek , Y. Kim , J. D. Brock , R. Uecker , X. X. Xi , V. Gopalan , D. Nuzhnyy , S. Kamba , D. A. Muller , I. Takeuchi , J. C. Booth , C. J. Fennie , D. G. Schlom , Nature 2013 , 502 , 532 . [29] T. Suzuki , Y. Nishi , M. Fujimoto , Philos. Mag. A 2000 , 80 , 621 . [30] S. Witek , D. M. Smyth , J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1984 , 67 , 372 . [31] J.-M. Zuo , J. C. Mabon , Microsc. Microanal. 2004 , 10 , S02 . [32] B. Peplinski , Th. Hübert , M. Willfahrt , U. Banach , Mater. Sci. Forum 1996 , 228 , 531 . [33] C. M. Liu , X. T. Zu , W. L. Zhou , J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2007 , 40 , 7318 . [34] M. G. Vincent , K. Yvon , A. Grüttner , Acta Crystallogr. 1980 , 36 , 803 . [35] D. A. Muller , N. Nakagawa , A. Ohtomo , J. L. Grazul , H. Y. Hwang , Nature 2004 , 430 , 657 . [36] E. Stoyanov , F. Langenhorst , G. Steinle-Neumann , Am. Mineral. 2006 , 92 , 577 . [37] Z. Zhang , W. Sigle , M. Rühle , Phys. Rev. B 2002 , 66 , 094108 . [38] L. A. Bursill , B. G. Hyde , Prog. Solid State Chem. 1972 , 7 , 177. [39] J. C. Ruiz-Morales , J. Canales-Vazquez , C. Savaniu , D. Marrero- Lopez , W. Zhou , J. T. S. Irvine , Nature 2006 , 439 , 568 . [40] G. Van Tendeloo , O. I. Lebedev , M. Hervieu , B. Raveau , Rep. Prog. Phys. 2004 , 67 , 1315 . [41] E. D. Sprecht , A. Goyal , J. Li , P. M. Martin , X. Li , M. W. Rupich , Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006 , 89 , 162510 . [42] M. Batuk , S. Turner , A. M. Abakumov , D. Batuk , J. Hadermann , G. Van Tendeloo , Inorg. Chem. 2014 , 53 , 2171 . [43] J. S. Anderson , J. M. Browne , A. K. Cheetham , R. Von Dreele , J. L. Hutchison , F. J. Lincoln , D. J. M. Bevan , J. Straehle , Nature 1973 , 243 , 81 . [44] A. M. Abakumov , J. Hadermann , G. Van Tendeloo , E. V. Antipov , J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008 , 91 , 1807 . [45] A. M. Abakumov , J. Hadermann , S. Bals , I. V. Nikolaev , E. V. Antipov , G. Van Tendeloo , Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006 , 45 , 6697 . [46] A. M. Abakumov , J. Haderman , M. Batuk , H. D’Hondt , O. A. Tyablikov , M. g. Rozova , K. V. Pokholok , D. S. Filimonov , D. V. Sheptyakov , A. A. Tsirlin , D. Niermann , J. Hemberger , G. Van Tendeloo , E. V. Antipov , Inorg. Chem. 2010 , 49 , 9508 . [47] J. Hadermann , A. M. Abakumov , I. V. Nikolaev , E. V. Antipov , G. Van Tendeloo , Solid State Sci. 2008 , 10 , 382 . [48] R. J. D. Tilley , J. Solid State Chem. 1977 , 21 , 293 . [49] M. A. McCoy , R. W. Grimes , W. E. Lee , Philos. Mag. A 1997 , 75 , 833 . [50] A. P. Tomsia , A. M. Glaeser , Ceramic Microstructures: Control at the Atomic Level , Plenum Press , New York 1998 . [51] J. Kanamori , Prog. Theor. Phys. 1957 , 17 , 177 . [52] J. Kanamori , Prog. Theor. Phys. 1957 , 17 , 197 . [53] J. B. Goodenough , J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1958 , 6 , 287 . [54] J. Perdew , K. Burke , M. Ernzerhof , Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996 , 77 , 3865 . [55] A. V. Krukau , O. A. Vydrov , A. F. Izmaylov , G. E. Scuseria , J. Chem. Phys. 2006 , 125 , 224106 . [56] P. Gori , N. Ferdous , E. Ertekin , unpublished . [57] F. J. Morin , Phys. Rev. Lett. 1959 , 3 , 34 . [58] G. Lucovsky , R. J. Sladek , J. W. Allen , Phys. Rev. B 1977 , 16 , 5452 . [59] D. G. Cahill , W. K. Ford , K. E. Goodson , G. D. Mahan , A. Majumdar , H. J. Maris , R. Merlin , S. R. Phillpot , J. Appl. Phys. 2003 , 93 , 793 . [60] E. Breckenfeld , R. Wilson , J. Karthik , A. R. Damodaran , D. G. Cahill , L. W. Martin , Chem. Mater. 2012 , 24 , 331 . [61] D. J. Kim , D. S. Kim , S. Cho , S. W. Kim , S. H. Lee , J. C. Kim , Int. J. Thermophys. 2004 , 25 , 281 . [62] J. Ravichandran , A. K. Yadav , R. Cheaito , P. B. Rossen , A. Soukiassian , S. J. Suresha , J. C. Duda , B. M. Foley , C.-H. Lee , Y. Zhu , A. W. Lichtenberger , J. E. Moore , D. A. Muller , D. G. Schlom , P. E. Hopkins , A. Majumdar , R. Ramesh , M. A. Zurbuchen , Nat. Mater. 2014 , 13 , 168 . [63] K. H. Lee , S. W. Kim , H. Ohta , K. Koumoto , J. Appl. Phys. 2006 , 100 , 063717 .