ND ReSource:  Law professor sees abortion case as crucial | News | Notre Dame News | University of Notre Dame






	
	





  	Skip To Content
	Skip To Navigation
	Skip To Search






  
  
    University of Notre Dame

    
      
      Notre Dame News

      
      
    


    
    
      
        
        
        	
	Experts
	ND in the News
	Subscribe
	About Us
	


      
        
          
          
          
          
          
        

      


      
    


    
    
      	 Home
	 Contact
	 Search
	
          
          
            
            
          
          Menu
        
        


      
        
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

    

  

  
  

  

  
    	Home › 
	News › 
	ND ReSource:  Law professor sees abortion case as crucial


    
      
        
          ND ReSource:  Law professor sees abortion case as crucial

          
            
              
                
                Published: February 22, 2006
              

              
                Author: Michael O. Garvey
              

              







          

          
          
          

          
        
        
        
          

The U.S. Supreme Courts agreement earlier this week to hear the Gonzales v. Carhart abortion case will have a decisive impact on a divisive issue, according to O. Carter Snead, associate professor of law in the University of Notre Dame Law School.

It is impossible to overstate the potential impact this case might have on the jurisprudence of abortion,Snead said.Since 1973, the court, by expansively defining ‘healthto include factors such as emotional, familial and economic well-being, and by delegating to the abortion provider the authority to determine whether or not such an interest is implicated, has effectively prevented Congress or the states from enacting any legislation that seeks to limit an abortion procedure. It seems unavoidable that in reaching its decision in Gonzales v. Carhart, the court will either affirm this highly controversial conception of ‘health,or significantly limit its scope and substance, effectively clearing the way for the political branches to enact limitations on abortion that enjoy majority—or in the case of partial birth abortion, supermajority—support.Either way, this is the most important abortion case the court has seen in years.

Snead, who joined the Notre Dame law faculty last year, lectures and writes on the intersection of law, science, and medicine.He is the former general counsel for the President’s Council on Bioethics, a White House advisory committee and the principal author of the council’s 2004 report on the regulation of new biotechnologies affecting assisted reproduction, human embryo research and genetics.

Professor Snead may be reached at 574-631-8259 or snead.1@nd.edu

TopicID: 16003

        

        
        
          
            

          

        
      
      
    
  
  
    	Home
	Experts
	ND in the News
	Subscribe
	About Us


  

  
  
    
     
  
  

  
  
    
      	For the Media
	Contact


    
            
    
      
	Office of Public Affairs and Communications


      Notre Dame News

      
        
          
            500 Grace Hall
 
            Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
          
          
          
          
        

        
          	 Facebook
	 Twitter
	 Instagram
	 YouTube
	 Pinterest


        
      

      
© 2022 University of Notre Dame

    
    
      

        
      
      
        
          	Search
	Mobile App
	News
	Events
	Visit
	Accessibility


        
        
          	 Facebook
	 Twitter
	 Instagram
	 YouTube
	 LinkedIn